
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today we're flipping the script to bring you an interview where your host Courtney Bullard features as a guest on the Higher Ground podcast with John Graff. In this episode, Courtney, John, and Scott Schneider discuss COVID-19, the NPRM and its implications, and more. These two men are respected colleagues in the industry; some might recall Scott being a former guest on the show. Scott is a well-known litigator, as well as a sought-after advisor on Title IX, labor and employment law issues, and risk management concerns related to student affairs. He has led several investigations of serial sex abuse allegations, allegations of misconduct involving senior leadership and other acts of institutional misconduct. Their discussion today involves weighing up the pros and cons of rolling out the new Title IX regulations in the current COVID environment, why it might not be worth postponing, and what these new regulations will mean for educational institutions and students. A big concern is that the suggested policies will discourage schools from conducting hearing processes, which in turn will deter students from reporting incidents. On the positive side, the new policies might lead to an increase in informal resolution type processes, although this comes with its own set of risks. Be sure to join the conversation to learn everything there is to know about the current status of new Title IX regs!
Key Points From This Episode:
Tweetables:
"It would basically be a collection of states getting together, going to a court and saying, 'Block enforcement of these regulations.'"— @EdLawDude [0:10:42]
"I think the general census, at least from my clients, would be not to have to add something else. On the flip side, I also think there are a lot of folks—especially like myself—that's just like, 'Let's just get on with it.' If we are going to have to comply and this is going to happen, then let's just do so that we can move on with our lives." — @ICSLawyer [0:11:10]
"Assuming that the final regs are what we suspect the final regs would be, I would think the net impact of that is going to be students no longer wanting to come forward and participating in the process and maybe not even coming forward at all, which would be a tragedy." — @EdLawDude [0:22:21]
"That's why I'm almost hoping the regs drop sooner rather than later. Give people as much time as humanly possible to start transitioning to whatever the final regs are going to say." — @EdLawDude [0:34:47]
Links Mentioned in Today's Episode:
Higher Ground Podcast
John Graff on Twitter
Scott Schneider
Scott Schneider on Twitter
Scott Schneider Number
Courtney Bullard on Twitter
Courtney Bullard Email
Courtney Bullard Number
The Chronicle of Higher Education
Inside Higher Ed
Vice News
HBO
Mohegan Sun
By Institutional Compliance Solutions/Courtney Bullard - Title IX Attorney4.8
4242 ratings
Today we're flipping the script to bring you an interview where your host Courtney Bullard features as a guest on the Higher Ground podcast with John Graff. In this episode, Courtney, John, and Scott Schneider discuss COVID-19, the NPRM and its implications, and more. These two men are respected colleagues in the industry; some might recall Scott being a former guest on the show. Scott is a well-known litigator, as well as a sought-after advisor on Title IX, labor and employment law issues, and risk management concerns related to student affairs. He has led several investigations of serial sex abuse allegations, allegations of misconduct involving senior leadership and other acts of institutional misconduct. Their discussion today involves weighing up the pros and cons of rolling out the new Title IX regulations in the current COVID environment, why it might not be worth postponing, and what these new regulations will mean for educational institutions and students. A big concern is that the suggested policies will discourage schools from conducting hearing processes, which in turn will deter students from reporting incidents. On the positive side, the new policies might lead to an increase in informal resolution type processes, although this comes with its own set of risks. Be sure to join the conversation to learn everything there is to know about the current status of new Title IX regs!
Key Points From This Episode:
Tweetables:
"It would basically be a collection of states getting together, going to a court and saying, 'Block enforcement of these regulations.'"— @EdLawDude [0:10:42]
"I think the general census, at least from my clients, would be not to have to add something else. On the flip side, I also think there are a lot of folks—especially like myself—that's just like, 'Let's just get on with it.' If we are going to have to comply and this is going to happen, then let's just do so that we can move on with our lives." — @ICSLawyer [0:11:10]
"Assuming that the final regs are what we suspect the final regs would be, I would think the net impact of that is going to be students no longer wanting to come forward and participating in the process and maybe not even coming forward at all, which would be a tragedy." — @EdLawDude [0:22:21]
"That's why I'm almost hoping the regs drop sooner rather than later. Give people as much time as humanly possible to start transitioning to whatever the final regs are going to say." — @EdLawDude [0:34:47]
Links Mentioned in Today's Episode:
Higher Ground Podcast
John Graff on Twitter
Scott Schneider
Scott Schneider on Twitter
Scott Schneider Number
Courtney Bullard on Twitter
Courtney Bullard Email
Courtney Bullard Number
The Chronicle of Higher Education
Inside Higher Ed
Vice News
HBO
Mohegan Sun

6,839 Listeners

43,566 Listeners

25,830 Listeners

4,052 Listeners

3,531 Listeners

87,458 Listeners

112,543 Listeners

56,536 Listeners

5,801 Listeners

18 Listeners

16,013 Listeners

10,799 Listeners

7,104 Listeners

813 Listeners

5 Listeners