
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In 2005 Dad and his wife, D1, established a super fund.
They were the trustees and beneficiaries of the fund. Before Dad’s death his son from a previous marriage, P, was appointed as trustee in his place. P was also Dad’s financial manager and guardian, and held his Power of Attorney.
In 2015 Dad died. His executor was D2.
In 2018 D1 and D2 entered into a deed apparently confirming D2’s replacement of P as trustee of the fund with retrospective and apparently automatic effect from the date of Dad’s death: [28].
The Court had to consider (i) whether P was appointed trustee in his personal capacity or as Dad’s attorney, (ii) whether P’s appointment ceased on Dad’s death, and (iii) whether D2 was validly appointed as P’s replacement trustee: [6].
Re (i) and (ii): P was appointed in his personal capacity, not pursuant to the PoA meaning his appointment did not end on Dad’s death: [75]. Re (iii): the appointment and removal of a trustee must be in accordance with the trust deed.
In this case P’s purported removal and D2’s purported appointment was not: [105].
The judgment considered other juicy issues such as s17A of the SIS Act and quia timet injunctions, but hopefully the above is enough to get your day started.
By James d'Apice5
22 ratings
In 2005 Dad and his wife, D1, established a super fund.
They were the trustees and beneficiaries of the fund. Before Dad’s death his son from a previous marriage, P, was appointed as trustee in his place. P was also Dad’s financial manager and guardian, and held his Power of Attorney.
In 2015 Dad died. His executor was D2.
In 2018 D1 and D2 entered into a deed apparently confirming D2’s replacement of P as trustee of the fund with retrospective and apparently automatic effect from the date of Dad’s death: [28].
The Court had to consider (i) whether P was appointed trustee in his personal capacity or as Dad’s attorney, (ii) whether P’s appointment ceased on Dad’s death, and (iii) whether D2 was validly appointed as P’s replacement trustee: [6].
Re (i) and (ii): P was appointed in his personal capacity, not pursuant to the PoA meaning his appointment did not end on Dad’s death: [75]. Re (iii): the appointment and removal of a trustee must be in accordance with the trust deed.
In this case P’s purported removal and D2’s purported appointment was not: [105].
The judgment considered other juicy issues such as s17A of the SIS Act and quia timet injunctions, but hopefully the above is enough to get your day started.

1,065 Listeners

23 Listeners

797 Listeners

773 Listeners

25 Listeners

89 Listeners

18 Listeners

1 Listeners

314 Listeners

649 Listeners

227 Listeners

169 Listeners

8 Listeners

14 Listeners

18 Listeners