
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
The gavel didn’t just fall—it landed with intent. We walk through why the judge denied Sean “Diddy” Combs’ motions for a new trial and acquittal, and how the court’s reasoning undercuts the defense’s central narrative. The key turn: the defense defined “prostitution” at trial, the jury applied that very definition, and the judge found the evidence robust—testimony from Cassie Ventura and Jane, corroboration from escorts, and a paper trail across texts and emails. That combination makes appeals steeper and sets the stage for a high-stakes sentencing.
From there, we zero in on what truly shapes the next chapter: victim impact statements and relevant conduct. Cassie’s letter describes coercion, threats tied to leaked tapes, and fear that outlasts headlines. Her parents argue that a sentence measured in months would trivialize years of harm and weaken public faith in the law. We unpack how federal judges weigh these factors against guidelines, deterrence, and protection of the public—and why a jury’s mixed verdict actually blunts claims of “spillover prejudice.” We also note the small but telling procedural detail: a tightly limited clothing order for sentencing, a reminder that the courtroom runs on rules, not theatrics.
The conversation turns to outcomes and optics. What sentence communicates accountability without capitulating to celebrity or outrage? Why might anything under five years provoke backlash, while a double-digit term could signal that power doesn’t purchase impunity? Along the way, we surface underreported threads, including a former chef’s account of a toxic workplace and why her testimony would matter at allocution. Whether you’re following for the legal craft, the survivor voices, or the cultural reckoning, this is the moment where the system either speaks clearly—or loses the room. Subscribe, share with a friend who’s tracking the case, and drop your sentencing prediction in the comments.
Go to this link to subscribe to my podcast to get all the exclusive podcasts uncovering the celebrity scandals! Diddy/Clive connection! What really happened to Whitney Houston, Aaliyah and more!
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2419432/subscribe
for merch (hoodies, tees etc) go to my shopify linked below!
www.andidontlikeit.com
FOR ANY ISSUES with your subscription please reach out to [email protected] and they will be happy to assist you!
FOR ALL VIDEO VERSIONS OF "THE FLO SHOW NO FILTER" LIVE SUBSCRIBE TO MY PATREON! FloDaddyFlo | "Uncover the Stories Behind the Headlines: Exclusive Celebrity & | Patreon TAP THE LINK!
By Flo5
105105 ratings
Send us a text
The gavel didn’t just fall—it landed with intent. We walk through why the judge denied Sean “Diddy” Combs’ motions for a new trial and acquittal, and how the court’s reasoning undercuts the defense’s central narrative. The key turn: the defense defined “prostitution” at trial, the jury applied that very definition, and the judge found the evidence robust—testimony from Cassie Ventura and Jane, corroboration from escorts, and a paper trail across texts and emails. That combination makes appeals steeper and sets the stage for a high-stakes sentencing.
From there, we zero in on what truly shapes the next chapter: victim impact statements and relevant conduct. Cassie’s letter describes coercion, threats tied to leaked tapes, and fear that outlasts headlines. Her parents argue that a sentence measured in months would trivialize years of harm and weaken public faith in the law. We unpack how federal judges weigh these factors against guidelines, deterrence, and protection of the public—and why a jury’s mixed verdict actually blunts claims of “spillover prejudice.” We also note the small but telling procedural detail: a tightly limited clothing order for sentencing, a reminder that the courtroom runs on rules, not theatrics.
The conversation turns to outcomes and optics. What sentence communicates accountability without capitulating to celebrity or outrage? Why might anything under five years provoke backlash, while a double-digit term could signal that power doesn’t purchase impunity? Along the way, we surface underreported threads, including a former chef’s account of a toxic workplace and why her testimony would matter at allocution. Whether you’re following for the legal craft, the survivor voices, or the cultural reckoning, this is the moment where the system either speaks clearly—or loses the room. Subscribe, share with a friend who’s tracking the case, and drop your sentencing prediction in the comments.
Go to this link to subscribe to my podcast to get all the exclusive podcasts uncovering the celebrity scandals! Diddy/Clive connection! What really happened to Whitney Houston, Aaliyah and more!
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2419432/subscribe
for merch (hoodies, tees etc) go to my shopify linked below!
www.andidontlikeit.com
FOR ANY ISSUES with your subscription please reach out to [email protected] and they will be happy to assist you!
FOR ALL VIDEO VERSIONS OF "THE FLO SHOW NO FILTER" LIVE SUBSCRIBE TO MY PATREON! FloDaddyFlo | "Uncover the Stories Behind the Headlines: Exclusive Celebrity & | Patreon TAP THE LINK!

11,737 Listeners

10,711 Listeners

13,730 Listeners

8,538 Listeners

29,099 Listeners

368,902 Listeners

47,273 Listeners

10,078 Listeners

6,324 Listeners

482 Listeners

563 Listeners

1,435 Listeners

465 Listeners

182 Listeners

1,658 Listeners