Further. Every. Day.

https://www.fox5dc.com/news/white-house-accused-of-us-flag-code-violation-over-pride-month-display https://tinyurl.com/mr2wwdn8 https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/burlington-leaders-parents-decry-students-destruction-of-pride-decorations-at-middle-school/3066646/ https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/johns-hopkins-pulls-lesbian-definition-uproar-use-non-men-instead-wome-rcna89307 https://apnews.com/article/hamtramck-michigan-no-pride-flags-c380f8cdad592d69af9b2080ab4cc9cd https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/white-house-bans-trans-activist-topless-photo-pride-event-rcna89116 https://www.polygon.com/23755661/call-of-duty-nickmercs-skin-removed-anti-lgbtq-tweet https://youtu.be/euKC19haedY https://time.com/5613276/glaad-acceptance-index-lgbtq-survey/

Not many studies have been done on this, but this is what we know: So-Called Gender Affirming Care does not change suicidality outside of 10 years. In fact, it may cause significantly more harm than many have realized, according to a study done in Sweden, where Gender Confirmation Surgery has been available to minors for 30 years. If we are to believe the narrative that Gender Affirming Care is beneficial to those suffering from gender dysphoria, then we should see an incredible change in suicidality. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Instead we see between a 2-4X increase in mortality with significant increase after 10 years.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043071/

To understand this, let's hear some testimony from people who have experienced the surgery and post surgery regret:

https://www.tiktok.com/@faithfully_flawed247/video/7213129086133210411?q=detranistion%20god&t=1686372135738

0:00-4:09

https://youtu.be/v_o2Q2EgeLY

0:00-4:09

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6O3MzPeomqs

1:57:30-

With these testimonies in mind, the question comes, why do we even allow this sort of predatory behavior from Big-Pharma and Lobbyists? If someone has desire to amputate their leg or arm, we do not just approve the procedure and chop off a limb. Then why do we allow doctors to do this to people's private parts? Is there not something predatory about a medical industrial complex that makes millions off of one patient over 30 years, with numerous complications when the treatment that costs so much clearly does so little after doing so much damage?

https://www.tiktok.com/@77truthtiktok77/video/7214599686294916395?q=detranistion%20god&t=1686372135738

0:00-1:24

Well, Sweden is putting the brakes on these procedures for minors now in this article:

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20230208-sweden-puts-brakes-on-treatments-for-trans-minors

Part of the reason cited is the increase in Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria among women. Sweden has had the opportunity to get this right since before 1972, when they allowed an individual to change their legal gender status as seen by the state.

So why is this still a commonly performed procedure? Money may have a connection to it, in fact Gender Affirming Care is practically a single conversation away from any person's grasp, whether they actually suffer from any dysphoria or are a producer on the Matt Walsh show:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e724mKrkn3g

2:11-3:39

Sounds like an easy $150. Also sounds like an easy 1-2 million for an organization like Kaizer Permanente. It's almost like making profit is the objective here and not informed patient consent and care:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e724mKrkn3g

4:07-7:10

So what is the end game, population control? Sexual Liberation? Perverse fantasies of people at WPATH? Perhaps it is something of all of the above. One thing that we know is that the Enemy of Our Souls is seeking to devour anyone in his path. We need to remember that these folks are hostages in a Spiritual War and need our love and support, within the confines of truth.

#0102 How Transitioning Goes Wrong Further. Every. Day.

Again, to remind everyone, we are coming to this from the spirit of love. One does not love someone who is causing self harm if one says nothing when the harm is being committed.

So, why is the transition of teens becoming more common:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906237/

See figures 1-3 from this clinic who is reporting more surgeries and more FTM surgeries.

So what would explain this? Well, there certainly seems to be a social contagion issue at play here. Dr. Lisa Littman found herself in a serious quandary when she performed a study at Brown University which resulted in findings that included a social contagion element, primarily among girls.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq8ryFVy_LM

3:45-6:28

Now, there have been rebuttals to the Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria hypothesis of Dr. Littman, but none of which deal with the substance of the matter and use poor if not misleading standards. Articles and Studies below:

https://www.city-journal.org/article/a-new-low

https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/150/3/e2022056567/188709/Sex-Assigned-at-Birth-Ratio-Among-Transgender-and?autologincheck=redirected

Now, what does WPATH, the leading organization on standards for transgender surgery say about this? Well, Dr. Marci Bowers, the transgender vaginoplasty surgeon who worked on Jazz Jennings had this to say:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuwOx9YdHXY

So how has transitioning affected those who have transitioned? Well, let's look at the most publicized transition, Jazz Jennings and see how she is doing post surgery:

Courtesy of Candace Owens:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuwOx9YdHXY

0:44-2:33

Now, Jazz Jennings has nearly 2 decades of life dedicated to this transition. Do you think that it would be easy to say that there was regret here? But let's look at how Jazz feels about life in general:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2lmlWy0yXg

0:44-1:49

Remember, this is the mom that told Jazz to shove a dilator, a phallus, into the vaginoplasty or momma would… sounds like assault to me.

Now, some brave souls have detransitioned despite the backlash that they have faced:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6O3MzPeomqs

0:00-1:17

So why, why is this so common? Why are we leaving all of the warning signs behind? Well there are two motivations, both as old time and as perverse as possible: Money and Power. Scott Newgent, a female to male transitioner, clearly articulates the issue of money and Lupron here in this press event:

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1634682798903635970

5:01-8:31

But what of the power claim? Well, to look at that, we need to be introduced to some people at WPATH, World Professional Association for Transgender Health, and what they do. This org sets the standards for care that are followed religiously by medical facilities and governments for the Transgender Community. Recently, they've been pushing for a new addition to the LGBT acronym, E for Eunuch.

https://twitter.com/WomenReadWomen/status/1646564740242743298?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1646564740242743298%7Ctwgr%5E9ad1042dc28605962f8a5c0072237e8ee50358de%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.louderwithcrowder.com%2Fsurgeon-eunuch

Now, why is this relevant, well a number of people, including Thomas W Johnson, have been discovered by their own carelessness to be moderators on www.eunuch.org, a site with abuse child porn. Johnson and others in WPATH's pool of thought leaders have been discovered to be founding members of this smut site and are pushing for so-called scholarship that fits their destructive kinks, much like Kinsey, Money, and every other sicko under the sun.

https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/top-academic-behind-fetish-site-hosting

So what does this mean for the Christian? We should be quick with the truth, slow to anger, and consistent in love. Let's be equipped for the next time someone tells us that it is only kind to transition youth or that we are doing it for the right reasons. No, it is not kind, it is abuse and it is for money and or power/deviant gratification.

https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/surgeon-eunuch

#0102 The Effect of Pride and Children Further. Every. Day.

First off, the whole conversation surrounding the LGBT community needs to be handled with the preface of love. This does not mean that we ignore the destructive behavior, but that we instead attempt to provide a path for healing and repentance.

With all of that said, pornography and sexual acts are NOT suitable for children and the main thrust of Pride Month is to put partially sanitized samples of both infront of children:

https://protectyoungeyes.com/5-ways-pornography-harms-children-teens/

Now, how is the LGBT Community putting this in front of children? You may ask. Well here are several excerpts from the books banned in Florida Schools:

In “Gender Queer: A Memoir”, we can see a young girl having intimate relations with a fake phallus.

In “Flamer” We see boys committing homosexual acts and assault on one another.

https://www.flgov.com/2023/03/08/governor-ron-desantis-debunks-book-ban-hoax/

https://idahofreedom.org/idaho-school-libraries-promote-radical-sexual-agendas-and-pornographic-material/

I would go on, but it only gets worse with full on pornographic scenes being depicted. Gone are the days of showing human anatomy, but instead, we are showing children porn in the name of “educating” them concerning LGBT issues.

And for what? To bind them to a destructive lifestyle filled with mental health issues? https://news.vumc.org/2022/02/24/study-finds-lgbq-people-report-higher-rates-of-adverse-childhood-experiences-than-straight-people-worse-mental-health-as-adults/

Notice the T was left out of that study. When we look at the Transgender community, the numbers are even more frightening: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34226247/

Now, how should the Christian react to this information? There is a ferver that arises in one's heart to see justice done. This is a good thing, a Godly thing. However, it is critical to note that everyone who holds this ideology is a captive to sin. There are times to be candid and seek justice, but there are also times to act in grace. Note how Christ spoke against the corruption of Judea's Sanhedrin, but he dined individually with them in an attempt to offer grace. Christ also treated individuals with grace, not apathy. His intent was always to offer a path to restoration. That too, should be our aim.

First off, what is AI and what is it capable of? Well, what we have right now is a mixture of machine learning and and incredible database, the internet. When people discuss AI today, they're often referring to ChatGPT, Stable Diffusion, or any other number of programs whose dataset comes from the internet. When referring to these things, it's hard to imagine AI being anything more than a threat to copyright, identity security, or whatever little integrity the news had before 2023.

An introduction to AI 0:00-1:44

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1qZbsytk08

AI and job loss: 0:00-1:23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WPFLWEVGAI

Story on Stable Diffusion Copyright: 0:00-1:16

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gv9cdTh8cUo

Story on kidnapping and ransom spoof: 0:00-1:35

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3DnDFqWIXY

Story on fake news via AI: 0:00-0:52

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m4xRso_2Rg

What do the experts say? First, should you even trust the experts? There is an unprecedented nature to AI in that the doubling of knowledge appears to be increasing beyond what Moore's Law will allow, this means that knowledge is doubling faster, perhaps it will reach the prediction of Buckminster Fuller of doubling every 12 hours. Some tech experts are rattled including these folks, quotes courtesy of Glenn Beck:

https://www.glennbeck.com/contributor/how-dangerous-is-ai-these-13-quotes-from-ai-researchers-will-terrify-you

Now, what could all of this have to do with the Antichrist? Well, who will the Antichirst be? He will be the head of a world governmental system. He will die and rise again, apparently at least. He will be inhabited as the Son of Perdition, just as Judas was. He will not be some AI, but rather a man.

Now, what about the Mark of the Beast? Well, let us use a Biblical Rubrik to divine this:

Does any of this look like the Mark of the Beast? Not really, not yet at least. Be aware and be strong, but Christians should really be wary of playing the pin the tail on the Beast and his Mark all day long. If we were half as interested in Evangelism as we were in Eschatology, we might not be looking at the End Times as we seem to be.

Buckminster Knowlege Curve: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwie68rIrfH-AhXbnGoFHUV2C04QFnoECCMQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Flodestarsolutions.com%2Fkeeping-up-with-the-surge-of-information-and-human-knowledge%2F&usg=AOvVaw1sG7mv0YbrP5BS-zltSWs4

Moore's Law: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjlor_erfH-AhXOnGoFHYqTBFsQFnoECBoQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.investopedia.com%2Fterms%2Fm%2Fmooreslaw.asp&usg=AOvVaw1StZ9uDmXw6auiQpEKnhIj

Did the UN explicitly say that they want to legalize adult sexual interaction with minors? No. But did they open the doors? Yes. Some will argue the point that the text in the March 8th declaration is speaking of like aged individuals only. The March 8th document does not make any distinction between ages of children vs adults, but it only points to consent as the key issue. The trouble with this is that there is no way for a child to consent and no minimum age is expressed and certainly no age gap.

Now, you may say that this is all overblown, “republicans pounce” nonsense. Well, look at how the UN has conducted itself in regards to sexual abuse from within its own ranks. This will shed a heinous light on the phraseology: "sexual conduct involving persons below the domestically prescribed minimum age of consent to sex may be consensual in fact, if not in law. In this context, the enforcement of criminal law should reflect the rights and capacity of persons under 18 years of age to make decisions of engaging in consensual sexual conduct."

Up to 60,000 cases of sexual assault were committed by UN workers within one decade. -https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/un-child-rape-sex-exploitation-united-nations-antonio-guterres-prosecutions-immunity-trial-a7956816.html

This all leads to the why? Why is this happening? A lack of accountability? A corruption of governmental agencies that attracts these types of criminals? A reduced penalty for such acts? A lack of God in the Culture? Indeed, all of the above are correct. But why are we leaning into it? Why are we seeing more of this in the United States as well?

In Minnesota HF1655 would remove the exception for pedophilic proclivities from the protected sexual orientation statuses for the state. For those who didn't catch it, that means the state will not prosecute pedophilia. Link here:

https://dailycaller.com/2023/04/26/minnesota-bill-could-make-pedophiles-a-protected-class/

Why is there an activist movement to legalize the abuse of children? We could theorize about a pedophilic cabal who wish to make their previous misdeeds legal. We could assume that these people have desires that they wish to explore, but haven't yet. We could think they are perhaps misguided idealists, detached from reality. Any of these examples might be true, pending the subject, but the truth is even more bizarre. We are fighting a Spiritual War that many of these people do not even know they are taking part in. This is an issue as old as Ashtoreth and Molech, the Cannanite demons of sexual deviancy and child abuse.

We as Christians need to stand firm. When someone calls you backward for believing in a moral right and wrong concerning children, remind them that it was the so-called backwards Judeo-Christian faith that pulled us out of the barbaric abuses of women and children seen in ancient times. The so-called Progressive wishes to bring us back. We free the slaves, empower women, and enrich the minds of children only to have the Regressive attempt to divide by race, enslave women to the bondage brought on by the sexual revolution, and dim the minds of children by calling grades racist. Remember who you are and from where God has brought you. Maybe then you can show others God's work in love and kindness.

The last couple of weeks have been interesting. Politicians have called for the silencing of media personalities, such as AOC and Mitch McConnel. Networks have fired primary journalists and commentators, CNN's Don Lemon and Tucker Carlson. And much talk concerning Free Speech has been bantered. So what exactly is Free Speech?

Introduction of Panel

Tucker's J6 coverage 3:16-5:04 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Opy7MLGAPBk

Tucker's Mulvaney Coverage 0:00-0:33 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr8OPmPE-j4

AOC's Response Full: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Mt4LW1TtmPc

Dylan Mulvaney's Response Full https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzJcs1hmT_A

First off, it is important to note the shifting definition from the founding of the United States through the present day.

Webster's 1828 Definitions:

FREE'DOM, noun

1. A state of exemption from the power or control of another; liberty; exemption from slavery, servitude or confinement. freedom is personal, civil, political, and religious. [See Liberty.]

2. Particular privileges; franchise; immunity; as the freedom of a city.

3. Power of enjoying franchises.

4. Exemption from fate, necessity, or any constraint in consequence of predetermination or otherwise; as the freedom of the will.

5. Any exemption from constraint or control.

6. Ease or facility of doing any thing. He speaks or acts with freedom

7. Frankness; boldness. He addressed his audience with freedom

8. License; improper familiarity; violation of the rules of decorum; with a plural. Beware of what are called innocent freedoms.

SPEECH, noun

1. The faculty of uttering articulate sounds or words, as in human beings; the faculty of expressing thoughts by words or articulate sounds. speech was given to man by his Creator for the noblest purposes.

2. Language; words as expressing ideas. The acts of God to human ears cannot without process of speech be told.

3. A particular language, as distinct form others. Psalms 19:2.

4. That which is spoken; words uttered in connection and expressing thoughts. You smile at my speech

5. Talk; mention; common saying. The duke did of me demand, what was the speech among the londoners concerning the French journey.

6. Formal discourse in public; oration; harangue. The member has made his first speech in the legislature.

7. Any declaration of thoughts. I, with leave of speech implor'd, repli'd.

2023 Merriam-Webster's definitions are as follows:

Free Speech: speech that is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

also : the right to such speech

an unconstitutional restraint on free speech —

Nat'l Law Jour.

What changed? The former meaning was as bestowed by the Creator, the second is as bestowed by the State. That is indeed interesting. As the world has become less Godly, Jefferson's Bill of Rights has become more and more restricted. We see this inclination towards more laws in our Second and Fourth Amendments in the form of Gun Control and TSA's unlawful searches of citizens without Probable Cause. We have also seen this in modern times, but it is worth noting that the debate of how freedoms should be restricted or not has always been present. Noah Webster, author of the 1828 Webster's dictionary didn't believe that the Bill of Rights was prudent as it would allow for crimes to be committed under the color of “Rights”. He and Jefferson debated this publicly and even wrote letters back and forth on the topic.

In Jefferson's Letter to Noah Webster in December of 1790, Jefferson stated:

“It had become an universal and almost uncontroverted position in the several states, that the purposes of society do not require a surrender of all our rights to our ordinary governors: that there are certain portions of right not necessary to enable them to carry on an effective government, and which experience has nevertheless proved they will be constantly incroaching on, if submitted to them. That there are also certain fences which experience has proved peculiarly efficacious against wrong, and rarely obstructive of right, which yet the governing powers have ever shewn a disposition to weaken and remove. Of the first kind for instance is freedom of religion: of the second, trial by jury, Habeas corpus laws, free presses.”

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-18-02-0091

We can find the more modern sensibilities, in a perverse way, in Webster's reply:

“That both policy and right require that the delegation should at all times possess the whole power of the state for the purpose of preventing all possible wrong and obtaining all possible good—That every right claimed by a citizen of a free government is liable to vary with circumstances; except what rest wholly on the moral law; that therefore every right, created by political law, should be always subject to be modified by the power that created it, viz. the will of the state, which is always the will of the delegation.—That in short, the election and organization of the body which is to express the will of the state, is the only power which the people and a convention can exercise, and the only power which an ordinary legislature can not. ”https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-18-02-0106

Jefferson also wrote this to David Humpreys in a 1789 letter:

"There are rights which it is useless to surrender to the government and which governments have yet always been found to invade. These are the rights of thinking and publishing our thoughts by speaking or writing; the right of free commerce; the right of personal freedom. There are instruments for administering the government so peculiarly trustworthy that we should never leave the legislature at liberty to change them. The new Constitution has secured these in the executive and legislative department, but not in the judiciary. It should have established trials by the people themselves, that is to say, by jury. There are instruments so dangerous to the rights of the nation and which place them so totally at the mercy of their governors that those governors, whether legislative or executive, should be restrained from keeping such instruments on foot but in well-defined cases. Such an instrument is a standing army." --Thomas Jefferson to David Humphreys, 1789. ME 7:323

Remember that both of these men were arguing from the Judeo-Christian Framework and had both agreed upon morality. The debate was concerning the long term good of the nation. Webster saw the need to enforce morality via the government. Jefferson, however, feared the tyranny that they had just escaped returning in the form of a hard theocracy, and wished to institute a government governed by Godly men, in a sort of soft Theocracy. We can see that the worst fears of both men have been realized.

We can also see the playing out of this debate in the form of Supreme Court Decisions over the years. Not all speech is protected.

In Roth vs the United States, Roth was charged with indecency for his “A Quarterly for the Fancy-Free” publication, a porno magazine subscription. The case was decided against Roth in that the material was harmful if in the hands of children.

The dissenting opinion of Justice Earl Warren in the Roth vs United States case was interesting. His concern was “the broad language used here may eventually be applied to the arts and sciences and freedom of communication generally.” This was stated in spite of Justice Warren's assent that pornography was not constitutionally protected.

So what then, is Freedom of Speech limited? If so, how and why? Let us look at another case.

In Hess vs Indiana, Gregory Hess screamed in public that the protest would “take the *bleeping* streets later.” The Supreme Court overturned a call to violence charge in that there was no definite time laid out in Hess's call to violence.

So what is the defining line? What is protected speech? In a legal sense, the simplest and most true to an originalist interpretation of the Bill of Rights is likely the following: “You have full personal autonomy, until you commit an offense against another individual and are found guilty of a crime under common law.”

Now, as a Christian, we should understand this principle well. What our Founding Fathers in America created was a very similar legal system to the moral system that our Heavenly Father has instituted: You have the freedom to make moral decisions, but lack the freedom to decide the consequences for your sins. Actions, not thoughts, expressed or spoken are what warrant punishment. We need to hold that standard clearly for ourselves and for our nation so that we can be a witness and testimony to the world.

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-18-02-0091

https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-18-02-0106

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39kc29lCQ94

https://languagemuseum.org/noah-webster-an-american-dictionary-for-an-american-english/

https://www.history.com/topics/us-presidents/thomas-jefferson

• Dollar stores squ... • 4 Chicago Walmart... • Chicago leaders r... • What went wrong? ... • Why Grocery Store... #fed #christianity #furthereveryday #podcast #freedom #woke #america #rights #fooddesert #wokeism #walmart

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/new-cdc-report-suicide-is-now-the-second-leading-cause-of-death-of-americans-under-35-jumps-4-in-a-year/ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/04/trans-florida-teacher-keeps-job-despite-allegedly-threatening-to-shoot-students-guns-taken-away-by-law-enforcement/ https://www.youtube.com/shorts/3i2GhyKcx-s https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kfGLftiQZpk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABQDAj0TQ7o #podcast #fed #furthereveryday #christianity #woke #freedom #rights #tradwives #304 #traditionalmarriage #feminism #publicfreakout #stranger #maid

The most important point that the Culture has missed is that neither "Progress" nor "Tradition" actually hold any meaningful value. These are simply man made ideas and will always fail to fulfill the yearning of the human experience.

We see this here in the Trad Wife issue: Traditional Gender Roles are God ordained, but without God, the tropes surrounding Gender Roles simply harken back to a more morally backward society (see 1950s misogyny and Civil Rights violations). "Progressive" sensibilities, or lack thereof, are detached from all biology, logic, and morality. Without God, "Tradition" is nothing.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/3i2GhyKcx-s

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kfGLftiQZpk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABQDAj0TQ7o

https://youtu.be/rK1snM-NTdU