
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Hi everyone,
In this episode I interview Laura Powell, a lawyer who fought against a law in California that restricted doctors from discussing their opinions with patients. The law, known as AB 2098, aimed to silence doctors who were expressing views that went against the mainstream narrative. Laura discusses the unconstitutional nature of the law and the chilling effect it had on doctors' free speech rights. She also discusses the role of various organizations, such as the California Medical Association and the No License for Disinformation group, in pushing for the law. Despite facing personal blowback, she is proud of the work she has done and the friendships she has formed.
The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported podcast. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:
Takeaways
* AB 2098 was a law in California that restricted doctors from discussing their opinions with patients, particularly on topics that went against the mainstream narrative.
* The erosion of trust in public health institutions has contributed to the skepticism towards mainstream narratives and the importance of allowing doctors to prioritize their patients' interests over public health agendas.
* The victory in the Hoeg v. Newsom case highlighted the importance of protecting doctors' free speech rights and ensuring that laws are narrowly tailored and not overly vague. Laura Powell started Californians for Good Governance before the case because she saw a lack of opposition to the California law that would have restricted doctors' free speech rights.
* She testified in front of the California legislature and received a positive response from the judge, who granted a preliminary injunction against the law.
Listen Now:
Spotify / Apple podcasts
Sound Bites
* "It's just frustrating because we actually weren't paid and people were telling lies in order to as an ad hominem attack against us to say we're only doing this because we're getting money."
* "It's a great free speech victory.
* "Nobody else was doing this."
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Background
03:23 AB 2098: The Unconstitutional Law
10:47 The Role of the California Medical Association
35:06 The Fight for Free Speech Rights for Doctors
44:43 The Erosion of Trust in Public Health Institutions
53:57 The Hoag v. Newsom Case: A Victory for Free Speech
01:00:56 Challenging Unconstitutional Laws
01:06:33 The Need to Stand Up for Free Speech
By Dr. Jay Bhattacharya & Rav Arora4.8
185185 ratings
Hi everyone,
In this episode I interview Laura Powell, a lawyer who fought against a law in California that restricted doctors from discussing their opinions with patients. The law, known as AB 2098, aimed to silence doctors who were expressing views that went against the mainstream narrative. Laura discusses the unconstitutional nature of the law and the chilling effect it had on doctors' free speech rights. She also discusses the role of various organizations, such as the California Medical Association and the No License for Disinformation group, in pushing for the law. Despite facing personal blowback, she is proud of the work she has done and the friendships she has formed.
The Illusion of Consensus is a reader-supported podcast. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a paid subscriber:
Takeaways
* AB 2098 was a law in California that restricted doctors from discussing their opinions with patients, particularly on topics that went against the mainstream narrative.
* The erosion of trust in public health institutions has contributed to the skepticism towards mainstream narratives and the importance of allowing doctors to prioritize their patients' interests over public health agendas.
* The victory in the Hoeg v. Newsom case highlighted the importance of protecting doctors' free speech rights and ensuring that laws are narrowly tailored and not overly vague. Laura Powell started Californians for Good Governance before the case because she saw a lack of opposition to the California law that would have restricted doctors' free speech rights.
* She testified in front of the California legislature and received a positive response from the judge, who granted a preliminary injunction against the law.
Listen Now:
Spotify / Apple podcasts
Sound Bites
* "It's just frustrating because we actually weren't paid and people were telling lies in order to as an ad hominem attack against us to say we're only doing this because we're getting money."
* "It's a great free speech victory.
* "Nobody else was doing this."
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Background
03:23 AB 2098: The Unconstitutional Law
10:47 The Role of the California Medical Association
35:06 The Fight for Free Speech Rights for Doctors
44:43 The Erosion of Trust in Public Health Institutions
53:57 The Hoag v. Newsom Case: A Victory for Free Speech
01:00:56 Challenging Unconstitutional Laws
01:06:33 The Need to Stand Up for Free Speech

3,969 Listeners

14,262 Listeners

4,909 Listeners

949 Listeners

2,187 Listeners

578 Listeners

5,307 Listeners

1,826 Listeners

178 Listeners

40,448 Listeners

2,487 Listeners

398 Listeners

243 Listeners

16,892 Listeners

533 Listeners