Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share French v Bremner [2020] NSWCA 339
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
French v Bremner [2020] NSWCA 339
"No new claims, no new claims. (No new claims. No, no new.)"
__
A created an invention and R wanted to help commercialise it.
R made a loan of $335K to A, and then a further $3m loan. The two also became involved in property development together, with R providing some finance: [10], [11]
A lender sued A for failing to keep up with finance payments. A cross-claimed against R alleging a number of agreements.
A said R was contractually obliged to pay A (i) the money A had to pay the lender, (ii) $39m for breaching an agreement to commercialise the invention, and (iii) some property management fees: [18]
(R also cross-claimed against A seeking repayment of the loans, and declarations of resulting trusts for some properties: [19], [20])
A's cross-claim failed on all counts: [22]
Crucially, A explicitly said he was not pursuing any claims arising from the law of partnership nor any equitable remedies: [52], [53]
A appealed, saying the judge should have found there was a partnership and equitable relief should flow: [41]
The CoA said A's appeal could only be about claims he brought at first and could not raise a partnership claim on appeal, having failed to do so at first: [61]
A's appeal was dismissed.
___
If you'd like to keep in contact with me my socials are:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/coff...
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzo6...
https://www.instagram.com/coffeeandac...
https://www.facebook.com/CoffeeandaCa...
https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast...
https://twitter.com/coffeeandacase1?l...
View all episodes
By James d'Apice
5
22 ratings
"No new claims, no new claims. (No new claims. No, no new.)"
__
A created an invention and R wanted to help commercialise it.
R made a loan of $335K to A, and then a further $3m loan. The two also became involved in property development together, with R providing some finance: [10], [11]
A lender sued A for failing to keep up with finance payments. A cross-claimed against R alleging a number of agreements.
A said R was contractually obliged to pay A (i) the money A had to pay the lender, (ii) $39m for breaching an agreement to commercialise the invention, and (iii) some property management fees: [18]
(R also cross-claimed against A seeking repayment of the loans, and declarations of resulting trusts for some properties: [19], [20])
A's cross-claim failed on all counts: [22]
Crucially, A explicitly said he was not pursuing any claims arising from the law of partnership nor any equitable remedies: [52], [53]
A appealed, saying the judge should have found there was a partnership and equitable relief should flow: [41]
The CoA said A's appeal could only be about claims he brought at first and could not raise a partnership claim on appeal, having failed to do so at first: [61]
A's appeal was dismissed.
___
If you'd like to keep in contact with me my socials are:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/coff...
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzo6...
https://www.instagram.com/coffeeandac...
https://www.facebook.com/CoffeeandaCa...
https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast...
https://twitter.com/coffeeandacase1?l...
More shows like Coffee and a Case Note
View all
Law Report
25 Listeners
Hamish & Andy
1,119 Listeners
Conversations
852 Listeners
All In The Mind
795 Listeners
The Economy, Stupid
25 Listeners
Politics Now
88 Listeners
If You're Listening
322 Listeners
Unravel
815 Listeners
Full Story
172 Listeners
What's That Rash?
254 Listeners
The Front
49 Listeners
How Do They Afford That?
7 Listeners
15 Minutes with the Boss
11 Listeners
The Fin
19 Listeners
The Case Of
272 Listeners