Strife doesn’t build a stronger organization. Conflict won’t deepen a leader’s influence.
Confrontation is commonplace leadership topic. I often hear managers lament how they hate it and work hard to avoid it. Frequently they feel that confrontation is synonymous with strife and conflict. It’s not. Well, it doesn’t have to be.
Let’s talk about this and see if we can better understand how our leadership is too often damaged because we’re not seeing things clearly enough. Defining some terms can help. We’ll start with some dictionary definitions because that’ll help point out why we’ve got a problem.
Strife is angry or bitter disagreement.
Conflict (which is synonymous with strife) is a serious disagreement or argument.
Confrontation is a hostile or argumentative meeting or situation between opposing parties.
Do you agree with those definitions?
Let’s work in reverse now. Confrontation has another definition, based on the Merriam-Webster Dictionary. And this is the first definition listed.
“a face-to-face meeting”
Strife and conflict aren’t even third cousins to confrontation. But we confuse them. Easy to do because of the idiocy behind keyboards today where people can spew whatever venom they want. Daily we see folks dig into positions, stop up their ears, and refuse to listen long enough to understand anybody else, especially anybody who may disagree with them.
Waging war is easy. Understanding is hard. So too often people plant their flag and declare war!
Is it possible for your leadership and your culture to foster disagreement without increasing strife and conflict? Can people disagree in your organization without behaving poorly? Can people disagree without being disagreeable?
Of course, they can, but some things are mandatory.
Strong leadership is a must. Fairness and respect have to be protected.
Strong leaders understand that enthusiastic debate can fuel some of the best ideas and creative solutions. Rather than putting a negative connotation on the emotions, strong leaders help people harness those emotions toward learning, understanding and growth. Team members are encouraged to listen without judgment. Strong leadership can help show people the value of supporting the team’s effort, even though there may be disagreement over specifics. This largely happens when the leader keeps the team focused on the big objective. Disagreement over details doesn’t have to result in disagreement over what the team is trying to accomplish. Nor should it.
Safety and trust are required. If they don’t exist, all bets are off. Conflict is sure to follow.
Teams can build trust and safety. To elevate team performance, leadership must make those qualities top priority in the culture.
Intentions matters! If people are pursuing agendas other than those best for the group, then it’s easier for individuals to behave selfishly. Trust and safety don’t exist where selfishness is allowed.
Strong leaders are tough on intentions. People don’t behave perfectly. Sometimes we all mess up. But it’s very important that people learn to exhibit care and concern for the team and the team’s objectives.
“If your end of the boat sinks, so does mine.”
Strong leaders require behaviors to reflect that intention. They don’t allow anybody to violate that without great personal cost. It’s not being intolerant of individualism. It’s being intolerant of autocratic tyranny.
Ideas, opinions, and thoughts deserve to be tested. Vigorously.
If people can merely toss out some idea,