El Podcast

Is sociology becoming too political to function as a serious academic discipline? Professor Ashley T. Rubin discusses her new report for the Vanderbilt–WashU Commission on Scholarly Standards, which examines the growing politicization of sociology and whether political commitments are influencing what researchers study, what questions they avoid, and how scholarship is evaluated.

We discuss sociology’s increasing focus on inequality, taboo research questions, resistance to biological explanations, declining political neutrality in top journals, reproducibility problems, activism versus objective scholarship, the decline of sociology majors, and what universities should teach students in the age of AI. Dr. Rubin also explains why she believes sociology still produces valuable work—but faces serious problems if the field is unwilling to confront its own blind spots.

Special thanks to Professor Ashley T. Rubin for joining us and for her work on this important report.

📄 Read Ashley Rubin’s full sociology report:
The Status of Scholarly Standards in Sociology — Vanderbilt University
https://www.vanderbilt.edu/principles/state-of-scholarship-report/sociology/ashley-rubin/ (https://www.vanderbilt.edu/principles/state-of-scholarship-report/sociology/ashley-rubin/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

✍️ Ashley Rubin’s Substack:
https://ashleytrubin.substack.com/ (https://ashleytrubin.substack.com/?utm_source=chatgpt.com)

About the guest:
Ashley T. Rubin is a sociologist at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa whose research examines punishment, prisons, law and society, and academic scholarship.

About El Podcast:
In El Podcast, anything and everything is up for discussion. Grab a drink and join us in this epic virtual happy hour! We sit down with authors, researchers, scientists, academics, and independent thinkers to explore the ideas shaping our world—from science, health, and technology to economics, education, culture, politics, and society.

Come curious. Leave with something to think about.

#Sociology #HigherEducation #AcademicFreedom

Darrell Bricker explains why Canada is approaching a potential breaking point as soaring housing costs, immigration pressures, generational divides, regional tensions, demographic decline, and a changing relationship with the United States challenge the country’s future. 

Dr. Darrell Bricker is Global CEO of Ipsos Public Affairs and co-author, with John Ibbitson, of Breaking Point: The New Big Shifts Putting Canada at Risk. He is a leading Canadian public-opinion researcher and has written extensively on demographics, politics, and social change. 

• Why Canada may be approaching a national “breaking point”
• Canada’s housing affordability crisis
• Falling fertility and an aging population
• Immigration and the breakdown of Canada’s traditional immigration consensus
• The “Laurentian elite” and Canada’s political establishment
• Alberta, Saskatchewan, equalization payments, and Western alienation
• The widening divide between younger and older Canadians
• Canada’s brain drain to the United States
• Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID)
• Canada’s military decline and renewed defense spending
• Arctic sovereignty and competition with Russia, China, and the U.S.
• The changing Canada–U.S. relationship
• The decline of the U.S.-led global order
• Trudeau, Carney, Canadian identity, and national pride
• Whether Canada can remain unified over the coming decade

• Canada’s problems are deeper than its current tensions with the United States; Bricker argues that longstanding internal divisions are being exposed. Housing is central: younger Canadians increasingly struggle to achieve the homeownership and financial security enjoyed by earlier generations, with Bricker citing polling in which 74% say owning a home is now only for the rich. 
• Immigration, historically a source of broad Canadian consensus, became politically contentious as temporary workers, international students, and other newcomers increased rapidly while housing and public services struggled to keep pace. At the same time, Canada’s fertility rate has fallen sharply, making immigration increasingly important to population growth. 
• Regional tensions remain another major fault line. Alberta and Saskatchewan generate substantial resource wealth while many Western Canadians believe federal policy has constrained their energy industries, contributing to resentment toward Ottawa and the equalization system. 
• Bricker also argues that Canada must adapt to a world in which it can no longer assume the old U.S.-led international order will return after Trump. Canada is increasing defense spending, focusing more heavily on Arctic sovereignty, and attempting to diversify its relationships with Europe, Asia, India, and China. 
• Despite these problems, Bricker does not portray Canada as a failed country. Canada and the United States remain highly desirable destinations for immigrants, but Canada faces a serious challenge if younger, highly skilled Canadians increasingly believe they can find greater opportunity south of the border. 

“The idea that the Canadian dream paid off for one group of the population and it’s not paying off in the same way for another group of the population is absolutely valid in the data.” 

“We need to start building a lot more housing stock that looks like what people want rather than what planners want them to endure.” 

“We’re going to have to carve a new path.” 

Guest: Dr. Darrell Bricker
Book: Breaking Point: The New Big Shifts Putting Canada at Risk
Co-author: John Ibbitson
Role: Global CEO, Ipsos Public Affairs
Core themes: Canada, housing, immigration, demographics, generational inequality, Western alienation, U.S.–Canada relations, defense, Arctic sovereignty, MAID, national identity
Overall framing: Is Canada’s traditional economic, political, and national model reaching a breaking point?
Closing takeaway: Bricker expects late 2026 and 2027 to be an especially consequential period for Canada, with major political and regional tensions potentially coming to the forefront. 

🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

Thanks for listening!

Bill Gifford, co-author of Outlive, explores why Americans are living less healthy lives despite spending more on healthcare, the surprising benefits of heat, and why relationships, purpose, and everyday movement may matter more than biohacking for longevity.

Bill Gifford is a journalist and author specializing in health, fitness, and longevity. He co-authored Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity with Dr. Peter Attia, wrote Spring Chicken: Stay Young Forever (or Die Trying), and is the author of Hotwired: How the Hidden Power of Heat Makes Us Stronger. A longtime contributing editor at Outside magazine, Gifford has spent more than three decades exploring human performance, aging, and the science of living healthier lives.

• What Bill Gifford has changed his mind about after more than a decade researching longevity.
• The science behind Outlive and Peter Attia's approach to preventing chronic disease.
• Ozempic, rapamycin, supplements, and the search for a longevity breakthrough.
• Why American life expectancy and healthspan lag behind other developed countries.
• The longevity paradox of South Korea and Japan.
• Diet, exercise, muscle mass, and maintaining physical independence as we age.
• The Harvard Study of Adult Development and the importance of close relationships.
• Bryan Johnson, biohacking, and the dangers of excessive health optimization.
• Social media and the rise of performative wellness.
• Whether excessive endurance exercise can undermine health.
• Why wealthy Colorado ski towns have some of America's longest life expectancies.
• The science of saunas, hot tubs, sweating, and heat acclimation.
• Heat exposure, depression, and emerging mental health research.
• The evolutionary importance of temperature fluctuations and physical discomfort.
• Bill's experience co-authoring Outlive with Peter Attia.
• Sleep, stress, retirement, and maintaining a sense of purpose.
• Why living longer means little without a reason to live.

1. There is no magic bullet for longevity.

After writing three books about aging and health, Gifford has become increasingly skeptical of supplements and interventions promising dramatic extensions of human lifespan. Aging is a complex biological process that cannot be solved by replacing a single missing substance.

2. Preventing chronic disease requires acting earlier.

One of the central arguments of Outlive is that modern medicine intervenes too late. Rather than waiting until patients develop diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or other chronic conditions, healthcare should focus on identifying and addressing risks decades earlier.

3. Everyday movement matters more than occasional workouts.

Gifford emphasizes incorporating physical activity into daily life through walking, cycling, climbing stairs, and remaining active throughout retirement. Maintaining muscle mass and physical independence becomes increasingly important with age.

4. Relationships and purpose are essential to healthy aging.

The conversation explores the Harvard Study of Adult Development and the importance of close relationships. Gifford argues that optimizing cholesterol, metabolism, sleep, and exercise means little if someone lacks meaningful relationships or a reason to get up in the morning.

5. Biohacking can become counterproductive.

Gifford questions the growing obsession with supplements, peptides, constant measurement, and biological optimization. He argues that excessive intervention and anxiety about health can undermine the resilience and quality of life people are trying to preserve.

6. Wealth, lifestyle, and environment help explain Colorado's longevity advantage.

The discussion examines why counties surrounding Aspen, Vail, Breckenridge, and Telluride have unusually high life expectancies. Gifford points to wealth, active lifestyles, outdoor recreation, and the self-selection of people who prioritize physical activity.

7. Heat exposure may offer benefits beyond relaxation.

Drawing on research explored in Hotwired, Gifford discusses associations between sauna use and lower rates of cardiovascular disease and dementia, improvements in heat acclimation, and emerging research into heat exposure as a potential adjunct treatment for depression.

8. Sleep and stress deserve greater attention.

Gifford describes eliminating his morning alarm as one of the most consequential changes he made to his health and productivity. The conversation also examines how retirement can reduce chronic stress while creating new challenges around purpose and engagement.

9. Longevity should be about living better, not simply living longer.

Gifford concludes that the ultimate goal of longevity should be maintaining meaningful relationships, contributing to the world, and enjoying life rather than pursuing additional years for their own sake.

1. On the importance of relationships and purpose:

"None of that means none of that means shit unless you have good relationships in your life, or if you have a purpose, a reason for getting up in the morning."

2. On the dangers of excessive biohacking:

"We're actually more resilient than maybe the biohackers give us credit for."

3. On the ultimate purpose of longevity:

"It's not enough just to live a longer life. You have to have a reason and a purpose and you have to have meaning, right? What are you gonna add to the world? Why do you wanna live longer? What's your what's the why?"

🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

Thanks for listening!

Former progressive activist and counter-disinformation strategist Sabrina Joy Stevens explains why she walked away from the activist left, exposing the incentives, staged activism, ideological groupthink, and institutional machinery she says keep the movement alive.

Sabrina Joy Stevens is a former progressive activist, political communications and narrative strategist, educator, and counter-disinformation professional who spent years working inside activist organizations and campaigns. After beginning to question her worldview—particularly during and after 2020—she became an outspoken critic of the activist culture and institutions she once helped advance.

• Why Sabrina Left Progressive Activism
• The “Omni-Cause” and Political Groupthink
• Staged Protests and Planned Arrests
• Wokeness as an Industry
• Credentialism, DEI and Bureaucracy
• California Homelessness and Incentives
• Luxury Beliefs and Identity Politics
• Inside the Counter-Disinformation Industry
• Gender, Objective Truth and “What Is a Woman?”
• Losing Friends, Parenthood and Life After Activism 

• Activism can become self-reinforcing. Stevens describes moving from one cause to another under an overarching oppressor-versus-oppressed worldview. 
• Some high-profile activism is performative. She recounts seeing protest arrests planned in advance and describes how organizations can use such events for publicity and fundraising. 
• Ideology can become an industry. Her central argument is that careers, organizations, funding and professional status can create incentives to perpetuate problems rather than solve them.
• Credentialism helps sustain bureaucracy. She argues that graduates with highly specialized degrees can flow into academia, nonprofits, DEI, government and administrative positions that reinforce the ideology.
• The counter-disinformation world became a major breaking point. Stevens says she came to believe that systems ostensibly designed to identify misinformation disproportionately scrutinized political opponents while failing to apply consistent standards to their own side.
• Leaving came with significant social costs. She says most of her old friend group disappeared and some family relationships became more difficult. 
• Parenthood changed her priorities. Having children gave her responsibilities outside activism and reduced the importance of online battles, cancellations and ideological infighting. 
• Practical competence matters more than credentials. She encourages young people to question whether college is necessary and consider useful skills, trades and careers that provide real market value. 
• Her final lesson is epistemic humility: seek evidence, expose yourself to people who disagree with you, and don't assume your political in-group is correct. 

1. “You don't need a conspiracy when you have...a convergence of people's interests and incentives.”

2. “We're the anti-disinformation group, but we're helping people who explicitly want to spread bad information.”

3. “If you're surrounded by people who think exactly like you, then they're gonna be wrong exactly like you, and then you're all going off the cliff together.”

🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

Thanks for listening!

Former banking CEO Richard Vague explains why America’s $40 trillion federal debt may be less dangerous than private debt, how banks actually create money, what really causes financial crises, and why an AI bubble probably won’t crash the broader economy.

GUEST BIO

Richard Vague is a former banking CEO, entrepreneur, author, and former Pennsylvania Secretary of Banking and Securities. He co-founded two major credit-card banks and has spent decades studying how private debt, bank lending, and financial crises shape the economy. His books include The Paradox of Debt, A Brief History of Doom, The Next Economic Disaster, and The Banker Who Made America.

TOPICS DISCUSSED

• Why the $40 trillion U.S. federal debt may be less alarming than it sounds
• Why private debt matters more for financial crises
• How commercial banks create roughly 90% of the money supply
• Debt, asset prices, inequality, and the K-shaped economy
• Why housing affordability is fundamentally a supply problem
• The myth that China “owns” America’s debt
• Gold standards, fiat money, Bitcoin, and debt-based money
• What actually caused the 2008 financial crisis
• Shadow banking, private equity, and private credit
• Why economists largely missed the 2008 crash
• Whether today’s AI boom is a bubble
• Why an AI crash could resemble the dot-com bust rather than 2008
• Whether AI will ultimately destroy or create jobs
• Thomas Willing and the origins of American banking
• America’s centuries-old divide between coastal elites and the interior

MAIN POINTS

• Federal debt needs context: Vague points to roughly $180 trillion in household net worth compared with $40 trillion in federal debt.

• Private debt may be more dangerous: U.S. private debt is roughly $45 trillion, and Vague argues private lending booms are much more closely connected to financial crises.

• Banks create money: Roughly 90% of money creation occurs through commercial-bank lending. When a bank makes a loan, it simultaneously creates a new deposit.

• Debt can increase inequality: Expanding credit pushes up stocks and real estate, disproportionately benefiting people who already own those assets.

• The K-shaped economy is real: Vague argues middle- and lower-income Americans are increasingly being left behind, particularly men with only a high school education.

• Housing needs more supply: The U.S. has roughly 1.5 million homes for sale versus the approximately 2 million Vague believes are needed for a balanced market.

• China does not “own” America: China holds only a small fraction of total U.S. federal debt.

• Lending booms cause banking crises: Vague’s research into 43 banking crises across six major economies found excessive lending at the center of every major crisis studied.

• Economists missed the warning signs before 2008: Mortgage debt roughly doubled from $5 trillion to $10 trillion between 2002 and 2007 while conventional economic models largely ignored private debt.

• An AI crash does not necessarily mean an economic crash: Vague compares today’s AI boom more closely to the dot-com era, when the Nasdaq collapsed but the broader economy continued growing.

• AI may ultimately create more jobs than it eliminates: Vague expects major disruption but believes lower costs, higher demand, and entirely new industries will ultimately expand employment.

TOP QUOTES

• “Don't freak out. If you're gonna freak out, find something else to freak out about.”
• “My answer is human nature.”
• “People tend to overestimate how much change will occur in the short run and underestimate how much change will occur in the long run.”

BOOKS DISCUSSED

• The Paradox of Debt
• A Brief History of Doom
• The Next Economic Disaster
• The Banker Who Made America: Thomas Willing and the Rise of the American Financial Aristocracy

EPISODE INFO

Guest: Richard Vague
Podcast: El Podcast
Topics: Economics, Banking, Federal Debt, Private Debt, Financial Crises, Money Creation, Inequality, Housing, Bitcoin, AI, Economic History

🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

Thanks for listening!

Professor Olof Hallonsten argues that society has never talked more about innovation and entrepreneurship, yet bureaucracy, short-term thinking, risk aversion, and startup mythology may actually be making real innovation harder to achieve.

Olof Hallonsten is Professor of Socioeconomic Technology Studies at Lund University in Sweden and an expert on science, innovation, and research policy. He spent roughly 10–15 years studying innovation and research policy and has consulted for both the European Commission and the Swedish government. He is the author of Empty Innovation: Causes and Consequences of Society’s Obsession with Entrepreneurship and Growth, which challenges modern assumptions about innovation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth.

Main point

What Hallonsten argues

1. Innovation has become a buzzword

Governments, universities and companies spend enormous amounts promoting “innovation,” but rhetoric shouldn't be confused with actual progress.

2. Real innovation is messy

Genuine breakthroughs are uncertain, collaborative and often take decades to reveal their importance.

3. Bureaucracy isn't inherently bad

Bureaucracy can enable discovery when it serves scientists; problems arise when administrators begin directing and controlling creative work.

4. Short-term metrics undermine discovery

Demanding measurable impact today encourages researchers to promise immediate results rather than pursue uncertain discoveries whose value might emerge decades later.

5. Today's technology rests on old breakthroughs

Much of the digital revolution ultimately rests on foundational technologies such as the transistor developed many decades ago.

6. Entrepreneurship has been romanticized

The typical entrepreneur isn't Steve Jobs; most businesses are ordinary, difficult, risky ventures that don't produce extraordinary wealth.

7. We increasingly perform entrepreneurship

Pitch competitions, branding, buzzwords and startup culture can reward people for appearing entrepreneurial rather than creating something genuinely valuable.

8. Politicians may promote innovation because they don't know how to create it

Leaders know technological progress is necessary but cannot reliably manufacture breakthroughs, so visible innovation programs can substitute for actual results.

9. AI's biggest effects are unknowable today

Major technologies often produce consequences their inventors never anticipated; judging AI's ultimate significance now is premature.

10. Give scientists more freedom

Reduce short-term evaluations and grant bureaucracy and give researchers greater independence to pursue work whose payoff cannot be predicted.

We may have built an enormous system designed to produce, measure and advertise innovation that increasingly interferes with the unpredictable, long-term creative process through which genuine breakthroughs actually occur.

1. On entrepreneurship culture:

“We are selling a lie to them.”

Hallonsten argues that presenting exceptional figures like Zuckerberg or Jobs as representative entrepreneurs gives young people a deeply distorted picture of entrepreneurship.

2. On what we should tell real innovators:

“Keep up the good work, we depend on you.”

His ultimate message is pro-innovation rather than anti-technology: society genuinely needs innovators, but needs to stop confusing innovation theater with their work.

3. On why innovation is difficult to measure:

“What is going on right now that is comparable to the invention of a transistor? We don't know.”

The most important discoveries may not look revolutionary when they occur, making demands for immediate measurable impact fundamentally misguided.

Guest: Olof Hallonsten
Institution: Lund University, Sweden
Field: Socioeconomic Technology Studies / science, innovation and research policy
Primary book: Empty Innovation: Causes and Consequences of Society’s Obsession with Entrepreneurship and Growth
Book availability: Hallonsten says Empty Innovation is available open access.
Approx. episode length: ~1 hour 13+ minutes
Other works/books discussed: Not Even Trying: The Corruption of Real Science, The Entrepreneurial State, the Moonshots book in which Hallonsten contributed a chapter, and ideas associated with Thorstein Veblen and Ulrich Beck.

🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

Thanks for listening!

Swedish demographer and political candidate David Lorentzon explains his controversial theory of the “Hot Girl Service Economy”—how social media, global travel, gender-segregated careers and migration created female-centered economic ecosystems in places like Bali, Phuket, Dubai and Miami, and why he believes AI and economic disruption could bring them down.

David Lorentzon is a Swedish demographer, researcher and political candidate who studies migration, gender ratios, dating markets and demographic change. His research has focused particularly on separating migration statistics by gender, which led him to theories about mass female migration and what he calls the Hot Girl Service Economy. He is running for Sweden's parliament as a candidate for Alternative for Sweden (AfS), with personal policy interests including dating-app regulation and a modern debt jubilee. Lorentzon also holds U.S. citizenship through his American mother. 

1. The Hot Girl Service Economy is bigger than influencers. Lorentzon describes an ecosystem where models and online creators bring money into places such as Bali and Dubai, then spend that money on businesses and services—fitness, beauty, wellness and other lifestyle industries—that often employ other women.

2. Social media provided the catalyst. He traces early versions of the phenomenon to international tourism in the 1980s and 1990s, but says it reached critical mass around 2010 and became much more established around 2016–17.

3. The broader thesis is about a gender-segregated economy. Lorentzon argues that young men and women increasingly work in different industries and therefore live in different places: men disproportionately gravitate toward industrial, agricultural and blue-collar work, while women concentrate in cities and service-oriented industries.

4. He believes this has demographic consequences. In his view, these geographic and occupational differences make dating, marriage and family formation harder because compatible men and women increasingly don't live and work in the same places.

5. AI could threaten the economic model. Lorentzon predicts businesses will increasingly substitute inexpensive AI-generated models and influencers for human ones, potentially removing some of the high-income jobs that feed money into the wider ecosystem. This is presented in the episode as his forecast, rather than an established outcome.

6. Marriage migration acts as another demographic balancing mechanism. His research argues that migration from Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe and parts of Latin America into Western countries is disproportionately female in some flows, partly because of international marriage.

7. Gender imbalance can hurt men as well. Lorentzon rejects the idea that simply having many more men necessarily produces a stronger economy, arguing that extreme male surpluses can eventually produce disengagement, lower productivity and social instability.

8. His political platform goes beyond demographics. As an AfS parliamentary candidate, Lorentzon discusses leaving NATO and the EU and supporting re-migration, while his personal priorities include restructuring dating-app incentives and implementing a modern debt jubilee.

9. He challenges the conventional American image of Sweden. Lorentzon argues that modern Sweden combines a large welfare state with socially restrictive policies and a highly entrepreneurial economy, making the country's politics harder to categorize on a simple American left-right spectrum.

10. Sweden becomes the episode's second major case study. The latter portion moves from gender and dating into immigration, national identity, political polarization and differences between Sweden and the United States.

“We have basically created a gender-segregated economy, not just in the US, but on a global scale.” — David Lorentzon

“The money is just circulating amongst each other. And that's the ecosystem.” — David Lorentzon

“People don't like dating apps anymore. Kind of have to change that.” — David Lorentzon

🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

Thanks for listening!

A German travel YouTuber shares how visiting America challenged nearly every stereotype she had about the United States—from friendliness and safety to healthcare, food, and quality of life—while comparing American culture with Europe and Asia.

Cori Ander is a German travel YouTuber currently based in Thailand who has spent years exploring countries often misunderstood by the media. Her channel focuses on experiencing cultures firsthand, documenting life across Europe, the United States, China, Ukraine, Colombia, and beyond while challenging common stereotypes through on-the-ground travel.

This conversation explores how travel replaces stereotypes with nuance, showing that many widely held beliefs about America, Europe, and other countries become far more complicated once experienced firsthand.

🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

Thanks for listening!

Australian law professor Dr. Augusto Zimmermann argues that Western civilization is in rapid decline due to the erosion of free speech, the rule of law, mass migration, and the growing power of political and global institutions.

Dr. Augusto Zimmermann is an Australian law professor, constitutional scholar, and author specializing in free speech, constitutional law, natural law, and Western civilization. Born in Brazil and living in Australia for more than 26 years, he has served as a law professor, Associate Dean, and Law Reform Commissioner. He is the co-author of The Battle for the Soul of Western Civilization and several books examining law, government, and political culture.

🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

Thanks for listening!

Professor Jeff Fynn-Paul argues that many popular narratives about European colonialism are historically inaccurate, tracing their origins to ideological reinterpretations of history rather than the historical evidence itself.

Professor Jeff Fynn-Paul is a professor of economics and global history at the Institute for History in the Netherlands. Originally from the United States, he earned his PhD from the University of Toronto and specializes in European, colonial, and economic history. He is the author of Not Stolen: The Truth About European Colonialism in the New World and the forthcoming The Four Pillars of Western Civilization.

Guest: Professor Jeff Fynn-Paul
Book: Not Stolen: The Truth About European Colonialism in the New World
Upcoming Book: The Four Pillars of Western Civilization
Duration: ~72 minutes
Primary Themes: History, Colonialism, Western Civilization, Academia, Marxism, Immigration, Democracy, Culture, Revisionist History, Political Philosophy.

🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

Thanks for listening!