Well, it's gonna start to get weird now.  By the way, if anyone wants to write episode notes that actually describe things for us, email us at [email protected].  Otherwise, you'll be getting Jessa's sarcastic one liners.

We're about to get really geeky, law-wise.  Buckle up for the first part of the Lamar Johnson case.

So, if the prosecution decides a case was wrongfully decided, that ends the conversation, right?  Not so much...check out our explainer of CIUs and the intro to our next deep dive.

We got a case suggestion out of Kansas that made us think more about the problem of wrongful convictions and accountability.

This is a policy deep dive request regarding the history of the juvenile justice system.

After an unexpected hiatus, Nick and Jessa are back to conclude the Bembenek saga.

Jessa and Nick talk about the conclusions of the John Doe investigation relating to the conduct of law enforcement regarding the investigation of Laurie Bembenek's case, and why things that might appall lay people actually make a lot of sense within the confines of The System.

Ufdah.  There's a lot going on here.

Nick and Jessa discuss why some defense attorneys don't like Marsy's Law, and some ways that maybe they...should? 

Shout out to Lexi, our new audio editor.  If you can tell a difference, tweet, facebook, instagram, email, or otherwise let us know that it makes the quality better!

What is Marsy's Law and who does it protect?  Jessa and Nick discuss the broad campaign to expand Victim's Rights, and what the law looks like.