Why won't Mark Zuckerberg post his kids on social media? We're talking about a movement toward pulling children off the internet entirely. We'll expose how a private profile cannot keep your family safe, and how corporate Terms of Service agreements use your private photos as data to train generative AI. We prove how mainstream recommendation algorithms promote predator networks, from early internet sharenting victims to home invasions.
🎙️ Subscribe to the podcast on Spotify and Apple Podcasts!
👍 Make sure to leave us a rating, review, and hit that subscribe button to help the algorithm find us!
Stick around to learn more about:
How an audit of 5,000 mom-run profiles shows that as a minor's account grows, the percentage of adult male followers skyrockets.
The specialized features allowing accounts to charge up to $250 a month for exclusive photos and private chat sessions with underage girls.
Why private photos are harvested from social media to train deep-learning facial recognition software and deepfake nudify apps.
The reality of growing up as a permanent digital asset, living in a twilight zone where teachers and peers have access to your home details.
The case of Ava Majury's stalker tracking her to orchestrate an armed home invasion, and a recent predator who used a 1,862-page, single-day text onslaught on TikTok to lure a child into a four-hour Uber ride.
What you can do to protect the next generation:
Commit to an absolute ban on public and private sharenting. Mask faces with emojis, take photos from behind.
Hit Not Interested or block family vlogging and mom-influencer accounts. Boycott brands that fund the exploitation of minors for content.
Push for Right to be Forgotten legislation allowing adults to wipe their childhood digital footprints.
If you notice suspicious saving spikes or timestamp tracking on minor imagery, report the post to Meta. If you think a child is at risk, report to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.
References:
Goodlet, E. (2025). The money behind mommy: Addressing the exploitation of kidfluencers on social media. The Business, Entrepreneurship & Tax Law Review, 9(2), 191–214.
Harrod, C. (2024). Influencer “sharenting” and the inherent conflict of interest. Cardozo Law Review, 45(4), 5–28.
Keller, M., & Valentino-DeVries, J. (2024). A marketplace of girl influencers managed by moms and stalked by men. The New York Times.
National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. (2024). Cybertipline analytic reports: The intersection of parental sharing and peer-to-peer dark web image distribution networks. NCMEC Forensic Unit Publications.
Public Broadcasting Service. (2024, May 15). The dangers of parents sharing their children's lives on social media. PBS NewsHour.
State of Illinois. (2023). Senate Bill 1782: An act concerning child labor and the financial safeguarding of minors featured in monetized social media content. Illinois General Assembly.
Stratman, A. (2024). Sharenting and exploitation: A content analysis of public reactions to the Wren Eleanor situation. Department of Sociology, MacEwan University.
The Cornell Undergraduate Law Review. (2025). The exploitation of children in family vlogging: Truman babies under the digital glare. CULSR Research Articles.
Westmoreland County District Attorney’s Office. (2025). Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. [Sealed Defendant]: Criminal complaint regarding algorithmic grooming, cross-county luring via paid rideshare services, and technology-facilitated sexual assault. Pennsylvania Judicial Records.
White, J. (2022). Stalked online and targeted at home: The Ava Majury case and the immediate need for digital footprint security for minors. Journal of Cyber Law and Interpersonal Security, 14(3), 112–135.