RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

Deep Dive Episode 169 – Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid


Listen Later

In Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, the Supreme Court will decide whether a California “Access Regulation” violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The Access Regulation allows union organizers to enter the private property of agricultural employers in the state for three hours per day, 120 days per year, for the purposes of soliciting employees to join the union.
Petitioners Cedar Point Nursery and Fowler Packing Company, Inc., are California agricultural employers subject to the Access Regulation. In 2015, union organizers came onto the property of Cedar Point Nursery, a strawberry plant harvester near the Oregon border. The same year, union organizers filed an unfair labor practices charge against Fowler Packing, a citrus and table grape grower, alleging that Fowler denied access to union organizers seeking to enter their property. Petitioners contend that the Access Regulation constitutes a per se taking by appropriating an easement for the benefit of third party union organizers. Petitioners add that, because there is no mechanism for providing just compensation to Petitioners, the Access Regulation violates the Takings Clause.
Respondents are members of the Agricultural Labor Relations Board. They argue that per se taking analysis is inappropriate because of time, place, and manner limitations contained in the Access Regulation. They urge the Court to analyze the Access Regulation under the multi-factor balancing test invoked in cases involving regulatory takings.
In 1979, a divided California Supreme Court rejected a takings claim brought by other California growers shortly after the Access Regulation went into effect. Petitioners in this case brought this case in federal court. A divided Ninth Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision rejecting Petitioners’ Fifth Amendment claim, and Petitioners’ petition for rehearing en banc was denied over the dissent of eight judges. The Supreme Court accepted the case in November 2020, and heard oral arguments on March 22, 2021.
Featuring:

Wen Fa, Attorney, Pacific Legal Foundation

Visit our website – www.RegProject.org – to learn more, view all of our content, and connect with us on social media.
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

RTP's Fourth Branch PodcastBy The Federalist Society

  • 4.9
  • 4.9
  • 4.9
  • 4.9
  • 4.9

4.9

28 ratings


More shows like RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

View all
Cato Daily Podcast by Cato Institute

Cato Daily Podcast

960 Listeners

FedSoc Events by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Events

88 Listeners

SCOTUScast by The Federalist Society

SCOTUScast

106 Listeners

FedSoc Forums by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Forums

82 Listeners

Faculty Division Bookshelf by The Federalist Society

Faculty Division Bookshelf

8 Listeners

The Editors by National Review

The Editors

4,789 Listeners

Heritage Explains by Heritage Podcast Network

Heritage Explains

823 Listeners

Necessary & Proper Podcast by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast

47 Listeners

The Daily Signal by The Daily Signal

The Daily Signal

1,282 Listeners

The McCarthy Report by National Review

The McCarthy Report

2,805 Listeners

Verdict with Ted Cruz by Premiere Networks

Verdict with Ted Cruz

44,239 Listeners

The Megyn Kelly Show by SiriusXM

The Megyn Kelly Show

38,723 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

666 Listeners

Honestly with Bari Weiss by The Free Press

Honestly with Bari Weiss

8,558 Listeners

Morning Wire by The Daily Wire

Morning Wire

26,471 Listeners

Club Random with Bill Maher by Bill Maher

Club Random with Bill Maher

4,091 Listeners

The President's Daily Brief by The First TV

The President's Daily Brief

3,160 Listeners