
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In 2005 Dad and his wife, D1, established a super fund.
They were the trustees and beneficiaries of the fund. Before Dad’s death his son from a previous marriage, P, was appointed as trustee in his place. P was also Dad’s financial manager and guardian, and held his Power of Attorney.
In 2015 Dad died. His executor was D2.
In 2018 D1 and D2 entered into a deed apparently confirming D2’s replacement of P as trustee of the fund with retrospective and apparently automatic effect from the date of Dad’s death: [28].
The Court had to consider (i) whether P was appointed trustee in his personal capacity or as Dad’s attorney, (ii) whether P’s appointment ceased on Dad’s death, and (iii) whether D2 was validly appointed as P’s replacement trustee: [6].
Re (i) and (ii): P was appointed in his personal capacity, not pursuant to the PoA meaning his appointment did not end on Dad’s death: [75]. Re (iii): the appointment and removal of a trustee must be in accordance with the trust deed.
In this case P’s purported removal and D2’s purported appointment was not: [105].
The judgment considered other juicy issues such as s17A of the SIS Act and quia timet injunctions, but hopefully the above is enough to get your day started.
By James d'Apice5
22 ratings
In 2005 Dad and his wife, D1, established a super fund.
They were the trustees and beneficiaries of the fund. Before Dad’s death his son from a previous marriage, P, was appointed as trustee in his place. P was also Dad’s financial manager and guardian, and held his Power of Attorney.
In 2015 Dad died. His executor was D2.
In 2018 D1 and D2 entered into a deed apparently confirming D2’s replacement of P as trustee of the fund with retrospective and apparently automatic effect from the date of Dad’s death: [28].
The Court had to consider (i) whether P was appointed trustee in his personal capacity or as Dad’s attorney, (ii) whether P’s appointment ceased on Dad’s death, and (iii) whether D2 was validly appointed as P’s replacement trustee: [6].
Re (i) and (ii): P was appointed in his personal capacity, not pursuant to the PoA meaning his appointment did not end on Dad’s death: [75]. Re (iii): the appointment and removal of a trustee must be in accordance with the trust deed.
In this case P’s purported removal and D2’s purported appointment was not: [105].
The judgment considered other juicy issues such as s17A of the SIS Act and quia timet injunctions, but hopefully the above is enough to get your day started.

1,069 Listeners

25 Listeners

824 Listeners

751 Listeners

27 Listeners

91 Listeners

19 Listeners

2 Listeners

326 Listeners

646 Listeners

234 Listeners

158 Listeners

10 Listeners

19 Listeners

24 Listeners