We discuss the unionization effort among Amazon warehouse workers in Bessemer, Alabama. Nearly 6,000 workers voted whether to unionize or not with the Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union (RWDSU). Over 3,200 votes were cast, and around 70% of workers voted not to unionize while the the other 30% voted to unionize, defeating the unionization effort.
However, the RWDSU is filing an objection of the results with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging that Amazon "created an atmosphere of confusion, coercion, and/or fear of reprisals" which skewed the Amazon employees towards voting not to unionize.
Amazon's alleged misconduct include (1) pressuring the United States Postal Service to install a modified mailbox on its campus and encouraging employees to drop their ballots there as opposed to mailing them in outside of supervisor scrutiny, (2) pressuring the local government to change the traffic light timing at the major intersection of the campus to make it harder for labor organizers to connect with employees as they wait at the red light, (3) forcing temp workers to wear uniforms donned with anti-union sloganeering, (4) holding mandatory "information sessions" where management slandered unions, (5) repreatedly blasting workers with emails, texts, posters, and fliers which encouraged them to vote not to unionize, (6) lying to workers that they would be forced to pay hundreds of dollars in union dues if they voted to unionize even though Alabama is a "Right to Work" state, (7) forcing the union to encompass more workers than originally intended so that it would be harder to for labor organizers to mobilize and represent the myriad interests of different categories of workers, (8) and contesting hundreds of ballots cast in the unionization vote.
To be clear, it appears that most--if not all--of these efforts might be found to be within the law as it's currently written and interpreted, which points to the inordinate power corporations have over labor in unionization efforts. We ask then: why do corporations go through all the trouble to squash unionization efforts? Is it because they genuinely want what's best for their workers and want them to realize that they would be materially better off with the company's bargaining compared to the union's bargaining, or is it because corporations want as much money and power as possible, and they see unions as a threat to their sovereignty? We think the latter is more likely.
Thanks for joining us.