dicta – law in audio

By dicta

We’re transforming legal learning through immersive audio streaming. Find out more about us on our website: dicta.dev... more

· Education

Download on the App Store

Download on the App Store

Get it on Google Play

FAQs about dicta – law in audio:

How many episodes does dicta – law in audio have?

The podcast currently has 529 episodes available.

dicta – law in audio episodes:

September 28, 1980 Prof. Burningham – September 28 – Keegstra, 1990 SCC
The judgment of Dickson C.J. and Wilson, L'Heureux-Dubé and Gonthier
One: Facts – (0:00:54)
Three: Relevant Statutory and Constitutional Provisions – (0:03:19)
Five: The History of Hate Propaganda Crimes in Canada – (0:06:28)
Six: Section 2 sub b of the Charter -- Freedom of Expression – (0:10:27)
Seven: Section 1 Analysis of Section 319 sub 2 – (0:21:31)
A: General Approach to Section 1 – (0:21:36)
B: The Use of American Constitutional Jurisprudence – (0:24:14)
C: Objective of Section 319 sub 2 – (0:26:50)
1: Harm Caused by Expression Promoting the Hatred of Identifiable Groups – (0:26:54)
2: International Human Rights Instruments – (0:30:49)
3: Other Provisions of the Charter – (0:34:44)
4: Conclusion Respecting Objective of Section 319 sub 2 – (0:38:07)
D: Proportionality – (0:39:14)
1: Relation of the Expression at Stake to Free Expression Values – (0:39:16)
2: Rational Connection – (0:48:54)
3: Minimal Impairment of the Section 2 sub b Freedom – (0:54:47)
a: Terms of Section 319 sub 2 – (0:56:28)
b: The Defences to Section 319 sub 2 – (1:03:24)
c: Alternative Modes of Furthering Parliament's Objective – (1:06:20)
4: Effects of the Limitation – (1:10:17)
E: Analysis of Section 319 sub 2 Under Section 1 of the Charter - Conclusion – (1:12:24)

The dissenting opinion of Sopinka and McLachlin JJ – (1:13:03)
Analysis – (1:13:10)
A: A Philosophical View of Freedom of Expression and the Charter – (1:13:12)
B: The Historical Perspective – (1:19:33)
C: Hate Propaganda and Freedom of Speech -- An Overview – (1:21:14)
Two: The Scope of Section 2 sub b of the Charter – (1:23:00)
A: The Argument Based on Violence – (1:24:20)
B: The Construction Arguments – (1:25:16)
1: The Argument Based on Section 15 of the Charter – (1:25:39)
2: The Argument Based on Section 27 of the Charter – (1:29:24)
3: The Argument Based on International Law – (1:31:44)
4: The Analysis under Section 1 – (1:34:01)
A: Section 1 and the Infringement of Freedom of Expression – (1:34:04)
1: The Objective of Section 319 sub 2 of the Criminal Code – (1:35:28)
2: Proportionality – (1:36:39)
a: General Considerations – (1:36:42)
b: Rational Connection – (1:39:28)
c: Minimum Impairment – (1:44:16)
d: Importance of the Right versus Benefit Conferred – (1:54:35)
3: Conclusion -- Section 1 in Relation to Infringement of Free Speech – (1:58:54)
...more
1h 60min
September 28, 1980 Prof. Burningham – September 28 – Irwin Toy, 1989 SCC
The Chief Justice and Lamer and Wilson JJ.
Preamble – (0:00:37)
One: The Relevant Legislative and Constitutional Provisions – (0:01:07)
Six: Whether sections 248 and 249 Limits Freedom of Expression as Guaranteed by the Canadian and Quebec Charters – (0:03:34)
B: The First Step - Was the Plaintiff's Activity Within the Sphere of Conduct Protected by Freedom of Expression? – (0:03:44)
C: The Second Step - Was the Purpose or Effect of the Government Action to Restrict Freedom of Expression? – (0:08:22)
a: Purpose – (0:09:03)
b: Effects – (0:11:05)
c: Sections 248 and 249 – (0:12:57)
D: Summary and Conclusion – (0:15:20)
Seven: Whether the Limit on Freedom of Expression Imposed by sections 248 and 249 Is Justified Under section 9.1 of the Quebec Charter or section 1 of the Canadian Charter – (0:17:43)
B: Whether sections 248 and 249 Are too Vague to Constitute a Limit Prescribed by Law – (0:17:56)
a: Confusion and Contradiction – (0:18:15)
b: Judicial Discretion – (0:19:37)
D: Whether the section 1 and section 9.1 Materials Justify Banning Commercial Advertising Directed at Persons Under Thirteen Years of Age – (0:21:36)
a: Pressing and Substantial Objective – (0:21:45)
b: Means Proportional to the Ends – (0:26:53)
one: Rational Connection – (0:26:56)
two: Minimal Impairment – (0:27:58)
three: Deleterious Effects – (0:38:23)
c: Conclusion – (0:39:26)

Beetz and McIntyre JJ, dissenting – (0:39:48)
Preamble – (0:39:55)
The Importance of Freedom of Expression – (0:40:17)
Section 1 – (0:41:19)
...more
45min
September 25, 1980 Prof. Burningham – September 21 – Oakes, 1986 SCC
Dickson CJ (Chouinard, Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain JJ, concurring)
Headnote – (0:00:31)
Is section 8 of the Narcotic Control Act a Reasonable and Demonstrably Justified Limit Pursuant to section 1 of the Charter? – (0:01:58)
...more
14min
September 25, 1980 Prof. Burningham – September 21 – Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society, 1992 SCC
Judgment of the Court (Gonthier J)
Facts – (0:00:33)
A. Vagueness under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – (0:01:39)
1. The Case Law of this Court – (0:01:44)
2. The Proper Place of the Doctrine of Vagueness in Charter Adjudication – (0:03:50)
3. The Content of the Doctrine of Vagueness – (0:06:05)
(a) Fair Notice to the Citizen – (0:06:45)
(b) Limitation of Law Enforcement Discretion – (0:09:49)
(c) European Court of Human Rights Case Law – (0:11:21)
(d) The Scope of Precision – (0:13:40)
(e) Vagueness and the Rule of Law – (0:16:49)
...more
20min
September 25, 1980 Prof. Burningham – September 21 – GVTA, 2009 SCC
Headnote – (0:00:13)
Is the Limit Justified Under Section 1 of the Charter? – (0:01:40)
Case Law on the Prescribed by Law Requirement – (0:02:05)
Government Policies and the Prescribed by Law Requirement – (0:06:52)
Application of the Principles to the Transit Authorities’ Policies – (0:10:33)
...more
13min
September 21, 1980 Prof. Burningham – September 18 – Eldridge, 1997 SCC
Factual Background – (0:00:37)
Application of the Charter – (0:04:17)
The Sources of the Alleged Charter Violations – (0:04:59)
The Application of the Charter to the Medical Services Commission and Hospitals – (0:13:54)
...more
27min
September 21, 1980 Prof. Burningham – September 18 – Stoffman, 1990 SCC
Facts – (0:00:38)
The Application of the Charter – (0:04:38)
...more
10min
September 21, 1980 Prof. Burningham – September 18 – McKinney, 1990 SCC
La Forest J (Dickson CJ and Gonthier J, concurring)
Preamble – (0:00:39)
Facts – (0:00:58)
The Application of the Charter – (0:01:41)
Wilson J, dissenting – (0:18:38)
One: To Whom Does the Charter Apply? – (0:18:44)
1. Academic Opinion – (0:19:37)
a: The Common Law/Statute Distinction – (0:19:40)
b: The Status of Court Orders – (0:20:48)
2. Is the Private/Government Distinction Sustainable? – (0:24:21)
3. What is Government Action? – (0:27:23)
4. The Relevant Criteria – (0:32:37)
a: The Control Test – (0:33:17)
b: The Government Function Test – (0:36:09)
c: The Government Entity Test – (0:38:48)
a: The Control Test – (0:41:43)
b: The Government Function Test – (0:45:28)
c: Statutory Authority and the Public Interest Test – (0:45:54)
...more
48min
September 21, 1980 Prof. Burningham – September 18 – Dolphin Delivery, 1986 SCC
McIntyre J (Dickson CJ, Estey, Chouinard, LeDain JJ, concurring)
Overview – (0:00:41)
Freedom of Expression – (0:11:27)
Section 1 of the Charter – (0:23:11)
Does the Charter apply to the Common Law? – (0:31:51)
Does the Charter apply to private litigation? – (0:33:12)
Beetz J, concurring – (0:56:33)
Wilson J, concurring – (0:57:15)
...more
1h

FAQs about dicta – law in audio:

How many episodes does dicta – law in audio have?

The podcast currently has 529 episodes available.