
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today, David resumes his consideration of whether philosophical reasoning can be the way to bet back to a Christian view of law. Reasoning's imits, he explains, are demonstrated when the question is whether women should fight in combat roles. David explains why the prevalence of complementarian thinking in Christian circles can't answer this question and offers an asnwer Scripture provides.
By FLF, LLC4.7
947947 ratings
Today, David resumes his consideration of whether philosophical reasoning can be the way to bet back to a Christian view of law. Reasoning's imits, he explains, are demonstrated when the question is whether women should fight in combat roles. David explains why the prevalence of complementarian thinking in Christian circles can't answer this question and offers an asnwer Scripture provides.

1,949 Listeners

1,168 Listeners

987 Listeners

843 Listeners

1,088 Listeners

426 Listeners

461 Listeners

1,388 Listeners

461 Listeners

1,063 Listeners

445 Listeners

960 Listeners

775 Listeners

1,159 Listeners

3,654 Listeners