Can Medicare for All really save 114,000 lives and more than $1 trillion a year? Nate and Charlie dig into the assumptions behind that claim, from Medicare reimbursement rates to drug pricing, fraud, administrative costs, emergency room use, and higher healthcare utilization.

Bernie Sanders shared a study arguing that Medicare for All would dramatically reduce national healthcare spending while saving lives. In this audio-only episode, Nate and Charlie walk through the model and ask what happens when hospitals and clinicians are paid Medicare rates, drug prices are pushed toward international benchmarks, and projected savings depend on assumptions about fraud and emergency care.

Key beats:

• Where the "114,000 lives saved" estimate comes from
• Why Medicare reimbursement rates drive so much of the projected savings
• The tradeoffs around drug pricing, innovation, hospital finances, and wait times
• The trillion-dollar question: who actually pays?

The U.S. healthcare system is expensive and heavily distorted. The argument here is whether more government control fixes those problems or compounds them.

Subscribe or follow, like, comment, and share the show. If you listen on a podcast app, leave a rating or review and tell us where you think the Medicare for All math holds up or breaks down.

New Youtube Channel: https://youtube.com/@gmlclips?si=FhFe2EkvciJJKEru

00:00 Recording Chaos and Show Intro

02:30 Democratic Socialists and the Election Update

04:45 Setting Up the Medicare for All Debate

06:15 The Study and Its Rosy Assumptions

08:15 How the Study Gets to $1 Trillion

13:15 Where "114,000 Lives Saved" Comes From

21:30 The Emergency Care Savings Assumption

24:15 What Happens If Everyone Gets Medicare Rates?

28:45 Drug Pricing and Medical Innovation

33:15 Fraud and Administrative Cost Assumptions

38:30 What Happens When Care Is Free at the Point of Service?

40:30 Can Government Actually Make Healthcare Cheaper?

44:45 Who Pays for Medicare for All?

49:15 Homes for All, Cars for All, Netflix for All

*]:pointer-events-auto R6Vx5W_threadScrollVars scroll-mb-[calc(var(--scroll-root-safe-area-inset-bottom,0px)+var(--thread-response-height))] scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" data-turn-id= "request-WEB:3b1fb148-ae77-4e0a-a510-285b7b2bb416-0" data-turn-id-container= "request-WEB:3b1fb148-ae77-4e0a-a510-285b7b2bb416-0" data-testid= "conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant"> Links

Join GML: joingml.com

All GML Links: gml.bio.link

Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA

Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2

Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub

Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Tucker Carlson says he's socially conservative and economically liberal. That's where we think the trouble starts.

The $20 burrito may be real evidence that Americans are getting crushed by higher prices, but blaming investors, rich CEOs, and "free market capitalism" misses the actual argument.

Nate and Chuck break down Tucker Carlson's comments about affordability, capital gains taxes, the purpose of an economic system, and the massive CEO-to-worker pay ratios that make people furious. Then they pull out a calculator and ask a very simple question: if you took a CEO's entire compensation and gave it to the workers, how much would their lives actually change?

The conversation gets into libertarian economics, incentives, investment, government intervention, the Federal Reserve, monetary policy, and why politicians have such an easy time selling immediate solutions to complicated economic problems.

There's also a bigger political problem. If voters correctly recognize that the economy isn't working for them but incorrectly identify the cause, the "solution" can easily become more government power.

Finally, Nate and Chuck look at Argentina and Javier Milei as an example of a radically different approach: government doing less instead of promising to manage everything better.

Subscribe or follow Good Morning Liberty, like and comment where your app supports it, share the episode, and leave a rating or review.

00:00 Opening and Back-to-School

02:15 The $20 Burrito Affordability Debate

05:15 What Should a President Actually Do?

07:45 Does an Economy Need a "Purpose"?

12:30 "Economically Liberal" and Socially Conservative

13:30 Capital Gains, Taxes, and Investment

18:30 Affordability and Blaming the Free Market

24:00 The CEO-to-Worker Pay Argument

29:45 We Run the CEO Pay Math

35:45 Blaming the Rich Misses the Real Source

40:15 Why Easy Economic Promises Sell

44:15 Argentina, Milei, and Government Doing Less

Join GML: joingml.com

All GML Links: gml.bio.link

Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA

Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2

Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub

Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Merch mentioned in the episode: godhatesfeds.com

Cancel Thanksgiving... then call it your favorite holiday. Dumb Bleep of the Week is finally back, and government has been busy.

NEW YOUTUBE LINK: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCRhGmSkyii4Hd_wF-TPxgg

Nate and Charlie break down a Wisconsin gubernatorial candidate's Thanksgiving backtrack, Mamdani's proposed city-run grocery stores, New York's attempt to mandate self-checkout discounts, and the viral argument over whether a burrito should cost $20.

Then there's Dan Crenshaw telling people to stop whining about prices while making a free-market argument, Elizabeth Warren blaming private equity for soaring firetruck costs, and pro-China posts crediting communism for lifting millions out of poverty.

The episode finishes with an Instagram algorithm allegedly serving a Michigan Senate candidate OnlyFans models, a proposal to give young voters proxy votes for children, and the growing fight over Flock license plate cameras and Fourth Amendment concerns.

If government groceries, price controls, inflation, communism, surveillance, and political hypocrisy sound like a good Friday, you're in the right place.

Subscribe or follow Good Morning Liberty, like the show, leave a comment, share it with a friend, and leave us a rating or review on your podcast app.

Chapters

00:00 Dumb Bleep of the Week Returns 09:00 Cancel Thanksgiving... Then Call It Your Favorite Holiday 19:45 Mamdani's Government Grocery Stores 27:00 The $20 Burrito Affordability Fight 34:15 Dan Crenshaw Says "Stop Whining" 38:45 New York's 10% Self-Checkout Discount 41:45 Elizabeth Warren and $2.5 Million Firetrucks 51:15 Communist China and the Market Incentive Problem 59:45 "Only Abdul" Blames the Instagram Algorithm 01:04:45 Proxy Votes for America's Children 01:07:30 Flock Cameras and Mass Surveillance 01:13:30 The Dumb Bleep Vote 01:16:45 Thanksgiving Hong Wins Dumb Bleep of the Week

Links

Join GML: joingml.com

All GML Links: gml.bio.link

Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA

Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2

Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub

Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

Flock cameras can help police solve crimes. The hosts argue that the same network can also build a searchable picture of ordinary people's movements. And the proposed "solution" of giving Washington more control may be even worse.

Nate and Chuck examine Flock Safety cameras, automated license plate readers, police surveillance, privacy rights, and government accountability. They discuss Thomas Massie's proposal to block federal funding for municipalities that use Flock cameras.

They also compare local accountability with federal surveillance programs, revisit the abuses revealed by Edward Snowden, and ask how this technology might have been used during COVID lockdowns.

The central question is simple: How much freedom should people surrender for another promise of safety?

Chapters

00:00 Concert banter and the Flock setup 02:15 Flock cameras at the neighborhood gate 04:15 Thomas Massie on freedom vs. false security 08:15 The COVID surveillance test 12:00 Private profit vs. authoritarian surveillance 17:30 Local abuse vs. federal accountability 25:00 Officers face allegations, but who checks the feds? 29:15 Federal regulation could entrench Flock 33:00 The libertarian answer 35:15 Drones, safety, and the 1984 problem 38:15 The abyss of total surveillance 43:00 Deflock.org and final thoughts

Links

Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club @ https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Join GML: https://joingml.com [Martens Minute]: https://martensminute.podbean.com/ All links @ gml.bio.link

Subscribe, like the video, and tell us in the comments where public safety ends and the surveillance state begins. Share this with someone who still believes "nothing to hide" is a good argument. Follow the podcast and leave a rating and review.

New York City wants to sell essential groceries at 30% below typical retail prices. Sounds great, until someone asks who pays the difference, how purchases get rationed, and what happens to every unsubsidized grocery store down the street.

Nate and Chuck break down Mamdani's government grocery plan and the bureaucratic monster required to keep it running. The proposal includes taxpayer-backed operating deficits, higher labor costs, purchase limits, restricted products, and a "library card-esque" system to prove shoppers are New Yorkers.

Also in this show:

• Why subsidized groceries could create resellers and black markets • How the plan accidentally exposes what government does to existing stores • Trump's latest "last chance" for Iran and the war nobody authorized • The spread of Flock cameras and automated surveillance

Links

Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA

Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2

Join the Fed Haters Club: https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub

Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

All Links: https://gml.bio.link

Chapters

00:00 A Somber Return to Good Morning Liberty

03:19 Mamdani's Government Grocery Store Plan

04:34 NYC's "Library Card-Esque" Grocery ID

06:17 Resellers, Delivery Apps, and Grocery Arbitrage

08:22 The Bureaucracy Behind Five City-Run Stores

11:23 Mamdani Promises Groceries at 30% Below Retail

15:12 The Bottomless Subsidy and Price Controls

18:27 Rationing, Administrative Costs, and Store Competition

25:31 The Grocery Store Press Gag

26:12 Government Ignores the Real Cost of Groceries

30:36 NYC Hires a Branding Consultant

32:52 The Plan Accidentally Confesses Government Is the Problem

37:14 Trump, Iran, and Another "Historic" Peace Deal

43:02 The Military Asks for Ideas to Punish Iran

47:13 The Constitutional Case Against the War

50:39 Socialists Will Seize the Affordability Crisis

52:17 Flock Cameras and Automated Surveillance

54:16 Final Thoughts and Sign-Off

Sen. Ron Johnson says investigators found internal warnings that a federal vaccine-safety analysis could mask important signals. Why did officials allegedly ignore a second analysis, and why did most major news organizations skip the story?

In this Good Morning Liberty interview, Senator Ron Johnson discusses his investigation into COVID vaccine safety surveillance, VAERS data, federal health agencies, informed consent, vaccine injuries, and declining trust in public-health institutions.

Johnson describes searching 11 million pages of government records with six investigators. He says the documents show officials were warned about limitations in an algorithm and later received an analysis identifying multiple potential safety signals. VAERS reports alone do not prove causation, but Johnson argues that unusual patterns should have prompted further investigation and public warnings.

The conversation also covers media incentives, pharmaceutical advertising, liability protection, medical freedom, congressional oversight, and why Johnson believes reducing federal power is essential to restoring liberty.

Sen. Johnson's post: https://x.com/SenRonJohnson/status/2067427189759332619?s=20 The Report: https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Senate-PSI-Majority-Staff-Interim-Report-April-29-2026-FINAL.pdf

Chapters

00:00 Why Senator Ron Johnson Says the Story Was Ignored

01:15 Eleven Million Pages and Six Investigators

02:00 The Algorithm Warning

04:15 Twenty-Five Potential Safety Signals

08:00 Informed Consent and Children

10:00 Swine Flu, VAERS, and Reporting Rates

12:00 Why Not Run Both Algorithms?

15:00 Media, Pharma, and the Narrative

20:00 Injury Recognition, Treatment, and Accountability

23:15 A Lonely Voice in Congress

28:30 What Happens Next?

31:45 One Change for Liberty

Links

Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA

Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2

Join the Fed Haters Club @ https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub

Join GML: https://joingml.com

All links @ https://gml.bio.link

Subscribe, like the video, and tell us in the comments which part of Johnson's investigation deserves the most scrutiny. Share this interview with someone who still believes government agencies always investigate themselves honestly. Then leave Good Morning Liberty a rating and review on your podcast app.

The Supreme Court blocked Trump's emergency tariff strategy. So why is the tariff agenda already coming back through different laws?

David McGarry explains who actually pays tariffs, why the costs multiply, and how protectionism can undermine America's own China strategy.

Donald Trump originally relied on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, commonly called IEEPA, to impose sweeping tariffs. After the Supreme Court rejected that legal theory, the administration turned toward Section 122 tariffs and Section 301 investigations.

Josh Martens and David McGarry also break down trade deficits, Article I tariff authority, American manufacturing, retaliatory tariffs, farm bailouts, corporate welfare, supply-chain resilience, and why tariffs are ultimately taxes paid by Americans.

David McGarry is the research director at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance. Find his work at @davidbmcgary and protectingtaxpayers.org.

Chapters

00:00 David McGarry joins Good Morning Liberty 01:15 Liberty, Los Angeles, and political tribes 13:45 The Supreme Court tariff battle 18:15 Who actually pays tariffs? 21:00 Congress and the history of tariff power 26:15 Trade deficits, steel, and invisible job losses 31:30 When every problem becomes a tariff nail 36:45 Trade happens between individuals 45:30 Supply chains, baby formula, and free trade 52:45 Retaliation, bailouts, and the taxpayer triple hit 1:02:45 Tariffs, allies, China, and global tensions 1:12:00 Local government and one change for liberty

Links

Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA

Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2

Join the Fed Haters Club @ https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub

Join GML: https://joingml.com

All links @ https://gml.bio.link

Subscribe for more libertarian interviews. Like the video, comment with your take, and share it with someone who still thinks foreign countries pay American tariffs. Then find Good Morning Liberty on your podcast app and leave a rating and review.

https://x.com/davidbmcgarry?s=20

https://www.protectingtaxpayers.org/

Trump says the United States is at war with Iran again, and the administration claims another 60-day window for military action without congressional approval. Then Gavin Newsom blames "capitalism as we know it" for rules and regulations created through government power.

Nate Thurston and Josh Martens break down presidential war powers, Congress abandoning its constitutional role, Republican warnings about communism, crony capitalism, free-market competition, and the incentives politicians face when voters keep rewarding broken promises.

The guys also examine the economics behind Bryant Park, Scandinavian welfare states, voluntary charity, climate-change claims involving child marriage, MrBeast's questions about child labor in cacao production, and the Taylor Swift fans buying alleged wedding trash.

CHAPTERS 00:00 Josh Martens Takes Charlie's Chair 02:30 The Principles Behind Martens Minute 08:30 Dumb Bleep of the Week Begins 10:15 Trump's New 60-Day War Clock 19:15 The "Socialist" Park Run Privately 25:15 Gavin Newsom Blames Capitalism 37:00 Mike Johnson Warns About Communism 45:30 Toy Guns Versus Real Guns 48:45 Climate Change and Child Marriage 51:15 MrBeast, Chocolate, and Child Labor 56:15 Taylor Swift's $25 Wedding Trash

LINKS Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club @ https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub [Martens Minute]: https://martensminute.podbean.com/ All links @ gml.bio.link

Subscribe for more blunt libertarian commentary. Like the video, share it with someone who still thinks Congress controls war, and comment with your pick for Dumb Bleep of the Week. Follow the podcast and leave a rating and review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Lindsey Graham is dead, Iran is escalating again, and Washington's war machine is already searching for its next mission. Then a socialist YouTube comment gives us the perfect case against blaming free markets for government-created failures.

Nate and Charlie examine Lindsey Graham's interventionist foreign-policy legacy, Donald Trump's account of their final phone call, and the renewed conflict surrounding Iran and the Strait of Hormuz. They also wrestle with the uncomfortable morality of feeling relieved when a powerful politician you strongly opposed is no longer in office.

The second half breaks down capitalism, cronyism, housing regulations, healthcare bureaucracy, insurance markets, grocery pricing, monetary policy, and the Federal Reserve. Are Americans suffering from too much free-market capitalism, or from a government-controlled economy that protects incumbents and restricts competition?

CHAPTERS

00:00 Technical problems and sad news 01:45 Lindsey Graham's death and an uncomfortable reaction 06:45 Graham's final Ukraine sanctions push 11:45 How do you mourn a political opponent? 15:45 Lindsey Graham's most revealing war clips 20:00 Trump gives Graham a posthumous score 27:30 Iran and the Strait of Hormuz escalate 31:15 A socialist challenges capitalism 34:45 Housing prices, supply, and regulation 38:45 Is American healthcare a free market? 42:15 Grocery pricing and tiny profit margins 54:15 Inequality, technology, and capitalism's record

LINKS

Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA

Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2

Join the Fed Haters Club @ https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub

Join GML: joingml.com

Martens Minute: https://martensminute.podbean.com/

All links @ gml.bio.link

Subscribe for more blunt, skeptical, liberty-minded analysis. Like the video, answer the pinned question, share it with someone who disagrees, and leave a rating and review on your podcast app.

Campaign donation limits look strict. Super PACs can make those limits feel almost meaningless. James Harrigan and Antony Davies join Josh Martens to debate who really controls American elections: donors, politicians, parties, or voters.

How much does it cost to win a House or Senate seat? The Words and Numbers hosts explain individual contribution limits, candidate committees, political action committees, independent expenditures, and the unlimited spending available through super PACs.

The conversation examines campaign finance, political incentives, the Thomas Massie race, outside spending, foreign influence, publicly funded elections, mandatory voting, gerrymandering, the Republican and Democratic duopoly, and the direct election of senators.

The uncomfortable conclusion might be that campaign money is only a symptom. When government has enough power to sell favors, people will spend enormous amounts trying to control it.

https://x.com/antonydavies

https://x.com/JamesRHarrigan

https://wordsandnumbers.org/

Chapters

00:00 James Harrigan and Antony Davies Join GML 02:00 The Thomas Massie Race and Outside Spending 03:30 What American Elections Really Cost 05:45 Campaign Money, Speech, and Property Rights 07:15 Are Voters Responsible for Selling Their Votes? 10:15 Unlimited Government and the Rise of Oligarchy 13:00 Donation Limits and the Super PAC Loophole 18:15 Political Spoils, Corporations, and Union Money 22:45 Libertarians Debate Public Election Funding 27:30 The Massie Race and Foreign Influence 31:15 Stupid Voters, Mandatory Voting, and the Party Duopoly 42:00 One Change That Could Fix American Elections

Links

Watch All Episodes: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr_8o0dDOX8DxO_Wwxu6WYhhA Watch Host Favorites: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi78svKlBr__Zu40RL7mWxCuOOe54zgy2 Join the Fed Haters Club @ https://www.goodmorningliberty.us/fedhatersclub Join GML: https://joingml.com [Martens Minute]: https://martensminute.podbean.com/ All links @ gml.bio.link

Subscribe to Good Morning Liberty, like the video, and tell us who deserves more blame: donors, politicians, or voters. Share this conversation with someone who thinks contribution limits solved campaign finance. Please also leave GML a rating and review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.