# DOJ WEEKLY BRIEF: CLIMATE LAWSUITS AND POLICY SHIFTS

Welcome to this week's DOJ Brief, I'm your host. Today, we're diving into the Department of Justice's most significant action this week: filing unprecedented lawsuits against four states over their climate policies.

In a dramatic move, the DOJ sued Hawaii, Michigan, Vermont, and New York, claiming their climate actions conflict with federal authority and President Trump's energy agenda. Attorney General Pamela Bondi stated, "These burdensome and ideologically motivated laws and lawsuits threaten American energy independence and our country's economic and national security."

The lawsuits target two types of state climate initiatives: Hawaii and Michigan's planned legal action against fossil fuel companies for climate-related damages, and New York and Vermont's "climate superfund" laws requiring fossil fuel companies to pay into state funds based on greenhouse gas emissions.

The American Petroleum Institute praised the action, with Senior VP Ryan Meyers saying, "The Trump Administration gets it. This cadre of state lawsuits and laws is not only an attack on the companies that provide Americans with affordable and reliable energy, but also an unconstitutional affront to the federal government's role."

These lawsuits align with President Trump's April 8th Executive Order directing the Attorney General to identify state and local laws potentially burdening domestic energy development.

In other developments, February saw a significant policy shift in prosecutorial discretion. The Attorney General issued guidance emphasizing that prosecutors "may not be influenced by the person's political association, activities, or beliefs" and stated there's "no place in the decision-making process for animosity or careerism."

For state governments, these actions signal potential constraints on climate policy autonomy. For businesses, particularly energy companies, this represents a federal shield against state-level climate accountability measures.

The DOJ's actions reflect broader administration priorities to "unleash American energy" while also addressing perceived "weaponization" of the justice system.

Looking ahead, watch for legal challenges from the affected states and potential similar actions against other state climate initiatives. For more information, visit justice.gov or your state attorney general's website.

How will these tensions between federal authority and state climate action resolve? Stay tuned to our podcast for continued coverage of this developing story.

# DOJ TODAY: Breaking News and Policy Shifts

*[Host intro music fades]*

Welcome to DOJ Today, I'm your host bringing you the latest from the Department of Justice. Our top story: just yesterday, the DOJ sentenced an Arizona man to 4 years in prison for COVID-19 fraud and filing false tax returns. This case highlights the department's ongoing commitment to prosecuting pandemic-related crimes.

In a major development, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a memorandum on April 25th dramatically changing how DOJ handles leak investigations. The new policy now permits using compulsory legal process against journalists in leak investigations - a significant reversal from the 2022 regulations that had protected news media. Bondi stated that "this Justice Department will not tolerate unauthorized disclosures that undermine President Trump's policies."

This follows February's sweeping policy changes that redirected DOJ resources away from corporate enforcement toward combating illegal immigration, human trafficking, and transnational organized crime. The department has also implemented major shifts in national security priorities, including disbanding the National Security Division's Corporate Enforcement Unit and limiting FARA investigations.

For American businesses, these changes create a mixed landscape. While there's reduced focus on traditional corporate enforcement, the department's renewed attention to transnational crime and strict charging policies introduces new risks for multinational companies.

Looking at regulatory changes, the DOJ's Data Transaction Rule took effect on April 8th, prohibiting certain data transactions with six countries of concern, including China. U.S. businesses have until October 6th to comply with affirmative obligations, with violations potentially resulting in civil penalties up to $368,136 or criminal fines up to $1 million.

For citizens concerned about these developments, the DOJ maintains its commitment to its core mission of "upholding the rule of law, keeping our country safe, and protecting civil rights" as stated on its website.

What's next? Watch for implementation details on these policy shifts and their impacts on specific industries. For businesses engaged in international transactions, compliance reviews before the October deadline will be critical.

For more information, visit justice.gov, where you can also find the department's latest press releases and action center.

This is DOJ Today. I'm your host, signing off until next week.

*[Outro music begins]*

Welcome back to the Justice Brief, your weekly rundown of the Department of Justice’s latest moves and what they mean for you. The headline this week: the DOJ’s new Data Transaction Rule took effect on April 8, marking a major step to prevent foreign access to Americans’ sensitive personal data. This sweeping rule prohibits or restricts certain data transactions with six countries of concern, including China, and sets new compliance and reporting requirements for businesses dealing with cloud computing or data brokerage. U.S. persons must file yearly reports if their cloud transactions involve entities 25% owned by those countries and report any rejected offers to engage in prohibited data deals. Civil penalties for violations can soar to $368,136 or double the transaction value, while willful breaches may lead to criminal fines up to $1 million and even 20 years in prison.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi underscored the urgency, stating, “Our data is a national asset. We are sending a clear signal to adversaries: Americans’ privacy and our national security are not up for negotiation.” Experts warn that these rules will have ripple effects across the tech sector, potentially raising costs and altering how companies manage international partnerships. U.S. organizations now have until October 6 to meet certain compliance obligations, while many in industry are racing to reevaluate contracts and data flows.

Adding to the week’s momentum, the DOJ just rolled out a new prosecutorial discretion policy, emphasizing that charging and sentencing decisions must never be swayed by political associations or beliefs. The fresh guidance limits overuse of criminal statutes like the Foreign Agents Registration Act and urges prosecutors to focus on the most serious provable offenses, reserving exceptions for rare cases. This is part of a broader DOJ strategy to restore public trust and depoliticize law enforcement actions.

Meanwhile, DOJ’s high-profile enforcement efforts made headlines: a plea deal involving an ISIS-inspired terror plot, action against illegal foreign agents, and the sentencing of a private investigator working on behalf of China. These cases showcase the Department’s focus on both national security and foreign interference.

For American citizens, these policy shifts mean greater protections for your personal data and a renewed emphasis on fair, unbiased justice. Businesses must quickly adapt to tougher compliance standards, especially those with global operations or data ties abroad. State and local governments may see increased federal involvement in sensitive prosecutions, particularly where policy differences arise. Internationally, the data transaction crackdown could trigger regulatory responses and complicate cross-border tech collaborations.

Looking ahead, keep an eye on compliance deadlines this October, upcoming DOJ task force recommendations, and potential court challenges to these far-reaching rules. For more on how to respond or submit public input, visit justice.gov/news or contact your regulatory compliance officer. Stay alert, stay informed, and make your voice heard—how DOJ acts today shapes America’s legal landscape tomorrow.

The Department of Justice’s biggest headline this week centers on its sweeping new Data Security Program, or DSP, which officially took effect on April 8. This landmark rule aims to block sensitive U.S. personal and government data from falling into the hands of foreign adversaries, specifically targeting six “countries of concern” including China, Russia, and Iran. The DOJ’s National Security Division rolled out key guidance and FAQs, along with a 90-day grace period for companies to get their compliance programs up to speed—ending July 8. While willful violations will still be met with enforcement, companies showing good-faith efforts won’t face penalties during this transition.

The new program means U.S. organizations—whether running websites, hiring vendors, or negotiating investments—must now scrutinize how bulk data might be accessed or transferred. Even seemingly innocuous tech like tracking pixels or third-party software in apps is on the DOJ’s radar if it could expose Americans’ data overseas. The compliance guide spells out clear steps: review data flows, vet vendors, tighten internal security, and revise contracts where needed. Notably, reporting requirements are robust: firms engaged in relevant data transactions will be expected to file annual reports, document rejected prohibited offers, and swiftly flag suspicious activity involving foreign actors.

For American citizens, this initiative promises stronger privacy and enhanced protection against foreign misuse of personal information. For businesses, especially those in tech, finance, healthcare, and cloud services, there’s a pressing need to adapt internal processes and, in some cases, rethink international partnerships. State and local governments, particularly those managing large datasets or running digital public services, must likewise ensure their operations comply with the new rules.

DOJ officials stress the gravity and intent behind these changes. One spokesperson emphasized, “Protecting Americans’ sensitive personal data is a national security imperative.” Legal experts note the stakes: civil fines for violations can reach over $360,000 per infraction, and criminal penalties include fines up to $1 million and 20 years in prison for willful misconduct.

Looking ahead, the 90-day grace period represents a critical compliance window. By October 6, certain ongoing compliance obligations will kick in, expanding enforcement teeth. The DOJ has yet to publish its official list of "covered persons"—those entities specifically restricted—which is another milestone to watch for.

Citizens and organizations can learn more by visiting the DOJ’s Data Security Program web hub. For businesses, now is the time to audit your data practices, consult qualified counsel, and start documenting your compliance steps. As the DOJ continues to roll out updates and enforcement actions, staying engaged—and prepared—remains the best defense. If you have concerns or wish to comment, DOJ will be opening a public feedback portal in the coming weeks. Stay tuned for further guidance, and make sure your organization is ready for this new era of digital security.

This week’s top story from the Department of Justice revolves around the fallout from what is now being referred to as the "Thursday Night Massacre." Back in February, a wave of high-profile resignations rocked the DOJ when seven prosecutors stepped down in protest of orders to dismiss federal corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams. The case centered on claims of a quid pro quo deal to align policies with federal enforcement priorities, leading to its dismissal with prejudice earlier this month. Judge Dale Ho, who oversaw the case, described it as a potential violation of "equal justice under law," raising serious questions about DOJ integrity. Critics are comparing this to the Watergate-era Saturday Night Massacre, sparking debates on prosecutorial independence and transparency.

In other developments, Attorney General Pam Bondi has issued sweeping changes to DOJ policies. A new memo imposes stricter prosecutorial discretion, requiring charges to focus on the most serious, provable offenses and limiting circumstances for leniency. This shift also deprioritizes corporate and Foreign Agent Registration Act enforcement, reallocating resources to combat illegal immigration and transnational organized crime. Business leaders are concerned this pivot could heighten risks in areas like antitrust enforcement and regulatory compliance, particularly given Bondi’s directive to investigate diversity and equity policies within private organizations.

Meanwhile, in Alabama's Lowndes County, the DOJ has ended a Biden-era environmental justice agreement aimed at addressing severe wastewater issues. The decision follows an executive order by President Trump banning federal agencies from pursuing diversity and equity initiatives. This move has drawn criticism from local advocates, who cite poverty and inadequate infrastructure as ongoing public health threats. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon defended the decision, emphasizing a commitment to "serving every individual with dignity" without what she termed “arbitrary criteria.”

What does all this mean for everyday Americans? For citizens, the DOJ’s shifting priorities could influence public safety and civil liberties, particularly as enforcement becomes more centralized. For businesses, adapting to the changing legal environment will be critical to avoid penalties. State and local governments may face increased scrutiny, especially those with progressive law enforcement policies.

As the DOJ steers into uncharted territory, the impacts on American governance and global relations remain to be seen. Up next, keep an eye on additional policy announcements from Attorney General Bondi and further developments in the New York City corruption case. For more information or to share your thoughts, visit justice.gov.

Welcome to today’s episode, where we dive into the latest from the Department of Justice. The headline making waves this week is the DOJ's dramatic shift in policy regarding digital assets. On April 7, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a clear message: the DOJ is stepping back from acting as a “digital asset regulator.” Instead, it will focus its firepower on prosecuting crimes like terrorism financing, human trafficking, and investor fraud involving digital currencies. The move disbands the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team and reallocates these responsibilities to the DOJ’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section. This pivot highlights a firm stance against regulatory overreach, while sharpening focus on protecting investors and combating transnational criminal operations.

This signals a shift for businesses in the cryptocurrency space. Virtual currency platforms and services are no longer targeted for unintentional regulatory slip-ups, but compliance programs and anti-money laundering measures remain essential to avoid scrutiny. For American citizens, this shift could mean enhanced protections from scams and fraud, but also highlights the DOJ’s prioritization of combatting crimes that exploit digital technology.

Meanwhile, the DOJ is continuing its nationwide operation to stem illegal immigration and organized crime through “Operation Take Back America.” More than 900 individuals were charged with immigration-related crimes in early April alone. These actions are part of broader enforcement priorities under the Trump administration’s goal to enhance border security and eliminate transnational criminal enterprises like cartels and trafficking networks. Both citizens and businesses reliant on cross-border trade should expect heightened enforcement and regulatory checks in these areas.

This week also saw the DOJ issue a press release announcing its pursuit of the death penalty for a federal inmate charged with first-degree murder. This decision aligns with current prosecutorial policies emphasizing charges for the most severe offenses and underscores the department's hardline stance on violent crime.

For state and local governments, the DOJ’s renewed focus on immigration and organized crime may result in closer federal partnerships, particularly in jurisdictions struggling with crime surges. Internationally, the digital assets pivot and emphasis on transnational crime signal potential cooperation with allied nations in tackling global security challenges.

Looking ahead, the DOJ's shift in resources and priorities may reshape how businesses operate in regulated sectors while altering the legal risks they face. For more details on these developments or to provide feedback, visit the DOJ’s official website or consult local U.S. Attorneys’ offices. Stay informed—and engage if you’re affected by these policy changes. Until next time, stay vigilant and up to date!

This week, the Department of Justice took bold steps that are already sparking conversations nationwide. The most significant development? Attorney General Pam Bondi announced a sweeping realignment of the DOJ’s priorities, focusing heavily on combating illegal immigration, dismantling cartels, and addressing transnational organized crime. This shift comes in tandem with the disbanding of high-profile initiatives like the National Security Division’s Corporate Enforcement Unit and its cryptocurrency crime task force, signaling a stark pivot in enforcement strategies.

One of the key policy shifts includes a directive to prioritize prosecuting the most severe offenses, particularly those tied to violent crimes and cartel operations. This will likely impact state and local governments, as resources and coordination with federal entities may be reallocated to align with these goals. AG Bondi emphasized that decisions on whether to prosecute must remain unbiased, reflecting the DOJ’s attempt to distance itself from any perception of political influence. “Accountability will be driven by provable offenses, not headlines or political rhetoric,” Bondi remarked during a press conference.

Business leaders, however, are on high alert. The DOJ’s deprioritization of corporate and foreign bribery cases not directly tied to cartel activity may reduce the regulatory scrutiny many corporations previously faced. Some experts fear this could unintentionally create loopholes, allowing unethical corporate practices to proliferate. Meanwhile, in the private sector, companies are being advised to keep robust compliance teams in place, even as oversight shifts.

For American citizens, these changes could bring mixed outcomes. The crackdown on organized crime and human trafficking has the potential to enhance public safety and reduce criminal networks. However, critics have raised concerns about whether the redirection of resources may come at a cost to other critical areas, such as environmental enforcement and civil rights protections.

On the international front, partnerships with foreign entities could evolve as the DOJ moves to prioritize issues like cross-border crime and immigration. Already, countries in Latin America are bracing for intensified cooperation with U.S. agencies in targeting cartels and smuggling networks.

Looking ahead, citizens and businesses are encouraged to stay informed and engaged. The DOJ plans further announcements in the coming weeks, with possible updates to regulatory frameworks and public safety initiatives. For those seeking to provide input or learn more, visit the DOJ’s website or contact local U.S. Attorneys’ Offices.

As the DOJ reshapes its approach, the real-world impacts are just beginning to unfold. Keep listening for updates on how these changes may redefine justice across the nation and beyond.

**Podcast Script: DOJ Weekly Roundup – April 7, 2025**

This week’s biggest DOJ headline? The explosive fallout from the *Thursday Night Massacre*—a wave of resignations after federal prosecutors refused orders to drop corruption charges against NYC Mayor Eric Adams. Acting Deputy AG Emil Bove’s alleged *quid pro quo* demand—dismissing charges in exchange for Adams supporting Trump’s policies—sparked comparisons to Nixon’s *Saturday Night Massacre*. Judge Dale Ho later tossed the case, calling it "special dispensation" that violates "equal justice under law."

Meanwhile, AG Pamela Bondi’s DOJ is charging ahead with sweeping changes. A new *Title IX Special Investigations Team*—jointly run with the Education Department—aims to fast-track bans on transgender athletes, with Secretary Linda McMahon warning schools: "There’s a new sheriff in town." Bondi pledged "comprehensive action" to protect "women’s sports and spaces," shifting civil rights enforcement from Education to DOJ. Critics call it a politicized crackdown, especially after OCR layoffs gutted oversight capacity.

On national security, Bondi disbanded the *Foreign Influence Task Force* and *KleptoCapture*, refocusing on cartels and terrorism. FARA prosecutions will now target only "traditional espionage," easing scrutiny on foreign lobbying. But businesses face new risks: DOJ’s *bulk data rules*, effective April 8, restrict transactions with China, Russia, and four other "countries of concern." Companies must audit data flows or risk penalties.

For corporations, DOJ’s memo on *prosecutorial discretion* demands tougher charging—prioritizing immigration, trafficking, and cartels over white-collar cases. Fraud Section attorneys warn of unpredictable FCPA enforcement as U.S. Attorneys gain autonomy.

What’s next? Watch for DOJ’s appeal of Judge Ho’s ruling and more Title IX enforcement actions. Businesses should review data compliance by October. For citizens, the Brennan Center warns Project 2025’s DOJ agenda threatens "rule of law norms."

Resources: Track DOJ’s *Public Integrity* dockets and the *Title IX SIT* portal for updates. Got a tip on DOJ overreach? Whistleblower protections remain—for now.

This is [Your Name], signing off. Stay informed—justice depends on it.

Welcome back to *Inside Justice,* your go-to podcast for the latest developments from the U.S. Department of Justice. This week, the DOJ is making headlines with its impending implementation of a sweeping final rule aimed at restricting foreign access to Americans' sensitive personal data, which officially takes effect on April 8, 2025. This move follows last year's Executive Order 14117 and is part of a broader effort to protect national security.

Under the new rule, transactions involving data—such as biometric, health, financial, and precise geolocation data—are prohibited with six "countries of concern," including China, Russia, and North Korea, unless specific licensing exceptions apply. Companies involved in data exchange with entities in these nations will face stringent reporting, due diligence, and compliance requirements. Violations could result in steep penalties, including fines and imprisonment. As Attorney General Pam Bondi stated, "This framework is a critical step to safeguarding Americans' privacy and strengthening our national security."

This policy underscores a growing divide between the U.S. and adversarial nations. For businesses, the rule introduces operational burdens and supply chain challenges, especially for tech firms and financial institutions reliant on global data processing. For state and local governments, it signals a need for closer coordination with federal authorities on data security. And for everyday citizens, the announcement reflects a commitment to reducing privacy risks, although it raises questions about potential surveillance overreach.

But data restrictions aren’t the only DOJ shake-up. The department continues to realign its enforcement focus under Bondi’s leadership. Immigration crimes, human trafficking, and transnational criminal organizations—like cartels—are now central priorities. Operation Take Back America, for example, recently charged over 960 individuals with immigration-related offenses in just one week. Federal resources are being redirected, with significant cuts to corporate-related enforcement and the dissolution of key units, such as the National Security Division’s Corporate Enforcement Unit and the task force targeting Russian oligarchs.

Critics, however, argue that these changes could weaken corporate accountability and oversight. Former DOJ officials warn of “generational damage” from what they describe as politicization of the department. Liz Oyer, a former DOJ pardon attorney, has expressed deep concerns over leadership's focus on personal loyalty to the president rather than upholding justice impartially.

Looking ahead, April 8 marks the start of enforcement for the DOJ’s data protection rule, while October brings stricter compliance requirements for businesses. The public can provide feedback on implementation and compliance measures by contacting the DOJ directly.

That’s all for today. Keep following *Inside Justice* for updates on how these changes shape America’s legal landscape. If you have thoughts or want to engage with these policies, visit justice.gov for more details. Thanks for tuning in—stay informed and empowered!

Welcome to this week's Department of Justice update. Our top story: Attorney General Pamela Bondi has implemented major changes to the DOJ's national security priorities, reshaping the landscape for corporate legal risk.

In a series of memos issued shortly after her confirmation, Bondi outlined new policies on charging, plea negotiations, and sentencing. The DOJ will now prioritize immigration enforcement, human trafficking, and transnational organized crime. Notably, the National Security Division's Corporate Enforcement Unit has been disbanded, signaling a reduced focus on traditional corporate enforcement.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Unit has been directed to prioritize investigations related to foreign bribery that facilitates criminal operations of cartels and transnational criminal organizations. This marks a significant shift from its previous focus on bribery of foreign officials by U.S. businesses to obtain or retain overseas contracts.

Attorney General Bondi stated, "There is no room in plea bargaining for political animus or other hostility. Prosecutors may not use criminal charges to exert leverage to induce a guilty plea."

These changes are likely to impact multinational corporations engaged in international business. Companies may need to reassess their compliance policies, particularly those aimed at preventing overseas bribery.

In other developments, the DOJ has announced a Second Amendment pattern-or-practice investigation into California's Los Angeles County. This follows President Trump's mandate to end what he terms "illegal DEI policies."

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is shifting resources from alcohol and tobacco-related enforcement to "more pressing priorities such as cartels." This could lead to reduced enforcement of the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act, which regulates the sale of e-cigarettes.

For American citizens, these changes may result in stricter immigration enforcement and potentially increased prosecution of transnational crimes. Businesses should be aware of the shifting focus in corporate investigations and adjust their compliance strategies accordingly.

State and local governments may see increased federal intervention in prosecutorial decisions, as the DOJ aims to take action against local prosecutors deemed "too soft" on crime.

Looking ahead, we're expecting more details on the reconstitution and expansion of Joint Task Force Vulcan, tasked with eliminating MS-13 and other transnational gangs.

For more information on these developments, visit the Department of Justice website at justice.gov. If you have concerns about these policy changes, consider contacting your local representatives or relevant industry associations.

Stay informed and engaged as these new policies unfold. This has been your DOJ update for the week. Thanks for listening.