Although the numbers may be low, COVID-19 and other illnesses remain a significant threat to patients. The role of masks in preventing SARS-CoV-2 spread has been politicized since the beginning. A new meta-analysis purports to answer the question of mask effectiveness. Join host Geoff Wall, with guest Jake Galdo, as they deep dive into the article and evaluate the science.

The GameChanger
A new meta-analysis suggests that mask mandates do not affect the prevention and spread of COVID-19. However, the study has numerous limitations and errors, making its interpretation difficult.

Show Segments
00:00 - Introductions
01:31 - Pros and Cons of a Meta-Analysis
06:31: Looking at the Analysis
10:24 - The GameChanger: Jefferson et al. Results
11:24 - Connecting to Practice: Recognizing Limitations
28:43 - Closing Remarks

Host
Geoff Wall, PharmD, BCPS, FCCP, CGP
Professor of Pharmacy Practice, Drake University
Internal Medicine/Critical Care, UnityPoint Health

Jake Galdo, PharmD, MBA, BCPS, BCGP
Course Content and Developer, CEimpact
Managing Network Facilitator, CPESN Health Equity
CEO, Seguridad

References and Resources
Jefferson T, Dooley L, Ferroni E, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (Review). Cochrane Library. 

Novella S. Masks Revisited. Science Based Medicine.

Redeem your CPE here
CPE (Pharmacist)

Get a membership & earn CE for GameChangers Podcast episodes (30 mins/episode)
Pharmacists: Get a membership

CE Information

Learning Objectives
Upon successful completion of this knowledge-based activity, participants should be able to:
1. Discuss the pros and cons of a meta-analysis
2. Describe the limitations of the Jefferson et al meta-analysis

0.05 CEU/0.5 Hr
UAN: 0107-0000-23-119-H01-P
Initial release date: 03/22/2023
Expiration date: 03/22/2024
Additional CPE and CME details can be found here.

Follow CEimpact on Social Media:
LinkedIn
Instagram