
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


[Forgive the audio - this one recorded in the bad old days before Rode came along]
A plaintiff brought a defamation suit.
The defendants succeeded in having it summarily dismissed at first instance and the Court ordered that no further claim be made on the basis of the publications complained of without leave. The plaintiff sought leave to appeal (leave being necessary if you’re appealing an interlocutary decision) and got it. The defendants/respondents then sought security for their costs of the appeal.
Please join me to discuss whether the facts in this case (including the appellant’s/plaintiff’s bankruptcy and a number of outstanding costs orders!) met the “special circumstances” test for granting security for costs on appeal.
This might all sound a little dense, but we’ll get there I’m sure!
By James d'Apice5
22 ratings
[Forgive the audio - this one recorded in the bad old days before Rode came along]
A plaintiff brought a defamation suit.
The defendants succeeded in having it summarily dismissed at first instance and the Court ordered that no further claim be made on the basis of the publications complained of without leave. The plaintiff sought leave to appeal (leave being necessary if you’re appealing an interlocutary decision) and got it. The defendants/respondents then sought security for their costs of the appeal.
Please join me to discuss whether the facts in this case (including the appellant’s/plaintiff’s bankruptcy and a number of outstanding costs orders!) met the “special circumstances” test for granting security for costs on appeal.
This might all sound a little dense, but we’ll get there I’m sure!

1,067 Listeners

21 Listeners

897 Listeners

759 Listeners

29 Listeners

91 Listeners

20 Listeners

1 Listeners

351 Listeners

684 Listeners

232 Listeners

183 Listeners

10 Listeners

22 Listeners

20 Listeners