Coffee and a Case Note

Ghorbanzadeh [2023] NSWSC 1330


Listen Later

“Those notes aren’t privileged! Hand them over.”
___
P sued D in relation to personal injuries P alleged at around the time they were giving birth. D, to oversimplify, was the hospital’s insurer: [7], [9]
D instructed an expert who produced a report.
P filed a NoM seeking access to a document produced by the expert in response to a subpoena, but over which D asserted legal professional privilege: [1], [9]
P said the document was not privileged or, if it was, privilege was waived: [6]
D had briefed the expert and invited the expert to initially provide a verbal opinion on 6 Qs. The expert gave evidence that during that conversation “(they) referred to.. 2 pages of handwritten notes (they) had prepared. (They) used them as the basis for expressing (their) verbal opinion to (D’s lawyer)”: [10] - [14]
These 2 pages constituted the document P sought and D asserted was privileged.
Privilege attaches to a *communication* not a document. D asserted the document was a communication: [20], [21]
Documents generated unilaterally by an expert in the course of forming an opinion do not attract privilege: [22]
Despite there being a “grey area”, privilege may be claimed in communication between the expert and solicitor if made for the confidential use in the litigation: [24]
A draft report, for example, is not a communication: [25]
It is for the party asserting privilege to prove privilege attaches to a document: [32]
Despite having prepared an affidavit on the topic there was no evidence that the document was intended to be a means of communication between expert and lawyer: [34]
Having so found, the Court did not need to consider the question of waiver. However - noting that disclosure of an expert’s report is an implied waiver of the instructions underpinning that report, and that there was no suggestion the document did not cover material that eventually formed part of the final report - the Court would have concluded privilege was waived: [34] - [37]
P was granted access to, and permitted to inspect, the document: [38]


___


Please send a follow to James d'Apice, Coffee and a Case Note, and Gravamen on all your favourite platforms!

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Coffee and a Case NoteBy James d'Apice

  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5

5

2 ratings


More shows like Coffee and a Case Note

View all
Background Briefing by ABC listen

Background Briefing

68 Listeners

Law Report by ABC listen

Law Report

23 Listeners

Conversations by ABC listen

Conversations

861 Listeners

Mamamia Out Loud by Mamamia Podcasts

Mamamia Out Loud

590 Listeners

Politics Now by ABC listen

Politics Now

104 Listeners

Lawyers Weekly Podcast Network by Momentum Media

Lawyers Weekly Podcast Network

1 Listeners

Australian True Crime by Bravecasting

Australian True Crime

1,373 Listeners

Ladies, We Need To Talk by ABC listen

Ladies, We Need To Talk

340 Listeners

Forgotten Australia by Forgotten Australia

Forgotten Australia

146 Listeners

True Crime Conversations by Mamamia Podcasts

True Crime Conversations

584 Listeners

The Front by The Australian

The Front

40 Listeners

5 in 5 with ANZ by ANZ

5 in 5 with ANZ

4 Listeners

Justice Matters: Conversations About Crime & Punishment by Justice Matters

Justice Matters: Conversations About Crime & Punishment

9 Listeners

Mushroom Case Daily by ABC listen

Mushroom Case Daily

739 Listeners

Witness: William Tyrrell by news.com.au

Witness: William Tyrrell

271 Listeners