We look at the democratisation of command when people are credited more than demand when consumers of life.

Is there a cost to social enterprise? What would this cost be if the purpose sold regions the good they can do so enables what is externalised to persist? We discuss.

How do we animate goodwill that would further potentialise a civilisational enterprise of transcending the form of life of the consumer? We explore the turns we take in roles when receptive to giving ourselves more credit than the want we otherwise are..

Are there stages of the buyers journey when it is set through the totalising claim made on time that makes us marginal. We explore whether this rather involves a revelation as there is not progression to see what we are beholden allows for no outside.

If the marketing of intangibles can only generate a diminishing return when they are sold, this is because to supplement a good can only highlight what business is sold on first - the consumer. We explore why change requires risking the form of life.

We explore how giving notice of the product return of the consumer puts on notice through a message that is off in reference to our commercial paradigm the future will not be beholden to the past.

We explore communication through two claims that would be made on it if the form of life of the consumer is addressed.

We explore the opportunity cost of our economising actions, so the opportunity our civilisation forgoes to make  a business out of life.

We explore democracy through the choice we feel we dont make when time is given as an economic good. How can the power of people animate a change beyond its institutionalised forms that are otherwise held captive by interest?

If we look at the issue of pollution as marketing the form of life of the consumer, does the issue sanction power as an arbiter for the future by qualifying what people are credited so as to dictate behaviour considered "harmful"? We explore.