Coffee and a Case Note

Ghorbanzadeh [2023] NSWSC 1330


Listen Later

“Those notes aren’t privileged! Hand them over.”
___
P sued D in relation to personal injuries P alleged at around the time they were giving birth. D, to oversimplify, was the hospital’s insurer: [7], [9]
D instructed an expert who produced a report.
P filed a NoM seeking access to a document produced by the expert in response to a subpoena, but over which D asserted legal professional privilege: [1], [9]
P said the document was not privileged or, if it was, privilege was waived: [6]
D had briefed the expert and invited the expert to initially provide a verbal opinion on 6 Qs. The expert gave evidence that during that conversation “(they) referred to.. 2 pages of handwritten notes (they) had prepared. (They) used them as the basis for expressing (their) verbal opinion to (D’s lawyer)”: [10] - [14]
These 2 pages constituted the document P sought and D asserted was privileged.
Privilege attaches to a *communication* not a document. D asserted the document was a communication: [20], [21]
Documents generated unilaterally by an expert in the course of forming an opinion do not attract privilege: [22]
Despite there being a “grey area”, privilege may be claimed in communication between the expert and solicitor if made for the confidential use in the litigation: [24]
A draft report, for example, is not a communication: [25]
It is for the party asserting privilege to prove privilege attaches to a document: [32]
Despite having prepared an affidavit on the topic there was no evidence that the document was intended to be a means of communication between expert and lawyer: [34]
Having so found, the Court did not need to consider the question of waiver. However - noting that disclosure of an expert’s report is an implied waiver of the instructions underpinning that report, and that there was no suggestion the document did not cover material that eventually formed part of the final report - the Court would have concluded privilege was waived: [34] - [37]
P was granted access to, and permitted to inspect, the document: [38]


___


Please send a follow to James d'Apice, Coffee and a Case Note, and Gravamen on all your favourite platforms!

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Coffee and a Case NoteBy James d'Apice

  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5

5

2 ratings


More shows like Coffee and a Case Note

View all
Newshour by BBC World Service

Newshour

1,065 Listeners

Law Report by ABC

Law Report

23 Listeners

Conversations by ABC

Conversations

797 Listeners

All In The Mind by ABC

All In The Mind

773 Listeners

The Economy, Stupid by ABC

The Economy, Stupid

25 Listeners

Politics Now by ABC News

Politics Now

89 Listeners

NAB Morning Call by Phil Dobbie

NAB Morning Call

18 Listeners

Lawyers Weekly Podcast Network by Momentum Media

Lawyers Weekly Podcast Network

1 Listeners

If You're Listening by ABC

If You're Listening

314 Listeners

FT News Briefing by Financial Times

FT News Briefing

649 Listeners

Behind the Money by Financial Times

Behind the Money

227 Listeners

Full Story by The Guardian

Full Story

169 Listeners

15 Minutes with the Boss by The Australian Financial Review

15 Minutes with the Boss

8 Listeners

Chanticleer by Australian Financial Review

Chanticleer

14 Listeners

The Fin by Australian Financial Review

The Fin

18 Listeners