FedSoc Forums

Guidance Against Guidance


Listen Later

The Trump Administration has made clear that it is engaged in a regulatory reform effort. One stated goal of that effort is to ensure that administrative enforcement actions rely on legally binding authority such as laws and regulations and that enforcement actions are not brought for “violations” of non-binding materials such as guidance or staff views. The Department of Justice, which is the prime litigating authority for the federal government, has issued statements disclaiming department or agency guidance as legally binding authority. More recently, independent agencies, including the Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection issued an interagency statement stating that “guidance does not have the force and effect of law, and the agencies do not take enforcement actions based on supervisory guidance." And, most recently, the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission stated that “all staff statements are nonbinding and create no enforceable legal rights or obligations of the Commission or other parties.” While potentially a positive step, significant questions remain about the scope of the statements and how they will be implemented in practice.
This Teleforum will discuss the implications of these statements and this effort. Will this step rein in regulation through adjudication? Will this step reduce the issuance of guidance itself leading to enforcement against behaviors that could have been redirected through guidance? What role should the federal enforcement authorities play in signaling through guidance and statements what they find problematic when the laws are broad enough to not provide a clear message?
Featuring:
John C. Richter, Partner, Special Matters and Government Investigations, King & Spalding LLP

Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.
...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

FedSoc ForumsBy The Federalist Society

  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5
  • 4.5

4.5

83 ratings


More shows like FedSoc Forums

View all
FedSoc Events by The Federalist Society

FedSoc Events

88 Listeners

SCOTUScast by The Federalist Society

SCOTUScast

106 Listeners

Faculty Division Bookshelf by The Federalist Society

Faculty Division Bookshelf

8 Listeners

Cato Podcast by Cato Institute

Cato Podcast

974 Listeners

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Oyez

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

675 Listeners

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke by The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke

704 Listeners

We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,113 Listeners

The Libertarian by The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin

The Libertarian

985 Listeners

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast by The Federalist Society

RTP's Fourth Branch Podcast

28 Listeners

Necessary & Proper Podcast by The Federalist Society

Necessary & Proper Podcast

47 Listeners

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture by The Heritage Foundation

Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture

522 Listeners

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg by The Dispatch

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

6,594 Listeners

What the Hell Is Going On by AEI Podcasts

What the Hell Is Going On

637 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,904 Listeners

The Dispatch Podcast by The Dispatch

The Dispatch Podcast

3,337 Listeners

Amarica's Constitution by Akhil Reed Amar

Amarica's Constitution

399 Listeners

Divided Argument by Will Baude, Dan Epps

Divided Argument

745 Listeners

Supreme Court Oral Arguments by scotusstats.com

Supreme Court Oral Arguments

36 Listeners