Future Shock

Future Shock

By Jason KesslerNewsPolitics
Download on the App Store

Future Shock episodes

  • The Night the Lights Went Out in Charlottesville: Judicial Prejudice in a Southern Town

    That’s the night that the lights went out in Georgia

    That’s the night that they hung an innocent man

    Well, don’t trust your soul to no backwoods Southern lawyer

    ‘Cause the judge in the town’s got bloodstains on his hands

    One of the greatest country music songs of all time, “The Night the Lights Went Out in Georgia” was about corruption and the conviction of an innocent man in a small Southern town.

    The foreboding noir of that classic tune encapsulates the corrupt, small town injustice we see happening right now in Charlottesville, Virginia: to a spate of defendants who attended the August 11 torch procession during the Unite the Right weekend back in 2017.

    Charged with Virginia Statute § 18.2-423.01B which forbids “burning an object on public property…with the intent of intimidating…” they are beset on all sides by members of the court who were among the “counter-protest” 6 years ago and now sit in judgment against them.

    These charges are widely viewed by legal authorities across the political spectrum as a statutorily and constitutionally flawed attempt to prosecute nonviolent political assembly and speech. For more on that, read my last VDARE article.

    Research, both independently confirmed or independently discovered, during this investigation will demonstrate how a local judge, Claude Vibart Worrell II, has failed in his legal obligation to inform the court and recuse himself in cases where he is reportedly a material witness.

    Not only that but his wife and daughter, both obnoxious left-wing Antifa activists, were also material witnesses to the events in question.

    Kathryn Laughon at a protest against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Laughon is a self-described “antifascist”, commonly known as Antifa

    Kathryn Laughon, an assistant nursing professor employed by the University of Virginia, attended a so-called “antiracist” and “antifascist” sermon at St Pauls Church with her family near the site of the torch procession where the events in question occurred. In 2020, Laughon appeared on a podcast called The Pledge where described being “terrified” because she was “surrounded by nazis.” These same so-called “nazis” are the defendants in cases where her husband, Judge Worrell, is punitively denying bond even to defendants without a criminal record. (Read a transcript from The Pledge podcast)

    Laughon talks about her past experience as part of an “antifascist” counter-protest riot on July 2017, in which Antifa and Black Lives Matter affiliated groups initiated violence against police for protecting a nonviolent KKK demonstration:

    ” Because when the KKK left, it was declared an unlawful assembly, we were declared, the anti-racist, antifascist protesters were declared an unlawful assembly.”

    Laughon has also expressed what might be called “invidious discrimination” towards White people, in legal parlance.

    ”Honestly, I do kind of hate white people,” Laughon wrote to Antifa blogger Molly Conger on July 25, 2022.

    On that note, one of the persistent questions about these cases is how Conger (aka @socialistdogmom on X) seems to have so much insider foreknowledge about the cases. In fact, she created a new blog entitled “Burning Hate” where she broke news of the first “burning an object” arrest and has continued to share information that only an insider in the courtroom would know.

    While it is likely given the corruption of the Charlottesville judiciary that there are multiple sources, one of the most plausible explanations may be the judge’s wife herself. I found YEARS of communications between the two antifascist activist online (see video below).

    Laughon has publicly pronounced that she views Molly Conger’s content with Judge Worrel and shares with him her vitriolic hatred for the August 11 protesters.

    Not only that but Laughon has liked tweets about the arrest of defendants Judge Worrell has denied bond to and liked a tweet from Conger celebrating the Antifa surveillance that led to the arrest of defendant William Fears.

    She has also seemingly mocked the defendants’ difficulties in finding attorneys willing to represent them in the Charlottesville area by sarcastically asking if the reason “so many lawyers have noped out” is because “Elmer Woodward has flown to Miami.” Elmer Woodard is an out of town attorney who is only known in the Charlottesville area for representing Unite the Right defendants like myself, Chris Cantwell, Matt Parrott, Patrick Casey, Nathan Damigo, and Matt Heimbach.

    Finally, Laughon has been a passionate public advocate of the controversial legal position of prosecuting the August 11 protesters under the “burning objects” statute.

    In two tweets, one directed at Molly Conger, she reacts with furious vitriol to the decision of former Albemarle Commonwealth Attorney Robert Tracci not to prosecute protesters under the “burning objects” statute because of his determination that it would be a violation of their constitutional rights to free speech and assembly.

    Laughon: Tracci is arguing about the ‘burning object’ legal issue but Nazis ASSAULTED PEOPLE on A11. They TERRORIZED people.” (Archive)

    Laughon: “Why hasn’t he prosecuted the Nazis who terrorized us on A11?” (Archive)

    Judge Claude Vibart Worrell II

    Worrell himself is mentioned in the Charlottesville Independent Review (Read it here), examining the events of August 11 and 12 by former federal prosecutor Timothy Heaphy. That report describes Worrell’s attendance at St Paul’s near the torch demonstration, where he telephoned Charlottesville Police Lieutenant Mooney requesting police protection from the protesters.

    It does not mention that the dramatic and hysterical account of “the church being surrounded by torch wielding neo-nazis” proffered by far left activists like his wife was a fevered fiction of a wild imagination. Footage from a documentary by left-wing media personality Katie Couric clearly shows the demonstration far and away in the distance.

    Katie Couric points to the UVA torch demonstration in the distance.

    The torch demonstration as seen from the steps of St Paul’s Church (which was allegedly “surrounded”)

    Nevertheless, the fact that Worrell, Laughon and apparently his other family members witnessed the events of the case and were “terrified” enough by the defendants to phone police makes crystal clear that objectivity is out of the question. A hypothesis of revenge possibly motivating the judge in this case would seem to align with his overly punitive bond rulings thus far. (More on those later)

    Embed: Cornel West: Antifa Came to Fight and Get Arrested in Charlottesville (bitchute.com)

    (Above) Cornel West’s violent August 11 sermon in Charlottesville

    In that same podcast, Judge Worrel’s radical Black Lives Matter and Defund the Police supporting activist daughter, Althea Laughon-Worrell confirms that she was also in attendance as a material witness to the events of August 11.

    Althea Laughon Worrell (Left) with controversial Black Lives Matter and fat acceptance advocate Zyahna Bryant (Right)

    Althea Laughon-Worrell: “After it was over, we had to stay inside the church, and we had to leave quietly and in small groups. And it was terrifying. I present very white to the world. I’m mixed. I’m black and I’m white, and I’m also gay. And you may not know these things from looking at me. But it was still terrifying because my large black father was in that church with us. We had to run to our cars to try and stay away from these people because they were going to attack us.”

    Althea Laughon-Worrel: “fuck the police, fuck donald trump, and fuck america”

    This is particularly interesting because it depicts both Judge Worrell and his daughter as being so “terrified” that they had to “run to their cars.” Never mind that no one surrounded the church and these people are insane. How is a judge supposed to dispassionately set aside that he and his wife and daughter ran in fear of the defendants in the cases he is presiding over?

    The Commonwealth of Virginia Canons of Judicial Ethics provides some relevant guidelines on this matter:

    CANON 1A: “A judge must not allow family, social, political, economic, or other relationships to influence the judge’s judicial conduct or judgment.”

    CANON 1D: “A judge must recuse himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, including but not limited to instances where:

    (d) the judge is a material witness in the matter


    (g) the judge, a member of the judge’s family, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:

    (iv) is to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.

    Also, and this is critical, the Canon of Judicial Ethics stipulates that a judge is required to disclose “information the judge believes the parties or their lawyers might reasonably consider relevant to the question of disqualification, even if the judge believes there is no real basis for disqualification.”

    The fact that men have been denied bond and convicted in August 11 cases where Judge Worrell neglected his legal obligations to disclose the aforementioned conflicts could leave him open to charges of misconduct and throw his prior rulings into dispute.

    Additionally, Lawton Tufts, the prosecutor spearheading these political prosecutions from the Albemarle County Commonwealth’s Attorneys Office is also a left-wing counter protester with experience as a witness to the events of the Unite the Right weekend.

    Tufts (Right) is pictured with Soros-back Albemarle County Commonwealth Attorney Jim Hingely (Left)

    Tufts is described in the Charlottesville Independent Review as an “anti-racist activist” and liaison for radical left and antifa groups BLM (Black Lives Matter) and SURJ (Showing Up for Racial Justice) as they coordinated with the Charlottesville Police Department for the Unite the Right weekend.

    He was personally texting with CPD Lt Cheryl Sandridge during the events of August 12.

    According to the Fall 2017 edition of UVA Lawyer magazine, Tufts was in attendance as a counter-protester on August 12 and “followed supremacists who had dispersed through town.”

    Tufts describes the events surrounding the case he now prosecutes as “powerful in showing how many allies there are against hate.”

    Tufts continued, “We need to harness the energy our community obviously has for fighting nazis and use it to fight the injustices of everyday life and push towards equity for all.” (Standing Up for Charlottesville, by Mary Wood, UVA Lawyer Magazine, Fall 2017)

    Tufts (Right) with a close companion

    I have also been able to independently confirm that Lawton Tufts is friends with Judge Worrell’s radical wife Kathryn Laughon on Facebook, where she has, for example, “liked” a photo of Tufts with Albemarle Commonwealth Attorney Jim Hingely.

    With this knowledge in mind, its particularly nauseating to read the courtroom exchanges between Tufts and Worrell before denying bond. Both offer “commentary” that betray their political ideologies and agendas. But its most disturbing that Worrell would offer himself up as judge in a case where he was a direct witness and might even claim to be a “victim” of the incident in question. Charlottesville “justice” is third worldism at its most grotesque and corrupt.

    Lets start with Tufts presenting “evidence” to Worrell from the Atlanta Antifascist blog during a bond hearing for defendant Tyler Bradley Dykes.

    Tufts described the blog as “a source the Commonwealth would not normally rely on”, which is strange considering that the blog post had only been published within 24hrs of the hearing. That is some coordination for a source Tufts “wouldn’t normally rely on”!

    Worrell used the allegations in the Antifa blog, about Dykes flyering constitutionally protected so-called “white supremacist” political messages, to deny Dyke’s bond. Worrell agreed engaging in this nonviolent political speech activity made him a “danger to the community.”

    In another instance, Judge Worrell denied bond to defendant William McAffe Williams, a August 11 protester with a completely clean criminal record. Keep in mind, as VDARE has previously reported, that the charge itself is on highly dubious legal grounds and should be thrown out on a constitutional rights basis alone.

    But this draconian requirement for Williams to remain incarcerated pending trial proved decisive. Williams, a father of seven children under 10 years of age, with one born just after his April 1st arrest, was clearly in no position to leave his wife and children unsupported and accepted a plea deal.

    Worrell should have taken these factors into consideration in the interests of justice, not running interference to help his anti-racist fellow travelers secure a conviction under duress.

    According to the Daily Progress, “His lawyer told the court that being held without bail before trial was what forced William McAffe Williams of Nacona, Texas, to take a deal.”

    “In my own personal opinion I would have taken this case to trial,” attorney Ryan Rakness told Albemarle County Circuit Court. “That my client was held without bond made that impossible.” (Third participant in racist 2017 torch march pleads guilty, by Hawes Spencer, Daily Progress, July 13, 2023)

    Another torch demonstration defendant Jacob Dix, drove all night from Ohio to Charlottesville when he learned there was a warrant out for his arrest. Fortunately he stood before Judge Cheryl Higgins and not Worrell, because he was granted bond. (‘Face of White terror’ among latest indicted for 2017 torch march, by Hawes Spencer, Daily Progress, July 28, 2023)

    That is not sufficient to ensure justice according to Dix’s attorney Peter Frazier of Charlottesville. He has boldly filed a Motion for Subpoena Duces Tecum seeking documents related to Albemarle Prosecutor Tuft’s communications concerning August 11 and 12, including with counter-protest groups, police and the Albemarle County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office prior to his employment there.



    Read Fraziers Motion for Subpoena Duces Tecum here

    The purpose of this is to call for the recusal of Albemarle County prosecutors who may have knowingly engaged in prosecutorial misconduct and perhaps the dismissal of the charge itself.

    As of September 25, 2023 Attorney Frazier has also filed a Motion to Recuse Judge Worrell using much of the same evidence presented in this article.

    Read the Motion to Recuse Judge Worrell here

    Of interest is that the motion reveals Frazier’s intention to call Judge Worrell’s radical Antifa wife Kathryn Laughon as a witness in hearing on the Motion to Recuse.

    1 min
  • Why these Charlottesville lawsuits affect us all

    It’s not just their speech, it’s yours, too!

    (Not up to speed on what happened at Charlottesville? Here me explain it in my own words below)

    This is Jason Kessler. Some of you may know me as the permit holder of the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia in August 2017.

    In the nearly five years following the rally, I have been subjected to more abuses and provocations than most people could imagine. I have been smeared as a “Nazi” by activists in the mainstream media, and sites like Wikipedia. I have been blamed for the death of Heather Heyer, even though subsequent investigations by the Charlottesville Police Department and the FBI found there was no conspiracy or even communication between James Alex Fields Jr. and the organizers of the rally.

    I was the second person ever de-verified from Twitter, and banned from YouTube. They were putting strikes onto videos I hadn’t even published, which told me it was somebody inside the company who had it in for me. The purported reason for my ban was for “hate speech,” although I didn’t even have any videos about race, and spoke almost exclusively about the government abuse I had been subjected to in Charlottesville, including videos of police officers physically and verbally assaulting me, and breaking my recording equipment.

    My personal websites were pulled down a few days after the rally, for “violating terms of service”—although they never explained what the violation was—so I couldn’t get my side of the story out to the public. In 2020, I would be banned from personal banking with Wells Fargo, a bank I had been with for many years, with no issues, because of “risk.”

    The media, which gleefully hunted down identities of protesters so they could be fired from their jobs and ostracized by their friends and family, had no interest whatsoever in pursuing the government misconduct uncovered in the “Independent Review of the 2017 Protest Events in Charlottesville Virginia.”

    The rally set off a tidal wave of censorship across Silicon Valley which has now engulfed not only members of the alt-right but mainstream politicians, including former President Donald Trump.

    Although my own conduct in organizing the rally was First Amendment-protected and legally blameless, vindictive county and city prosecutors charged me with multiple criminal offenses, unrelated to the rally. All of these meritless charges were dismissed in court, but further drained my funds—$3,500, which was a lot of money to me at that time—as I desperately needed financial resources to pursue civil rights litigation for the sabotage that occurred at the rally.

    On top of that, the ACLU of Virginia dropped me as a client right after the rally, and I went to work furiously calling every law firm and then every prominent free speech law firm in the country. The task seemed insurmountable. One of the few law firms willing to take our case wanted an obscene retainer of over $100,000. Of course, at the time, I was so radioactive I couldn’t even hold down a job.

    I tried to set up legal fundraisers, to sue the City of Charlottesville—for the stand-down preventing me and others from speaking, violating our First Amendment rights—but they were shut down by GoFundMe, PayPal, Stripe, Patreon, and many others.

    Thankfully, in October 2017 I was able to find like-minded and sympathetic attorneys who didn’t require an enormous up-front retainer.

    No sooner had we found attorneys to sue the City of Charlottesville, than powerful interests started filing lawsuits of their own against us. The most prominent of these was Sines v. Kessler, filed by 10 Charlottesville residents against me and 14 rally organizers, on October 11, 2017, claiming they allegedly suffered some injury related to the rallies.

    Sines is funded by powerful Democrat-connected attorneys, hedge fund managers, and Silicon Valley titans. The lead attorney—radical lesbian Roberta Kaplan—is known for having litigated the U.S. Supreme Court case legalizing gay marriage, and also representing sleazy Hollywood types like Harvey Weinstein. When Kaplan spoke about Sines at a San Francisco synagogue in 2019, she bragged that “wiping out the finances of these groups and individuals is key to the plan.”

    The lawsuit Kessler v. City of Charlottesville, where I am a plaintiff, alleges a conspiracy between Charlottesville government officials and Virginia State Police to curtail First Amendment-protected speech. We claimed violation of our First Amendment rights by arguing state and local officials used the expected violence from Antifa and Black Lives Matter as a pretext to declare an unlawful assembly and curtail our speeches before they could occur. Police should have had an affirmative duty to separate the sides or try to stop the violence in some way before leaping immediately to the step of disbanding the rally.

    The court authored an outrageous opinion dismissing our case, claiming police had no duty to protect us from counter-protester violence. On June 29, 2020, we filed for appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond. I have attached our appeal brief for your review. We’re awaiting a ruling that should come later this year. If necessary, we’ll take our case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    The Sines trial began in late October 2021 and lasted four weeks, butting up against the Thanksgiving holiday. The result was a mixed verdict in which the two federal conspiracy claims against Charlottesville protesters were hung, but we were found liable under some Virginia statutes.

    We have to appeal these outrageous, politically biased verdicts on the Virginia statutes. For instance, I was found liable and ordered to pay over $200,000 to two far-left radicals for “racial violence and harassment” at the August 11 torch protest. But no evidence was presented that I touched either of them or said a word to them. Both plaintiffs testified that they didn’t even see me that night.

    Overturning this bogus verdict, an assault on my political speech and yours, is critical to undermining the legitimacy of the jury’s verdict and exposing their prejudice.

    The reason the jury ruled against us on those claims was, according to one source, because a really angry Black female juror was acting as a ringleader against the defendants, haranguing the other jurors until they agreed to her demands. Considering the lack of any evidentiary basis to the judgment, our attorneys expect there will be strong grounds to have this overturned.

    The legacy of Charlottesville has now been weighed down in litigation for the last five years. The cost has been enormous. We are talking thousands of dollars each month, per defendant. The cost of going to trial last October stretched into the tens of thousands of dollars.

    Thank you for taking the time to learn a side of the Charlottesville story you may not have been aware of. If powerful interests squelching our God-given free speech rights angers you as much as it does me, and you’d like to help us in the battle against those attempting to erase views and opinions other than theirs, any support you can give would be greatly appreciated, and there are a number of ways you can contribute.

    You can donate online, using a debit or credit card, through BuyMeACoffee or DonationAlerts.

    You can also send Bitcoin to the address:

    1EsUzC6NjpMNj7DA9qmN5VxtFDsPeCbCNu

    If you would like to mail cash, check or money order, make it out to Jason Kessler and send to:

    Jason Kessler                                                                                                                                            6256 Bullet Drive                                                                                                                                    Crestview, FL 32536

    If you are committed to this fight as much as I am, one of the most effective ways to help is through a monthly donation subscription, directly through my attorney, of $100 or $200 per month. Or any amount that you’re comfortable with. Please email me at [email protected] if you’d like to select this option.

    For further information please visit my website: JasonKessler.us

    9 min
  • PEDOPAC: America First’s Disturbing Pedophilia Problem

    By Jason Kessler (tip me) (follow me)

    (UPDATE: 8/18/22) Groyper General Alejandro Richard Velasquez Gomez, aka “Latino Zoomer”, (pictured below) was just charged with possession of child pornography. Fuentes had previously stated that he “loves” Latino Zoomer and defended him against allegations related to the grooming of a 13 year old child.

    https://jasonkessler.us/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Nick-Fuentes-Loves-Latino-Zoomer.mp4

     

     

    A persistent social media criticism of Nicholas Fuentes’ “America First” movement has been allegations of support for pedophilia, pederasty and attraction to underage children. Unfortunately, many of the allegations appear to be based in fact and range from condoning underage sex, admissions to sex with girls as young as 13, masturbating to illustrations of children, allegations of grooming and tolerance of known pedophiles in the America First crew.

    According to America First activists Fuentes and Anthime Gionet (aka “Baked Alaska”) the only thing immoral about sexual contact between “much older men” and underage girls is if its done outside of wedlock. Fuentes tells his audience that sex with young girls “past the point of puberty” is fine but should be done in marriage. For reference, girls typically reach puberty between the ages of 8 and 13 years old.

    Marriage to very young brides is still practiced in some parts of the world, like Afghanistan.

    When allegations arose that America First aligned Congressman Matt Gaetz had paid for sex with a minor and was under investigation for sex trafficking, Fuentes lept to his defense. “17 years old? What is even the big deal,” he wrote on March 30, 2021. But it wasn’t the first time Fuentes had argued against age of consent laws. His arguments for sexual intercourse would include children much lower than 17.

    The November 10, 2017 broadcast of “America First” was titled “Roy Moore Did Nothing Wrong” in reference to allegations that Judge Roy Moore, an Alabama senate candidate, had sexual relationships with a number of underage girls, including one who was just 14 years old when he was 32.

    Nick Fuentes – Abolish Age of Consent Laws

    Accuser Leigh Corfman alleged that when she was 14 years old Moore removed her clothing and stripped to his white underwear before molesting her and trying to get her to touch him.

    In total, 8 women came forward with assault allegations, 6 of whom were underage at the time.

    Fuentes argued that “the whole age of consent thing is just a social construct.” He implied that because some American states have age of consent at 18, others at 17, or even 16 and some foreign countries even lower than that (Nigeria is the lowest at 11) therefore age of consent is just arbitrary. In his view, puberty should be the standard in determining. whether someone is a “grown adult.” 

    “Do we really believe that you have to be 18 years old to consent to sex otherwise its rape? Are we really supposed to believe that people, adults, grown adults who are passed the point of puberty engage in a relationship and that becomes a rape?”

    On another broadcast, defending the Gaetz allegations Fuentes said, “Maybe we as a society need to reconsider what constitutes moral sexuality. Because we live in a society where age of consent law is the gospel.”

    ”If you violate that, ‘Crucify the man!’ Female teachers are having sex with middle school boys all the time, nobody cares about that. But its, uh, a large age gap between an older man and a younger woman, God forbid.”

    Nick Fuentes – Nothing Immoral About Sex With Underage Children

    On one broadcast of his show, Fuentes waxed profusely about the attractiveness of 15 year old Tik Tok star Charli D’Amelio. Fuentes was 22 years old at the time. When he wasn’t aware that she was underage he seemed unenthusiastic about her attractiveness (“She’s pretty don’t get me wrong. But this is not someone that I’m like, “Whoa! This is a knockout!”). But after learning she was only 15 became much more attracted to the girl and aggressive in insisting, “Charli D’Amelio: HOT! I’m just gonna say it….She’s hot!”

     Nick Fuentes – 15 Year Old Girl is Hot

    Disturbing beliefs about underage sex are common among Fuentes’ inner circle. Baked Alaska, for instance, echoed his sentiment that, “Roy Moore Did Nothing Wrong. ”

    On another occasion Baked Alaska hit on a 13 year old girl, asking for her phone number. He joked that he’d “grab her by the pussy” and cupped his hands as if to grope her breasts.

    Baked Alaska Hits On 13 Year Old Child

    On one livestream in 2021, Baked Alaska went to the bar with his friend “Chaggot”, a former employee of AFPAC 3 speaker Jesse Lee Peterson and an AFPAC 2 attendee who claims to speak with Fuentes daily. “Chaggot” (real name Dylan Volk) is a self-admitted pedophile who had sex with a 13 year old girl when he was an 18 year old adult. During the broadcast, the two wander around the streets asking random passerby whether or not it was immoral for “Chaggot” to sleep with the 13 year old.

    Baked Alaska himself defends the man stating, “I don’t think that you’re a pedophile” and insisting the only thing immoral about the sexual act was premarital sex.

    Baked Alaska Defends Pedophile

    During the stream Baked Alaska promises to defend “Chaggot’s” actions to the livestream audience. “We’re backing you up. We said you’re not a pedo. You didn’t molest anyone.”

    A streamer known as “Woozuh” jumps in and tells the viewers on his stream that, “Its not rape, child molestation, pedophilia. That is messed up that you would frame it like that.” Woozuh is yet another “special guest” listed on the AFPAC 3 poster.

    Baked Alaska has faced his own grooming and underage sexual abuse allegations. For example one source stated, “Baked Alaska used to groom me when I was like 16” and “Baked Alaska preyed on me when I was underage.” Another said, “”Baked Alaska tried to fuck my friend when she was underage.”

    Fuentes’ friend Tor Gustafsson Brookes, aka “Lolisocks”, aka “Catboy Kami” has repeatedly faced accusations of pedophilia and attraction to children. Kami is a streamer from Australia who is part of the flamboyantly homoerotic “catboi” and weeaboo cultures. He brought a lot of criticism onto Fuentes in January 2020 when a video surfaced of the two men on an intimate outing around the town. Many accused the two of being lovers (which Fuentes has denied).

    Kami’s political livestreams have included appearing in blackface and using racial slurs on Omegle streams with young Black children.

    As part of the America First crew, Kami attended a November 2020 “Stop the Steal” rally in Arizona with Baked Alaska. Baked Alaska introduced him and cheered Kami on as he gave a speech calling Jews “rats in human form” before a crowd of MAGA faithful. Later Kami told a reporter, “I’m Catboy Kami and I hate niggers.”

    Kami’s former moniker of “LoliSocks” referred to his obsession with “Loli” porn, featuring animated depictions of prepubescent girls in sexual situations. The bedroom from which he livestreams is covered in sexually explicit cartoons of Loli girls.

    Kami frequently wears clothing depicting prepubescent girls, including on his infamous livestream with Fuentes.

    On several occasions Kami has admitted that he masturbates to illustrated images of children. (Timestamp: 13 minutes and 5 seconds)

    Pedophile Catboy Kami Admits Masturbating to Illustrations of Children

    In one instance a streamer named LeoPirate asked him,”(During a livestream) One of the guys joked about you masturbating to children and you corrected him: ‘No, no I masturbate to anime Lolis. Big difference.’ Do you actually masturbate to Lolicon, to illustrated images of children?”

    “I have jacked off to Loli hentai in the past,” Kami admitted.

    On February 23, 2020, Kami tweeted, “People say I’m a pedophile for finding THIS attractive” along with an animated depiction of a prepubescent girl. He exhorted his haters “if you don’t think she’s hot…you’re gay as fuck.”

    Kami has also tweeted about his belief that forced intercourse is not rape because, “Rape is not real.”

    Archive Link

    America First promoter Andrew Anglin was a big fan of Catboy Kami, calling him “the hero we deserve.” Anglin himself has had inappropriate relationships with underage girls as a sex tourist in the Philippines.

    Andrew Anglin with his self-described “jailbait girlfriend” in the Philippines

    Fuentes’ rise to prominence began in early 2018 with the patronage of Andrew Anglin and his Daily Stormer website, which has been described as the leading Neo-Nazi website on the internet. In a February 23, 2018 post Anglin wrote, “Understand this, friends: Nick Fuentes and Paul Nehlen are giving us the model for the future of the pro-white, anti-Jewish movement. I am officially declaring that.” And, “It’s CPAC day. And that means Nick Fuentes is murdering Jews.”

    Fuentes communicates about Anglin using coded language, as he did on the November 5, 2019 broadcast of America First saying, “I know that (Anglin) has been very supportive,” Fuentes said in response to a viewer question. “And I appreciate that … I really do appreciate his support.”

    Some might also point to Fuentes’ association with Milo Yiannopoulos, a key America First ally and featured speaker at AFPAC 3. 

    In the context of being molested as a boy by his Catholic priest, Yiannopoulos defended homosexual pedophilia, “In the homosexual world, particularly, some of those relationships between younger boys and older men — the sort of ‘coming of age’ relationships — the relationships in which those older men help those young boys to discover who they are and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable sort of rock.”

    “Milo likes young White guys”

    The saga of disgraced pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who introduced famous men to very young girls, has been a fixation of the Right for years. Alex Jones has used it as proof to vindicate his salacious theories about pedophile rings among the elite. There are numerous clips of him shouting about “pedophile demons” as though this is a cause he cares very much about.

    And yet Jones, and a large segment of the American Right, are getting in bed (so to speak) with this clique who are justifying the sexual abuse of young girls and in some cases acting on it. The house should be cleaned of pedophiles and their apologists or figures like Alex Jones are nothing more than enabling hypocrites.

     

    Jason Kessler is an independent journalist. If you appreciate this content, please consider making a donation to making this work possible.

    1 min
  • Deposition of City Manager Maurice Jones Proves Charlottesville Narrative is a Lie

    As a byproduct of my federal lawsuit against the City of Charlottesville for denying my August 12, 2018 UTR 2 permit application I recently had the opportunity to depose Charlottesville City Manager Maurice Jones under oath. (Read the deposition in full here)

    In the Charlottesville form of government the City Manager is essentially a consigliere for the Mayor and City Council who makes important decisions on their behalf. I met with this guy 5 days before the original Unite the Right and voiced concerns about the potential for violence that echoed those made by DHS, the Virginia Fusion Center, and police departments across the nation: keep the sides separate!

    Here are the highlights showing not only how my warning was ignored but how the Charlottesville government withdrew police protection of the event without warning at the 11th hour leading to riots, injury and death.

    By the way, this narrative about the violence being caused by 10 speakers not coming in from the back of the park is a complete fiction as well. What they’re referring to is an agreement between Richard Spencer’s head of security Jack Pierce and Sgt. Newberry of the Charlottesville Police Department for speakers to come in from the Market St side along with general attendees.

    You can hear this agreement reached between Pierce and Newberry here.

    It’s worth noting that none of this had been run by myself or any other speakers besides Spencer. I was never told anything about coming in from the back of the park. The plan, as I knew it, was always to come in from the Market St side.

    Finally, here is an admission from Maurice that members of City Council sought to deny the permit based on the content of the speech, violating the 1st Amendment and leaving them personally liable to future lawsuits.

    Please help me to keep the legal effort going so we can depose all of the tyrants involved with sabotaging the US Constitution by sharing this post and spreading the word.

    3 min
  • Week 6: Psychological Warfare
    -Exposing the psychological operations employed against the Unite the Right coalition

    -Please send me your email if you can contribute a monthly donation to the Unite the Right lawsuits (You can contact me at [email protected])

    -Also, send me your email if you're coming to the rally

    -Using the law to punish Leftists who go after your job, family and safety via doxxing

    -If you're injured at a rally go to a hospital and save your medical bill

    -Another reason why you shouldn't bring organizational flags to a rally
    32 min
  • Week 4: Vindicated!
    This week I explore the dramatic collapse of a politically motivated "perjury" charge levied against me by Albemarle prosecutor Robert Tracci meant to punish me for organizing the Unite the Right rally.

    PLUS:

    -my thoughts on wearing uniforms to rallies

    -nonwhite allies at pro-white demonstrations

    -seeking attorneys to act as legal observers

    -City of Charlottesville offers a settlement to prevent further lawsuits
    29 min
  • Week 1: Introduction
    This is the first episode of a weekly 24 episode podcast about the Unite the Right rally. In this episode I give an overview of things that we'll be talking about over the span of the show including investigations into the government machinations to sabotage the first Unite the Right and some of the things you'll need to know if you're planning to attend the new rally.
    35 min

About Future Shock

From the publisher's feed

Future Shock is the intersection of white identity politics and the cyberpunk dystopia. The revolt against the Great Replacement is in cyberspace.