
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In today's conversation, I chat with Peter Kristensen, Director, Head of Biomass Sustainability at the Danish energy company, Ørsted. Peter describes Ørsted's transition plan and how they are using nature-based solutions to abate their remaining emissions (only 2%!) after executing their ambitious Science-based targets emission reduction plan. In this conversation, we discuss why Ørsted has targeted the global south for their NbS project development, why they do everything in-house and explains some of the great projects they are supporting. Lots of boots on the ground lessons from this chat!
19:05
"One thing is sure: if you don't have local partners who are really committed, have the knowledge, and so on, then it is a no-go."
27:29
"I would encourage people to ensure the financing that they need before they start knocking on doors. Otherwise, we'll jeopardise this whole carbon market project; I don't think anyone will benefit."
Peter Kristensen LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/peter-k-kristensen-gcb-d-106a32/
Ørsted: https://orsted.com/
Favourite trees: Oak and Scots Pine
00:58
Intro to Ørsted
02:55
Ørsted's nature-based solutions - science-based targets (reduce emissions) & carbon projects
04:24
Why Global South
05:32
Projects
09:51
Design and execution standards
11:22
Internal and external contributors
13:01
Local community participation, agreement, and remuneration
15:04
Using, selling. retiring carbon credits
16:33
Run daily business and operations (system evaluation)
18:01
Learning curve with each project
19:57
Evaluate a local partner
21:00
Government support/legislation
21:47
Exit strategy
24:00
Extra benefits - education
24:40
Next steps (target of 2%)
26:26
Must ensure financing - actionable advice
29.27
Contact details
Sign up now for the ForestLink’s newsletter, where you’ll receive technical advice, reflections, and best-practice guidance to support you with your forest-linked investment strategy or business straight to your inbox.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In today's episode we dig into all things technical site evaluation with Dr. Colin Smith of Paperbark Consulting. Colin is an expert soil scientist, and today he shares his vast experience in plantation forestry, giving insights that will support investors (and forest managers for that matter) with what considerations should be made and questions should be asked when evaluating several technical plantation management factors. We talk about where certain tree species do best and get into specifics on soil, water, climate, the importance of research, ecological deserts and more.
4:16
"The most dangerous thing in a forestry investment plan is a spreadsheet"
43:37
"Make sure they get a good independent opinion about what they're up to. In some cases, consultants try to make projects look good to attract investment, and I think there is a big danger in that; not to be seen as a wet blanket, but I think people need a realistic appraisal."
Host: Shauna Matkovich - The Forest Link
Producer: Magdalena Laas - https://www.linkedin.com/in/laasmagdalena/
Dr. Colin Smith's email: [email protected]
Linkedin: linkedin.com/in/colin-smith-900b051a
Favourite trees: Acacia Sieberiana and Eucalyptus deglupta
The Center for International Forestry Research and World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF): CIFOR
Theory of Change Webinar: Theory of Change Webinar
00:44
Professional background and focus of work (Paperbark Consultancy)
04:09
The complicated process of forest management
05:54
Interesting assignments (real stories)
09:05
Macro-level technical considerations when investing in forestry
13:08
Micro-level technical considerations
15:41
Issues with native species
17:56
Dispell myths around Eucalyptus, specifically water usage
23:30
Irrigation of plantations
30:59
Climate change & species matching
36:25
Invest in research and technical expertise
39:03
Info on sustainability studies - eucalyptus & PH levels of soil (CIFOR)
43:36
Actionable advice for forestry investors
44:46
Contact details
Sign up now for the ForestLink’s newsletter, where you’ll receive technical advice, reflections, and best-practice guidance to support you with your forest-linked investment strategy or business straight to your inbox.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
As there are no widely accepted definitions in the lexicon that makes up responsible investing, semantics are important. This is because how you define terms like ESG, sustainable and impact investing as they relate to forest investments will have different implications - it could be in the types of forests you invest, the geographies of your investment, the end markets, return expectations and so on. In this episode, I take you through the definitions of these terms that I apply in my work and provide you some examples to make sense of it. I argue that its not the definition per se that matters, only that everyone in your organization shares the same definition and that you apply it credibly and consistently. I explain why an integrated approach to ESG, sustainable and impact investing will put your forest investments in the best position to succeed.
"Integrating these three features is the best way to future-proof your forest investments for financial performance and long-term social and environmental benefit."
Show notes:
Host: Shauna Matkovich - The Forest Link
Producer: Magdalena Laas - https://www.linkedin.com/in/laasmagdalena/
Important links:
Webinar: Theory of Change Webinar (subscribepage.io)
Favourite tree: Arbutus menziesii - Wikipedia
Details:
02:47ESG investing
05:01Sustainable investing
07:02Impact investing
11:09Integrated approach
14:12How to apply an integrated approach
15:15Webinar
15:37Actionable advice for forest investors
Sound Library:
Sign up now for the ForestLink’s newsletter, where you’ll receive technical advice, reflections, and best-practice guidance to support you with your forest-linked investment strategy or business straight to your inbox.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Join me today as I speak with Anthony Traina, Co-Founder of Tropical American Timber, a value-added producer and distributor of tropical hardwoods. We talk about lesser-known species as well as household names in tropical hardwoods. We discuss sustainability and trust—two key factors in determining where Anthony has sourced his wood to date and where he is looking to expand in the future. We also discuss the conundrum of certification relating to market demand and administrative and cost burden.
"Really look at the people on the ground and talk to them and get to know them to build that trust to see where the investments are going and being directed and that the projects are coming along as talked about. How are the communities interacting with the project?"
Show notes:
Host: Shauna Matkovich - The Forest Link
Producer: Magdalena Laas - https://www.linkedin.com/in/laasmagdalena/
Important links:
Tropical American Timber: https://tropicalamericantimber.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anthony-traina-974b2753/
Details:
01:43
Overview of Anthony's professional journey
05:19
Species of trees sourced and markets
09:26
Where timber/trees/wood is sourced from
12:39
Legal requirements for importing tropical hardwood
18:52
Interesting anecdote of Martin Guitar company requiring a single tree
20:10
Certification, sustainable harvesting, and forest investor (asset) requirements
25:47
Source countries in South America
27:50
Quality of product, sustainability, trust, and marketability
29:47
Business challenges
30:35
Main buyers
32:10
Actionable advice for forest investors
Sound Library:
Sign up now for the ForestLink’s newsletter, where you’ll receive technical advice, reflections, and best-practice guidance to support you with your forest-linked investment strategy or business straight to your inbox.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Join me today in the second of a two-part series, as I speak with Anne Valto, Senior Development Impact Advisor at Finnfund - the Finnish Development Finance Institution. In our conversation, Anne describes how Finnfund evaluates impact in deal due diligence. She explains how often their investees are not initially well capacitated to manage for impact, and how they are supporting to resolve this. We talk about why Finnfund normally does not invest into 3rd party managed, forest asset only models, finding the balance between impact and financial objectives and impact permanence at exit. If you haven’t listened to the first episode, please go back and listen to my conversation with Peter Chappell on breaking down risks in emerging markets.
“In forestry and in biodiversity, as in most impact indicators, the high risk usually means that there are more opportunities to gain as well.”
Host: Shauna Matkovich - The Forest Link
Producer: Magdalena Laas - https://www.linkedin.com/in/laasmagdalena/
Details
03:39
Impact evaluation in deal due diligence and the 5 dimensions of impact
05:00
Development Effectiveness Assessment Tool
06:21
How Finnfund goes beyond IFS PS to evaluate net biodiversity gain
07:51
How Finnfund supports traditional timberland managers to integrate impact
11:38
Biodiversity trainings for investees
11:52
Biodiversity pilot with MLR in Nicaragua
13:20
Sustainability capacity within Finnfund investee companies
14:29
Why Finnfund normally does not invest into 3rd party managed, forest asset only models
16:50
Finding the balance between impact and financial objectives
19:19
Does targeting impact mean forgoing returns?
23:40
Low hanging fruit for impact creation in forest investments
26:01
Impact permanence at exit
30:11
Actionable advice for investors new to the asset class
[5:50] In forestry and in biodiversity, as in most impact indicators, the high risk usually means that there are more opportunities to gain as well.
[17:42] So that's our role, taking more risks than, than a commercial investor would be willing to, to take.
[25:02] It's often that you actually don't need to do that much to give a little bit of push for regeneration and restoration. In the environments where we operate, the more challenging part is then to also keep people out.
[28:01] So if we would totally lose the impact for big money as an impact investor, I think that would be quite a red flag for us.
Finnfund: https://www.finnfund.fi/en/
MLR Forestal: https://mlr.com.ni/
Sound Library:
Sign up now for the ForestLink’s newsletter, where you’ll receive technical advice, reflections, and best-practice guidance to support you with your forest-linked investment strategy or business straight to your inbox.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Join me today in the first of a two-part series, as I speak with Peter Chappell, Investment Manager at Finnfund - the Finnish Development Finance Institution which, like the country, has a long history of investing in forests. In our conversation, Peter explains why Finnfund’s mandate is for greenfield investments, and why financial viability is one of their primary impact criteria. We discuss the risks in the emerging markets where Finnfund invests, compared to those in timberland core markets. We discuss how to evaluate risk and the merits of forest investment in emerging markets, and talk about why its important to go in with an experienced partner. Next week, be sure to tune in, where we discuss the impact-side of Finnfund’s forest investment approach with Anne Valto.
“But actually, our thesis is quite strong that ultimately the realisation of these positive impacts can only be sustained through financially viable, financially sustainable, you know, long term, successful businesses.”
Host: Shauna Matkovich - The Forest Link
Producer: Magdalena Laas - https://www.linkedin.com/in/laasmagdalena/
Details
01:36
Introduction to Finnfund and their approach to forest investment
04:54
Financial instruments used by Finnfund in forest investment
07:02
Timberland in core versus emerging markets
11:03
Real vs perceived risk
13:33
Greenfield vs brownfield
16:27
Tips for investors considering emerging markets for the first time
19:51
Red flags to look out for in emerging market deal evaluation
22:16
Impact in emerging markets vs core markets
27:53
Challenges leading to emerging market track record
30:46
Other benefits of emerging market forest investment
Significant quotes:[14:48] "One of the issues we have as a DFI is that actually a pure brown field operation doesn't actually fit our mandate because we need to ensure we're making impact."
[21:10] "Generally speaking, execution risks are the big risks."
[25:32] "But actually, our thesis is quite strong that ultimately the realisation of these positive impacts can only be sustained through financially viable, financially sustainable, you know, long term, successful businesses."
Sound Library:
Sign up now for the ForestLink’s newsletter, where you’ll receive technical advice, reflections, and best-practice guidance to support you with your forest-linked investment strategy or business straight to your inbox.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Join me today as I speak with Aleksandra Holmlund, CEO of Qarlbo Biodiversity for a glimpse into the biodiversity crediting mechanism she has championed in Sweden. In this conversation we explore the biodiversity finance mechanism developed in cooperation with the Swedish University of Agriculture that focuses on production forest landscapes. In a nutshell, the mechanism works from a baseline of business as usual forestry and attributes any net gains in biodiversity to come from conservation, restoration or diversification of forest management activities. In addition to the mechanics, we discuss the sentiments of key participants in making this biodiversity credit transaction work – the forest owner and the credit buyer. Tune in to learn more about this very pragmatic approach to biodiversity finance in production forests and see if you can learn a thing or two to apply in your own forest investments.
Host: Shauna Matkovich - The Forest Link
Producer: Magdalena Laas - https://www.linkedin.com/in/laasmagdalena/
01:26 Introduction to Alexandra and her background
03:06 Mechanism for biodiversity credit system in production forestry in Sweden
06:20 Example of integration of timber management and biodiversity management
08:50 Proportion of land dedicated to each (specific property owner)
10:12 Carbon credits in Sweden
11:51 Effect of policy changes and legislation on biodiversity offsets and markets
14:16 Buyer’s motivation of obtaining biodiversity credits (specific example)
17:05 Local or global market opportunities?
19:04 MRV process for conservation, restoration and diversification & target setting
22:24 Market price for biodiversity & loss of harvesting income
23:22 Interest from forest owners in biodiversity pilot project
24:15 Funding?
25:06 Duration of commitment by forestry owner (20+ years)
25:48 Mitigate risk of forestry owner quitting project
26:52 Development of biodiversity certification – Swedish Biodiversity Alliance
29:10 Methodology applicable in another jurisdiction
31:30 Data collection methods & fine-tuning metrics
34:26 Actionable advice for investors
[10:49] At this early stage, where we are in the development of the biodiversity credit market, I’d say it is better to keep carbon and biodiversity apart just to be on the safe side, not to trigger any unwanted consequences such as greenwashing critique.
[15:44] A transparent market will allow private funding of biodiversity and enable forest owners to engage in more nature conservation and restoration than we would have had if only taxpayers’ money was paying for everything.
Qarlbo Biodiversity: https://www.qarlbonac.com/
Portfolio: https://www.aleksandraholmlund.com/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aleksandra-holmlund-5b04101/
Sound Library:
Sign up now for the ForestLink’s newsletter, where you’ll receive technical advice, reflections, and best-practice guidance to support you with your forest-linked investment strategy or business straight to your inbox.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Join me today as I speak with Asger Strange Olesen and Herbert Yancey of the International Woodland Company, Asset Management + for an informative discussion on the EU Taxonomy. In this conversation we dig into the differences between the SFDR and the EU Taxonomy and how investors are looking at these sustainability regulations and tools. Though largely a concern for European investors, we talk about why it matters in forest investments the world over and how IWC AM+ is applying the EU Taxonomy in its approach to sustainable forest investment. We talk about the potentially affronting aspects, such as costs, management burden and how compliance will be monitored by the regulatory authorities, and spoiler alert – it’s not a drag on returns and will support the management of resilient forests.
“If you are not considering climate change with your forest assets, you’re doing a disservice to your investors”
Host: Shauna Matkovich - The Forest Link
Producer: Magdalena Laas - https://www.linkedin.com/in/laasmagdalena/
Details
01:50
Asger gives an overview re. EU taxonomy, SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation), impact on investments
05:50
Asger give more details about SFDR to avoid large-scale green washing
06:40
Asger explains how the disclosures moves from asset level to financial regulatory authorities
08:15
Looking at forest funds from different perspectives
10:39
Herbert explains American sentiment in investment regulations
13:23
Asger explains how IWC view EU taxonomy in the assets they manage
16:10
Asger explains about the learning curve translating financial regulation into investment strategy
18:30
Asger explains specific metrics (broad & context specific)
20:47
Herbert gives the American perspective – enhance forest resiliency
22:53
Asger adds to Herbert’s point – explains how SDFR works – making your methods transparent and comparable (it’s njot compulsory)
24:50
Asger gives a summary, touches on exploitation of the asset, if not sustainable, investors will move away
26:17
Asger explains the operational cost differences expected in an EU taxonomy aligned asset vs a non-taxonomy aligned asset
28:49
Asger elaborates on how aligning the EU taxonomy with one’s investment strategy build value in asset management (including point of exit opportunities)
31:03
Asger talks about how SFDR and EU taxonomy compliance will be monitored
37:47
Actionable advice to investors from Asger and then Herbert
34.58
IWC contact details
Significant quotes:[22:47] Herbert: If you are not considering climate change with your forest assets, you’re doing a disservice to your investors
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-international-woodland-company/
Sound Library:
Sign up now for the ForestLink’s newsletter, where you’ll receive technical advice, reflections, and best-practice guidance to support you with your forest-linked investment strategy or business straight to your inbox.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Join me today as I speak with Gabriela Leslie, Senior Manager, Food, Agriculture and Natural Capital at the Creo Syndicate - a membership organization that supports its family office members to better understand the latest developments in climate investing. It creates a platform for private family investors to come together, learn from each other and collaborate on investment opportunities to solve the climate crisis. In this illuminating conversation, we dig deep on how family offices are different than institutional investors and how this shapes why they consider forest investment, how they evaluate opportunities and what is challenging the attractiveness of forest investments currently (but the outlook is positive).
“So, we find that there’s a decision-making process that comes in around, not only is this a good investment and can this scale, but you know, is the impact really meaningful?”
Host: Shauna Matkovich - The Forest Link
Producer: Magdalena Laas - https://www.linkedin.com/in/laasmagdalena/
01:25
An overview of the Creo Syndicate
02:49
The profile of family office investors compared to institutional investors
06:21
Family office capacity to evaluate forest investments
08:29
Change in family office sentiment around investing in nature and why it is attractive
12:25
Sentiments on forests versus other natural climate investment strategies
16:15
The role of carbon markets
16:58
What makes forest investment strategies challenging at the moment
19:35
Exploratory and catalytic capital into forestry
21:47
Need for more transparency in forest investment
23:52
Emerging emphasis on biodiversity
26:18
Family office approach to catalytic finance
31:42
Investment vehicles suitable for family offices
35:55
Actionable advice for forest investment managers to attract more family office capital
37:27
Links (see below)
Significant quotes:[04:41] the lack of firepower means there’s a greater premium on capital efficiency and impact.
[05:12] So we find that there’s a decision-making process that comes in around, not only is this a good investment and can this scale, but you know, is the impact really meaningful?
[08:21] Our members come to the nature space with a lot of enthusiasm. I’d say this is a market shift over the last few years. We previously had folks come to us interested in nature but not really ready to engage [...] there’s more literacy around financial markets intersecting with nature now that there ever has been.
[22:23] I think some transparency around that counterfactual piece (Improved Forest Management) would be really important in helping uplift the reputation o the sector as an impact strategy.
[27:52] So catalytic in our mind doesn’t need to be philanthropic. It just needs to be risk on, it needs to be impact first. And we see some really great examples of folks coming in and they’ll either cut the first cheque or they be the last.
Links mentioned:Creo Syndicate: https://www.creosyndicate.org/
Sound Library:Sign up now for the ForestLink’s newsletter, where you’ll receive technical advice, reflections, and best-practice guidance to support you with your forest-linked investment strategy or business straight to your inbox.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Join me today as I speak with Thorsten Arndt, Head of Advocacy at the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC), where we discuss PEFC and how in addition to facilitating sustainable forest management, it can help those with forest products in their supply chains align to various voluntary and mandatory sustainability disclosure requirements. We dig deep into the EU Regulation on Deforestation Free Products, or EUDR, and about how PEFC is thinking about carbon certification.
Host: Shauna Matkovich - The Forest Link
Details
01:37
Thorsten introduces PEFC
05:08
Sustainability reporting under various voluntary and regulatory standards
10:10
Regulatory sustainability disclosures and the EUDR
14:16
How PEFC can support in meeting the EUDR
20:20
General public interpretations of the EUDR and what this could mean for sustainable forest management
21:31
Carbon certification and PEFC
25:13
How should investors be thinking about forest asset evaluation in light of forest management certification and EUDR
27:01
PEFC and its multistakeholder process
28:07
Actionable piece of advice for new investors
29:05
Contact details
11:15 “Under the scope of this regulation [EUDR] are essentially any kinds of products that enters the European market for several commodities including soy, palm oil, beef, rubber, cocoa, coffee and timber”.
20:20 “What we fear may happen [with the EUDR] is that an unintended consequence is that European consumers do not care about sustainability that much anymore because they will know that the products they buy are deforestation free.”
24:16 “The other option we are exploring is to collaborate and coordinate with existing carbon standards to see PEFC and carbon standards can be implemented in a more coordinated manner to reduce the burden on smallholders and the forest.”
PEFC: https://pefc.org/
Sign up now for the ForestLink’s newsletter, where you’ll receive technical advice, reflections, and best-practice guidance to support you with your forest-linked investment strategy or business straight to your inbox.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
From the publisher's feed
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.