Due Diligence by Sasha Latypova Podcast

I am on my way to the Netherlands for the first substantive hearing in the case against the orchestrators of Project Covid on behalf of injured and deceased victims of Pfizer mRNA injections on October 22 at 12:30pm in Leeuwarden, NL. Livestream link from the court if you want to listen live is here:

https://www.rechtspraak.nl/livestreams

Please not that rules apply to this livestream which are stated on this page, though you can share to your social media platforms.

There will be a press conference starting at around 7:30pm Central European time, and it will be streamed on Rumble, YouTube, Facebook and X. Links will be available on www.TheNetherlandsCase.com

Please help me share the information about this case on your social media. Here is my short clip posted on X today:

In the meantime, I am republishing this video from the previous hearing the the court of appeals in Amsterdam from March 9, 2026.

To keep up to date with the case, here is the website in English:

Art for today: Still Life with Green Goldfinches, oil on panel 16x16 in.

In this 40 min video Debbie Lerman and I are discussing the evolving propaganda narratives. Specifically, MAHA puppets are carrying water for the bio-chemical weapons Pandemic Preparedness cartel. Many of these accounts are desperately trying to convince you of the looming threat of “engineered pathogens” escaping from labs. This requires “mandatory countermeasures”, including new government agencies, and money! They are begging Bobby to make covid crimes permanent and well funded.

We discussed this MAHA pearl (a year old, but very relevant right now):

I have previously extensively discussed the “engineered pathogen leaks” narrative:

In preparation for this discussion with Debbie, I ran a quick AI search for all known illness and death cases due to leaks from (biosafety level) BSL3 and BSL4 laboratories world wide. I added some comments to it.

ChatGPT output:

There is no reliable global year-by-year count of cases and deaths caused by accidental leaks from BSL-3/BSL-4 laboratories. The available literature is incomplete, and an important distinction is needed between laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs)—people infected while working with pathogens—and actual escapes from containment that infect people outside the laboratory.

The best available evidence suggests the numbers are very small.

What the evidence shows

A 2024 Lancet Microbe scoping review searched worldwide reports from 2000–2021 and found:

* 16 documented accidental pathogen escapes (APELS).

* These involved Bacillus anthracis, SARS-CoV, poliovirus, Brucella, foot-and-mouth disease virus, variola virus, Burkholderia pseudomallei, and H5N1 influenza.

* The review explicitly warns that the numbers are biased downward because reporting is incomplete and relies on publicly available information.

* This is quite different from the 309 laboratory-acquired infections and 8 deaths found during the same period; most of those were infections of laboratory personnel rather than infections caused by a pathogen escaping into the community.

The underlying review provides some examples. For instance, documented external releases include anthrax incidents in the US and UK, poliovirus incidents, and several SARS-CoV laboratory incidents. Some releases produced zero human cases, while others produced a handful of infections.

Additional examples of world ending catastrophes:

* 2004, Russia — Ebola: one laboratory worker was infected and died following a laboratory accident.

* 2003–2004, Singapore/China/Taiwan — SARS-CoV: laboratory accidents resulted in infections, including secondary transmission in some cases. No deaths reported. These are SARS-CoV claimed to be deadlier than SARS-CoV-2.

* Other documented releases of anthrax, poliovirus, H5N1, Brucella, etc., frequently resulted in zero human infections despite potentially serious containment failures.

Another source, a 2025 systematic review covering 2000–2024 found 712 reported laboratory-acquired infections, with 13 deaths across research and clinical laboratories—but again, those are LAIs, not community infections from high-containment laboratory.

What if we look over 125 years (1900-2025)?

The most comprehensive recent analysis found examined 1,126 laboratory-associated incidents worldwide from 1900–2025. It identified 81 fatalities and 148 laboratory-associated outbreaks, but this dataset includes laboratory infections, exposures and releases across all containment levels and historical periods.

So, what is the annual number of world ending leaks of “deadly pathogens”?

For confirmed human infections caused by accidental escape from BSL-3/BSL-4 facilities, excluding SARS-CoV-2, the defensible answer is:

Best-supported conclusion:

* 2000–2002: Very few documented cases; no evidence of a substantial global burden

* 2003–2004: Several SARS-CoV laboratory-associated cases, including secondary transmission

* 2005–2010: Sporadic incidents; generally zero or very few human cases from external escapes

* 2011–2015Several documented containment failures, but generally 0 confirmed human cases from the releases

* 2016–2020Sporadic incidents; no evidence of sustained community outbreaks attributable to BSL-3/4 leaks

* 2021–2025: Some additional incidents reported, but no reliable global case/death denominator

Overall, 2000–2021: 16 documented accidental pathogen escapes, but the published literature does not provide a defensible single total of resulting human cases/deaths

ChatGPT had a stroke, having found a “striking finding” that leaking pathogens do not cause anything at all:

The striking finding is actually that documented accidental escapes are rare, and most documented containment failures do not result in human infection. At the same time, the literature emphasizes that under-reporting is substantial, so “rarely documented” should not be interpreted as “risk is zero.”

Yeah, it’s technically not zero, but in practice - a big f-ing zero!

Why are we supposed to treat the “leaking pathogens” as potentially world-ending events, and clamor for international “bio surveillance” when they are simply tragic cases of lapses in laboratory safety protocols? Yes, bad accidents can happen when you work with hazardous chemicals. Safety protocols exist to prevent them, and we do not require another layer of bio-fascism from the government to keep us “safe”!

I ran another ChatGPT query:

What about work related accidents for the same period worldwide?

There is no credible worldwide database that gives a cumulative number of hospitalizations and deaths specifically from accidental workplace chemical incidents in laboratories and other hazardous-chemical facilities since 2000. The data are much better for all occupational injuries and for long-term occupational chemical exposures than for the narrower category you’re asking about.

What we can say with reasonable confidence

The International Labour Organization estimates that in 2019:

* about 330,000 people died from occupational accidents worldwide;

* about 2.6 million additional people died from work-related diseases. ILOSTAT+1

* There were approximately 395 million non-fatal occupational injuries worldwide that year. International Labour Organization

But those figures include construction, transportation, agriculture, mining, manufacturing, etc.—not merely chemical facilities.

For chemicals specifically, the ILO estimates that more than 1 billion workers are exposed to hazardous substances annually, and roughly 1 million deaths per year are associated with hazardous-chemical exposure. However, that figure includes chronic diseases such as cancer and respiratory disease, not simply accidents, explosions, spills or acute poisonings.

WHO similarly estimates about 2 million deaths in 2019 from selected chemical exposures, but emphasizes that this covers only a subset of chemicals and exposure pathways.

Laboratories are a much smaller category

For laboratories specifically, the evidence is dramatically smaller but also much less complete.

One review of reported laboratory accidents found 49 fatalities from 34 laboratory accidents since 2000 in its dataset. Twenty-three of those accidents occurred in the United States and 11 at universities.

That 49 is not a worldwide census. It is a compilation of reported incidents, and it doesn’t provide a corresponding reliable number of hospitalizations.

We can establish that the number is far below the millions of deaths associated with occupational disease/chemical exposure, but we cannot responsibly turn the available incident databases into a worldwide hospitalization/death rate.

And importantly, the laboratory-specific evidence indicates that fatal accidents are measured in tens rather than hundreds of thousands in the documented literature since 2000. That doesn’t mean only tens actually occurred worldwide—it reflects substantial under-reporting and the absence of a global reporting system.

Additional topics discussed in this video:

Article by Jon Fleetwood discussing the reward to the military bioweapons crime cartel issued by MAHA admin/Jay Battacharya. 1/3 of NIAID money will be transferred to Pentagon to continue making bio-chemical poisons and passing them onto the public as “safe and effective vaccines”, but now in a totally non-disclosable way. So that next time people like me and Debbie cannot investigate any contracts or documentation, it will be all military secret:

Ed Dowd wrote a very good article about the AI panic mega-psyop launched via a sock puppet Jason Coxon:

Art for today: Mr. Parrot, oil on panel, 11x14 in.

:

I have spent 5+ years now investigating arguably the worst crime in the recorded human history - the faked pandemic, attack on civilian populations by their own government and military forces, in lockstep in most countries of the world. This crime has not stopped and is ongoing, now lead by the people who promised accountability, justice and reform, but delivered more of the same atrocities.

Joe has published a new book, which I highly recommend: “Psychopathic Authoritarianism. A Disease of the Soul”

In this conversation, we discuss the following questions:

Defining Evil: When we use the word “evil,” what are we talking about from a psychological perspective?

Do you believe there are genuinely evil people, or is it more accurate to say that people commit evil acts?

Is evil something that objectively exists within human nature, or is it something that develops through experience?

Where Does Evil Come From: Can a normal, psychologically healthy person commit evil?

The Psychology of Evil: Is evil always connected to a lack of empathy? Can someone have empathy and still deliberately do terrible things?

What role do narcissism, psychopathy, antisocial personality traits, or other personality characteristics play in what we call evil?

Is a psychopath necessarily an evil person?

Does evil look evil? Can charming, successful, and completely normal people be capable of profound evil?

Is it evil to rationalize behavior that is objectively morally wrong?

The Uncomfortable Questions: Could any of us become capable of doing something we currently consider evil under the right—or wrong—circumstances?

I encourage all of you to initiate similar conversation with your friends and family members. Joe Sansone’s book maybe a good conversation starter. I believe the education on these topics is thoroughly lacking in our society. Let’s change that.

Please provide your thoughts in comments.

Art for today: Plein air in Sonoma, watercolor, 8x10in.

Note: Substack changed the setting on this post to “paid subs”. I noticed strange changes like these lately (new forms of censorship?) I have updated the settings and it is now open to all subs.

Link to video on Rumble.

Scott Schara lost his daughter Grace to the covid hospital murder protocol, enabled and financially incentivized by the Pandemic Preparedness Crime Cartel maintained under both, Trump and Biden Administrations. While I never met Grace in person, painting someone’s portrait lets the artist learn about the person, whether they are here, in our material plane, or have left it. Thus, I got to meet Grace, a beautiful and highly intelligent soul who is now with Christ. She will be remembered always.

Despite the harshest loss anyone can endure, her father Scott continues to shine the light on the war crimes that are being committed by the US Government against the American people under pretenses of a faked “pandemic” and further pretenses of “botched” response, and now with a theatrical “prosecution” of a singled-out villain, Dr. Fauci.

Scott’s faith and commitment to the truth are inspiring. Please follow him on Substack Our Amazing Grace's Newsletter.

Art for today: Our Amazing Grace Schara, oil on panel, 16x20 in.

On Sunday, May 24, Debbie Lerman and I got together over zoom to discuss the newly minted limited edition (so we are told) [fake] pandemic of mouse poop declared by Bobby under the PREP Act… and all the nauseating propaganda that has been unleased by the MAHActivists who see no problem with Bobby using the unconstitutional PREP Act, because … “it’s ok when our guy does it!”

Just as with Patriot Act or any other awful piece of civil rights-destroying US law, it’s bad when the other party uses it to commit crimes and launder money to themselves. But in the hands of OUR GUY, it’s a precision tool for health, freedom and prosperity. And if you don’t see it that way - you are a BETRAYING TRAITOR!

My previous article about Bobby stepping into mouse doo-doo big time:

My previous article about the “Japanese pill” so urgently needed to fight the fake mouse doo-doo. Upon review of this article, you will realize that mouse doo-doo is much preferrable to this “rapid response life$$$aving liability freeeee! EUA countermeasure”:

I mean, you can empower yourself with “Bobby’s limited edition”, liability-free EUA poison shipped from Japan, or you can just adopt a servicemember of the Hantavirus Defense Force (HDF) … you decide, citizen:

This got MAHActivists spun-up in no time…

Bob Malone’s expertly nauseating propaganda piece, mansplaining that Limited Abominations(TM) are akshually good for you.

* Targeted!

* Responsible!

* Empowering!

It’s not your grandpa Biden’s Covid 2.0, kids! No! This Limited AbominationTM is going to save lives in a responsible common sense way!

And here is another shameless Trump ass-kisser, MAHA-propagandist, Jeff Childers, opining on what constitutes a “real betrayal!!!”… this legal eagle is not shy about defaming real people and calling them “bot accounts”:

MAHA’s enemies instantly sprang to work, using their bot accounts to convince MAHA people that Kennedy had, once again, betrayed the movement he started. He’s launching another legally protected pandemic! The false narrative quickly gained momentum, and given the setup, you can imagine the furious knee-jerk reactions, if you haven’t already seen some of them.

Here are just three examples:

Wow, what a creep!

While I do not always agree with all of their opinions, Mary, Shannon and Kelly are real women, who use their real names and identities online. They are not “bot accounts”. They are honest, sincere, hard workers who have helped thousands of people, while withstanding continuous attacks. It is a low character trait to smear people and to call them names because they are concerned about abridgment of their civil rights.

Asking questions about fake pandemics and regulation & liability free EUA poison being trafficked from Japan makes me and my colleagues the “betraying traitors”, according to Jeff:

So, please. Come on. He issued a PREP Act declaration for a Japanese pill that he presumably thinks might help a handful of people trapped in this limited outbreak; an outbreak that (so far as I know) nobody is calling fake. Would it make a difference if the Hondius passengers now in quarantine said they wanted it? How is this any kind of “betrayal?” To whom? Of what? I’m open to hearing the argument, but I just don’t see it.

There is a different betrayal, though. Whoever ginned up this fake narrative and fueled all the hot takes is the one betraying MAHA. They are trying to fracture the MAGA/MAHA coalition. They are the betraying traitors.

We are not “betraying traitors”. We simply do not see ANY use of the PREP Act as a benign activity. A limited atrocity is still an atrocity and it matters zilch to us that it’s “our guy”, Bobby Kennedy committing it now. In fact, Bobby is on video admitting this Act is unconstitutional, evil law.

Jeff Childers styles himself as a health freedom attorney, and, to his credit, has filed some cases, representing victims of the PREP Act-enabled murder masquerading as “public health”. Jeff is also on record challenging the constitutionality of the PREP Act (Moms v Becerra, 2024):

This is not one sentence out of context. The entire filing contains a lot of specifics about unconstitutionality of the PREP Act.

Now, herein is a bit of a problem. By the way, this is why licensed practicing attorneys should abstain from political hacktivism online. Jeff is running some ethical risks here. While lawyers are not required to hold personally consistent political beliefs across all contexts, still, some questions may arise, especially given Jeff’s vitriol against people who are sincerely concerned about already well established violations of their rights by the government under the same legal doctrine. Specifically, the following questions should be asked by Jeff’s clients:

* Was the above court filing made in good faith, or was it purely for tactical, financial or political purposes?

* Do Jeff’s online statements undermine his candor in court? An opposing counsel could potentially use that inconsistency to attack his credibility or sincerity.

* If Jeff told his clients that PREP Act is facially unconstitutional (as it seems to be phrased in para 3 above), while privately believing that “it’s ok if Bobby says it’s only for 2 months, trust the plan bro”, there could potentially be issues involving competence, communication, or misrepresentation.

Readers, the lesson here: don’t let the government tell you you need the PREP Act for a problem an average house cat can solve in a few days. It’s time for Jeff to rename his stack into “Hantavirus in Your Coffee”. Covid is so passe!

Art for today: Green Jacket, oil on panel 11x14 in.

This post is a trip down the memory lane. First I would like to quote my colleague and friend Debbie Lerman’s yesterday’s post:

The Covid dissidents were rebranded as MAHA – Make American Healthy Again – a coalition ostensibly working to bring Covid justice once RFK Jr. was appointed to a high public health position.

In actuality, MAHA is a public relations and marketing project run by corporate and political deep state entities, aimed at re-directing the righteous, nonpartisan, civil rights-focused health freedom movement into a docile, politically toothless self-help/healthy-lifestyle consumer coalition, with plenty of grifters and opportunists to top it off.

Nevertheless, many remain loyal to the ideal of RFK Jr. as a Covid dissident leader and health freedom warrior.

For the record, I never affiliated myself with MAHA, because I recognized the fakery of that “movement” for what it was from Day 1. About a year ago, several of us, including Shannon Joy, Mary Talley Bowden MD, Dr Naomi Wolf co-authored an open letter to RFK Jr., trying to remind him of his campaign promises. The text of the letter is at the end of this post. It was all for naught. Not only did Kennedy not do anything we asked him to, but he continued dancing on Trump/pharma leash, turning “Eat Real Food” tricks, rolling over for a rogue federal judge by walking back all CDC schedule changes, disbanding ACIP and now removing any references about mRNA, requirements for a toxicologist and a data scientist, or even a requirement for regular meetings from the “new” ACIP charter, too. On Wednesday, May 20, this was posted by HHS as a list of the “most sweeping public health reforms in modern history”:

Gosh, I am nostalgic for the Soviet propaganda, because they were never quite so cringe…

I could write a few comedy skits based on these nauseating bullet points, but honestly, I am tired and all I feel is sadness. Were you secretly indulging in unreal food but Mike Tyson scared you straight? If you are a SNAP recipient, are you overjoyed that Bobby enabled your state to take away more of your benefits? Are you feeling like any of this nonsense is going to make your children healthier as you frantically try to shield them from poison jabs? Is this going to put a dent into the skyrocketing chronic disease in this country? Finally, is any of this going to bring accountability or justice for covid and mRNA atrocities committed by the US Government against us, the people? However, I can tell you the good news: these “reforms” will make Trump and his cronies richer from self-dealing, looting, pay-to-play and insider trading schemes! That was the most sweeping part of these alleged “health reforms”.

The video clip above is cut from my 2023 interview with RFK Jr as evidence that he is fully aware of the powers of HHS Secretary to remove PREP Act declarations for covid, and the significance of these declarations (license to kill, liability shield for mass murder with EUA countermeasures). I told him of the powers HHS Secretary has under the PREP Act back in 2023, and it appeared he took careful notes. He subsequently obtained the position of HHS Scy … and decided to uphold the PREP Act liability shield for the mRNA/covid crime cartel.

As evident from the full 2023 interview, he knows quite a lot about this topic:

It is not complicated. Having a clear, principled, truth-based position is a hallmark of an honorable man who is fit for a leadership role in a civilized society. Abandoning your own principles to pander to the “other side” is the opposite of it, and it only backfires. Here is a recent example: Kennedy gets caught in a lie, live on air, by CNN. Transcript:

CNN: over the summer you said, quote “no vaccine is safe and effective.” Do you still believe that?

RFK Jr: I never said that!

CNN: So, stop, we have the clip, let’s play the clip…

CNN plays RFK JR (clip): “There’s no vaccine that is safe and effective.” (March 2024)

I wonder why is it so difficult for RFK Jr. to defend his own truth-based position? It is impossible to develop any kind of “safe and effective vaccine" whatsoever - that’s the truth! The public health demons themselves call it “unavoidably unsafe”. Even if RFK Jr. misspoke (and CNN took that out of context) - i.e., even if he sincerely believes that there is a possibility to make a “safe” vaccine, still, vaccination harms must be addressed head on. Vaccinations are a death lottery, where one of the well documented "paradoxical reactions" is a lifelong disability or death! No product that can kill you (even if only occasionally) can be legally considered “safe”. Something along these lines was the appropriate response to the obnoxious CNN presstitute, instead of behaving like a toddler who got caught stealing cookies!

“No vaccine is safe or effective” is a true statement, which Kennedy before 2025 would have had no problem defending with volumes of scientific evidence he could cite from memory. What happened to that man since 2025? Why attempt to pander to the CNN audience, only to be immediately caught and nationally embarrassed?

But please, it’s our own fault that we fell for Bobby Kennedy! Because he told us years ago. Here is Kennedy years ago warning about what Kennedy will do once in a position of power in the US government. Transcript:

People in authority lie! And if we all… are going to continue to live in a democracy, we need to understand that people in authority lie, people in authority will abuse every power that we relinquish to them.

Yup. He told us. People in power lie, and he will do so, once in power, too.

At this point, I typically get comments like:

“But he will get fired by Trump if he does anything he said he’d do on the campaign trail!”

“But what if there is someone else running HHS????”

I hear ya! However, how would you notice the difference? Precisely, what manifestations of not-Bobby running HHS should we expect, if not-Bobby’s hands will be tied by the same controllers as Bobby’s hands are tied and for the same reasons - to protect the government’s population control tools and pharma’s profit extraction machinery under the fake labels of “vaccination for public health”?

Yes, he told me himself that Trump won’t let him touch the PREP Act declarations. I do not consider this a valid excuse, because he knew the bargain when he agreed to join Trump’s campaign. He just forgot to tell the terms of this bargain to his base. Instead, he and Trump both told us that “Bobby will go wild on health!” when they needed our votes. Kennedy voluntarily tied his own hands.

Treating Kennedy as a victim of Trump is not helpful; he is Trump’s key cabinet member, an important collaborator and enabler. His agency has double the official budget of the DOD (DOW). Why are we supposed to treat him as a damsel in distress, or a little boy “Bobby” kidnapped by villain Trump? By the same token, we can say, Fauci’s hands were always tied, Baric’s hands were always tied, Alber Bourla’s hands are also tied - have you tried running a publicly traded company, reporting to the board, shareholders and Wall Street? Have some appreciation of the difficulties involved! A private pharma company cannot legally refuse a priority rated order from the DOD under the Defense Production Act to produce and ship millions of doses of mRNA poison. If they do, the CEO and key management will definitely be fired and they can be prosecuted for treason, too. Therefore, is Bourla also a Trump’s hostage?

Whose hands are free in the government? Trump’s? No! He is doing what his financial/control file owners tell him to do. So, why is “tied hands” a good excuse for some but not other actors?

To date RFK Jr has delivered zero on his campaign promises and lost most of his appointees at HHS. The FDA has been effectively gutted - no CBER or CDER leadership remains, except for the food division guy who is now holding practically all senior leadership offices. The latest departure was Tracy Hoeg, after a brief stint as CDER head. No reason cited. None of these people even know (or will admit) who made the decision to fire them and why! RFK Jr and his team have been chewed up and spit out by the deep state puppet masters whose MAHA script he dutifully followed… yet, the “other” side still hates him just as much!

Let this be a lesson: nobody likes a traitor. Was it worth it, Bobby?

Text of the open letter to RFK Jr, published a year ago, with annotations on what happened since then:

May 31, 2025

Dear HHS Secretary Kennedy and FDA Commissioner Dr. Makary,We are writing this open letter to express deep concerns about recent policies emerging from HHS, the CDC and the FDA: specifically, the omission of the dangerous mRNA injections from the recently released “MAHA Report”; and the reaffirmation of the CDC’s recommendations for mRNA injections. Removal of the mRNA platform from the market is one of the main goals of the grassroots MAHA movement. [May 2026: mRNA shots remain on CDC schedule and new mRNA vaccines have been approved without placebo-controlled studies. Moderna’s mRNA flu shot will be approved in the fall. Additionally, mRNA shots are being rolled out for pets and livestock, and as toxic and futile “gene therapies”.]

Millions of concerned parents set aside partisan differences and identities to embrace the historic MAGA/MAHA alliance. Instead of policy action on these key issues, we, the undersigned, along with many other citizens, see a set of distractions, linguistic misdirections, and watered-down policy announcements that avoid taking serious action on the deadly mRNA injections. [May 2026: I called out MAHA=Anything But Vaccines policy designed by the deep state represented by Calley Means beginning in September 2024. It was designed to protect the vaccine franchise as the population control and financial harvesting machinery. It was also designed to paint anyone who speaks about vaccine harms as a “crank”, “fringe” and “crazy radical” as Bob Malone painted all the co-signatories of this letter. I must admit, it was a brilliant strategy, because it worked.]

Contrary to what Dr. Makary recently stated, we do not need more data to establish whether the mRNA platform should or should not be recommended. The data are in, from many credible sources, including numerous peer reviewed publications, the analysis of the Pfizer documents released via Aaron Siri’s lawsuit, VAERS and vSAFE datasets, and data produced by foreign governments. The data show catastrophic levels of deaths and serious damage from the mRNA injections, as well as reproductive damage, including high miscarriage rates. [May 2026: I have further demonstrated that the increase in miscarriages in mRNA vaxxed women of ~400% was already detected by CDC in February 2021, i.e. just 6 weeks into the vax rollout. No investigation, accountability, or product labeling updates have been issued. Makary has been fired/resigned from the FDA Commissioner post earlier this month.]We do not need more studies to pull the mRNA injections from the market. You do not need Congress nor another election. You do not need a new mandate from voters – your own appointments to HHS and the FDA, and the election of President Trump in the MAGA-MAHA alliance, are the mandate.Indeed, your recent wordplay about “removing” the mRNA injection from being recommended to “pregnant women” and “healthy children” appears misleading, vis-à-vis the actual policy changes published by the FDA and CDC. The published policies reserve the power to “recommend” them for every child except the “healthy”.Most US children, as you, Secretary Kennedy, have pointed out yourself, have health issues, and healthcare encounters often involve a currently sick child who may be labeled “immunocompromised.” If a child has asthma or allergies, pre-diabetes or is overweight, has a damaged heart or an impaired immune system, that child is not “healthy,” yet that child will now be targeted with an mRNA shot. It appears that you are going to continue to recommend the shots that now have an FDA warning for heart damage, to children with heart damage. [May 2026: All CDC schedule changes and reductions made in 2025 have been erased and overturned on March 16, 2026 by the federal judge’s decision when American Academy or Satanic Witches Pediatrics sued HHS and Kennedy.]

The new FDA Covid shot policy claims to be evidence-based. However, no evidence was provided, and none exists to our knowledge, that supports statements that the categories of people marked as “vulnerable” by this FDA policy, would benefit from mRNA injections. [The policy, copy-pasted from the Biden era by Makary and Prasad, harked in very obvious ways to Eugenics - those who are deemed “vulnerable” must be gently pushed off the cliff by the mRNA shots for “greater protection”. For example, people who have pre-existing cardiovascular disease must get the shots that carry FDA’s warning for myocarditis. This ingenious policy was used to approve new mNexSpike from Moderna without placebo controlled safety studies. The policy is now irrelevant. Makary and Prasad were not the brightest bulbs out there, and both are gone from the FDA now. It remains to be seen who will be the last person out of the FDA to turn all the lights off.] Conflating clearly established risks with automatically assumed benefit from a product that is still legally a poorly-regulated, liability-free EUA Countermeasure under PREP Act emergency declaration, defies scientific reason and common sense.You stated the shots were removed from the CDC recommendation for pregnant women. But pregnancy remains listed as a “high risk” health category in the revised FDA policy for mRNA vaccines. It is especially troubling that the new versions of mRNA injections are recommended for all pregnant women, without this platform ever having been tested and proven safe in pregnancy. Pregnant women have not been made any safer by your wordplay.Lastly, there is evidence of the removal of parental rights to choose the health treatment for their children, buried in CDC’s language. Even for healthy children, the CDC insists on parents “sharing the decision” with healthcare providers, including pharmacists who lack authority to treat patients. By stating the decision to inject a child with mRNA is a “shared decision”, while “routine” injections are treated as the “default decision to inject”, a dangerous legal precedent is being set, assigning powers to the Federal government that have legally belong only to parents.We object strongly to any more equivocation and prevarication from HHS. We did not fight for you to be in positions of leadership, so that our clearly stated policy goals would suffer a “bait and switch” that rebrands MAHA’s powerful objection to the damaging mRNA platform as a concern about the coloring agents added to Skittles.MAHA is not the possession of Secretary Kennedy, Commissioner Marty Makary, advisor Calley Means, or Surgeon General nominee Dr. Casey Means. MAHA is the voice of millions of desperate parents, many with injured or deceased children. Those furious parents were active before any of you were in office, and their activism will outlast any administration.The MAHA vote, especially of independent moms, is an historic game-changer. Neither MAGA nor the Democrats could have won without this critical swing vote.MAHA voters can walk away if we continue to see inaction, let alone condescending non-policy, on our core issues.And we will.If you continue to ignore the centerpiece of our policy agenda – taking all mRNA products covered by PREP Act emergency declarations entirely off the market – you will pay a political price. We will run our own candidates at the state level; and we will find other challengers and sponsors, who share our values and get behind our draft bills, at the Federal level, for the midterms and even for 2028. We ask you to deliver our actual policy goals in the near term, or we advise that you will face the electoral consequences. [None of the thigs that we requested below have materialized, and the electoral consequences that we predicted are coming home to roost. In addition, Trump’s disastrous military adventures in Iran will end his admin in massive fuel price hikes, inflation, death of the petrodollar, and global supply chain disruptions. Trump is clearly gearing up for a landslide loss in the fall, hastily writing himself and his family pardons from tax crimes past and future, and building an underground bunker called “Ball Room” under the White House… Meanwhile, Bobby is flopping in the wind, turned from a formidable opposition leader into a confused puppy, indeed. Masterful job, the deep state, absolutely masterful!]

* Ban mRNA/gene therapy-derived technologies for all vaccines, due to definitivelydemonstrated abject failure regarding safety, efficacy and disease prevention in the real-world setting of over 4 years of deployment and billions of administered doses.

* Terminate the PREP Act declaration for COVID injections, as there is no emergency. Extension of this declaration, with its ironclad liability shield for manufacturers and administrators, serves no public health interest whatsoever.

* Recommend that Congress repeal the PREP Act entirely, due to numerous Constitutional conflicts.

* Ban pharmaceutical direct-to-consumer advertising, as is the case in every other country except New Zealand.

* Review and revise current HHS level policies that create perverse incentives forhealthcare providers for medical coercion, including but not limited to vaccinations.

* End conflicts of interest at CDC, FDA, NIH and NIAID.Sincerely,

Co-signatories:Mary Talley Bowden MD, Americans for Health FreedomDr Naomi Wolf, The Pfizer PapersShannon Joy, The Shannon Joy ShowSasha Latypova, Due Diligence and ArtDebbie Lerman Dr. Henry Ealy, Energetic Health InstituteBrad Skistimas, Five Times AugustToby Rogers Catherine Austin Fitts, The Solari Report Allen and Taylor Martin, in memory of Trista MartinThomas Haviland, 2022, 2023, and 2024 “Worldwide Embalmer Blood Clot Surveys”

Art for today: Tuesday, oil on panel, 12x20 in. Available art here.

This video is the recording from the Health and Wellness Summit, organized by my friend Shannon Joy which took place in Rochester, NY, on March 22, 2026. The key note speaker at this event was William Makis, and I hope his presentation will be released at some point soon. For now, it is not publicly available due to his ongoing legal battle with the government of Alberta, Canada.

Some of the articles which are referenced in this presentation:

Here is the peer reviewed study showing that vaccines are the primary driver of chronic illness (discussed with Joy Garner in “The Control Group” video above). The most crucial finding from this study is the following:

As noted in the Full Report on page 42, only 2.64% (or 27 of 1,024) of the post-birth unvaccinated controls (all ages) who also avoided exposure to the vitamin K shot and pregnancy vaccines, reported any disorders or disease conditions. That percentage 2.64% of persons in the Control Group Survey with no post-birth exposures to vaccines, no post-birth injection of vitamin K and, also, with no pre-birth vaccines administered to their mothers during her pregnancy, provides the baseline—the “background rate” —of reported conditions from all other possible causes in all ages combined.

The significance of this cannot be overstated:

1. Vaccines are responsible for 95%+ of ALL chronic illness at any age!

2. Everything else combined (!!!) accounts for about 2-5% of chronic illness at any age!

Note, of course, bad habits and self harm are significant causes of illness, but we are talking about average Americans exposed to average American environment, food, lifestyle, etc. All other things that RFK Jr./MAHA propaganda op is trying to distract you with - “toxic food! (TM)”, pesticides, chemtrails, parasites, nanobots, EMF, cellphone towers, food dyes, food pyramid, Big Jell-o in hospitals, Big Soda, sugar, carbs, seed oils, antisemitism and microplastics - all of these are largely insignificant as causes of chronic illness or lack thereof.

As usual, if anyone has scientific data proving otherwise, please post in comments and I will review, and if convincing, I will adjust my opinion on this matter.

Announcement for New Yorkers:

Dear Readers in NY state: Shannon Joy is running for Lieutenant Governor together with Larry Sharpe’s for Governor of NYS.

They are running as an independent coalition ticket and their main platform is anti-corruption and “very aggressive health freedom agenda”. Knowing Shannon, I can assure everyone this is going to be a very real health freedom agenda and not another MAHA-fake. New York needs a true liberation team. I am excited for Shannon and urge New Yorkers to support the Sharpe-Joy ticket. They need to secure 45,000 signatures in the next 5 weeks. Please consider signing their petition, supporting them and/or volunteering.

Art for today: Mustard Bloom, oil on panel, 9x12 in.

Big thanks to Cornelia Flashlights Podcast for putting together these detailed discussions on the Moderna non-clinical “studies” on which the FDA issued [a very fake] Biologics License Approval for their Spikevax mRNA injections. This material is part of the Citizen Petition by Children’s Health Defense which is based on my research and materials.

This video is Part 3 of the discussion. See Part 1 and Part 2. I am republishing Cornelia’s excellent summary and my powerpoint slides included in this discussion below:

In October 2020, only two months before the FDA granted Emergency Use Authorization to Pfizer’s and Moderna’s Covid-19 mRNA shots, the FDA’s ‘Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee’ (VRBPAC) held a public meeting to discuss the various regulatory pathways for the shots.

During this meeting, Dr. Doran Fink, then deputy director of FDA’s Division of Vaccines and Related Products Application, gave a presentation in which he built the case for choosing the Emergency Use Authorization pathway.

In his role as deputy director Fink was directly involved in the FDA’s decision to grant EUA authorization to the shots. Fink left the FDA two years later and started working for Moderna shortly after. So the same guy who had been instrumental in driving the decision to follow the Emergency Use Authorization pathway for the Moderna shots shortly after ended up working as ‘Clinical Therapeutic Area Head’ for Moderna. Presumably a golden thank you from the company that made a killing with the shots.

Fink’s career has been progressing nicely ever since: he’s now the head of Global Regulatory Strategy at GlaxoSmithKline.

Source: https://www.linkedin.com/in/doran-fink-md-phd-473a20a3/details/experience/

The Real Purpose of the Meeting

What was the true purpose of this public meeting? Usually the VRBPAC meets to discuss specific vaccine candidates - but not so in this October 2020 public session. Was this a policy debate to have a real discussion about which regulatory pathway to follow? Hardly. It was way too late for that - just two months before the shots were approved under EUA. The deadline for approving the shots had long before been fixed for the end of 2020.

More people than usual attended the October meeting, forty in total: Over half of those were government agency staff from the FDA, CDC, NIH and BARDA. Thirteen were academic experts. Just three were neither government nor academia. One of them worked for Merck.

The true purpose of the meeting appears to have been to legitimize the use of the EUA pathway, watch out for any objections from the large audience and, should they occur, refute them.

Basically, it was a carefully orchestrated EUA marketing and consensus building session.

Marketing the EUA as a Convenient and Hassle-Free Shortcut

The transcript of the meeting is fascinating to read. Here is one particularly pertinent part of the transcript:

Reading this page was a lightbulb moment for Latypova, she told me. Here was irrefutable evidence, provided in a public hearing, that government officials had carefully chosen the EUA pathway exactly because of the choice’s grave implications.

Dr. Kurilla, a senior NIH scientist, asked Doran Fink: “Did you consider at all the possibility of an expanded access protocol… instead of an EUA?”

Expanded Access Use (EAU) is another regulatory pathway created for patients with life-threatening conditions so that they can access not yet approved medical products outside of a clinical trial. Importantly, EAU is an investigational pathway because it allows patients to access investigational (but not yet approved) medical products - like drugs or biologics.

Emergency Use Authorization is completely different: It’s not an investigational pathway at all. EUA products are not under scientific investigation and do not have to comply with FDA’s usual regulations.

If the FDA had opted for the Expanded Access Use pathway for the Covid-19 shots, then the following conditions would have been to be met:

* Every vaccine recipient is treated as a clinical trial participant.

* IRB oversight is required at every administration site.

* Physicians administering the vaccine carry formal investigator responsibilities and liability.

* Informed consent documents explicitly describe the investigational nature of the product.

* Individual adverse events are fed back into a formal IND reporting structure.

How did Fink respond to this pivotal question whether FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee had considered following the Expended Access Use pathway?

The Magic Leap

Below is a graph from Latypova’s December 2025 presentation titled “Covid mRNA vaccines are misbranded: EUA Countermeasures in Disguise.”

It shows two switcheroos: In the spring of 2020, both Pfizer and Moderna opened so-called INDs, Investigational New Drug applications, with the FDA. So they did not start on the EUA pathway. They could have gone directly to the EUA pathway, but chose not to.

In October of 2020, the same month in which the VBRCAP meeting described above took place, the first switch happened: both companies changed tracks by jumping from the IND pathway to the EUA pathway.

The second switch came in August 2021: the switch from EUA authorization to full BLA licensure. This switch is not legitimate because none of the conditions for BLA licensure had been fulfilled.

Latypova told me:

Moderna’s Nonclinical Studies Are a Massive Deception Exercise

Through a FOIA lawsuit, Judicial Watch obtained the data Moderna had submitted to the FDA for BLA approval of its mRNA-1273 vaccine (later named Spikevax).

Moderna’s Non GLP Pharmacology Studies

The table below shows Moderna’s pharmacology studies for its Covid-19 mRNA shot. Have a look at the word inside each one of the red circles in the GLP (Good Manufacturing Practices) column.

Yes, you read that correctly: it’s a ‘no’ for every single toxicology study. None of the studies are GLP compliant. Moderna did not use Good Laboratory Practices when conducting the toxicology studies.

What are Good Laboratory Practices (GLP)?

In the United States, GLP is codified under 21 CFR Part 58: “Good Laboratory Practice for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies.” These practices apply exclusively to nonclinical studies and are enforced by none other than the FDA. Their primary purpose lies in ensuring the quality, integrity, and reliability of nonclinical studies’ safety data that pharmaceutical companies submit to the FDA.

* Toxicology and pharmacology testing in animals

* Biodistribution and pharmacokinetic studies

* Genotoxicity, reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity studies

* Food additives, pesticides, medical devices, and biological products

You can read the full text of the GLP regulation here: it’s pages upon pages of specific requirements regarding, for example, lab equipment, procedures and quality assurance:

The NIH Did Some of Moderna’s Toxicology Studies

Let’s return to the toxicology graph. Have a look at the letters in the orange circles: they all start with the letters VRC. What’s VRC? It’s a Vaccine Research Center of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The numbers refer to different NIH Vaccine Research Centers.

Excerpt from above:

Moderna outsourced half of its pharmacology studies to the NIH.

Moderna’s Tissue Distribution Study Was Done With Bananas Instead of Apples

As part of its nonclinical studies, Moderna did a key tissue distribution study for Spikevax and submitted it to the FDA.

Source:

Was the study GLP compliant? No.

Moderna tested the tissue biodistribution of an mRNA vaccine against herpes and submitted it to the FDA for approval of mRNA-1273. It did this while on the Emergency Use Authorization pathway. You see, that pathway really is a sewage pipe - everything goes.

Moderna Outsourced Its Biodistribution Study

Below you see the slide with the title page for the mentioned tissue biodistribution study:

Charles River Laboratories is a contract research organization (CRO). Moderna and other pharmaceutical companies pay CROs to conduct preclinical and clinical studies on their behalf. The Montreal facility where the tissue biodistribution study was done is just one of many such Charles River Laboratories’ sites.

Toxicology Studies Done on Five Random mRNA Products

On the graph below you see the toxicology section of Moderna’s nonclinical studies.

As you see, the toxicological studies are all GLP compliant. But have a look at the colorful rectangles on the left: not a single product they tested was mRNA-1273.

What Was the Purpose of Submitting All These Nonsensical Studies?

The purpose, Latypova says, was to “just produce a pile of paper to say, ‘we did a lot of things and yeah, maybe it’s not totally complete, but it’s mostly good.’”

CHAPTERS

0:00:05 FDA–Operation Warp Speed meeting and shift to EUA pathway

RESOURCES

* CHD’s Citizen Petition

* Tell the FDA to Revoke Licenses on COVID Vaccines

* Sasha Latypova Breaking: Citizen Petition to the FDA filed by Children’s Health Defense with my input.

* Biologics License Applications (BLA) Process (CBER)

* Sasha Latypova’s Substack

* PART 58—GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR NONCLINICAL LABORATORY STUDIES

Art for today: Study of Tuesday, oil on panel. Available art here.

:

Dear Readers,

I am now on my way to Amsterdam, where we are expecting a major showing of the international press. Over 30 journalists have signed up for the court hearing and press conference on March 9. Here is the link to the court live stream, please share:

https://www.rechtspraak.nl/livestreams

The hearing is from 11 am to 4 pm, the Netherlands time. I believe the livestream will be in Dutch. We have arranged for English translation inside the court, but I do not know if it will be broadcast (a volunteer translator will be with us inside the court). There are various AI apps that do simultaneous voice translation, which you can try to use. Also note that the court does not permit to make video recordings.

Not to worry, we will of course make lots of recordings from the press conference which will begin at 5 pm. You will be fully appraised of the situation!

For those who need to get up to speed on this case, here is an excellent summary and analysis of the case prepared by Katherine Watt:

Link to video on Rumble

Link to Katherine Watt’s wordpress site

* February 2026 – Memo in Support of Petitioners’ Appeal

* February 2026 – Leeuwarden Case Document Reading Guide

* February 2026 – Leeuwarden Litigation, video presentation

* February 2026 – Leeuwarden Litigation, presentation slide deck

This presentation is made by Katherine Watt as a primer on the two cases in the Netherlands, including legal background, the history of various filings and documents. This is an excellent summary up to date for anyone who wants to get up to speed on the case materials in English.

I find this material very helpful even for myself, and I am very familiar with this case! I also like how Katherine outlined two major categories of harm that qualify for the civil tort procedure:

* Cognitive harm: the lying by the government, media and pharma companies, telling people falsehoods about covid illness, driving fear and panic, lying about safety and efficacy of the injections, and therefore inducing people to take these injections based on false information and censorship of the truth.

* Physical harm: injuries, deaths, emotional and psychological suffering.

Please help us share this information widely as we are heading to Amsterdam for the March 9th court hearing and press conference! Please pray for justice!

For a one time donation:

Art for today: The Blue Cup, oil on panel 9x12 in.

Dear Readers,

This is the podcast recording that Substack would not let me cross-post from Cornelia’s page. She has written about this in the article that I was able to cross post yesterday. Which tells me, someone at Substack is minding my newsletter very closely. Substack has cut off all the growth for my page for over 12 months now, however, this particular selective “feature” is new. This type of censorship is very sophisticated and technically difficult to implement.

Not to worry, censorship won’t stop me, and I thank all of you who support this newsletter!

I received some questions regarding the material I previously published about biologics non-regulation, and how it squares with the CHD Citizen Petition which asks the FDA to revoke BLA licenses for Pfizer and Moderna covid shots because they did not satisfy the BLA standards.

This is a very confusing issue (on purpose, I assure you). There are several categories of law and regulations that apply, don’t apply or sometimes apply to “biologics” and “vaccines”. I tried to make a simplified and highly generalized graphic for two major categories of regulations/law that we are concerned with:

* Regulation of the composition-of-matter for a given medicinal product: this is where we are concerned with precision of ingredients, contaminants, i.e. - all cGMP regs.

* Regulation of informed consent and protection of human subjects in investigational clinical research, which are pre-requisites to “FDA approval” of anything. These rules are entirely suspended under CBRN “emergencies” declared via the PREP Act.

As you can see, the EUA Countermeasures is an extremely attractive space, because no pharmaceutical regulations apply whatsoever for the duration of the PREP Act declaration of emergency! The PREP Act has proven to be a nearly impenetrable liability shield based on the now accumulated case law. The CHD petition is primarily focused on the FDA falsely claiming that studies conducted by Pfizer and Moderna while on the non-investigational EUA pathway, can satisfy the legal requirements of the investigational biologics approval pathway. I.e., we are talking about the difference between the upper 2 quadrants of this graph.

Hope this helps you to navigate this discussion.

Art for today: Lilac and Tulips, oil on panel, 12x16 in.