We present methods for improved handling of morphologically
rich languages (MRLS) where we define
MRLS as languages that
are morphologically more complex than English. Standard
algorithms for language modeling, tagging and parsing have
problems with the productive nature of such
languages. Consider for example the possible forms of a
typical English verb like work that generally has four
four different
forms: work, works, working
and worked. Its Spanish counterpart trabajar
has 6 different forms in present
tense: trabajo, trabajas, trabaja, trabajamos, trabajáis
and trabajan and more than 50 different forms when
including the different tenses, moods (indicative,
subjunctive and imperative) and participles. Such a high
number of forms leads to sparsity issues: In a recent
Wikipedia dump of more than 400 million tokens we find that
20 of these forms occur only twice or less and that 10 forms
do not occur at all. This means that even if we only need
unlabeled data to estimate a model and even when looking at
a relatively common and frequent verb, we do not have enough
data to make reasonable estimates for some of its
forms. However, if we decompose an unseen form such
as trabajaréis `you will work', we find that it
is trabajar in future tense and second person
plural. This allows us to make the predictions that are
needed to decide on the grammaticality (language modeling)
or syntax (tagging and parsing) of a sentence.
In the first part of this thesis, we develop
a morphological language model. A language model
estimates the grammaticality and coherence of a
sentence. Most language models used today are word-based
n-gram models, which means that they estimate the
transitional probability of a word following a history, the
sequence of the (n - 1) preceding words. The probabilities
are estimated from the frequencies of the history and the
history followed by the target word in a huge text
corpus. If either of the sequences is unseen, the length of
the history has to be reduced. This leads to a less accurate
estimate as less context is taken into account.
Our morphological language model estimates an additional
probability from the morphological classes of the
words. These classes are built automatically by extracting
morphological features from the word forms. To this end, we
use unsupervised segmentation algorithms to find the
suffixes of word forms. Such an algorithm might for example
segment trabajaréis into trabaja
and réis and we can then estimate the properties
of trabajaréis from other word forms with the same or
similar morphological properties. The data-driven nature of
the segmentation algorithms allows them to not only find
inflectional suffixes (such as -réis), but also more
derivational phenomena such as the head nouns of compounds
or even endings such as -tec, which identify
technology oriented companies such
as Vortec, Memotec and Portec and would
not be regarded as a morphological suffix by traditional
linguistics. Additionally, we extract shape features such as
if a form contains digits or capital characters. This is
important because many rare or unseen forms are proper
names or numbers and often do not have meaningful
suffixes. Our class-based morphological model is then
interpolated with a word-based model to combine the
generalization capabilities of the first and the high
accuracy in case of sufficient data of the second.
We evaluate our model across 21 European languages and find
improvements between 3% and 11% in perplexity, a standard
language modeling evaluation measure. Improvements are
highest for languages with more productive and complex
morphology such as Finnish and Estonian, but also visible
for languages with a relatively simple morphology such as
English and Dutch. We conclude that a morphological
component yields consistent improvements for all the tested
languages and argue that it should be part of every language