The article discusses the transformative impact of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) on the consulting industry. Consulting firms are rapidly adopting AGI to automate tasks, improve efficiency, and meet client demands for AI-driven solutions. 

This adoption leads to cost reduction and improved margins, but also poses a potential long-term threat. AGI could enable cheaper, more accessible alternatives, and clients may internalize tasks previously outsourced. 

Ultimately, the survival of large consulting firms hinges on their ability to adapt to this evolving landscape and leverage AGI effectively.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Consulting companies: enjoy the AI ride while it lasts…«

Enrique Dans criticizes the UK government's demand for access to user data on Apple's iCloud. Dans argues this move undermines privacy by forcing Apple to remove end-to-end encryption for UK users, making their data accessible to authorities. He contends that this action equates the UK government's approach to that of authoritarian regimes like China. 

Dans asserts that attacking encryption is a common tactic by politicians, who seek to appear tough on crime but ultimately harm citizens' rights, while also stating that encryption is necessary for security. He believes governments shouldn't have the authority to compromise the technology that protects our privacy.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Why do governments keep telling us they have the right to access our private information?»

Enrique Dans' article analyzes Apple's announced $500 billion U.S. investment, suggesting it's more public relations than genuine innovation. 

The author argues that Apple's investment is largely repackaged spending and relies on partners like Foxconn for actual capital expenditure. Dans claims Apple's CAPEX spending is comparatively low compared to other Big Tech companies, especially in AI infrastructure. 

He suggests Tim Cook's announcement is a masterclass in managing Donald Trump by providing a "hollow political triumph." The piece implies that Apple is skilled at maintaining a conservative financial strategy while giving the appearance of significant investment to political figures. 

Ultimately, the author sees Apple's move as more of a PR stunt than a bold economic bet on the country.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Tim Cook has just given a masterclass in how to manage Donald Trump«

Enrique Dans's article advocates for regenerative agriculture, specifically no-till farming, as a sustainable alternative to traditional plowing. Plowing, while historically useful, is now seen as ecologically damaging, contributing to soil erosion, nutrient loss, and carbon release. 

The author argues that no-till farming, which nourishes the soil and promotes biodiversity, is essential for a sustainable future. Dans critiques those who resist this change, accusing them of prioritizing short-term gains over long-term environmental health. He highlights the historical example of the Dust Bowl as a cautionary tale against intensive plowing. 

Ultimately, the article calls for a shift towards regenerative practices to combat the climate crisis and ensure fertile farmland.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Why regenerative agriculture is the future of farming«

Enrique Dans's article examines the impact of AI on employment, particularly within the technology sector. The piece references a US Bureau of Labor Statistics study that forecasts job growth in professional, scientific, and technical services despite AI advancements. 

The author suggests that AI will reshape jobs rather than eliminate them entirely, with routine tasks being automated while new roles requiring specialized skills emerge. 

The analysis emphasizes the need for continuous learning and adaptation to thrive in the evolving digital landscape. It highlights that while some jobs might be negatively impacted, fields like systems design and data science are expected to experience significant growth. 

Ultimately, the article argues that managing the digital transformation well can lead to increased efficiency and improved services.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «AI isn’t taking our jobs, it’s rewriting them«

Enrique Dans's article addresses the impracticality of banning Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and instead suggests focusing on robust regulation. 

The author critiques the STOP AI movement's call for a ban, arguing that technological advancement is inevitable and prohibition is ineffective. 

Dans highlights the potential benefits of AI in various fields while acknowledging the associated risks, such as loss of control and existential threats. He emphasizes the need for international collaboration to establish ethical and security guidelines, a task complicated by current geopolitical realities. The article promotes a balanced perspective, advocating for managing AI development to harness its potential while mitigating its dangers. 

Ultimately, Dans urges a realistic approach that considers both the benefits and risks of AGI within the existing sociopolitical landscape.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «A ban on AGI isn’t going to happen, so let’s get real and have a proper debate«

Enrique Dans's article explores the adoption of general-purpose technologies (GPTs) like the internet, smartphones, and now, generative AI (GenAI). 

The author draws parallels between the adoption phases of the internet and smartphones, highlighting initial barriers, learning curves, and the need for trust and relevant content. 

Dans suggests GenAI's adoption could be faster than the internet but slower than smartphones due to implementation complexities. 

The article emphasizes the potential economic impact of GenAI and the importance of addressing challenges like resistance to change and ethical concerns. Unlike the self-taught approach to the internet and smartphones, Dans stresses the need for a concerted effort to develop GenAI skills. 

Ultimately, the article questions whether society has learned from past technological adoptions to handle GenAI responsibly.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «We had to teach ourselves how to use the internet and smartphones; will we get it right with AI?»

Enrique Dans discusses the proper integration of AI tools, emphasizing that their value lies in how they are used, not in the tools themselves. He uses examples from The New York Times and IE University, where AI is thoughtfully implemented to enhance human capabilities rather than replace them. 

Dans shares his personal AI-assisted writing process, assuring readers his articles are still researched, written, and edited by him. He argues that AI should be viewed as a partner to elevate creative processes and improve learning. He warns against superficial adoption and encourages a focus on maximizing the learning process for students.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «It’s not the tools, it’s how you use them«

Enrique Dans's article explores the "AI paradox" in software development, focusing on the tension between efficiency gains from AI and the experiential learning of junior developers. 

The author references a software developer's blog post suggesting younger developers overly rely on generative AI, hindering their understanding of coding principles. Dans highlights how the rapid adoption of AI tools could lead to the obsolescence of junior developer roles, impeding the acquisition of crucial experience. He then suggests that open-source code has helped train AI to take on more of the coding tasks that junior developers used to learn by doing. 

The article considers potential future scenarios, ranging from complete automation of software development to an evolution of the developer's role toward more creative and strategic functions. Dans concludes by urging developers to prepare for significant changes in the field.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «The AI paradox: efficiency vs experience in software development«

Enrique Dans's article addresses the controversy surrounding the use of AI in art creation. The author argues against the backlash from artists who feel threatened by AI, stating that inspiration is drawn from existing works and AI should be embraced as a tool. 

Dans believes that AI-generated art is not merely copying but creating new expressions, akin to using a brush. The piece suggests society should be open to the evolution of art and technology, rather than resisting it due to fears about copyright or job displacement. 

Dans uses examples such as the New York Times and IE University's adoption of AI to promote AI's advantages as a tool.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «AI is pushing the boundaries of what defines art«