
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Dear Listeners,
Welcome to Part II – the continuation of our interview with David Contorno – an expert in employee benefits and employer-based health programs. David is a founding member of Health Rosetta and has over 20 years of experience in the field.
If you haven’t listened to Part I yet, you may want to start there. In the first half of our interview, David described the ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ that exists between employees, employers and payers. He also shared the specific value-based strategies he deploys – interventions that assist employees in avoiding unnecessary tests and procedures; and that steer them toward more cost effective options – using pre-paid, at risk, bundled payment programs.
In Part II, you’ll hear :
Judging from listeners’ responses (on social media) to Part I of the interview, it’s clear this is a topic of high importance and high complexity. While many listeners did not agree with everything David said, there was a lot of agreement on his intention and approach.
I came away from this interview inspired and wanting to hear more.
As I thought about David’s recommendations, I tried to come up with reasons why we shouldn’t follow his advice. I couldn’t come up with any.
Can you?
Zeev
By Zeev Neuwirth4.8
164164 ratings
Dear Listeners,
Welcome to Part II – the continuation of our interview with David Contorno – an expert in employee benefits and employer-based health programs. David is a founding member of Health Rosetta and has over 20 years of experience in the field.
If you haven’t listened to Part I yet, you may want to start there. In the first half of our interview, David described the ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ that exists between employees, employers and payers. He also shared the specific value-based strategies he deploys – interventions that assist employees in avoiding unnecessary tests and procedures; and that steer them toward more cost effective options – using pre-paid, at risk, bundled payment programs.
In Part II, you’ll hear :
Judging from listeners’ responses (on social media) to Part I of the interview, it’s clear this is a topic of high importance and high complexity. While many listeners did not agree with everything David said, there was a lot of agreement on his intention and approach.
I came away from this interview inspired and wanting to hear more.
As I thought about David’s recommendations, I tried to come up with reasons why we shouldn’t follow his advice. I couldn’t come up with any.
Can you?
Zeev

8,764 Listeners

9,520 Listeners

112,758 Listeners

498 Listeners

9,157 Listeners

9,137 Listeners

1,082 Listeners

189 Listeners

9,716 Listeners

6,445 Listeners

395 Listeners

9,897 Listeners

16,042 Listeners

10,911 Listeners

63 Listeners