Episodes Archives - Cardionerds

CardioNerds (Dr. Josh Saef and Dr. Sumeet Vaikunth) join Dr. Sheng Fu, Dr. Payton Kendsersky, and Dr. Aniqa Shahrier from the Medical University of South Carolina for some off-shore fishing. They discuss the following featuring a patient with D-TGA and Eisenmenger’s syndrome treated with a Heartmate 3. Expert commentary was provided by Dr. Brian Houston. The episode audio was edited by student Dr. Adriana Mares.

A 39-year-old woman with a history of D-transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA) with prior atrial switch repair (Mustard) was admitted from the clinic with cardiogenic shock. She underwent right heart catheterization which demonstrated elevated biventricular filling pressures and low cardiac index. An intra-aortic balloon pump was placed, and the patient was evaluated for advanced therapies. A liver biopsy showed grade 3 fibrosis, which, in combination with her shock state, made her a high-risk candidate for isolated heart or combined heart-liver transplantation. After a multi-disciplinary discussion, the patient underwent a Heartmate III left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant in her systemic right ventricle. Although she did well post-operatively, she was admitted after a month with recurrent cardiogenic shock, with imaging showing her inflow cannula had become perpendicular to the septum.  The patient and family eventually decided to pursue comfort measures, and the patient passed.

“To study the phenomena of disease without books is to sail an uncharted sea, while to study books without patients is not to go to sea at all.” – Sir William Osler. CardioNerds thank the patients and their loved ones whose stories teach us the Art of Medicine and support our Mission to Democratize Cardiovascular Medicine.

Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values.

US Cardiology Review is now the official journal of CardioNerds! Submit your manuscript here.

CardioNerds Case Reports Page
CardioNerds Episode Page
CardioNerds Academy
Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll

CardioNerds Journal Club
Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!
Check out CardioNerds SWAG!
Become a CardioNerds Patron!

What are some common sequelae in ACHD patients?

ACHD patients are a heterogeneous population, but atrial tachycardias are extremely frequent in this patient population, often due to re-entrant pathways around surgical suture lines. These can often be treated with radiofrequency ablation while paying close attention to their challenging anatomy. Heart failure is also extremely common (up to 40% incidence) but has variable incidence dependent on the specific anatomy. Valvular heart disease, including infective endocarditis as well as non-cardiac organ dysfunction, are also important contributors to the overall prognosis of ACHD patients.

How does heart failure present in ACHD patients?

Heart failure presentations in ACHD patients tend to be subacute and insidious, as patients often have become accustomed to their symptoms. They are often unable to identify clear exercise limitations due to the slow, subacute nature of symptoms. However, acute presentations and shock can also be seen. Heart failure is the leading cause of death in ACHD patients.

What are the challenges for advanced therapies in the ACHD population?

First and foremost, risk stratification for these patients is often difficult due to often unreliable self-reporting of symptoms. Thus, early recognition becomes key, but even then, may not be enough. Several anatomic and physiological challenges remain. ACHD patients have often undergone multiple cardiac surgeries, increasing the surgical risk of redo sternotomies with severe adhesions. Due to the longstanding nature of their disease, ACHD patients often develop irreversible pulmonary hypertension (making transplant prohibitive) or end-organ dysfunction secondary to right heart failure (necessitating dual organ transplant).

Is durable LVAD a feasible option for patients with systemic right ventricles?

Isolated case reports demonstrate the feasibility of the off-label use of durable LVADs in systemic right ventricles. The complex anatomy of these patients has led to reports of alternative implant sites for the inflow cannula to minimize obstruction.  Alternative surgical approaches, such as lateral thoracotomy, have also been described to try to avoid the adhesions that are often seen in these patients as a result of multiple prior cardiac surgeries. While the surgery is technically feasible, long-term data is not available, and this remains a “bail-out” therapy with current-generation LVAD designs.

What is the role of goals of care discussions in ACHD patients?

Advanced care planning is rarely discussed in routine clinic visits, and most providers wait until the condition has deteriorated significantly. Most ACHD patients want to discuss advanced care early before the disease progresses, but some do not, so it is important to ask about patient preferences. The majority of ACHD patients prefer to have advanced care discussions with their ACHD provider due to an already established and trusting relationship.

CardioNerds co-founder Dr. Dan Ambinder, series chair Dr. Giselle Suero Abreu, and episode FIT Lead Dr. Rachel Ohman discuss disparities in cardiooncology with Dr. Javier Gomez Valencia, the Director of Cardio-Oncology services at John H. Stronger Jr. Hospital of Cook County. Dr. Rachel Ohman drafted show notes. Audio editing by student doctor Shivani Reddy.

A disproportionate burden of both cancer and cardiovascular disease affects racial and ethnic minority groups as well as lower-income communities. Similar patterns of vulnerability exist among cancer survivors with cardiovascular disease, although further investigation in these subpopulations is needed. We discuss a comprehensive approach to the cardio-oncology patient, our current understanding of the social and structural determinants of disparities in cardio-oncology populations, and other contributions to inequity in the field. Given the growing population of cancer survivors and limited accessibility to cardio-oncology specialists, these topics are of critical importance to anyone caring for cancer patients who have or are at risk for cardiovascular disease.

This episode is supported by a grant from Pfizer Inc.

This CardioNerds Cardio-Oncology series is a multi-institutional collaboration made possible by contributions of stellar fellow leads and expert faculty from several programs, led by series co-chairs, Dr. Giselle Suero Abreu, Dr. Dinu Balanescu, and Dr. Teodora Donisan. 

Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values.

US Cardiology Review is now the official journal of CardioNerds! Submit your manuscript here.

CardioNerds Cardio-Oncology Page
CardioNerds Episode Page
CardioNerds Academy
Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll

CardioNerds Journal Club
Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!
Check out CardioNerds SWAG!
Become a CardioNerds Patron!

How do you approach the evaluation of a new patient in cardio-oncology? How do social and structural determinants of health impact treatment-associated cardiotoxicity?

What barriers to cardio-oncology care are unique to the Hispanic/Latinx population?

What disparities are faced by Black patients with cancer?

How can patients’ sexual orientation and gender identity influence disparities in cardio-oncology, particularly for LGBTQIA+ patients?

What other areas of cardio-oncology might contribute to ongoing outcomes disparities, and how should we approach those disparities?

International Cardio-Oncology Society ( IC-OS). IC-OS exits to advance cardiovascular care of cancer patients and survivors by promoting collaboration among researchers, educators and clinicians around the world. Learn more at https://ic-os.org/.

CardioNerds (Dr. Josh Saef, Dr. Agnes Koczo) join Dr. Iva Minga, Dr. Kifah Hussain, and Dr. Kevin Lee from the University of Chicago – NorthShore to discuss a case of unrepaired congenital heart disease that involves D-TGA complicated by Eisenmenger syndrome. The ECPR was provided by Dr. Michael Earing. Audio editing by Dr. Akiva Rosenzveig.

A 25-year-old woman with an unknown congenital heart disease that was diagnosed in infancy in Pakistan presents to the hospital for abdominal pain and weakness. She is found to be profoundly hypoxemic, and an echocardiogram revealed D-transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA) with a large VSD. As this was not repaired in childhood, she has unfortunately developed Eisenmenger syndrome with elevated pulmonary vascular resistance. She is stabilized and treated medically for her cyanotic heart disease. Unfortunately given the severity and late presentation of her disease, she has limited long-term options for care. CardioNerds discuss the diagnosis of D-TGA and Eisenmenger’s syndrome, as well as long-term management and complications associated with this entity.

“To study the phenomena of disease without books is to sail an uncharted sea, while to study books without patients is not to go to sea at all.” – Sir William Osler. CardioNerds thank the patients and their loved ones whose stories teach us the Art of Medicine and support our Mission to Democratize Cardiovascular Medicine.

Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values.

US Cardiology Review is now the official journal of CardioNerds! Submit your manuscript here.

CardioNerds Case Reports Page
CardioNerds Episode Page
CardioNerds Academy
Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll

CardioNerds Journal Club
Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!
Check out CardioNerds SWAG!
Become a CardioNerds Patron!

Cyanotic congenital heart disease is often diagnosed in infancy and timely treatment is paramount. As these diseases progress over time, pulmonary over-circulation often pulmonary hypertension (PH), elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, and Eisenmenger syndrome will develop, which preclude definitive treatment. For D-TGA, before PH develops, there are surgical options such as the arterial switch procedure that can treat the disease. Unfortunately, once Eisenmenger syndrome develops, there are multiple systemic complications including hyperviscosity, thrombosis, bleeding, kidney disease, iron deficiency, arrhythmias, etc. that can occur. Management requires a multi-disciplinary team including an adult congenital cardiology specialist, but mortality rates remain high, with median survival reduced by 20 years, worse with complex cardiac defects. Bosentan is a first line treatment for patients with Eisenmenger syndrome, with PDE-5 inhibitors as a second line either by themselves or in combination with bosentan. Data are currently limited for latest-generation PH treatments in Eisenmenger syndrome and further study is still underway.

CardioNerds (Drs. Amit Goyal, Jason Feinman, and Tiffany Dong) discuss Beyond the Boards: Diseases of the Peripheral Arteries with Dr. Amy Pollak. We review common presentations of peripheral vascular disease, ranging from aortic disease to the more distal vessels in an engaging case-based discussion. Dr. Pollack talks us through these cases, including the diagnosis and management of peripheral vascular diseases. Show notes were drafted by Dr. Matt Delfiner and episode audio was edited by student doctor Tina Reddy.

The CardioNerds Beyond the Boards Series was inspired by the Mayo Clinic Cardiovascular Board Review Course and designed in collaboration with the course directors Dr. Amy Pollak, Dr. Jeffrey Geske, and Dr. Michael Cullen.

Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values.

US Cardiology Review is now the official journal of CardioNerds! Submit your manuscript here.

CardioNerds Beyond the Boards Series
CardioNerds Episode Page
CardioNerds Academy
Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll

CardioNerds Journal Club
Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!
Check out CardioNerds SWAG!
Become a CardioNerds Patron!

Learning Objectives:

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Abdominal aortic aneurysms are a source of high morbidity and mortality. The US Preventative Services Task Force recommends one time screening ultrasound for AAA in men older than 65 years of age with a tobacco use history. Risk factors include age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and tobacco use. Patients with AAA between 3-3.9 mm should be monitored every 2-3 years. Sizes 4-5 cm should be re-imaged every 6-12 months.  Additional screening can be done for individuals < 65 years who have a first degree relative with AAA.

Women are more likely to have aortic dissection at smaller diameters than men, which is why intervention (open vs endovascular repair) is recommended at 5 cm diameter for women versus at 5.5 cm for men. Additionally, repair is also warranted if a AAA grows more than 5 mm in 6 months or 10 mm in one year.

Risk factor management is key with AAA, including blood pressure, glucose, and lipid targeting.  The presence of an AAA should be treated as secondary ASCVD prevention like coronary arterial disease, since AAA is an atherosclerotic disease equivalent. Tobacco cessation is of the utmost importance here.

Regarding strategy for repair: if the patient is not a surgical candidate, then endovascular repair is a reasonable option. If they are a surgical candidate, then the location of the aneurysm comes into play. Infrarenal or juxtarenal disease are more likely to require open repair.

Peripheral Arterial Disease

When a patient presents with claudication, in addition to thorough history and physical exam, checking for ABIs is important. Risk factors include known coronary disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. Women often report cramping in their calves/legs rather than outright pain.

ABI < 0.9 are consistent with PAD, with > 1.3 consistent with calcified and non-compressible vessels. Toe brachial index (TBI) cutoff is 0.7. If there is strong clinical suspicion but normal ABI, then performing the test after a period of exercise (calf raises, treadmill) can be clinically useful. An exercise induced decrease in ankle pressure by 30 mm or change in ABI by 20% is consistent with PAD.

Therapy for PAD includes supervised exercise training, lifestyle changes (e.g., tobacco cessation) and risk factor modification (blood pressure/lipids/glucose). Additionally, low dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin has been shown to decrease events compared to aspirin alone.

If there are continued symptoms despite the above therapy, then invasive management can be considered. This includes percutaneous or surgical revascularization.  This would be proceeded with CTA imaging for further guidance. Invasive angiography is reasonable for someone with a higher likelihood of a single lesion amenable to percutaneous repair.  Discrete and singular lesions are usually repaired percutaneously while more diffuse or multivessel disease, then surgical management may be indicated.

Acute Limb Ischemia

ALI can present with the 6 Ps: pain, pallor, pulselessness, parasthesias,  poikilothermia, and paralysis. Limbs may (rarely) remain viable, with signs being a clear Doppler-able pulse without sensory or muscle loss. Otherwise, a limb is salvageable if there is a faint arterial Doppler signal. If there is muscle weakness, then the limb is considered threatened. If an arterial Doppler signal is completely lost, then the limb is considered non-viable.

ALI is an “acute leg attack.” The initial therapy is systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin. If symptoms have been present for less than two weeks, then endovascular therapy with either thrombectomy or catheter-directed lysis are indicated. Major contraindications to lytic therapy include recent surgery, any history of intracranial bleeding or neoplasm, or if they are otherwise at a high bleeding risk. Non-viable limbs may better be served with amputation rather than revascularization.

1. Eikelboom JW, Connolly SJ, Bosch J, et al. Rivaroxaban with or without Aspirin in Stable Cardiovascular Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(14):1319-1330. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1709118

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1709118

2. Criqui MH, Matsushita K, Aboyans V, et al. Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Contemporary Epidemiology, Management Gaps, and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association  Circulation. 2021;144(9):e171-e191. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001005

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001005?rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org

3. Lanzi S, Belch J, Brodmann M, et al. Supervised exercise training in patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Vasa. 2022;51(5):267-274. doi:10.1024/0301-1526/a001024

https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/full/10.1024/0301-1526/a001024

4. Sabouret P, Cacoub P, Dallongeville J, et al. REACH: international prospective observational registry in patients at risk of atherothrombotic events. Results for the French arm at baseline and one year. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;101(2):81-88. doi:10.1016/s1875-2136(08)70263-8

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213608702638?via%3Dihub

5. Zucker EJ, Misono AS, Prabhakar AM. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Practices: Impact of the 2014 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(7):868-874. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.020

https://www.jacr.org/article/S1546-1440(17)30200-4/fulltext

5. Hensley SE, Upchurch GR Jr. Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: JACC Focus Seminar, Part 1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(8):821-831. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.066

https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.066

6. Shishehbor MH, White CJ, Gray BH, et al. Critical Limb Ischemia: An Expert Statement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(18):2002-2015. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.071

https://www.jacc.org/doi/full/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.04.071

7. Kinlay S. Management of Critical Limb Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(2):e001946. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.001946

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.001946

8. Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, et al. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines [published correction appears in Circulation. 2017 Mar 21;135(12 ):e791-e792]. Circulation. 2017;135(12):e726-e779. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000471

https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000471?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed

CardioNerds (Dr. Daniel Ambinder, Dr. Giselle Suero Abreu, Dr. Kahtan Fadah, and Dr. Colin Blumenthal) discuss arrhythmias in CardioOncology with Dr. Michael Fradley.

In this episode, Dr. Michael Fradley joins us in the CardioNerds CardioOncology clinic where he uses his unique dual training in cardio-oncology and electrophysiology to walk us through the complex interplay and management of these disorders. We discuss the incidence and pathophysiology of these arrhythmias, including the link with various cancer treatments, screening and detection, and complex management including rate vs rhythm control in atrial fibrillation, need for anticoagulation, effects on the QTc and so much more. Given the unique challenges with this population we also delve into how this affects their oncology care and how to approach changes to their cancer treatment.

Show notes were drafted by Dr. Kahtan Fadah and episode audio was edited by student Dr. Tina Reddy.

This episode is supported by a grant from Pfizer Inc.

This CardioNerds Cardio-Oncology series is a multi-institutional collaboration made possible by contributions of stellar fellow leads and expert faculty from several programs, led by series co-chairs, Dr. Giselle Suero Abreu, Dr. Dinu Balanescu, and Dr. Teodora Donisan. 

Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values.

US Cardiology Review is now the official journal of CardioNerds! Submit your manuscript here.

CardioNerds Cardio-Oncology Page
CardioNerds Episode Page
CardioNerds Academy
Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll

CardioNerds Journal Club
Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!
Check out CardioNerds SWAG!
Become a CardioNerds Patron!

What is the prevalence of arrhythmias in patients with cancer?

Arrhythmias are common in patients with cancer due to a multitude of factors. Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in this population and occurs in approximately 5% of patients with cancer. The driving forces are multifactorial and include the direct arrhythmogenic effects of cancer therapeutics and cardiotoxicities of cancer therapeutics that make arrhythmogenesis more likely. Additionally, there is a bi-directional link between cancer and cardiac disorders. For example, not only is atrial fibrillation more common in patients with cancer, but there is also a higher incidence of cancer in patients with atrial fibrillation, likely due to shared risk factors. Risk factors in patients with cancer that make arrhythmias more likely include advanced age, metabolic disturbances, electrolyte abnormalities, and elevated levels of inflammation and catecholamines.

(How) Do cancer therapeutics increase the risk of arrhythmias?

Many cancer therapies are either directly or indirectly arrhythmogenic. Though therapies like the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib have a direct link to an increase incidence of atrial fibrillation, other medications like immune checkpoint inhibitors can cause myocarditis, reduce cardiac function, and predispose to arrhythmias. The following table includes broad categories of cancer therapeutics that are linked to arrhythmia:

What is the appropriate arrhythmia monitoring strategy for patients receiving cancer therapy?

Though there is a clear increased risk of arrhythmia in many patients with cancer receiving specific therapeutics, there is not specific data to support proactive monitoring in these patients. One meta-analysis showed that when compared to alternative regimens, ibrutinib increased the risk of incident AF compared to alternative therapies (RR 3.9, 95% CI 2.0-7.5, P <0.0001), with overall AF incidence of 3.3 per 100 person-years compared to 0.84 per 100 person-years in the ibrutinib and non-ibrutinib groups, respectively. Though proactive monitoring might lead to more or earlier detection of AF in this population, there is a lack of data to support improved outcomes with monitoring asymptomatic patients. Additionally, the clinical relevance of subclinical and/or short episodes of atrial fibrillation remains uncertain. Because of this, there are no current recommendations for broad proactive monitoring, though monitoring should be considered in patients with signs or symptoms that could be consistent with arrhythmia.

What is the management of arrhythmias in patients with cancer?

Management of arrhythmias in patients with cancer is similar to general management in non-cancer patients. For AF, a rhythm control strategy is preferred for patients with paroxysmal AF and in patients who are symptomatic. For other patients who are asymptomatic, a rate control strategy is reasonable. One notable exception is when control of the AF becomes a barrier to the oncology team. In these situations, more aggressive rhythm control is preferred to facility oncologic care. Anticoagulation is also approached in a similar way to non-cancer patients. Patients with a CHA2DS2-VAsC score >2 for men and >3 for women warrant anticoagulation. Many patients with cancer are anemic, thrombocytopenic, or prone to bleeding, which should also be taken into account when prescribing anticoagulation. Left atrial appendage closure may be a consideration for select patients.

As for medications that cause QT prolongation, malignant arrhythmias are quite rare and mostly occur in patients with QTc > 500 ms. This can be multifactorial as many patients with cancer may have episodic metabolic or electrolyte abnormalities in addition to cancer therapeutics or symptom/complication management medications (e.g. antiemetics, antibiotics, etc) which can prolong the QTc or lower the threshold for arrhythmogenesis. Life threatening arrhythmias like Torsades de pointes (TdP) are treated similar to that in non-cancer patients, which can include magnesium, increasing HR with isoproterenol or transvenous pacing, anti-arrhythmic drugs, or cardioversion in addition to addressing the underlying cause.

Balancing arrhythmia risk with cancer therapeutics

An important goal in cardio-oncology is to prevent cardiovascular disease from becoming a barrier for a patient to receive appropriate cancer therapy. The goal is to facilitate the treatment plan that the oncologist thinks is optimal for their cancer, not to protect the heart at the expense of appropriate oncologic care. This is a difficult balancing act and, in the case of serious or potentially fatal events (e.g. Torsades from QTc prolonging meds, vasospasm with ischemia from 5FU, severe myocarditis from immune checkpoint inhibitors etc.), it is often necessary to discontinue the cancer therapeutic temporarily or permanently. Ideally, the arrhythmia should be treated and controlled allowing the patient to continue therapy while minimizing the cardiac symptoms and side effects.

International Cardio-Oncology Society ( IC-OS). IC-OS exits to advance cardiovascular care of cancer patients and survivors by promoting collaboration among researchers, educators and clinicians around the world. Learn more at https://ic-os.org/.

CardioNerds join Dr. Tony Li Yi Wei, Dr. Rodney Soh Yu Hang, and Dr. Zan Ng Zhe Yan from the National University Heart Centre Singapore for a cocktail drink on the top of marina bay sands. They discuss the following case featuring a young woman with recurrent ACS ultimately found to have Takayasu Arteritis. The ECPR for this episode is provided by Dr. Teng Gim Gee and Professor Tan Huay Cheem. Episode audio was edited by student Dr. Shivani Reddy.

A 37-year-old woman presents with chest pain. She has a background history of Hashimoto thyroiditis, gestational diabetes, and anemia of chronic disease and possible iron deficiency. Her significant medical history includes ischemic heart disease with prior coronary angiogram showing triple vessel coronary artery disease for which she underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) with LIMA-LAD, SVG-OM, SVG-RCA. After CABG, she had recurrent admissions in the subsequent year with acute coronary syndromes where she underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to SVG-OM, RI, proximal LAD, and distal LAD. She was a non-smoker and had been compliant with her medications. For her current presentation, she underwent myocardial perfusion imaging which showed a large sized area of inducible ischemia in the LCx territory.  Repeat coronary evaluation showed occluded SVG-OM, occluded LIMA-LAD where she underwent PCI. Clinically, she was noted to have weak brachial and radial pulses on the left side with systolic blood pressure difference between both arms. CT Thoracic Angiogram demonstrated concern for underlying large vessel vasculitis such as Takayasu arteritis. ESR was elevated at 34. Rheumatology was consulted and she was diagnosed with Takayasu arteritis and started on prednisolone and azathioprine. Given her young age, absence of traditional atherosclerotic risk factors, and progressive coronary disease, Takayasu arteritis was deemed the underlying etiology of her coronary disease.

“To study the phenomena of disease without books is to sail an uncharted sea, while to study books without patients is not to go to sea at all.” – Sir William Osler. CardioNerds thank the patients and their loved ones whose stories teach us the Art of Medicine and support our Mission to Democratize Cardiovascular Medicine.

Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values.

US Cardiology Review is now the official journal of CardioNerds! Submit your manuscript here.

CardioNerds Case Reports Page
CardioNerds Episode Page
CardioNerds Academy
Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll

CardioNerds Journal Club
Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!
Check out CardioNerds SWAG!
Become a CardioNerds Patron!

Focusing on young patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI), the definition is often arbitrary, with most studies using an age cut off of around 40-45 years. As we know, the risk factor profile of the younger population is different with lower prevalence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and women of this age group are generally premenopausal.

Causes of MI among such patients can be divided into four groups, although a considerable overlap exists between all groups.

The first etiology is that of atheromatous CAD, which is linked to conventional risk factors in older patients that we are familiar with. This includes smoking, lipid abnormalities including familial hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance, hypertension, and obesity. Other more novel risk factors include hyperhomocysteinemia and elevated lipoprotein (a).

Secondly, there are non-atheromatous coronary pathologies. These include conditions such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection especially prevalent in peripartum females. Other considerations include vasculitides with coronary artery involvement such as Kawasaki disease with coronary artery aneurysms as well as Takayasu disease, coronary vasospasm, and microvascular dysfunction

The third etiology is that of hypercoagulable states leading to recurrent arterial and venous thrombosis. Examples include antiphospholipid syndrome and Factor V Leiden mutations. Acquired hypercoagulable states like nephrotic syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, solid organ malignancy, and myeloproliferative disorders have possible associations with arterial disease in the form of MI (REF). Embolic phenomenon may also cause coronary obstruction (from thrombi, infective vegetations, cardiac masses, etc).

Finally, recreational drug use must be considered, although it is the least common etiology in Singapore because of strict laws prohibiting it. Cocaine use is associated with MI by inducing coronary vasospasm as well as hypercoagulability, and long term cocaine use also leads to accelerated atherosclerosis as well as nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Takayasu’s arteritis is classified as a large-vessel vasculitis because it primarily affects the aorta and its primary branches. It has a worldwide distribution; however the greatest prevalence is seen in Asia. Women are affected in 80-90% of cases, with an age of onset that is usually between 10 and 40 years.

The onset of symptoms in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) tends to be subacute and diagnosis is often only made at the point where there is significant vascular disease leading to symptoms due to resultant ischemia in the affected vascular territory.

Physical examination is what led to the clinical suspicion of a large vessel vasculitis in our patient.

Measurement of BP should be done in all four extremities to evaluate for arterial stenoses. Many patients with TAK will have partial or complete occlusion of one or both subclavian, axillary, or brachial arteries, or the brachiocephalic artery, leading to low-pressure readings in the ipsilateral arm. Similarly, femoral or more distal arterial stenoses will lower leg blood pressures and stenosis of the aorta may lead to bilateral low blood pressure readings.

Bruits may be heard over the bilateral carotid, subclavian, axillary, renal, and femoral arteries, as well as the abdominal aorta. Cardiac auscultation may reveal signs of aortic valvular disease, pulmonary hypertension, or heart failure. Pulses should be felt for and evaluated at bilateral temporal, carotid, brachial, femoral, and dorsal pedal arteries, and any arterial tenderness should also be noted. Signs of limb ischemia should be sought.

In most cases, a clinical diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis can be made in a patient with both suggestive clinical findings (eg, constitutional symptoms, hypertension, diminished or absent pulses, and/or arterial bruits) and imaging showing narrowing of the aorta and/or its primary branches.

There are no specific diagnostic laboratory tests for TAK. As a disease with systemic inflammatory process, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) may be elevated but normal values do not exclude Takayasu arteritis.

Patients with suspected TAK should undergo imaging of the arterial tree by MR or CT angiogram to evaluate the arterial lumen, looking out for smoothly tapered luminal narrowing or occlusion that is sometimes accompanied by thickening of the wall of the vessel. 18 F-FDG – Positron emission tomography (PET), often in combination with CT (PET-CT) or MR (PET-MR) is an increasingly utilized test to evaluate for possible large-vessel vasculitis. The finding of “hot” segments (ie, those with increased standardized uptake values of fludeoxyglucose-F18) in the right clinical setting may be suggestive of large-vessel vasculitis. There is increasing use of PET to aid in the diagnosis of TAK.

Although definitive, getting a histological diagnosis via biopsy of the large arteries is impractical and rarely done. However, occasionally arterial tissue may become available after a revascularization procedure or aneurysm repair

American College of Rheumatology classification criteria were developed to help distinguish one form of vasculitis from another, however they are limited in terms of their use in clinical practice. The criteria are

Patients are said to have TAK if at least three of the six criteria are present. Although these criteria have been widely used by clinical researchers and clinicians to help diagnose patients, accurate diagnostic criteria have yet to be developed.

Management is targeted at tackling the inflammation in the various vascular territories and also endovascular or surgical procedures for critical areas of stenosis that have contributed to irreversible ischemia or aneurysm.

For example, as in this case, significant coronary artery disease leading to myocardial infarctions were addressed with surgical and/or percutaneous revascularization as per usual care for atherosclerotic CAD. Significant peripheral arterial disease can be treated in a similar fashion.

As for systemic anti-inflammatory therapy, the mainstay of treatment would be systemic glucocorticoids guided by the care of a rheumatologist.

In terms of long-term follow-up, monitoring disease activity and response to therapy may be challenging for clinicians, given the absence of specific laboratory tests or validated assessment criteria for disease activity.

The following question refers to Section 4.9 of the 2021 ESC CV Prevention Guidelines. The question is asked by Dr. Christian Faaborg-Andersen, answered first by UCSD fellow Dr. Patrick Azcarate, and then by expert faculty Dr. Melissa Tracy.

Dr. Tracy is a preventive cardiologist, former Director of the Echocardiography Lab, Director of Cardiac Rehabilitation, and solid organ transplant cardiologist at Rush University.

The CardioNerds Decipher The Guidelines Series for the 2021 ESC CV Prevention Guidelines represents a collaboration with the ACC Prevention of CVD Section, the National Lipid Association, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.

Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values.

In patients with a low risk of cardiovascular disease, which of the following is true?

A

Aspirin does not affect the risk of ischemic stroke

B

Aspirin increases the risk of fatal bleeding.

C

Aspirin reduces the risk of non-fatal MI.

D

Aspirin reduces cardiovascular mortality

Explanation

In 2019, an updated meta-analysis of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events found that patients with a low risk of CVD taking aspirin did not have a reduction in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. There was a lower risk of non-fatal MI (RR 0.82) and ischemic stroke (RR 0.87). However, aspirin was also associated with a  higher risk of major bleeding (RR 1.50), intracranial bleeding (RR 1.32), and major GI bleeding (RR 1.52). There was no difference in the risk of fatal bleeding (RR 1.09).

Accordingly, the ESC does not recommend antiplatelet therapy in individuals with low/moderate CV risk due to the increased risk of major bleeding (Class III, LOE A).

Although aspirin should not be given routinely to patients without established ASCVD, we cannot exclude that in some patients at high or very high CVD risk, the benefits may outweigh the risks.

Main Takeaway

In patients with low/moderate risk of CVD, aspirin for primary prevention is not recommended due to the higher risk of bleeding. For those at higher risk of CVD, low-dose aspirin may be considered for prevention in the absence of contraindications.

Guideline Loc.

Section 4.9.1, Page 3291

CardioNerds Decipher the Guidelines – 2021 ESC Prevention Series
CardioNerds Episode Page
CardioNerds Academy
Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll

CardioNerds Journal Club
Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!
Check out CardioNerds SWAG!
Become a CardioNerds Patron!

The following question refers to Section 8.5 of the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure.

The question is asked by Western Michigan University medical student & CardioNerds Intern Shivani Reddy, answered first by University of Southern California cardiology fellow and CardioNerds FIT Trialist Dr. Michael Francke, and then by expert faculty Dr. Shashank Sinha.

Dr. Sinha is an Assistant Professor of Medical Education at the University of Virginia School of Medicine and an advanced heart failure, MCS, and transplant cardiologist at Inova Fairfax Medical Campus. He currently serves as both the Director of the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit and Cardiovascular Critical Care Research Program at Inova Fairfax. He is also a Steering Committee member for the multicenter Cardiogenic Shock Working Group and Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network and an Associate Editor for the Journal of Cardiac Failure, the official Journal of the Heart Failure Society of America.

The Decipher the Guidelines: 2022 AHA / ACC / HFSA Guideline for The Management of Heart Failure series was developed by the CardioNerds and created in collaboration with the American Heart Association and the Heart Failure Society of America. It was created by 30 trainees spanning college through advanced fellowship under the leadership of CardioNerds Cofounders Dr. Amit Goyal and Dr. Dan Ambinder, with mentorship from Dr. Anu Lala, Dr. Robert Mentz, and Dr. Nancy Sweitzer. We thank Dr. Judy Bezanson and Dr. Elliott Antman for tremendous guidance.

Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values.

Ms. V. Tea is a 55-year-old woman with a history of cardiac sarcoidosis, heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF – EF 40%), and ventricular tachycardia with CRT-D who presents with recurrent VT. She has undergone several attempts at catheter ablation of VT in the past and previously had been trialed on amiodarone which was discontinued due to hepatotoxicity. She now continues to have episodic VT requiring anti-tachycardia pacing and ICD shocks despite medical therapy with mexiletine, metoprolol, and sotalol. Her most recent PET scan showed no active areas of inflammation. Currently, her vital signs are stable, and labs are unremarkable. What is the best next step for this patient?

A

Evaluation for heart transplant

B

Evaluation for LVAD

C

Dobutamine

D

Prednisone

E

None of the above

Explanation

The correct answer is A – evaluation for heart transplant.

For selected patients with advanced heart failure despite GDMT, cardiac transplantation is indicated to improve survival and quality of life (Class 1, LOE C-LD). Heart transplantation, in this context, provides intermediate economic value.

Clinical indicators include refractory or recurrent ventricular arrhythmias with frequent ICD shocks. Patient selection for heart transplant includes assessment of comorbidities, goals of care, and various other factors. The United Network of Organ Sharing Heart Transplant Allocation Policy was revised in 2018 with a 6-tiered system to better prioritize unstable patients and minimize waitlist mortality. VT puts the patient as a Status 2 on the transplant list. There was a contemporary analysis of patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy due to cardiac sarcoidosis, published in Journal of Cardiac Failure, in 2018 that demonstrated similar 1-year and 5-year survival after heart transplant between patients with and without cardiac sarcoidosis.

Choice B (evaluation for LVAD) is incorrect. While bridge to transplant with LVAD is definitely a potential next step in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, it is not recommended in patients presenting primarily with refractory ventricular arrhythmias due to granuloma-induced scarring. In this situation, patients benefit from direct heart transplant rather than bridge to transplant LVAD approach. The same study, described before in the Journal of Cardiac Failure, also showed similar 1-year and 5-year survival after bridge-to-transplant mechanical circulatory support between patients with and without cardiac sarcoidosis. Since cardiac sarcoidosis is not just limited to the left ventricle, patients being considered for LVAD need hemodynamic assessment to determine the risk of post-LVAD RV failure.

Choice C (dobutamine) is incorrect. The patient is currently not decompensated in terms of contractility nor is showing signs of cardiogenic shock. Further, dobutamine may worsen arrhythmia burden.

Choice D (prednisone) is incorrect as there is no sign of active inflammation on the PET scan. The recurrent ventricular arrhythmias are being driven by granuloma-induced scar.

Main Takeaway

Cardiac transplantation has a Class 1 (LOE C-LD) recommendation for eligible patients with advanced HF despite GDMT to improve survival and quality of life. Specifically, direct heart transplantation is the best next step in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and refractory ventricular arrhythmias rather than a bridge-to-transplant approach.

Guideline Loc.

Section 8.5

Decipher the Guidelines: 2022 Heart Failure Guidelines Page
CardioNerds Episode Page
CardioNerds Academy
Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll

CardioNerds Journal Club
Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!
Check out CardioNerds SWAG!
Become a CardioNerds Patron!

CardioNerds (Amit Goyal and Daniel Ambider) ACHD series co-chair Dr. Daniel Clark (Vanderbilt University), cardiology FIT lead Dr. Stephanie Fuentes (Houston Methodist Hospital), and Dr. Frank Fish, a Pediatric Electrophysiologist and the Director of the Pediatric Electrophysiology (EP) Lab at Monroe Carrell Jr Children’s Hospital at Vanderbilt University. He is a board certified Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) physician and has a wealth of experience performing EP procedures in adults living with congenital heart disease. Audio editing was performed by student Dr. Shivani Reddy.

In this episode, we discuss key concepts and management of electrophysiologic issues that we can encounter when caring for adults with congenital heart disease.  Arrythmias in adults with congenital heart disease can be intrinsic due to the defect itself or as a consequence of the interventions that they have undergone to palliate and/or repair these defects. The complex anatomy of these patients and the years of pressure and volume load make them not only exquisitely hemodynamically sensitive to arrhythmias (that may otherwise not be of much consequence to the general population) but they also make interventions (catheter ablation or device implant) complex. We therefore embark in a case-based discussion of patients with ACHD (Fontan circulation, Ebstein’s anomaly and Tetralogy of Fallot) in an effort to highlight the presentation of arrythmias and the management strategy in this very important group of patients.

Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values.

US Cardiology Review is now the official journal of CardioNerds! Submit your manuscript here.

The CardioNerds Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) series provides a comprehensive curriculum to dive deep into the labyrinthine world of congenital heart disease with the aim of empowering every CardioNerd to help improve the lives of people living with congenital heart disease. This series is multi-institutional collaborative project made possible by contributions of stellar fellow leads and expert faculty from several programs, led by series co-chairs, Dr. Josh Saef, Dr. Agnes Koczo, and Dr. Dan Clark.

The CardioNerds Adult Congenital Heart Disease Series is developed in collaboration with the Adult Congenital Heart Association, The CHiP Network, and Heart University. See more

CardioNerds Adult Congenital Heart Disease Page
CardioNerds Episode Page
CardioNerds Academy
Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll

CardioNerds Journal Club
Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!
Check out CardioNerds SWAG!
Become a CardioNerds Patron!

What should we know about atrial arrhythmias in a Fontan patient?

How should we manage atrial arrhythmias in a Fontan patient?

How should we approach catheter ablation in a Fontan patient?

How should we approach anticoagulation in Fontan patients?

What arrhythmias are associated with patients who are born with Ebstein’s anomaly and when should we pursue EP study and/or catheter ablation?

In which ACHD patients should we consider the use of Holter monitor when they are asymptomatic?

How should we approach ICD implant for primary sudden cardiac death prevention in patients who are born with Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF)?

What are the technical considerations that ACHD patients warrant when having an ICD/PPM implanted compared to the general population?

Adult Congenital Heart Association
Founded in 1998, the Adult Congenital Heart Association is an organization begun by and dedicated to supporting individuals and families living with congenital heart disease and advancing the care and treatment available to our community. Our mission is to empower the congenital heart disease community by advancing access to resources and specialized care that improve patient-centered outcomes. Visit their website (https://www.achaheart.org/) for information on their patient advocacy efforts, educational material, and membership for patients and providers

CHiP Network

The CHiP network is a non-profit organization aiming to connect congenital heart professionals around the world. Visit their website (thechipnetwork.org) and become a member to access free high-quality educational material, upcoming news and events, and the fantastic monthly Journal Watch, keeping you up to date with congenital scientific releases. Visit their website (https://thechipnetwork.org/) for more information.

Heart University
Heart University aims to be “the go-to online resource” for e-learning in CHD and paediatric-acquired heart disease. It is a carefully curated open access library of educational material for all providers of care to children and adults with CHD or children with acquired heart disease, whether a trainee or a practicing provider. The site provides free content to a global audience in two broad domains: 1. A comprehensive curriculum of training modules and associated testing for trainees. 2. A curated library of conference and grand rounds recordings for continuing medical education. Learn more at www.heartuniversity.org/

Join CardioNerds Co-Founder Dr. Dan Ambinder, Dr. Nino Isakadze (EP Fellow at Johns Hopkins Hospital), Dr. Karan Desai (Cardiology Faculty at Johns Hopkins Hospital and Johns Hopkins Bayview) join Digital Health Experts, Dr. Francoise Marvel (Co-Founder of Corrie Health and Co-Director of Johns Hopkins Digital Health Lab) and Dr. David Cho (Chair of the ACC Health Care Innovation Council) for another installment of the Digital Health Series. In this specific episode, we discuss pearls, pitfalls and everything in between for the emerging digital health innovator. This series is supported by an ACC Chapter Grant in collaboration with Corrie Health. Notes were drafted by Dr. Karan Desai. Audio editing was performed by student Dr. Shivani Reddy.

In this series, supported by an ACC Chapter Grant and in collaboration with Corrie Health, we hope to provide all CardioNerds out there a primer on the role of digital heath in cardiovascular medicine. Use of versatile hardware and software devices is skyrocketing in everyday life. This provides unique platforms to support healthcare management outside the walls of the hospital for patients with or at risk for cardiovascular disease. In addition, evolution of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and telemedicine is augmenting clinical decision making at a new level fueling a revolution in cardiovascular disease care delivery. Digital health has the potential to bridge the gap in healthcare access, lower costs of healthcare and promote equitable delivery of evidence-based care to patients.

This CardioNerds Digital Health series is made possible by contributions of stellar fellow leads and expert faculty from several programs, led by series co-chairs, Dr. Nino Isakadze and Dr. Karan Desai.  

Enjoy this Circulation 2022 Paths to Discovery article to learn about the CardioNerds story, mission, and values.

CardioNerds Digital Health Series Page
CardioNerds Episode Page
CardioNerds Academy
Cardionerds Healy Honor Roll

CardioNerds Journal Club
Subscribe to The Heartbeat Newsletter!
Check out CardioNerds SWAG!
Become a CardioNerds Patron!