These queer creators continuously host panel discussions saying: ovulation makes lesbians go d*ck crazy, identity is a choice, people should be allowed to bring men into sapphic spaces, and comparing gender to race. Even worse, they registered as a Canadian non-profit organization dedicated to "accurate representation," exempt from paying taxes, even though they have NO BOARD, no oversight, and no public reports about funding. So then what do the donations go to? Better podcast equipment for their podcast, which is already funded companies donating to right-wing politicians? Hosts Allison and Tabitha dive into the problematic rhetoric spread by the Canadian podcast The Queer Collective. We dissect how their points actively reinforce dangerous, weaponized conservative talking points about corrective rape and sexual identity being a fluid choice. Here's our take that we touched on at the end in probably too chaotic of a manner and not enough detail: if they are going to maintain nonprofit status and present themselves as an academic resource as they mention in their apology, then:
1) they need to get a board of directors that includes academics with degrees in gender/queer studies and represents a diverse set of people with intersectional identities (Em talks from a place of white privilege in many episodes)
3) stop advertising products for companies that donate to Mike Pence and other right-wing politicians and presenting Vizzy as one of their foremost "initiatives"
4) any donations and funding they receive should go to actual community-based initiatives, they should be publishing reports about salaries and funds on Guidestar or Charity Navigator (they do not)
5) stop using such vulgar language on their podcast (another comment here mentioned it made them feel nauseous), as many straight people and young people and people with sexual trauma (as seen in comments on their other videos) DO use their podcast as an educational resource, because they present themselves as such, and right-wing commentators can take clips of it and twist it to fit their narrative.
From the Canada.ca website: "If a private benefit is more than incidental, an organization can face sanctions or have its charitable registration revoked."
If they did all that, then we would be fine with them maintaining their nonprofit status. Otherwise, it should be presented as a conversation between friends talking about personal experiences.
Alyson worked in the nonprofit sector for 5 years, which is why we are particularly passionate about this topic, as we know many many other organizations that deserve the visibility that Queer Collective has.
Many orgs turn down funding from organizations that are affiliated with right-wing politicians, and Queer Collective has not, making us feel like their activism is performative and privileged.
Also, at the time the episode we were discussing in this video was released, Em was going by she/her pronouns and was referred to as such in the very early episodes of Queer Collective we were looking at, and we had only seen Instagram posts from around this time, so those were the pronouns we used in our conversation- we were not aware that they now go by Em, and they/them! If we talk about them in the future, we will make sure to use Em's correct pronouns. Thank you to those of you who let us know - we did not mean to misgender them.
How would you feel if the founder of the Trevor Project, GLAAD, or the Human Rights Campaign published a video using words like "d*ck crazy" and telling lesbians to "F*ck a guy a year" while advertising and drinking alcoholic beverages made by a company that donated to Mike Pence? Why does Queer Collective get an exception, given their rapid growth? Our community deserves better representation than this.
๐๏ธ Subscribe to the podcast!ย
๐ Make sure to leave us a rating, review, and hit that subscribe button to help the algorithm find us!