Dear Jane

Jesse Ridgway, known online as "McJuggerNuggets", recently shared that he and his wife aborted their unborn son after he was diagnosed with Trisomy 21, also known as Down syndrome.

The Ridgway's viral announcement sparked a much bigger conversation about abortion, disability, and the sinister role of eugenics in abortion decisions.

In this episode, we talk about why a Down syndrome diagnosis so often changes how parents decide the value of their child’s life. We also expose what happens when technology is used to identify genetic conditions before birth and abortion becomes the expected next step being pushed relentlessly by doctors.

Our conversation isn't just about one influencer's tragic abortion decision. It is about the growing pressure to decide who is worth welcoming into the world based on a test result.

Some commenters said unborn children have no more value than sperm. Others claimed no one is truly pro-abortion, abortion regret does not matter, and the abortion pill is safer than Tylenol.

This video dives into a candid and often intense abortion debate, exploring differing views on the value of unborn life and the concept of abortion as health care. We respond to some of the most revealing, frustrating, and widely repeated reactions to recent episodes, then turn to the growing debate over equal protection and whether pregnancy help centers could be affected by mandatory reporting laws.

Scott and Marcie discuss:

◼ Why abortion regret may be a weaker pro-life argument than many people realize

◼ What happens when human value is based on intelligence, ability, or personhood

◼ What a new legal memo says about equal protection and pregnancy help centers

◼ Whether enforcement concerns are enough to reject equal protection legislation

◼ Why one of the hosts says she is slowly moving toward equal protection

EQUAL PROTECTION MEMORANDUM: https://faa.app.box.com/v/PHC-reporting

Follow The Dear Jane Podcast:

Website - https://dearjane.org

Instagram - https://instagram.com/dearjanepodcast

Facebook - https://facebook.com/dearjanepodcast

Breanne Houston had an abortion at eighteen. Today she sits on the other side of the room, helping women in the exact moment she once lived. And she holds a view most people don't expect from someone with her story. She believes women who get abortions should be held liable.

In Part 2 of our equal protection series, Breanne joins Marcie and Scott to make her case, from the terminology people get wrong, to the line between pressure and coercion, to what it would actually mean to treat abortion the way we treat any other taking of life. It's an honest, uncomfortable, real-world conversation about one of the most divisive questions inside the pro-life movement, told by someone who has lived both sides of it.

ABOUT THE GUEST

Breanne Houston helps lead Alliance Family Services and is launching a new pro-life clinic in Lenoir City, Tennessee, serving women facing unexpected pregnancies with free ultrasounds, abortion pill reversal, and long-term support. https://www.alliancefamilyservices.org/

WHAT WE GET INTO

What "equal protection" really means, and why the words matter

The difference between pressure and coercion

How prosecuting women would affect pregnancy centers and abortion pill reversal.

Whether it would drive abortion further into the dark, or stop it

The committee room moment that crystallized all of it for Breanne

She's been through it herself and she doesn't believe women should be prosecuted for abortion. In this episode of Dear Jane, post-abortive advocate Victoria Robinson sits down with Scott and Marcie to debate why she believes criminalizing women misses the deeper realities behind abortion decisions.

Drawing from her own story and years of working with post-abortive women, Victoria unpacks the role of coercion, shame, guilt, and accountability in the abortion debate.

In this episode:

-Why Victoria opposes criminalizing women for abortion

-What coercion really looks like behind abortion decisions

-How guilt shapes the experience of post-abortive women

-Whether criminalization would actually protect preborn children

🎙️ Guest: Victoria Robinson — post-abortive advocate and spokesperson for women navigating life after abortion

📌 This is Part 1 of 2. Next week, hear the other side: post-abortive leader Breanne Houston explains why she now believes criminalization IS necessary to protect preborn children. Subscribe so you don't miss it.

🎧 Listen to Dear Jane wherever you get your podcasts.

📩 Have a story to share? Reach out at https://dearjane.org/

What happens to infants who survive abortions? Is infanticide happening in America — and why is nobody talking about it?

Olivia Summer, Senior Litigation Counsel with the ACLJ, exposes the legal loopholes, redefined language, and blocked investigations that critics argue allow born-alive infants to die without consequence.

⚠️ To be clear: Infanticide is illegal in all 50 states. This episode examines whether legal changes are creating dangerous gaps that allow born-alive infants to die without investigation or consequence.

In this episode:

• What "infanticide" actually means and what it doesn't

• The difference between "comfort care" and lifesaving medical care for abortion survivors

• How legal language around "perinatal" death is being rewritten

• Why investigations into infant deaths are being blocked

• The rise of unsupervised abortion pill use and its deadly consequences

• What happens to babies who are born alive after failed abortions

👇 Resources

Website: American Center for Law and Justice

YouTube: youtube.com/@OfficialACLJ

Instagram: instagram.com/acljofficial

Facebook: facebook.com/theACLJ

X: x.com/ACLJ

🔔 Subscribe & turn on notifications!

This week’s headlines are hard to ignore.

A newly released DOJ report is raising serious questions about how the FACE Act was used and whether pro-life Americans were unfairly targeted.

At the same time, troubling stories out of Canada show patients being encouraged toward euthanasia, even before receiving a full diagnosis.

Also, during a recent congressional hearing, one simple question about abortion stopped the conversation cold.

Scott and Marcie walk through these stories, what is being said, what is not, and why it all matters right now.

Subscribe to Dear Jane for weekly conversations you will not hear anywhere else.

Women are facing abortion alone now more than ever. Today on Dear Jane, Scott and Marcy sit down with Jessica Sifuentes, CEO of Southwest Coalition for Life, to unpack C.A.R.E. Kits, a frontline response for women who have already taken the abortion pill and are left to face the physical and emotional aftermath on their own. Jessica speaks to the reality of at-home abortion, the risks of the abortion pill, abortion pill reversal, and why these kits are sparking debate within the pro-life movement.

The ongoing abortion debate often overlooks the surprising statistics of over a million abortions annually, a fact many Americans are unaware of. This discussion highlights the importance of the pro-life movement in advocating for women's health and bringing these critical numbers to light. It's vital for us to address these issues within the broader context of health care and us news.

The untold side of abortion: men’s experiences, their influence, and the weight they carry long after the decision. They also unpack how a man’s presence and support are indispensable to ending abortion. From the quiet hesitations young men wrestle with to a deeper look at what “Biblical masculinity” really means, this conversation challenges cultural narratives and calls men higher. You’ll hear honest insight on responsibility, identity, and a compelling picture of masculinity.

What happens when a politician invokes the Bible to defend abortion?

James Talarico, Texas Senate candidate and self-described Christian, has made waves by claiming the Bible supports abortion and a woman's right to choose. It's a bold claim. But does it hold up under scrutiny?

In this episode, Scott and Marcie bring in Pastor Bryan Wolfmueller of Austin, Texas, to do what politicians rarely do: look carefully at what the biblical texts actually say. They walk through Talarico's specific claims, examine the passages he's citing, and explore what faithful biblical interpretation really looks like when the stakes are this high.

If you've ever wondered how to respond when Scripture gets invoked in the political and cultural wars, this episode is for you.

Find Pastor Wolfmueller online:

Website: https://wolfmueller.co/

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@PastorBryanWolfmueller

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bryanwolfmueller/

Substack: https://whatnot.substack.com/

X: https://x.com/bwolfmueller

Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/wolfmueller/