We read The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels by Alex Epstein this week because we're not here just to tow the democratic- climate crisis - anti-fossil fuels line, we're here to investigate the fossil fuel industry and climate change issue deeper.
This wasn't the book that we had hoped it would be.
It was more of a thirsty love letter to the fossil fuel industry than anything remotely resembling an unbiased account of why fossil fuels could be moral to continue using.
We asked last week, "can we separate the energy from the industry" and our distinctive answer is nope. Definitely not.
Hearing someone defend fossil fuels as having a causative relationship for every type of growth and human ingenuity while claiming further ingenuity into renewable resources would be too costly and dangerous was frustrating, to say the least.
Hearing over, and over again the words, "cheap and reliable" intermixxed with standards of the "free world" while being actually shamed for maintaining value in anything other than a Western societal human (read: white, privileged, and American) was infuriating.
Many humans were (and are still) harmed in the making of today's fossil fuel energy technology. This energy is cheap because of deep cut governmental subsidies. It remains cheap because the labor and land to get it remains to be stolen. It stays cheap because the industry would rather pull its strings and start a war (or fund a war) so they can find footholds to create a way to exploit communities and governments (and the land),
We don't pay the true cost of the energy we rely on.
We don't pay the true cost of fossil fuel tech and we never have. Calling it cheap is a gross misrepresentation.
This energy is "reliable" because we have built an infrastructure and invested in the technology to make it reliable. Epstein goes to great lengths to say this and to say that we should fear for our right to pursue cheap, reliable energy - then also to say that investing in any other tech in a similar way is a waste because we should be grateful to the fossil fuel industry for all that it has given us.
And yes, the fact of the matter is that we, as a society, are not ready flip the switch (pun intended) on fossil fuel usage.
We still have years left of development and transitioning into renewable energies. No one is denying that, and no one is saying that we should cut the power off around the world.
But Epstein would have you believe that Environmentalists are out here trying to kill babies by denying NICU units power unless they build new solar and wind farms. Again, a gross misrepresentation of the truth.
All in all, our investigation of the positive side of fossil fuels left us baffled and angry. There was so much conjecture and venom that now we find ourselves on a mission to get to the truth.
So for next week, we decided to do some independent research on funding, injustices, actual risks, and real climate change statistics.
Subscribe and stay tuned!