
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In this episode, Chris Jobman and Dave Marsteller answer questions from the Facebook group about dog training and judging in HRC and AKC tests. They discuss topics such as how judges determine the difficulty of a test based on the participants, what factors they consider when deciding whether a dog passes or fails, and how they set up tests differently based on the time of year. They also compare the rules and regulations of HRC and AKC tests and share their opinions on various aspects of both organizations. In this conversation, the hosts discuss various topics related to judging retriever tests. They cover the importance of gun safety, the reaction of judges to handler mistakes, the role of judges in challenging the blind, the dynamics between co-judges, and the challenges and responsibilities of judging. They also address questions about dog behavior, scoring sheets, and the use of force-fetching in training. Overall, the conversation provides insights into the judging process and offers advice for aspiring judges.
4.9
7272 ratings
In this episode, Chris Jobman and Dave Marsteller answer questions from the Facebook group about dog training and judging in HRC and AKC tests. They discuss topics such as how judges determine the difficulty of a test based on the participants, what factors they consider when deciding whether a dog passes or fails, and how they set up tests differently based on the time of year. They also compare the rules and regulations of HRC and AKC tests and share their opinions on various aspects of both organizations. In this conversation, the hosts discuss various topics related to judging retriever tests. They cover the importance of gun safety, the reaction of judges to handler mistakes, the role of judges in challenging the blind, the dynamics between co-judges, and the challenges and responsibilities of judging. They also address questions about dog behavior, scoring sheets, and the use of force-fetching in training. Overall, the conversation provides insights into the judging process and offers advice for aspiring judges.
1,698 Listeners
354 Listeners
502 Listeners
1,470 Listeners
619 Listeners
497 Listeners
192 Listeners
848 Listeners
578 Listeners
548 Listeners
413 Listeners
247 Listeners
96 Listeners
57 Listeners
27 Listeners