
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today, David resumes his consideration of whether philosophical reasoning can be the way to bet back to a Christian view of law. Reasoning's imits, he explains, are demonstrated when the question is whether women should fight in combat roles. David explains why the prevalence of complementarian thinking in Christian circles can't answer this question and offers an asnwer Scripture provides.
By FLF, LLC4.7
947947 ratings
Today, David resumes his consideration of whether philosophical reasoning can be the way to bet back to a Christian view of law. Reasoning's imits, he explains, are demonstrated when the question is whether women should fight in combat roles. David explains why the prevalence of complementarian thinking in Christian circles can't answer this question and offers an asnwer Scripture provides.

1,945 Listeners

1,165 Listeners

983 Listeners

840 Listeners

1,091 Listeners

469 Listeners

1,393 Listeners

457 Listeners

1,070 Listeners

450 Listeners

469 Listeners

983 Listeners

774 Listeners

1,186 Listeners

3,788 Listeners