
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


We speak with Dr. John Pascarella, Chief Academic Officer of K-12 Professional Learning at USC Race and Equity Center. The Center works with schools to identify disparate outcomes for students and strategies to eliminate them. Dr. Pascarella discusses the need for educators to stand up against systemic bias as it occurs in daily school life. He points out that we need to be aware that we are all inevitably involved in differential power relationships and offers suggestions for teachers engaging in ongoing self-reflection.
Overview
00:00-00:37 Intros
00:37-01:39 USC Race and Equity Center
01:39-03:49 What precipitates involvement with a district or school?
03:49-06:48 What happens when people from a school ask the Center for involvement?
06:48-10:53 Conditions for involvement
10:53-15:31 Defining implicit bias
15:31-17:52 Individual and systemic bias
17:52-23:57 Ways of addressing both individual and systemic bias
23:57-29:37 Strategies for working with teachers who are resistant
29:37-33:16 What happens when school leaders leave
33:16-37:02 Racial Equity Leadership Academy and COSAs project in LA Unified School District
37:02-41:41 Parent involvement
41:41- Outro
Transcript
Click here to see the full transcript of this episode.
References
USC Race & Equity Center website
Soundtrack by Poddington Bear
We speak with Al Kurland, longtime leader of out-of-school-time programs in Upper Manhattan’s Washington Heights. Mr. Kurland founded youth programs that help teens to “rewrite their stories” with the support of adult and peer mentors. He collaborated with other local youth organizations, creating a cluster of empowering and horizon-broadening experiences for students, helping many expand “tunnel vision.”
Overview
00:00-00:39 Intros
00:39-04:50 Washington Heights community and its youth
04:50-09:05 What made programs successful
09:05-12:48 The Dreamers
12:48-15:15 Teens changing from fatalism to purpose
15:15-17:47 Teen-centric programming and its impact on young people
17:47-23:01 Increased isolation of teens in “modern” compared to traditional societies
23:01-27:38 Meaningful rites of passage
27:38-33:06 Storytelling, mentors, co-mentors
33:06-35:03 How schools can enhance adolescents’ sense of efficacy; action civics
35:03-39:35 Suggestions for starting a youth program
39:35- Outro
Transcript
Click here to see the full transcription of this episode.
References
Soundtrack by Poddington Bear
We speak with independent journalist Audrey Watters, author of “Teaching machines: The history of personalized learning,” about the origins of teaching machines and the pedagogies that incorporate mechanical devices for teaching and learning. Ms. Watters explains how BF Skinner’s emphasis on behaviorism, in combination with commercial opportunism, has led in some cases to the supplanting of teachers by computer software.
Overview
00:00-00:37 Intros
00:37-01:33 Significance of the book title
01:33-04:19 What personalized learning is
04:19-05:40 Teaching machines and today’s computers
05:40-09:06 Encouraging students to find their interests: how humans are better than computers
09:06-10:29 How choices are presented in personalized study tools
10:29-12:10 Responsibility of adults to help students experience things they don’t even know they don’t know
12:10-15:35 “Dewey lost and Thorndike won,” “Skinner won and Papert lost”
15:35-17:58 B.F. Skinner
17:58-21:04 Economics of technology in schools
21:04-26:38 “Technology shapes education; education shapes technology and capitalism and white supremacy shape both”
26:38-30:01 Algorithms and their problems
30:01-32:35 Can software be a useful supplement to constructivist or project-based learning; why don’t we invest in humans?
32:35-34:39 Underlying reasons why Dewy and Papert lost to Thorndike and Skinner
34:39-36:51 Education is the “practice of care”
36:51-40:23 Lessons from the pandemic
40:23-44:30 Outro
Transcript
Click here to see the full transcription of this episode.
References
Soundtrack by Poddington Bear
Image: Columbia University (YouTube channel)
We speak with Dr. Rosa Rivera-McCutchen, associate professor of leadership studies at Lehman College, CUNY, about the importance of school leaders and teachers practicing radical care, including listening with intent and addressing skill gaps with honesty. Dr. Rivera-McCutchen talks about the importance of teachers getting to know the life of the neighborhoods around their schools.
Overview
00:00-00:50 Intros
00:50-02:57 Meaning of the book title, ”Radical Care”
02:57- 04:55 Five components of radical care
04:55-08:00 Creating a culture of radical care
08:00-10:27 Graduate students’ reactions to going on walking tours into the communities of their schools
10:27-12:21 Listening, reflecting, not selling students short
12:21:16:45 How principals can create authentic relationships with staff
16:47-20:07 Working and talking with teachers who are burned out or not interested in change
20:07-23:38 Balancing demands for excellence with realities of skills gaps
23:38-31:16 Talking with graduate school students, teachers, students about gaps in their skills
31:16-34:53 How school leaders can leverage their power strategically for change
34:53-38:09 Hw school leaders can avoid burnout
38:09-43:40 Need for change in teaching and leadership education programs
43:40- Outro
Transcript
Click here to listen to see the full transcription of this episode.
References
Book “Radical Care: Leading for Justice in Urban Schools” by Dr. Rosa Rivera
Soundtrack by Poddington Bear
We speak with Dr. Richard Price, associate professor of political science at Weber State University, about recent attempts to ban books, especially those about GLBTQIA+ people and people of color, from classrooms and school libraries across the country. (Spoiler alert: it’s not only in red states). Dr. Price offers strategies for teachers, principals, and school districts for responding to book challenges.
Overview
00:00-00:40 Intros
00:40-01:27 Becoming involved in anti-censorship work
01:27-02:36 Anti-diversity activists: who they are and what materials they target
02:36-03:43 Where book challenges are taking place
03:43-06:22 Current censorship efforts compared to past ones
06:22-09-07 Challenges, district responses, and outcomes
09:07-12:17 Steps administrators and teachers can take when there are complaints
12:17-14:10 Mechanics of opt-outs
14:30-16:06 Training and resources for teachers
16:06-18:18 Objections to “white savior” books or books with the N-word
18:18-20:06 Self-censorship
20:06-22:33 Responding to challenges based on N-word
22:33-26:46 Roles of American Library Association and other resource organizations
26:46- Outro
Transcript
Click here to see the full transcript of this episode.
References
Soundtrack by Poddington Bear
We continue our conversation with LaToya Baldwin Clark of UCLA School of Law. Dr. Baldwin Clark explains how the special education system advantages White middle class families. Poor families and families of color tend to lack cultural capital to navigate the system and advocate effectively for their children. While resources flow to White children with special needs, Black children tend to be stigmatized and placed in more restrictive settings. Dr. Baldwin Clark offers recommendations.
Overview
00:00-01:00 Intros
01:00-01:54 Racial disparities in special education
01:54-06:41 How White parents/children benefit from social and cultural capital in special education process
06:41-08:59 Parental participation fails to protect Black children from segregation in special education placements
08:59-14:01 Process of mandated parental participation exacerbates/legitimizes racial inequities
14:01-20:22 Racial breakdown of children placed in more or less restrictive special education environments; greater physical segregation of Black children
20:22-21:53 Suspensions and expulsions
21:53-24:13 Recommendations for change
24:13-28:42 Disproportional suspensions of Black youth; biases and stereotypes of Black girls
28:42-29:51 Responsibility of school districts to ensure White middle class students do not get more resources
29:51-32:46 Need to educate White middle-class parents about equitable distribution of resources
32:46-34:15 Outro
Transcription
Click here to see the full transcription of this episode.
References
We speak with Dr. LaToya Baldwin Clark, assistant professor at UCLA School of Law. Dr. Baldwin Clark explains how school boundaries are used for racial exclusion. In many cases, schools don’t just reflect, but cause, segregated neighborhoods. Dr. Baldwin Clark argues that closing the education gap isn’t just about bringing up the bottom, but bringing down the top as well. Parents, teachers, and administrators need to work together to prevent children from benefiting from unearned privilege. Inequality is intrinsically detrimental.
Overview
00:00-00:57 Intros
00:57-03:12 Schools are not preparing all students to be lifelong learners
03:12-13:16 Education as property; cultural and social capital
13:16-15:28 Schools as community enterprises
15:28-18:20 “Schooling in Capitalist America;” caste; legacies of slavery
18:20-21:32 Enforcement of school district boundaries
21:32-25:28 School segregation and housing segregation
25:28-28:20 “Bringing up the bottom and bringing down the top”; reducing the relative distance between the bottom and the top
28:20-31:30 Making the gap less consequential
31:30-35:10 What Culver City (CA) is doing to address inequality in a relative way
35:10-37:44 Implications for Black students when “good schools” look like “White schools”
37:44-40:50 Aggressions and microaggressions in predominantly White schools
40:50-42:15 Outro
Transcript
Click here to see the full transcript of this episode.
References
Soundtrack by Poddington Bear
We speak with Dr. Deb L. Morrison, research scientist at the University of Washington School of Education, about centering climate science throughout the K-12 curriculum. Dr. Morrison talks about ClimeTime, a Washington State-funded program that teaches how to engage in climate science and climate justice education across disciplines, and describes nationally-available resources. She emphasizes the importance of integrating society, technology, and science education and says that climate science can be taught even in very conservative areas through place-based education, addressing what matters to kids in their communities.
Overview
00:00-00:35 Intros
00:35-03:32 ClimeTime: What it is, how it is funded
03:32-06:05 Climate change education and climate justice
06:05-07:36 Mentorship, all of us learning
07:36-10:34 Project-based learning; action civics
10:34-13:02 Teaching science as it actually works
13:02-16:54 Engaging conservative communities while teaching climate science
16:54-18:44 Socioecological systems; humans’ relationships with each other and with nature
18:44-19:57 The doughnut economy
19:57-22:05 Society, technology & science (STS) as an interdisciplinary field
22:05-26:28 Examples of teaching STS, place-based learning
26:28-29:13 Collaborations among colleges in Washington and Oregon
29:13-33:32 Resources for teaching climate change, including industrial farming
33:32-37:38 Action for Climate Empowerment at national and international levels
37:38- Outro
Transcript
Click here to see the full transcript of this episode.
Soundtrack by Poddington Bear
We speak with Katie Worth, investigative journalist and author of Miseducation: How Climate Change is Taught in America. Ms. Worth explores what children across the country are taught, or not taught, about climate change. In 24 states, oil and gas company representatives teach children about the wonders of fossil fuels, downplaying or denying their climate impacts. With an eye on sales in Texas, textbooks falsely depict a scientific debate over climate science, and often cover it in the last unit of the last chapter.
Overview
00:00-00:46 Intros
00:46-02:33 Patterns in what children are (and aren’t) being taught about climate change
02:33-03:30 Pre-service training about teaching climate change
03:30-04:52 Climetime in Washington state
04:52-05:55 Professional development resources
05:55-08:22 State science standards and climate change
08:22-12:24 Textbooks and climate change
12:24-15:20 Public/private partnerships that provide climate change programming
15:20-18:47 Oklahoma’s Energy Resources Board
18:47-22:08 Pressures teachers face in teaching accurate science
22:08-25:43 Cloaking religion in academic sounding language
25:43-27:44 Discovery Institute
27:44-29:45 Outro
Transcript
Click here to see the full transcription of this episode.
References
Book Miseducation: How Climate Change Is Taught in America by Katie Worth
We speak with Dr. Daniel Schugurensky and Tara Bartlett of Arizona State University and Madison Rock of the Center for the Future of Arizona about school participatory budgeting in Arizona and worldwide. Students, and sometimes parents and school staff, determine how a pool of money will be spent. By participating in democratic, meaningful decision-making, students become acclimated to civic engagement. Trust and other positive elements of school climate increase as well.
Overview
00:00-01:04 Intros
01:04-04:36 Overview of School Participatory Budgeting (SPB)
04:36-05:17 Arizona State University involvement
05:17-08:58 Roles of teachers and administrators
08:58-10:37 Amounts and allocations of money
10:37-16:20 Models of student participation
16:20-19:29 School day and afterschool activities; registration of students as adult voters
19:29-21:52 Roles of external organizations
21:52-23:00 Timespans of SPB processes
23:00-24:21 Changes in the school
24:21-31:05 Design factors for effectiveness
31:05-36:41 Impacts on student engagement during and after the SPB processes
36:41-38:42 “Mini-public”: involving all students, especially those beyond the “usual suspects”
38:42-42:58 Phoenix Union H.S. District (PUHSD) PB for alternatives to police school resource officers
42:58-45:03 Public response to PUHSD PB project
45:03-47:30 Outro
Transcript
Click here to see the transcription of this episode.
References
Soundtrack by Poddington Bear
From the publisher's feed

15,996 Listeners