We often hear this but is this even possible if we do not consider what underwrites our way of life; how we make others a means. We discuss.

What does consumer sovereignty become when average social relations are potentialized from want to creativity. We discuss.

We reserve time as a supplement so the choices that would potentialise life have to considered in light of this given, we discuss. 

To unmarket our way of life is to dispose of the way of our communication when beholden to marketing. We explore this transition in greater detail.

When independence is considered an ideal whereby you must secure it against the "they" we set in motion a way of life that has at its core social distancing as an ideal. We discuss 

If we are marginal, then to potentialise our lives through an indivisible creativity would be a way of over overcoming our slightness. We discuss the way towards this

Is life about securing credit for the afterlife of our labouring? If so are we substantiating purgatory as a way of life and the marketing of visions to console us with? We discuss.

We are market oriented, but what exactly does that mean? We explore this question with a view to surpassing it.

If we are marginal, in the sense we are a means towards the end of life we presuppose, we look at our indivisibility as the ideal we should aspire to in our way towards it.

We explore consumption in light of the "good of visibility" our way of life engenders when the want of self reigns and how appearance can initiate an encounter with an order removed from the claim of want.