History has paid little attention to Alfred Baldwin, the Watergate wiretap monitor, and his knowledge.  That is most likely the result of the Washington Post feigning ignorance of his existence for the crucial first several months of the scandal.  Was the Washington Post truly ignorant of his overhearings, which would have radically altered the narrative?  And were Washington Post reporters, as claimed, ignorant of his name and role prior to October 1972?  Is there a circumstantial way to prove the Washington Post's early knowledge of Baldwin, if the Post claims otherwise?
________________________________________
Thank you for listening! For more information such as a hyperlinked Cast of Characters, visit themysteriesofwatergate.com.  And if you like what you've heard, please leave us a 5-star review on Apple Podcast and pick up a copy of the new book, "The Mysteries of Watergate: What Really Happened" on Amazon.