Expedition 44

Expedition 44

Download on the App Store

Expedition 44 episodes

  • Original Sin: Romans 5 (Part 5)

    Romans 5 is the central Original Sin prooftext so today we’re going to dig in and look at what it says. As we mentioned in our first episode Augustine used Romans 5:12 as the cornerstone text for his doctrine of concupiscence, original sin, and infant depravity. First we need to set the context of Romans before we exegete the text. 


    Context of Romans

    Romans is a pastoral (Shepherding) letter that does contain theology. The theology in the letter is to service Paul’s purpose in the Roman church (Lived theology and a lived gospel). 


    Summary and connections to Original Sin in Romans 1-4

    As we have seen the narrative is that Jesus is the truly faithful Human and Jew. Because of his faithfulness and our faith in him we are reconciled to God and to our vocation as Imagers. (All have sinned and missed that Mark). 

    ·      There are a lot of connections and allusions to Adam and the image of God but it never says anything about transferred guilt but Romans 1 actually shows how God’s wrath (“handing over”) leads to death just like in Eden. 

    ·      Romans 2 says that pagan gentiles can do the things of the Law instinctively though they do not have it. This goes against total depravity. 

    ·      All HAVE sinned (become sinners) they are not born sinners. But a better way to take this is that both Jews and Gentiles have gone off course from God’s original plan in the garden. 

    ·      All of these arguments are to show how Jews and Gentiles are on an equal plain and need to come to unity in Jesus to truly live out the kingdom in their church. 

     


    Romans 5:12-21


    All of Romans 5:12-21 is a contrast of 2 ways- Adam or Jesus… the way of life or the way of death:

    o   We saw that the thing Adam brought was death through his sin

    o   We do not inherit Adam’s sin but we are born into mortality

    o   We become sinners when we sin and Adam introduced these systems of sin into the world by our expulsion from Eden

    o   Sin and Death are seen as Powers that enslave us. We all need saving from death and from sin

    o   Jesus defeats these Powers as the 2nd Adam and brings life. 

    o   The entire narrative of Romans up to Romans 5 is about “glory”- the image of God. The purpose of this life is for the purpose of being conformed to his image (Romans 8)

    o   We can walk this way through the life of the Spirit

     

    Original sin?

    o   Where is original sin and total depravity here? It is completely absent! 

    o   The only way you can get there is through reading Romans out of context.

    o   We see that death is the focus and the thing that needs to be dealt with in order to get to the restoration of glory!

     

    Original Context: 

    o   The pastoral context of Romans is not just about some abstract theologies of original sin and total depravity, or a road to individual salvation (Romans road). 

    o   Paul exhorting the Roman house churches to live out the way of Jesus in unity instead of the divisions of the Weak and the Strong. He wants them to be conformed into Christ’s image and live out the gospel under Jesus’ kingship- GLORY and GLORIFICATION. 

    o   This message is also for us today- Choose the Life and Way of Christ and live in it (the Truth)!

     

    _________


    Visit www.expedition44.com for posted articles and more.


    If you have comments or questions please email us at: [email protected], [email protected]  



    1 hr 47 min
  • Original Sin: The Incarnation (Part 4)

    Today Dr. Will Ryan and Dr. Matt consider the incarnation of Jesus and the ramifications regarding Original Sin.

    We want to give a Shout out to Warren McGrew of Idol Killer and Will and Brian of The Church Split for their series’ on Original sin and for helping us articulate some of the content in this episode.


    • The immaculate conception of Mary is a late dogma created to prop up original sin. But not only this a “preservative redemption” is also needed for Mary to remain sinless

    • The Virgin birth in both Protestant and Catholic circles is used incorrectly to promote the doctrine of Original Sin.
    o For Catholics it deals with the issue of concupiscence
    o For Protestants it actually does nothing as Mary was born of human parents and still would transmit Original Sin
    o We affirm the virgin birth but in Isaiah 7 it is called a sign pointing to the miracle of the messiah and has nothing to do with original sin.
    • The way Protestants try to get around this is the hypostatic union, which we also affirm, but Protestants use it incorrectly to support this Doctrine.
    • 3 points of the incarnation:
    o Jesus came in flesh- he was fully human like us (yet fully God). He experienced what we do.
    o Jesus had no sin in him (he wasn’t born with it)
    o And Jesus never sinned
    • Thus, no Original sin if Jesus assumed exactly what we are and partook of the same nature yet did not sin.
    • If Original Sin is true and Jesus was spared it through the immaculate conception then Jesus was not like us in every way and cannot sympathize with our weaknesses and Hebrews 4:15 is a lie and Jesus is an unfit High Priest.
    o This is what the Doctrine of Original Sin gets us into.
    Conclusion/ The Better Way
    Jesus was fully God and Fully Man. He assumed all that we are so that he could make us all that he is and heal us.
    The Incarnation
    o We saw that Jesus came in the flesh just like us (but also fully God)
    o We saw that there was no sin in Jesus (no original sin)
    o We saw that Jesus did not sin
    We also looked at Mary and all the gymnastics that needed to happen with her to hold up this unbiblical doctrine.
    We looked at how Calvinists have no foundation to stand on with Original sin in the Virgin Birth (we affirm it!), the Hypostatic Union (in which they downplay Jesus’ humanity), and they come dangerously close to many Gnostic heresies.
    The Better Way
    As humans it is comforting to know that Jesus went through all that we did and was still sinless. He has redeemed us and comes beside us to conform us into his image.
    So rather than focusing on the negative theology of Augustinianism and Calvinism look at the beauty that is in Jesus becoming just like us in every way to heal us and make us whole!
    _________
    Visit www.expedition44.com for posted articles and more.
    If you have comments or questions please email us at: [email protected], [email protected]

    57 min
  • Original Sin: Original Guilt & Infant Depravity (Part 3)

    Today we are going to look at 2 main things: 1) Does the Bible say sin is transferable or inheritable? And  2) What does the Bible say about the state of infants and children (are they doomed from the womb?). Do they inherit Adam’s guilt.  

     

    Does the Bible say Sin and Guilt are Transferable/Inheritable?

    Deut 1:39


    Sons punished for a Father’s sin?

    Ezekiel 18:19-23

    Deut 24:16 

    2 Kings 14:6 

    Exodus 32

    John 9:1-3 

    Exodus 34:6-7 


    What about the nature of Infants and Children?

    As we said in the first episode of this series; the Reformers who inherited their doctrine from Augustine believed in the depravity of infants and their damnation from birth without baptism to wash off Original Sin. 

     

    Johnathan Edwards (famous Reformed Puritan) sums up their beliefs saying: 

     “It is most just, exceedingly just, that God should take the soul of a new-born infant and cast it into eternal torments [due to Adam’s sin]”


    Isaiah 7:14-15

    Psalms 22:9-10 


    Jeremiah and Innocent Babies

    Jer 19:4-6, 7:30-33, and 32:32-38 basically say the same thing: The burning of INNOCENT babies never entered God’s mind. 

    Notice: Babies are declared innocent (not sinful) by God. They are not born guilty of Original Sin but become sinners when they sin and can be held accountable for it. This has major ramifications on the abortion debate, as we mentioned in the first episode. If babies are born in Original Sin then why advocate for human life? They are born under the hatred  and wrath of God anyways!


    Infant Depravity Proof texts

    Psalm 58:3

    Go astray means they weren’t already astray at birth. It was something they had to leave to become astray. They become this way “FROM” (or after) birth. Not IN birth. 


    Psalm 51:5 

    What is the context of the psalm? David’s sin with Bathsheba. David is putting his sin with Bathsheba in parallel with his mother’s sin in his conception. He is not talking about infant depravity.


    What about Job?

    Job 15:14-16; Job 25:4-6; Job 14:4

    Two of these are the false words of Job’s friends (See Job 42:7-9) and the 3rd is about ritual uncleanness and not about the nature of man. 

    Jesus and the Children 

    Matt 18:3-6

    Mark 10:13-16

    Children are equated with innocence, purity, and trust. They are the example of the Kingdom.


    Conclusion/The Better Way 

    Inherited Guilt

    o   We saw that the Bible says that sins cannot be transferred. 

    o   Each will be accountable for their own sins

    o   Thus when Original Sin says we inherit Adam’s guilt it goes against God’s Law and all of the scriptures

    Infant Depravity

    As we can see in scripture babies and children are innocent before the Lord. God does not hold them accountable until they can truly know good from evil. 

    o   Some call this the age of accountability or as the Jews call it Bar mizpah (becoming a son of the commandments- age 13)

    o   We are born with desires and we must learn how to act upon them because they can be used for good or evil. 

    o   We are not born doomed from the womb or as sinners but rather become sinners when we sin knowingly. 

    Jesus invites us into the kingdom to become innocent like children and renewed into the state we were at the beginning in order to bear his name in this world. 

     

    The Take Aways

    o   We need to be formed in Christlikeness from our youth 

    o   God has placed life in front of us and we must choose it

    o   He guides us by the Spirit to be able to walk in this way

    o   The discipleship of children is so important!

    _________

    Visit www.expedition44.com for posted articles and more.

    If you have comments or questions please email us at: [email protected], [email protected]  

    1 hr 23 min
  • Original Sin: The Nature of Humanity (Part 2)

    Genesis 2-3 

    In Genesis we see Adam and Eve as the first priests in Eden with the vocation to image God. God gives them one command- to not eat of the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil. Notice it is the tree of the KNOWLEDGE of GOOD and EVIL. It is knowledge and not just of evil. 


    Some things to notice:

    ·      The things cursed are the Nahash and the ground. Adam and Eve are not. 

    ·      God promises that the Seed of the Woman (Jesus) will crush the serpent (a foreshadow of the major picture of atonement)

    ·      We see that pain will increase in child bearing and it will be there will be thorns and thistles making cultivation harder. 

    ·      There will be inequality and “lording over” that will happen due to eating of the tree between the man and woman. (This is not God’s ideal but the result of the fall)

    ·      Notice what God says: “they have become like us”… Totally depraved??? No! Knowing Good and Evil. Adam and Eve have knowledge but not maturity. 

    ·      God mercifully separates them from the Tree of Life so that they will not live in this way forever. 

    ·      Death comes into this world (This is what Romans 5 says!)

    ·      The logic here is also that God is life and separation from him = death. Eternal life is partaking in God’s life. 


    The Jewish View (The Yetzer)

    When you have the knowledge of something you can have the desire for it. This is where the Jews get the view of the Yetzer (desire). The Calvinist view is that all human desires and actions are evil. But was this what we saw in the Genesis account? All we saw was that they has the KNOWLEDGE of the good and evil and thus could act upon either. 

     

    Yetzer Ha Tov (Good desire) and Yetzer Ha Ra (Evil desire)

    The Jewish view is that the eating of the tree awakened the two desires in mankind and we much choose which we entertain. 

    Yetzer: God given drives, desires, and appetites . The Yetzer itself is neutral and it is God given 


    OT-Yetzer

    Gen 4:6-7

     Isaiah 26:3 

    1 Chron 28:9

    Gen 6:5 (cf. Gen 8:21)


    NT-Epithumia

    Mark 4:19

    John 8:44

    Luke 22:15

    James 1:13-15

    Gal 6:7-10

    James 5:17

    1 John 3:7-8

    Ephesians 2:1-3



    Augustine and Concupiscence 

    What in Hebrew is yetzer and in Greek is epithumia was translated as concupiscence in Latin.

    As we have seen yetzer and epithumia are completely neutral in meaning in Greek and Hebrew but in Latin usually concupiscence nearly always takes on a negative meaning. Remember Augustine could not read Hebrew or Greek. And he still was dealing with a lot of Pagan presuppositions that he brought into the Bible.  He introduced this new doctrine where sex is a sin and we inherit guilt through Adam and are born totally unable to act on the good desires.


    Conclusion/Better View

    ·      Throughout all of this we have seen that God given desires and ambitions are good but we can use them for evil as well when abused. 

    ·      We are not created as sinners but become sinners when we chase after evil desires (yetzer ha-ra). 

    ·      We are weak in the flesh and without the work of the Spirit in us we are prone to the yetzer ha-ra. (Matt 26:41; Rom 8:3-4)

    ·      God says we can practice righteousness, we can sow to the Spirit, and we can rule over the sin crouching at our door. If he says it we can do it with his help!

    ·      We are not totally depraved and unable to seek after God and exercise the yetzer ha-tov. 

    ·      Everyday we have the choice to walk out our discipleship or walk according to the world. Choose this day whom you will serve!



    _________


    Visit www.expedition44.com for posted articles and more.


    If you have comments or questions please email us at: [email protected], [email protected]  

    1 hr 22 min
  • Original Sin: Intro & Historical Background

    Today Dr Will Ryan & Dr. Matt launch a series examining the Doctrine of Original Sin.

    If you’ve followed us long enough you’ve probably seen there are 2 theologies we tend to jab at quite a bit: Dispensationalism, and Calvinism/Reformed Theology, So we basically have issues with doctrines that promote fear and a distortion of God’s Character.
    In this series we’ll be looking at how Original Sin is not Biblical or Ancient.
    The first 400 years of the Church did not believe this
    There is zero evidence that Judaism ever believed this. Messianic Jews do not believe this.
    The Eastern Orthodox church along with some Protestant denominations never adopted this view.
    As we’ll see in this intro, Augustine was the inventor of this doctrine in the 5th century and much of it was due to his importation of his pagan background into Christianity.

    Defining original sin

    We do not deny that there was AN ORIGINAL SIN. What we will be referring to as “Original Sin” is the doctrine of Original Sin which teaches that because of Adam and Eve’s sin we are all born guilty before God and that we inherit their guilt from birth. Sometimes we may refer to this as Original Guilt. This is also called Augustinian Anthropology or Augustinian Original Sin


    Original Sin is the building block for Total Depravity or Total Inability of Calvinism’s TUPLIP which is about the nature of man in that they are so totally depraved that they cannot even seek after God. 

    Augustine and Original Sin

    The doctrine came into the church through Augustine of Hippo (396-440 CE) and the doctrine was originally called Concupiscence.  

    “Concupiscence” , according to Augustine, relates to Adam’s sin being transferred through sexual reproduction.  It’s root definition is a base sexual desire. We get our word concubine from this.  He believe that though this all men are born with their will, body, and mind corrupt and this is transmitted sexually. They inherited the sin through the sexual act leading to birth. Augustine could only read Latin. He tried to learn Greek but despised it due to his teacher who was very hard on him and so never learned it. He also could not read Hebrew. Augustine came to original sin by reading Romans 5:12 in a bad Latin translation. 

    Augustine and Pelagianism 

    Often the label thrown at those who disagree with Original Sin or who hold to Freedom of the Will is “Pelagian”. 

    Augustine developed 14 points of accusation against Pelagius. But you can look Pelagius’ writings and they completely refute the accusations. 


    The 14 Points of Pelagianism:

    1. Adam was created mortal & would die whether he sinned or not 

    2. Adam’s sin harmed only Adam, not mankind 

    3. The law leads to heaven in the same way as the Gospel 

    4. Newborn infants are in the exact same state as Adam before his sin 

    5. The whole human race doesn’t die through Adam & live through Christ 

    6. Even unbaptized infants possess eternal life 

    7. The wealthy must renounce their possessions or they will not see the Kingdom of Heaven 

    8. God’s grace & help are not given for individual actions, but consist in free will, the law & teaching. 

    9. God‘s grace is given in accord with our merits & is located in the human will 

    10. Only those who are without sin can be called children of God 

    11. Forgetfulness & ignorance are not sinful since they’re not done willingly 

    12. A choice is not free if it needs God’s help 

    13. Our victory is not the result of God’s help, but free will 

    14. The soul can be as sinless as God. 

    “Pelagianism” is based on Augustine’s 14 claims that Pelagius actually never believed. They are a strawman, a distortion, defamation, and slander of the beliefs of an orthodox Christian in order to change orthodoxy in the church. 

    1 hr 29 min
  • The Church Series: Summary & Recap (Part 25)

    We started a series on the church back in July of 2022 and a year and a half later we are wrapping It up.  Today we’re going to recap where we’ve been. 

    The big idea is that the church is not an institution … it’s an organism (it’s organic)!

    ·      There was equality- No clergy/laity divide

    ·      The giftings of the entire body were active to display Jesus

    ·      They met face to face throughout the week in relationships


    7 Churches of Revelation (Nationalism and Dispensationalism)

    The point of looking at these 7 churches is that it pointed out Jesus’ ideals in his Body. Much of the issues here deals with the World seeping into the church.

     Leadership and Oversight

    the glaring question we need to ask is “Are these offices or simply people using their god given gifts?”  Positional thinking is hung up on nouns, while functional thinking stresses verbs. 

    The view of oversight in the NT church is about the whole body operating in their giftings and being discipled by those who are wise, mature, and have the character of Christ in them. This is what leadership and oversight looks like rather than the CEO structure that focuses on offices and hierarchy which hurts the church. 

    5-Fold Ministry

    Ephesians 4 describes these as “ascension gifts” not “ascension offices”.  This entire chapter focuses on unity in the body of Christ, not positions which divide clergy from laity.Reimagining GiftsSpiritual gifts are not about hierarchy but about building up the body of Christ. The church is a body- a mutual and co-equal body- that reflects Jesus. There is no hierarchy in giftings. These giftings don’t lead to an office, though some might lead or administrate in their gifting better than others based on maturity and humility- we should all mutually submit to each other. 

    Reimagining Community

    ·      Spiritually- We need to be together in spiritual friendship gathering around the Way of Jesus, studying scripture, breaking bread, praying for each other. DEVOTED- They devoted themselves to these things.

    ·      Physically- meeting the needs of the community, being generous and being available. 

    ·      Emotionally- This is about completeness and transformation- How is our mindset and focus? Is it singularly on Jesus or is there entanglement with the world?

    ·      Missionally- Do we live in unity or are there offenses and divisions among us that we have swept under the rug? Division and disunity kills the mission to be lights to the world. 

    Reimagining Giving

    The main ideals of giving in the New Covenant:

    ·      Give Cheerfully

    ·      Take care of fellow believers (and support the work of the Lord)·      Care for the least of these

    ·      Celebrate God (see communion and the love feast in 1 Cor 11)


    Whenever the church gathers together, its guiding and functioning principal is simply to incarnate Christ (1 Cor 12:12)

    The Edenic Ideal:

    We always take everything back to God’s ideals. The Bible begins and ends with Eden. New Creation has broken into the present through the resurrection, so the church should be living according to God’s ideals in our communities even if the world looks completely opposite. God’s eternal purpose was to have a people in relationship with him working in equality under God’s kingship. This is God’s ideal for his church too. Each of us bringing our gifts to the altar/table and using them to image him to creation. 

    ·      The western view of leadership connected to authority, hierarchy, control, and covering has handcuffed the bride of Christ - making her ineffective for the kingdom. 

    ·      We need to get back to the servant mindset rather than the CEO leader mindset in the church

    ·      We need more feet washing and less discussions about “who’s your covering” 

    ·      More mutual submission and less “human headship”

    ·      More family, less institution

    ·      More verbs, less nouns

    1 hr 26 min
  • Pivot: Transform Your Church into a Tov Culture (Interview with Scot McKnight)

    Dr. Will Ryan and Dr. Matt interview Dr. Scot McKnight about his newest book- Pivot: The Priorities, Practices, and Powers That Can Transform Your Church into a Tov Culture.


    Order the Book here:

    https://a.co/d/9R6hqSY

    A practical guide to help you build a culture in your church or organization that resists abuse and cultivates goodness.
    After the release of their groundbreaking book, A Church Called Tov, which recorded the stories of abuse and toxic church cultures at some of the most prominent churches in the United States, New Testament scholar and blogger for Christianity Today Scot McKnight and Laura Barringer heard from a flood of people who had experienced similar instances of abuse. After all they’ve seen and heard, they still believe it’s possible for church cultures to be transformed from toxic to tov―from oppressive to good.
    In Pivot, Scot and Laura help churches to implement practices,establish priorities, and cultivate the Kingdom Gospel-centered qualities that form goodness cultures. Readers will find answers to the four most common questions people have about culture transformation:

    1. How can I transform the culture in my church or organization to make it tov?
    2. I believe my workplace has unhealthy values. How do I initiate change?
    3. How do I unleash a culture of goodness in my ministry?
    4. I’m not in a position of church leadership. What are some red flags that indicate a toxic culture, and what can I do if I see them?
      • The “Tov tool,” a survey to help you discern your organization’s culture and to promote spiritual conversations
      • A “getting to work” section at the end of each chapter with questions and next steps for application
      • Pivot also includes the following practical features:Transformation is never easy. But for the sake of the next generation, we must do it.





        52 min
      • Biblical Israel and Modern Israel: Interview with Steve Gregg

        Dr. Will Ryan and Dr. Matt talk with Steve Gregg about Biblical Israel and Dispensational Theology. 


        Steve Gregg is a teacher, author, and international lecturer on the Bible, theology, and discipleship. He is the author of “Revelation: Four Views: A Parallel Commentary”(1997, 2013) and “All You Want to Know About Hell: Three Christian Views” (2013) and most recently his series on the kingdom of God “The Empire of the Risen Son. His talk show, “The Narrow Path,” broadcasts on stations across the USA and  you can find his teachings on the website and mobile app: thenarrowpath.com. 


        Other teachings by Steve Gregg on this topic:


        Steve Gregg on The Modern State of Israel:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Scz5t_D-ung&t=608s


        2 Part Lecture on the Problems of Dispensationalism and Israel:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRD77lqsw4I

        https://youtu.be/FXrUOtpRWB8?si=iqFgnih6LN-tcBLJ


        Replacement Theology?:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96JcDkZ4bvI

        1 hr 5 min
      • Reimagining Giving Part 2: New Testament (The Church part 24)

        Part 2 of 2 on Giving- Tithes, Offerings, and First Fruits.

        History tells us that:

        • Tithing (10%) did not become an accepted “New Covenant Doctrine” in the church for over 700 years after the cross.
        • Before this in 585 the church at the Council of Macon in France, they tried to enforce tithing on its members and were unsuccessful.
        • It was not until the year 777 that Charlemagne allowed the church to enforce the collection of tithes.
        OT Recap
        • Before the law giving was voluntary not a commandment. This seems to be God’s ideals.
        o We cannot take these Pre-Law examples too far though. We don’t see that the giving was in regularity or even immediate. It was usually in response of thanks to God for something big He accomplished.
        • The Commands for tithing were for the children of Israel and to only be done “in the Land”
        • The Levitical tithe was to the Levites (the priests). Originally the whole nation were to be priests but they rejected this and God commissioned the Levites. Today we are a kingdom of priests in Christ, so we can’t exactly use this for supporting a class of religious professionals. We’ll see in the NT their possessions were at the disposal of the community when in need.
        • The festival tithe was money saved up for you to use 3x a year to celebrate God with the community- essentially money to take 3 vacations with Jesus.
        • The Storehouse tithe was about caring for the least of these. It was 10% every 3rd and 6th year in the 7-year cycle. This was for the care of the needy.
        • The King’s Tithe was a tax for rejecting God.
        The main ideals of tithing in the OT:
        • Caring for the Levites (caring for those ministering in the family of God)
        • Caring for the poor, widow, alien, and fatherless
        • Fellowship and celebration with God
        NT Recap
        • The mentions of “tithing” are in the context of the children of Israel (the pharisees)
        • Attitude in giving is central in the NT- being a cheerful giver and not out of compulsion
        • Generosity is key- there is no set amount in the New Covenant
        • We give because God gave to us
        • First Fruits- all belongs to him
        The main ideals of giving in the OT:
        • Take care of fellow believers (and support the work of the Lord)
        • Care for the least of these
        • Celebrate God (see communion and the love feast in 1 Cor 11)
        o These are just like the OT- not commanded but still expected.

        1 hr 24 min
      • Reimagining Giving Part 1: Old Testament (The Church part 23)

        Part 1 of 2 on Giving- Tithes, offerings, and first fruits


        All the these the audience and commands on tithing are directed to specifically the children of Israel- the ones under the Mosaic Law. And directly connected to being in the Promised Land.

        • For the gentiles the concepts and commands in the Law are good but they are shadows of the substance which is Christ. They are signposts pointing to something greater. Next episode we’re going to look at the substance.
        Second, it was always produce, fruit, and animals and never money given to the Lord. Money was always exchanged for an animal, produce, drink, etc, if the trip to the temple was too far to haul your offering. It was not give in the place of these things in the 3 tithes.
        If we want to take this in context we need to see a few things:
        • Before the law giving was voluntary not a commandment. This seems to be God’s ideals.
        o We cannot take these Pre-Law examples too far though. We don’t see that the giving was in regularity or even immediate. It was usually in response of thanks to God for something big He accomplished.
        • The Levitical tithe was to the Levites (the priests). Originally the whole nation were to be priests but they rejected this and God commissioned the Levites. Today we are a kingdom of priests in Christ, so we can’t exactly use this for supporting a class of religious professionals. We’ll see in the NT their possessions were at the disposal of the community when in need. The Levites would also tithe to the Priests who would tithe to God. So, God actually got 1% of the whole Levitical Tithe.
        • The festival tithe was saved up for you to use 3x a year to celebrate God with the community- essentially to take 3 vacations with Jesus.
        • The Storehouse tithe was about caring for the least of these. It was 10% every 3rd and 6th year in the 7-year cycle. This was for the care of the needy.
        • The King’s Tithe was a tax for rejecting God.
        The main ideals of tithing:
        • Caring for the Levites (caring for those ministering in the family of God)
        • Caring for the poor, widow, alien, and fatherless
        • Fellowship and celebration with God

        1 hr 28 min

      About Expedition 44

      From the publisher's feed

      Expedition 44 is a covenant community dedicated to cultivating a discipleship culture that is wholly devoted to King Jesus.

      More shows like Expedition 44

      BibleProject by BibleProject Podcast

      BibleProject

      19,444 Listeners

      Seminary Dropout by Shane Blackshear: Interviews with N.T. Wright, Christena Cleveland, Greg Boyd & More!

      Seminary Dropout

      364 Listeners

      What If World - Stories for Kids by Eric O'Keeffe / Starglow Media

      What If World - Stories for Kids

      6,208 Listeners

      Theology in the Raw by Theology in the Raw

      Theology in the Raw

      1,480 Listeners

      Ask NT Wright Anything by Premier Unbelievable

      Ask NT Wright Anything

      2,056 Listeners