Gideon Korrell explains how prosecution statements in a continuation application can narrow claim scope across an entire patent family.

Gideon Korrell explains how the Federal Circuit applied anti-SLAPP protection to patent filings in the IQE PLC v. Newport Fab, LLC (Tower Semiconductor) ruling.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell breaks down when district courts can disregard PTAB validity findings. Using the Federal Circuit’s Inland Diamond v. Cherry Optical decision, he explains why issue preclusion fails across different proof standards, how claim construction matters, and what this means for litigants navigating parallel PTAB and district court battles.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell breaks down Brita LP v. International Trade Commission, explaining why broad functional genus claims failed under Section 112. He explores how performance-based claiming, carbon-block-only disclosure, and trial-and-error enablement shaped the Federal Circuit’s ruling and what patent drafters should learn from it.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell talks about what Hyatt v. Stewart means for § 145 cases and why the decision reinforces real limits on district court review. He explains how prosecution laches survives de novo proceedings, why Article III still governs § 145 actions, and what patent applicants and practitioners should take away from the Federal Circuit’s ruling.

In this presentation, Gideon Korrell examines the Ninth Circuit’s landmark ruling in Epic Games v. Google, focusing on why remedies, not liability, define the case’s lasting impact. He explains how affirmative, forward-looking injunctions can reopen digital markets and why courts now see stronger intervention as essential to restoring competition in platform economies.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell breaks down the Federal Circuit’s decision in Jiaxing Super Lighting v. CH Lighting, explaining why evidentiary missteps triggered reversal and how EcoFactor continues to reshape damages testimony. From on-sale bar proof to Rule 702 gatekeeping, the case offers clear warnings for patent litigators handling multi-patent damages claims.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell examines Acorda v. Alkermes and explains how alternative legal theories can quietly derail Federal Circuit jurisdiction. He breaks down the arbitration dispute, Brulotte’s limits, and why the pleading strategy, not patent substance, often decides where an appeal is heard.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell breaks down the Federal Circuit’s decision in Sunkist v. Intrastate Distributors and explains how courts decide when trademarks are simply too close for comfort. He explores commercial impression, abandoned marks, and why newcomers bear the risk of confusion in crowded consumer markets.

In this episode, Gideon Korrell breaks down the Federal Circuit’s decision in LabCorp v. Qiagen and explains why claim language, especially the word “identical,” can decide an entire case. He explores claim construction, the limits of the doctrine of equivalents, and what this ruling means for future patent litigation.