
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Haaland v. Brackeen, which could strike down the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).
The ICWA was intended to prevent Native children from being separated from their tribes and families. It was enacted in 1978 in response to US Government practices that forcibly removed hundreds of thousands of Native children from their homes.
We speak with Rebecca Nagle, a freelance writer and member of the Cherokee Nation, about what this new challenge in the Supreme Court could mean for ICWA and the SCOTUS precedents it could overrule.
4.3
712712 ratings
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Haaland v. Brackeen, which could strike down the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).
The ICWA was intended to prevent Native children from being separated from their tribes and families. It was enacted in 1978 in response to US Government practices that forcibly removed hundreds of thousands of Native children from their homes.
We speak with Rebecca Nagle, a freelance writer and member of the Cherokee Nation, about what this new challenge in the Supreme Court could mean for ICWA and the SCOTUS precedents it could overrule.
6,183 Listeners
459 Listeners
9,168 Listeners
665 Listeners
3,761 Listeners
916 Listeners
38,520 Listeners
43,789 Listeners
316 Listeners
90,828 Listeners
37,873 Listeners
27,086 Listeners
913 Listeners
11,504 Listeners
32,073 Listeners
926 Listeners
8,243 Listeners
43,329 Listeners
6,639 Listeners
11,912 Listeners
4,629 Listeners
320 Listeners
1,876 Listeners
16,093 Listeners
1,512 Listeners