#dobetter Pod

#dobetter Pod

By Megan Miller & Joe SmithScience
Download on the App Store

#dobetter Pod episodes

  • Difficult Discussions #4: Research with Michael Crosby, Cailey Rodgers, and Megan Miller

    Welcome  to Difficult Discussions #4 on Research. I am Dr. Megan Miller and I am  pleased to welcome Cailey Rogers and Michael Crosby for tonight’s  discussion. The purpose of Difficult Discussions is to bring together  people with different perspectives and different identities to share  their perspectives on a topic that is typically considered taboo to  discuss, seen as controversial, and/or is well accepted but maybe should  involve more critical analysis and discussion. The format for these  events is as follows:

    None of the panelists will directly respond to anything the other panelists say except in Part 3.

    Part  1: Each person will briefly share any identities they are comfortable  sharing and indicate why they wanted to discuss this topic

    Part 2: Each person will provide about a 5-10 minute explanation of their history and perspectives with the topic.

    Part  3: Each panelist will briefly reflect on 1 thing said by one of the  panelist to share an a-ha moment or something they hadn’t considered  before

    Part 4: Each  panelist will share a closing thought about the topic. This might be an  action item, a key point they want listeners to carry with them, etc.

    The  views and opinions expressed in this Difficult Discussions video are  those of each individual person and do not necessarily reflect the  official policy or position of any affiliated company or professional  organization.  Thank you to everyone who is joining us live for this  discussion. Please remember that each of the individuals sharing within  this discussion are sharing their own personal stories and perspectives  and we expect everyone to be treated with respect, empathy, compassion,  and civility. We will do our best to monitor the chat and anyone who is  engaging in a manner that is not respectful of the discussion, that does  not demonstrate a commitment to listening to learn, sharing  perspectives, and/or is focused on making people wrong will be removed  from the chat.

    1 hr 2 min
  • S2 E4: All things Social Media with Ryan O'Donnell

    In this episode, Joe and Megan connect with Ryan O’Donnell to discuss some burning questions we had about social media, research, and everything in between. The format is slightly different, we each take about 5 minutes answering one of the show questions and then we reflect at the end of the episode about what we learned by listening to each other. Make sure to check out the resources linked below to learn more about the perspectives shared!

    Episode Resources shared by Megan:

    • Do Better Collective Ethics Webinar
    • Beaulieu, L., Addington, J., & Almeida, D. (2019). Behavior analysts’ training and practices regarding cultural diversity: The case for culturally competent care. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(3), 557-575. Bevill-Davis, A., Clees, T. J., & Gast, D. L. (2004). Correspondence training: A review of the literature. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 1(1), 13.
    • Critchfield, T. S., Doepke, K. J., Epting, L. K., Becirevic, A., Reed, D. D., Fienup, D. M., ... & Ecott, C. L. (2017). Normative emotional responses to behavior analysis jargon or how not to use words to win friends and influence people. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10(2), 97-106.
    • Klimecki, O. M. (2019). The role of empathy and compassion in conflict resolution. Emotion Review, 11(4), 310-325.
    • LaFrance, D. L., Weiss, M. J., Kazemi, E., Gerenser, J., & Dobres, J. (2019). Multidisciplinary teaming: Enhancing collaboration through increased understanding. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(3), 709-726.
    • McGill, O., & Robinson, A. (2020). 'Recalling hidden harms': autistic experiences of childhood Applied Behavioural Analysis (ABA). Advances in Autism.
    • Miller, K. L., Cruz, A. R., & Ala’i-Rosales, S. (2019). Inherent tensions and possibilities: Behavior analysis and cultural responsiveness. Behavior and Social Issues, 28(1), 16-36.
    • Museux, A. C., Dumont, S., Careau, E., & Milot, É. (2016). Improving interprofessional collaboration: The effect of training in nonviolent communication. Social work in health care, 55(6), 427-439.
    • Robinson, A., Galbraith, I., & Carrick, L. (2020). Practitioner experience of the impact of humanistic methods on autism practice: a preliminary study. Advances in Autism.
    • Taylor, B. A., LeBlanc, L. A., & Nosik, M. R. (2019). Compassionate care in behavior analytic treatment: Can outcomes be enhanced by attending to relationships with caregivers?. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(3), 654-666.
    • Tschaepe, M. (2018). Cultural Humility and Dewey’s Pattern of Inquiry: Developing Good Attitudes and Overcoming Bad Habits. contemporary pragmatism, 15(1), 152-164
    • Wright, P. I. (2019). Cultural humility in the practice of applied behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(4), 805-809.

      • Episode Resources shared by Ryan:

      • Kantor
      • Scientist Practitioner Book
      • Model Dependent Realism
        • 59 min
      • Wheel Decide Wednesday Dec 9th, 2020

        Wheel Decide Wednesday: A special feature of the #dobetter podcast. What topic will Dr. Megan Miller and Joe Smith discuss today? Tune in to find out!


        Check out these links we referenced in this chat:

        https://collective.dobettermovement.us/course/do-better-disrupt-racism-series-part-3-putting-learning-to-action/

        https://www.facebook.com/groups/dobetterreadtoaction

        https://www.facebook.com/groups/939507026480135


        19 min
      • Difficult Discussions #3: Talking to Children about Race with Stephanie Bolden and Adrienne Bradley

        The purpose of Difficult Discussions is to bring together people with  different perspectives and different identities to share their  perspectives on a topic that is typically considered taboo to discuss,  seen as controversial, and/or is well accepted but maybe should involve  more critical analysis and discussion. 

        The format for these events is as  follows:   None of the panelists will directly respond to anything the other  panelists say except in Part 3. 

        Part 1: Each person will briefly share any identities they are  comfortable sharing and indicate why they wanted to discuss this topic 

        Part 2: Each person will provide about a 5-10 minute explanation of  their history and perspectives with the topic.  

        Part 3: Each panelist will briefly reflect on 1 thing said by one of the  panelist to share an a-ha moment or something they hadn’t considered  before 

        Part 4: Each panelist will share a closing thought about the topic. This  might be an action item, a key point they want listeners to carry with  them, etc.     

        The views and opinions expressed in this Difficult Discussions video are  those of each individual person and do not necessarily reflect the  official policy or position of any affiliated company or professional  organization.  Thank you to everyone who is joining us live for this  discussion. Please remember that each of the individuals sharing within  this discussion are sharing their own personal stories and perspectives  and we expect everyone to be treated with respect, empathy, compassion,  and civility. We will do our best to monitor the chat and anyone who is  engaging in a manner that is not respectful of the discussion, that does  not demonstrate a commitment to listening to learn, sharing  perspectives, and/or is focused on making people wrong will be removed  from the chat.

        1 hr 5 min
      • S2E3: Wise Feedback interview with Dr. Bettina Casad and Julie Preuss, BCBA

        In this episode, we have two special guests: Dr. Bettina Casad and Julie Preuss, BCBA. Dr. Megan Miller met with Dr. Casad to learn more about her research article Wise psychological interventions to improve gender and racial equality in STEM that was published in the Journal of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations in 2018. Julie served as a co-moderator and provides insightful questions and makes connections between Dr. Casad’s research and behavior analysis.

        Resources Mentioned in this Episode:

        • Social Class Susan Fisk
        • Wise psychological interventions (Casad et al., 2018)
        • Breaking the cycle of mistrust (Yeager et al., 2014)
        • No Stupid Questions: How do you handle criticism?
          • 1 hr 51 min

        About #dobetter Pod

        From the publisher's feed

        A professional development initiative for behavior analysts

        More shows like #dobetter Pod

        The How to ABA Podcast by Shira Karpel & Shayna Gaunt

        The How to ABA Podcast

        60 Listeners