The Supreme Court’s Friday ruling has sent shockwaves through the legacy media and leftist legal circles, reigniting the national debate over birthright citizenship. In this episode, we expose the widespread misrepresentation of the 14th Amendment, break down the constitutional argument against granting citizenship to children of illegal migrants, and highlight how President Trump’s executive order challenges decades of judicial activism. Local news is melting down, but the legal foundation is clearer than ever.

---

Pre-order your copy of America Awakened today at https://turley.pub/AwakenUSA and join the movement that’s not just dreaming of a better America—we’re building it.

Leave a message for Steve! Call now! 717-844-5984

Highlights:

• “These local news affiliates aren’t even trying to appear objective or unbiased. They are 100% behind this absolutely absurd notion that illegal migrants, who have no legal claim whatsoever to being here, can give birth automatically to US citizens.”
• “There is no birthright citizenship in the constitution.”
• “Illegal migrants are subject to our territorial jurisdiction in that they have to abide by and are responsible to the laws of our land, but they are not subjects of our political jurisdiction, in that they’re still the citizens of the country they left.”

Timestamps:   

[00:21] Media hysteria over Trump's birthright citizenship executive order and SC ruling

[07:34] What the 14th Amendment actually says about birthright citizenship

[09:09] Legal distinctions between territorial and political jurisdiction

[11:31] The origin of the birthright citizenship controversy - Justice Brennan’s 1982 footnote

--

Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode.  If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.

FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks

Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter

**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy