Summary:

I am looking for feedback on a new tool being released by Yield & Spread called the FI Purpose Planner*. This template is meant to help individuals explore how different life choices—such as changing careers, donating more, or adjusting spending—can impact their Financial Independence (FI) and CoastFI timelines. My goal is to provide a dynamic way to model potential scenarios, making it easier to visualize the long-term consequences of various decisions.

After receiving valuable feedback on the FI-lanthropy Calculator I previously released, I’m once again reaching out to this community for insights.

(*Note on access: For the next week, the link to the FI Purpose Planner will be a direct link to the tool, after which I will revert the link back to my website where you have to submit a form to get the planner. It will remain free.)

Rationale for creation of the tool:

Financial Independence [...]

---

Outline:

(00:06) Summary:

(01:01) Rationale for creation of the tool:

(01:50) About the tool:

(03:58) Example use cases:

(06:03) Tips for using the template effectively:

(07:21) Author background:

---

First published:

Source:

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

We are pleased to announce the publication of Altruismo Eficaz, a repository of EA-related content in Spanish. (The site had been in beta for a while but is now officially launched.)

Content

The site features translations of many of the most important or influential articles written by members of the effective altruism community. The translations comprise the EA Handbook and dozens of other classic posts excluded from that collection. The site also includes translations of hundreds of (mostly brief) entries from the EA wiki, as well as short biographies of every author with published articles. In total, we have translated over 650,000 words of content.

All published articles and wiki entries are available in audio format, playable directly from the site and also on major podcasting platforms (including Apple Podcasts and Spotify). Some of the articles (e.g., Nick Bostrom's Astronomical Waste) are narrated by Martin [...]

---

Outline:

(00:20) Content

(01:19) Design

(04:39) Plans

The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:

Source:

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

Crosspost from https://stijnbruers.wordpress.com/2025/03/11/how-to-systematically-reduce-wild-animal-suffering-in-the-near-future/

Reducing wild animal suffering is not easy. We need to do more scientific research on how to safely and effectively reduce wild animal suffering (by supporting organizations like Wild Animal Initiative). However, many people who care about wild animal welfare, are impatient and do not want to wait until we have invented technologies to reduce wild animal suffering. For those people, is there something specific that they can do or that they can support right now?

Perhaps they can support organizations that directly help wild animals, such as wildlife rescue centers. However, those wildlife rescue centers also help and release predators that are going to harm other wild animals. And suppose one helps starving wild animals by feeding them. If those animals survive, they can reproduce and increase the population of animals, resulting in more competition for food. Eventually some of those newborn animals [...]

---

First published:

Source:

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

We are excited to announce the launch of the Abundance and Growth Fund, which will spend at least $120 million over the next three years to accelerate economic growth and boost scientific and technological progress while lowering the cost of living.

We’re grateful for support from Good Ventures, which has committed $60M, and from the other private individuals who matched them. We’re also grateful for a contribution from Patrick Collison, who helped launch the Progress Studies movement.

We launched the fund because:

• Economic growth has transformed global living standards, and further growth could deliver vast improvements to health and well-being.
• Innovation is a key input to growth; economists and our own researchers estimate that R&D and scientific research have very high social returns.
• We have strong evidence that it's possible to boost growth and innovation by removing existing constraints; there are many positive examples to point to where [...]

---

First published:

Source:

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

This is a linkpost for a new paper called Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion, by Will MacAskill and Fin Moorhouse. It sets the high-level agenda for the sort of work that Forethought is likely to focus on.

Some of the areas in the paper that we expect to be of most interest to EA Forum or LessWrong readers are:

• Section 3 finds that even without a software feedback loop (i.e. “recursive self-improvement”), even if scaling of compute completely stops in the near term, and even if the rate of algorithmic efficiency improvements slow, then we should still expect very rapid technological development — e.g. a century's worth of progress in a decade — once AI meaningfully substitutes for human researchers.
• A presentation, in section 4, of the sheer range of challenges that an intelligence explosion would pose, going well beyond the “standard” focuses of [...]

---

First published:

Source:

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Forethought[1] is a new AI macrostrategy research group cofounded by Max Dalton, Will MacAskill, Tom Davidson, and Amrit Sidhu-Brar.

We are trying to figure out how to navigate the (potentially rapid) transition to a world with superintelligent AI systems. We aim to tackle the most important questions we can find, unrestricted by the current Overton window.

More details on our website.

Why we exist

We think that AGI might come soon (say, modal timelines to mostly-automated AI R&D in the next 2-8 years), and might significantly accelerate technological progress, leading to many different challenges. We don’t yet have a good understanding of what this change might look like or how to navigate it. Society is not prepared.

Moreover, we want the world to not just avoid catastrophe: we want to reach a really great future. We think about what this might be like (incorporating [...]

---

Outline:

(00:34) Why we exist

(01:57) Research

(02:00) Research agendas

(03:13) Recent work

(03:34) Approach

(03:37) Comparison to other efforts

(04:14) Principles

(05:35) What you can do

(05:39) Engage with our research

(06:08) Apply to work with us

(06:25) Funding

The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.

---

First published:

Source:

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

Confidence check: This is my field of expertise, I work in the field and I have a PhD in the subject. However I am not an expert in every sub-field that I’m covering here, and in particular I do not have much machine learning experience. This is a blog post and I do not guarantee complete accuracy.

I have done my best to make this readable and enjoyable for a general audience (on the nerdy side), but certain parts are very difficult to explain, so apologies in advance

Introduction

Both AI skeptics and AI boosters sometimes operate on the “breaking news” model of assessing capabilities. Boosters who think powerful AI is imminent can point to a steady stream of breakthrough achievements. Skeptics counter this with an steady stream of AI mistakes and flops. I think both things are important to keep track of, but they [...]

---

Outline:

(00:52) Introduction

(03:38) How CEST works:

(08:00) AI failures

(10:47) The conference statistics

(14:47) So what is AI being used for?

(23:50) Panel on AI and quantum computing.

(26:27) What about LLMs and GenAI

(31:16) But will it come for our job later?

The original text contained 4 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:

Source:

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

Context

On booking 1:1 meetings

Responding to people and punctuality

Know your limits and commit accordingly

Actually commit* to your 1:1 meetings

Focus

On giving feedback

They know more about their situation

Give constructive feedback kindly

EAG is a professional event

Personal space and body language

Conversation topics

Eye contact

Some practical ideas for navigating eye contact in a 1:1:

To walk or not to walk

Closing thoughts

Context

One-on-one (1:1) meetings are widely recognized as one of the most valuable aspects of EA Global (EAG) and EAGx conferences, both anecdotally and in the survey data CEA receives. However, last year I noticed in the conference feedback forms that there was a slight rise in feedback about a small number of 1:1s that have left people feeling unwelcome or disrespected. From a preliminary skim of the EAG Bay Area feedback, this doesn’t seem to have continued, but I’ve [...]

---

Outline:

(01:51) How I'm hoping you'll orient to this

(03:08) Epistemic status / what I'm basing this on

(04:09) On booking 1:1 meetings

(04:13) Responding to people and punctuality

(06:09) Know your limits and commit accordingly

(08:47) Actually commit\* to your 1:1 meetings

(11:16) Focus

(12:24) On giving feedback

(12:28) They know more about their situation

(13:52) Give constructive feedback kindly

(17:05) EAG is a professional event

(17:40) Personal space and body language

(18:54) Conversation topics

(20:08) Do not use Swapcard/EAG as a dating opportunity.

(21:25) Eye contact

(22:49) Some practical ideas for navigating eye contact in a 1:1:

(23:53) To walk or not to walk

(25:03) Closing thoughts

---

First published:

Source:

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

[Cross-posted from my Substack here. I wrote this back in November 2024 but someone recently said it would be worth cross-posting here. Some things....didn't age so well.]

Grassroots movements can fall apart and die in many ways. One such way is having demands that are too broad, too intangible or have no defined endpoint.

When Social Change Lab did a survey of 100+ political scientists and sociologists, something that cropped up was the importance of having achievable demands. In the graphs below, you can see that these experts believe that it was the 2nd most important strategic and tactical factor (of the ones we asked about) contributing to a social movement's success. The second graph shows that experts also believed having a clear political goal was one of the most important organisational factors leading to success.

I wanted to unpack these findings a bit more [...]

---

First published:

Source:

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.

*Disclaimer* I am writing this post in a personal capacity; the opinions I express are my own and do not represent my employer.

I think that more people and orgs (especially nonprofits) should consider negotiating the cost of sizable expenses. In my experience, there is usually nothing to lose by respectfully asking to pay less, and doing so can sometimes save thousands or tens of thousands of dollars per hour. This is because negotiating doesn’t take very much time[1], savings can persist across multiple years, and counterparties can be surprisingly generous with discounts. Here are a few examples of expenses that may be negotiable:

For organizations

• Software or news subscriptions
  • Of 35 corporate software and news providers I’ve negotiated with, 30 have been willing to provide discounts. These discounts range from 10% to 80%, with an average of around 40%.
• Leases
  • A friend was able [...]

The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:

Source:

Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.