
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Haaland v. Brackeen, which could strike down the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).
The ICWA was intended to prevent Native children from being separated from their tribes and families. It was enacted in 1978 in response to US Government practices that forcibly removed hundreds of thousands of Native children from their homes.
We speak with Rebecca Nagle, a freelance writer and member of the Cherokee Nation, about what this new challenge in the Supreme Court could mean for ICWA and the SCOTUS precedents it could overrule.
By WNYC and PRX4.3
712712 ratings
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Haaland v. Brackeen, which could strike down the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA).
The ICWA was intended to prevent Native children from being separated from their tribes and families. It was enacted in 1978 in response to US Government practices that forcibly removed hundreds of thousands of Native children from their homes.
We speak with Rebecca Nagle, a freelance writer and member of the Cherokee Nation, about what this new challenge in the Supreme Court could mean for ICWA and the SCOTUS precedents it could overrule.

38,494 Listeners

6,779 Listeners

25,764 Listeners

11,652 Listeners

321 Listeners

3,984 Listeners

1,572 Listeners

934 Listeners

8,432 Listeners

466 Listeners

719 Listeners

1,002 Listeners

309 Listeners

3,784 Listeners

923 Listeners

14,616 Listeners

4,661 Listeners

112,022 Listeners

326 Listeners

1,889 Listeners

7,225 Listeners

16,340 Listeners

15,835 Listeners

1,555 Listeners

1,584 Listeners