Divorce Matters

Vicci Bailey claims CPS is corrupt and tells me how they colluded to deprive her of her son.

Vicci also claims her son is in imminent danger. He recently was hiding in the back of a Petco bathroom in San Diego, from the father who allegedly sexually and physically abusing him. This precious boy's name is Charlie. He is 16 with an Autism diagnosis.

And that's just the beginning of it. Hear Vicci tell her story of how corrupt court actors have deprived her of her son.

Hear about a potential white knight judge here in the County of San Diego.

Vicci Bailey claims CPS is corrupt and tells me how they colluded to deprive her of her son.

Vicci also claims her son is in imminent danger. He recently was hiding in the back of a Petco bathroom in San Diego, from the father who allegedly sexually and physically abusing him. This precious boy's name is Charlie. He is 16 with an Autism diagnosis.

And that's just the beginning of it. Hear Vicci tell her story of how corrupt court actors have deprived her of her son.

Hear about a potential white knight judge here in the County of San Diego.

Vicci Bailey claims CPS is corrupt and tells me how they colluded to deprive her of her son.

Vicci also claims her son is in imminent danger. He recently was hiding in the back of a Petco bathroom in San Diego, from the father who allegedly sexually and physically abusing him. This precious boy's name is Charlie. He is 16 with an Autism diagnosis.

And that's just the beginning of it. Hear Vicci tell her story of how corrupt court actors have deprived her of her son.

Hear about a potential white knight judge here in the County of San Diego.

Alex Falconi went from having Zero custody to Primary Custody. Learn what he did that can help you.

"My ex didn't want me to see our son. It was because of, I guess, revenge purposes is the quickest way to explain it. The entire case is published on my YouTube channel, people who want to watch it. And I filed the custody petition because that's what I had to do.

Because I wanted to see him she didn't want me to see him. And that triggered several responses. She got an attorney accused me of domestic violence, which apparently back then was a common thing that I guess mothers would do to get a leg up in custody fights. Now it's a common thing doesn't change. Well, in Nevada, it's actually becoming a lot less common. But I do hear that another states, it's still the same. Anyway, I'm trying to be fair to the judiciary, because back then it was a routine thing to do. And now, not only is it not routine, but it can backfire.

Anyway, because of all of those allegations, ended up starting out with supervised visits, and then over the course of representing myself against the attorney, I went from supervised visits to visitation rights to primary physical custody or joint physical custody, and then the primary physical custody, then I got sole legal custody, then her visitation was suspended.

Then I had her banned from going to appointments and stuff. And then finally, her parental rights were terminated. And my wife adopted him. So I started from, you know, the very beginning with nothing in at the very end, everything, I hate to characterize it that way. And I would never do that if I didn't publish my entire series. The reason I say it so boldly now is because if people think that there's a problem with it, watch it. It's a 226 part series, by the time you're done with it, you will say, Okay, I see how this happened. So I mean, that's the we're gonna stay high level, because, you know, I'm all for 5050. So she must have done something really, really bad, and to lose her rights, or it's just a corrupt judiciary that you were able to exploit.

I'm guessing it's the former not the latter, though, if anyone exploited the judiciary with her and her attorney, as a non attorney, and I was in college, so it's not like I even I didn't even have the average amount of income that an ordinary person would have. I was filing for a fee waivers and form a poppers applications. So I mean, I really wasn't nobody. And the judge both judges on the way multiple times. So I had to file appeals, I ended up winning four Supreme Court appeals. And then I filed a writ petition got published. So justice Michael cherry of the Supreme Court, Nevada published a repetition that I had filed, it's named after me. So it took a lot of intervention from our high courts to get the case back on track.

And then it just took forever. It took over 20 hearings. I mean, you just took forever, it took hundreds of filings and a ton of hearings. And finally, after eight years, I got the outcome that was certainly in the best interest of our son. And I actually agree with you, I do not think that primary physical custody is the way to go.

Ordinarily, I do believe very much in joint physical custody, even though it didn't work in my case. And I do believe that termination of parental rights and the erasure of a parent is an absolute last resort. I do believe that as well. And that's one of the reasons that I published everything because I knew people would be very upset about that. So a lot of people will then watch the videos, and they will walk away and say I get it now. Anyway, go ahead.

Tell me about what happened with the trial courts in Nevada. They fucked up so badly. Well, I think it's a myriad of issues. I do. I guess, the first and most obvious problem that I faced and this is not consistent with all judges, but I would say most judges back then and now I would say maybe around three

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity

Frank Hand was blindsided by the family court system in New York. His lawyers didn't do him any favors and took a lot of money from him.

Frank discusses his story and what he went to. He finally had to recuse the attorney general and a judge to move his case forward.

• False allegations and Domestic Violence
• Getting a judge recused
• Judicial misconduct
• Gaslighting

Are you a whistleblower? Contact us!

Sponsored by Kids Matter www.kidsmatter.charity donate to give kids a voice in divorce

How Brent fought pro-se against a San Jose Divorce Crime Family and their ecosystem, and used an AI to gain an advantage.

Learn how Brent Oster filed a RICO using AI to gather evidence and support. This is not a podcast you want to miss.

"A judicial system when one human decides is always corrupt, and has been since Ancient Egyptian and Roman times. We cannot fix that. The system needs to be disrupted, displaced, and replaced by something better, more modern, where humans and their flaws have less influence."

Brent filed a RICO lawsuit against the Law Firms of Hector and Marilyn Moreno, and Intero Real-Estate Services as the primary operators of the racketeering enterprise. I named a Judge, a temp real-estate Judge, and a DA as personally acting outside their official duties and conspiring with those operators of the racketeering enterprise. You CANNOT file RICO against a Court, or any government agency, Even a color of law person (Judge, DA, police) acting in their official capacity is immune. The best you can get is conspiracy if they really stepped out of bounds, took a bribe,.... So the title should be RICO Filed Against Divorce Attorneys' Racketeering Enterprise. Check out RICO Attorney Jeffery E Grells chapter on RICO and Government: https://ricoact.com/?page_id=60 d. Extortion vs. Legitimate Exercise of Government Power Extortion "under color of official right" should not be confused with the legitimate exercise of government power. Governmental power, by its nature, is legalized extortion, e.g.,: unless you abide by the law, you'll go to jail; unless you buy car insurance, your license will be revoked; unless you pay taxes, you'll go to jail and be fined; unless you register your gun, your gun will be confiscated. But for the government's authority to jail people and fine people and confiscate their property, how many of us would abide by the law? If we all naturally treated each other in a decent manner, there would be no need for government. From the first day that man emerged from the wilderness, however, most political philosophers and most of our experiences have taught us that if left to our own devices, people will rob from each other, abuse each other, and kill each other. Thus, pursuant to the basic social contract upon which all governments are based, people have consented to the government's use of extortion to keep all of us in line and to make sure that we all abide by the prevailing standards of decency. The government's power to extort proper behavior from each of us is limited only by "due process," i.e., the government can't send someone to jail unless they first receive a fair trial, a law cannot be enforced unless it is properly approved by our elected officials and thereafter monitored by our courts, etc. A citizen cannot complain that he or she is being extorted by their government if the government is simply enforcing a law that complies with society's sense of due process. It is difficult to imagine when an official act of government could constitute extortion. When considering official government action, the appropriateness of the government's action is measured by the Constitution — not by the criminal law of extortion. If the government does not have the power to enforce a law against a citizen (i.e., if the government does not have the power to extort certain behavior from a citizen), the law is unconstitutional – not extortionistic. Background My wife and I got caught up in a dirty divorce scam 2017-2020, with the Law firms of J Hector Moreno, and Marilyn Moreno representing my ex-wife. The lawyers got orders and charges against me (with a nephew in the DA office's help), and I have to leave the country to avoid constant arrest. They put me in fear and by extortion got orders to sell my home. Then a corrupt temp judge, Sharon Roper took control of the sale process, Intero Real Estate Services did the unlawful sale, laundered the funds and they all paid themselves well - my wife and I got nothing, and have spent our retirement fighting in the divorce. The Moreno Attorneys and their conspirers have defrauded hundreds of people in the past decade with this pattern of racketeering - this is a 3rd generation crime family, a real mob. This is why I filed a RICO lawsuit against them in July 2021, using a a prototype Legal AI - Justine Falcon, using those tools to finds 63 other cases in the same pattern of racketeering, 5 that are an exact match with 2 other victims providing testimony. As a pro-se, this is my 8th filing, and I continue to learn law and refine the AI tools.

Please list the Judges, Attorneys, etc that acted as bad actors in your situation Hector and Marilyn Moreno - Attorneys, Michael H Moreno - DA prosecutor

Richard and I discuss controlling the courtroom and removal of bad judges. Join Richard at https://www.david-vs-goliath.org/

or email him [email protected]

What is your story? My background was in film and entertainment. By accident, iI got caught up in a legal situation that forced me to investigate and research how the inner workings of the judicial system works.

Lisa Goodpaster discusses how to identify and reverse parental alienation. If you're a victim of parental alienation, than this podcast episode is for you.

Here's the link for free 10 signs of Parental alienation https://tinyurl.com/yan4dph5 Donate to www.Kidsmatter.charity

Mark Reel is owner of Reel Father's Rights and has been through the system. He was treated so badly that he went to law school to learn how to fight back.

Mark discusses how to win at Pro Se, what to avoid and why fathers are held to a different standard.

Angry text messages are now considered domestic abuse

Why preponderance of the evidence is bullshit and why your federal rights are violated as a result.

Why fathers are trying to overcome 60 years of lobbying.

Why Best interest of child is in name only and not in practice

Mark's #1 rule for father's success

Why judges often get it wrong due to case overload

Bio

Sports and Fitness Exec for a decade. Graduated law school in 2017, didn't take the bar until 2020, inspired by 3.5 year custody battle. Founded Fathers Rights Law Firm in 2021.

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity

5 years and counting George Argell has been fighting his case in Family Court in Texas and Michigan.

Learn how George was tricked by his ex into changing venue to Michigan and causing him 5 years of pain with the family courts

Fake allegations, hearsay and no evidence. Sound familiar?

Michael's YouTube Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/MrPropriaPersona1

Want to help us fight judicial injustice? Donate to KidsMatter.charity