SOCOM's acquisition speed advantage isn't about special authorities — they follow identical DOW policies as every one else. The difference is structural proximity and leadership empowerment. Brandi Evans, Director of SOCOM Enterprise at TurbineOne, also operates under a simple principle: there's nothing a PM can decide that can't be fixed within 48 hours. This calculated risk framework, paired with direct PEO access, enables the velocity SOCOM is known for. 

Brandi was also among the second programs to transition under the software acquisition pathway, managing intelligence tools for all-source analysts while the government struggled to adopt commercial practices like PI planning and sprinting, putting them at least a decade behind industry. Her most pointed critique targets the requirements process itself: validation cycles stretching over a year demanding perfect documentation before programs start, when the real need is treating more capabilities as urgent operational requirements and moving to a project-based model rather than traditional programs of record.

Topics Discussed:

It might be surprising, but The International Spy Museum is an important diplomatic tool, functioning as neutral ground where foreign intelligence officers from allied nations can bring their families to understand work they cannot discuss openly. Executive Director Chris Costa’s observation that U.S. intelligence culture prioritizes public transparency far more than Five Eyes partners traces directly to George Washington's decision to show taxpayers intelligence value, creating institutional differences that persist today. 

This unique positioning allows the museum to collect international artifacts and host intelligence leaders in ways official government channels cannot, providing safe space for collaboration that strengthens partnerships without compromising operational security. Chris’ framework for discussing sensitive topics through historical analogs demonstrates sophisticated operational security while maintaining educational value. 

Resources: 

Topics Discussed:

Former White House Official Trevor Hough’s career framework of accepting opportunities aligned with critical national security priorities rather than institutional advancement metrics paid off. Now, he has invaluable insights to share, including why large defense contractors excel at exquisite hardware like bombers and missiles but struggle with software requiring rapid iteration and flat organizational structures, and how classified intelligence sharing post-9/11 depended more on personal relationships across agency boundaries than formal bureaucratic processes.

His conversation with Ian also covers the strategic tension in counterterrorism between maintaining offensive pressure on networks abroad through special operations while securing domestic borders with conventional forces. 

Resources: 

Loonshots by Safi Bahcall

Topics Discussed:

When RADM Terry Kraft, USN (ret.), flew his first combat mission during Desert Storm, 20 years of Cold War training doctrine changed in a single night of anti-aircraft fire so dense "you could walk on it." His experience commanding the USS Ronald Reagan's maiden deployment and flying 40 combat missions gives insights into leadership adaptation under extreme pressure and the evolution of naval warfare tactics.

Now serving as President & CEO of The USS Midway Museum, Terry demonstrates how military leadership principles translate to civilian organizations, from managing 750 volunteers to preserving 80-year-old Naval hardware. His approach to command — built on direct access rather than hierarchical communication — offers practical frameworks for leaders managing large, distributed teams in high-stakes environments.

Resources:

Topics Discussed:

Ret. Vice Admiral Bob Sharp's journey from Desert Storm to NGA Director showcases how foundational experiences can shape decades of strategic thinking. His framework for intelligence-operations integration, where intelligence without operations is just trivia, and operations without intelligence is dangerous, emerged from witnessing combat operations during the Gulf War.

Bob also shares his leadership scaling method that involves daily "walkabouts" where he tries to make at least one person feel special on the team every day, maintaining personal connection even across 15,000 employees. His "you can't surge trust" philosophy emphasizes genuine consistency and demonstrable care over time. 

Resources & Events Mentioned: 

Topics Discussed:

Responsible AI requires understanding capabilities and limitations the same way officers learn that Aegis radar struggles on cloudy days. This mindset shift could change how the military adopts AI systems across operational environments.

Emelia Probasco, Senior Fellow at CSET, discusses how Project Maven succeeded by finding "trilingual leaders" who understood operations, technology, and contracting, not through formal training, but by figuring it out through curiosity and necessity. These leaders became the bridge between commercial tech companies and military operations, enabling rapid integration without traditional bureaucratic delays.

Resources: 

Topics Discussed:

Ret. Lt. Gen. Bob Ashley's career spans the complete transformation of military intelligence, from alcohol pens and map boards in 1987 to tactical Internet access at the squad level today. He witnessed and shaped how intelligence operations evolved across six combat tours and two decades of conflict. 

His insights highlight critical vulnerabilities in our communications-dependent approach to warfare and the fundamental relationship dynamics that determine intelligence effectiveness. Bob's framework for commander-analyst relationships challenges conventional wisdom about information flow in military organizations. 

Bob also emphasizes that commanders must brief analysts before analysts brief commanders, establishing mission context that drives effective intelligence collection and analysis. His perspective on the flattening of intelligence hierarchies exposes both opportunities and risks in modern warfare, particularly the tension between information accessibility and operational security in contested environments.

Topics Discussed:

Mike Minihan, General, USAF (ret.) breaks down the "permissive environment trap" plaguing current military thinking. While recent operations in Iran, Ukraine, and Israel demonstrate exceptional execution, he tells Ian they mask fatal capability gaps that will emerge in Pacific conflicts where forces face contestation in all domains. Mobility aircraft currently have less connectivity than consumer smartphones, making tanker crews unaware they're under attack "until they wake up in heaven."

But this isn't just about technology gaps. Minihan outlines why institutional change requires what he calls commander business — the obligation to prioritize mission and troops over career preservation. From his framework for Congressional engagement to his resource allocation reality check, he provides a playbook for senior leaders willing to challenge systems that prioritize survival over effectiveness.

Topics Discussed:

Heather Ichord, CEO & Founder of Mile37 Tech, LLC, argues that successful defense technology goes far beyond building better hardware — it requires understanding exactly how tactical units will employ these systems, including training pipelines, maintenance requirements, and sustainment logistics in environments where contractors can't provide on-site support. Her framework for evaluating defense technology starts with specific use cases: which unit size will employ this system, how does it integrate with daily operations, and what does the entire sustainment ecosystem look like in distributed environments?

Drawing from her background as a Marine logistics officer, Heather emphasizes that sustainment thinking must drive technology development from day one. She advocates for "hardware as a shell for software" approaches that enable constant iteration and updates, though she acknowledges to Ian that this mindset remains controversial in defense circles accustomed to decades-long asset lifecycles. Her investment thesis focuses on companies that can scale from prototypes to squad-level deployment across thousands of tactical units while maintaining software-like update capabilities.

Topics Discussed:

Defense acquisition feels broken, because it's working exactly as designed — to prevent political embarrassment rather than enable mission success. Dr. Alexis Lasselle Ross, President of Apex Defense Strategies, spent 25 years navigating this system and breaks down the fundamental business dynamics that control America's defense spending, from congressional quasi-entitlements that build on themselves year after year to the five-year budget cycle that disconnects funding decisions from technology development.

Alexis sees the current moment as uniquely positioned for significant acquisition reform, she tells Ian, with alignment across government and industry driven by the China threat. She explains why contracting officers become risk-averse by design, operating under layers of regulations from decades of reactive policymaking, and identifies the breakthrough authorities that could finally address funding inflexibility.

Topics Discussed: