In March 2025, Elon Musk's AI startup, xAI, acquired X (formerly Twitter) in an all-stock deal. This transaction valued xAI at $80 billion and X at $33 billion, raising questions about Musk essentially selling his own company to himself. 

The article highlights that X's value had decreased since Musk's 2022 purchase, potentially disappointing recent investors. Comparisons are drawn to past controversial acquisitions, suggesting possible conflicts of interest and insider trading opportunities. 

The author questions whether this move strategically benefits both entities or serves to artificially inflate the value of a struggling asset. 

Ultimately, the acquisition positions X as a testing ground for xAI's ambitions to have AI own the online conversation.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Can AI save X from Elon Musk?»

This article discusses a perceived divergence in AI development strategies between the United States and China. 

The US approach is characterized by substantial, private sector-driven investments in AI data centers. In contrast, China appears to be adopting a more measured and environmentally conscious strategy, reassessing its data center investments partly due to the emergence of more efficient AI models and environmental regulations. 

This difference raises questions about the sustainability and long-term implications of each nation's chosen path in the global AI race. 

The piece suggests a potential "tortoise and the hare" dynamic, with China prioritizing a steadier approach.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Is AI becoming a global race between the tortoise and the hare?»

Enrique Dans argues that recent court decisions, such as the Anthropic case, indicate a growing judicial understanding that copyright infringement requires actual copying of content. 

He highlights a ruling where a judge stated no infringement occurred because an AI model did not reproduce lyrics in its output. 

Dans supports the idea that AI synthesizes information rather than memorizing or plagiarizing, drawing a parallel to human learning. He criticizes copyright managers and the music industry for resisting technological progress through litigation instead of innovation. 

The author contends that applying old copyright laws to AI's statistical learning is an attempt to stifle progress by a greedy industry.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Judges finally seem to understand that if there’s no copy, there’s no copyright«

Enrique Dans's article argues that China's unwavering focus on education is the primary driver of its success in overcoming economic challenges and becoming a global leader. 

He highlights the quality of Chinese educational infrastructure and teaching methods, including the impact of the "sea turtle strategy" which saw Chinese students return home with international experience.

This investment fostered a large pool of skilled engineers, enabling the rise of innovative companies founded by graduates of domestic universities.

Dans concludes that China's commitment to educating its own population to high standards has been crucial in its ascent, now attracting talent domestically rather than relying on foreign education.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «The three reasons for China’s success: education, education and education«

Enrique Dans's article discusses the significance of choosing encrypted messaging apps like Signal, especially in light of government surveillance. 

The author highlights the irony of Trump administration officials using Signal for sensitive communications despite criticizing Hillary Clinton's email practices. 

Dans emphasizes that Signal's strength lies not only in its encryption but also in its commitment to not storing metadata, unlike other popular apps. He notes the European Commission's adoption of Signal due to its strong privacy features. 

Ultimately, Dans frames the selection of privacy-focused communication tools as a politically charged act in an era of widespread monitoring.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Choosing Signal: a political act in the era of constant surveillance«

This article from Enrique Dans, writing in March 2025, examines the precipitous decline of 23andMe, a company founded in 2006 that pioneered direct-to-consumer DNA testing for health predispositions.

Initially successful with significant investment and recognition, 23andMe faced critical scrutiny and regulatory pushback from the FDA.

The FDA was concerned about users misinterpreting genetic risk information, exemplified by the "Jolie effect," leading to a ban on the company providing health-related data.

Consequently, 23andMe's business model, once groundbreaking, was severely hampered, placing it in competition with services offering only ancestry information. The author suggests that this downfall of a promising innovation might have been avoidable.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «23andMe: an entirely avoidable disaster?»

Enrique Dans's article argues that Europe must achieve digital independence due to the United States and its Big Tech companies undermining fair international competition.

The author contends that the "America First" policy is a guise for protectionism and the abuse of power, harming global free competition.

Dans expresses hope that recent EU regulatory efforts will establish Europe's own digital environment, distinct from the approach taken by the US. He highlights accusations of anti-competitive practices against major US tech firms by EU regulators seeking a more level playing field. Ultimately, the piece champions Europe creating its own regulatory and cultural framework in the digital realm.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Hazardous territory: why Europe must establish digital independence«

Enrique Dans's article discusses the increasing trend of individuals using AI like ChatGPT to seek medical second opinions, sparked by anecdotes of AI outperforming doctors in diagnosis. 

This phenomenon is presented as an evolution of the "Doctor Google" syndrome, where people self-diagnose using online information. 

The author highlights a study indicating that ChatGPT's medical diagnostic accuracy is currently below 50%, suggesting successful instances might be outliers. A key distinction is made between a human doctor's diagnosis and an AI's, where the latter, based on its training, might consider a broader range of possibilities, even unlikely ones. 

The piece raises questions about the implications of patients potentially prioritizing AI-generated diagnoses over professional medical advice when such technology becomes more readily accessible.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «What happens when ChatGPT’s second opinion overrules your doctor’s?»

The provided text, primarily an article by Enrique Dans, analyzes the rapid decline of Adobe Flash following Apple's decision to cease support, illustrating how a once-dominant technical skill can quickly lose relevance. 

The author examines the labor market dynamics that ensued, noting that despite a sharp drop in demand, Flash developer salaries did not collapse due to the workforce's ability to adapt to newer technologies like HTML5. 

Dans highlights the importance of continuous skill diversification for tech professionals in a rapidly evolving digital landscape, drawing parallels with other technologies like Cobol and link building. 

Reader comments further enrich the discussion, providing personal anecdotes and diverse perspectives on the rise and fall of Flash, as well as the broader challenges and opportunities within the technology sector.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «What the death of Adobe Flash a decade ago tells freelancers today about the need to develop new skills«

Enrique Dans argues that Big Tech companies have transitioned from fostering harmful online discourse to actively interfering in American politics. 

He contends that their pursuit of profit through algorithms that amplify divisive content paved the way for Donald Trump's ascent. 

Dans further asserts that these tech companies are now openly aligning with Trump to avoid regulation, even at the expense of democratic principles. This alliance, according to the author, constitutes an unprecedented assault on democracy, masked by claims of progress. 

The piece suggests that the long-term prioritization of engagement over factual accuracy by tech platforms has significantly damaged public discourse and trust.

This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «Big Tech and Trump want to seize control of democracy«