Haven't Seen It

Haven't Seen It

By Haven't Seen ItTV & Film
Download on the App Store

Haven't Seen It episodes

  • Episode 31: Adolescence (2025)

    Is love inherently violent? Does romance require an act of violence? Are humans inherently violent? Are they inherently romantic? Do we always glamorous violence? Are there different kinds of violence? When will MK Ultra leave us alone? Is Adolescence state propaganda advocating for further surveillance? Do we need more surveillance? Can you smell what the Rock is cooking?Please send us hate mail:EMAIL: [email protected]: haventseenpodLETTERBOXD: haventseenpod#podcast #film #philosophy

    1 hr 36 min
  • Episode 30: Kinetta (2005)

    Does Yorgos Lanthimos hate cinema? Does he hate this medium? And why? Is his shtick surface level antics, or is there more going on besides a vulgar self-reflexivity? How do his early films compare to his later ones? How do people feel about his work back home in Greece? Why is it important to be true to where you're from? Will Josh ever do the slightest bit of research, or will he insist on getting simple facts wrong? We're joined by the legendary (at least 20 feet tall) filmmaker Paolo Antypas to discuss what the hell is up with Yorgos Lanthimos' first film, Kinetta from 2005. Warning: very high IQ takes. [Sorry for the hiatus! More episodes on the way.]


    Please send us hate mail:

    EMAIL: [email protected]

    INSTA: @haventseenpod


    #filmpodcast #film #podcastshow

    1 hr 37 min
  • Episode 29: David Lynch

    In this episode, we get to the bottom of WHAT MAKES DAVID'S FILMS SO SPECIAL. We advance a vaguely Jungian reading of his work, while also advancing a vaguely Shamanistic reading of his work, while also grappling with Mark Frost's claim that David is "anti-psychological." What did he mean by this? Join us in celebrating one of America's greatest artists in any medium. Rest in peace, David Keith Lynch#davidlynch #podcast #filmpodcast

    1 hr 24 min
  • Episode 28: Listener Suggestions

    In this rapid-fire episode, we tackle every film that listeners have suggested we cover, INCLUDING:


    Quills (2000) dir Philip KaufmanMr. Klein (1976) dir Joseph LoseyA Matter of Life and Death (1946) dir Emeric Pressburger, Michael PowellIt's Always Fair Weather (1951) dir Gene Kelly, Stanley DonenShanghai Express (1932) dir Josef von SternbergMephisto (1981) dir István SzabóFearless (1993) dir Robert F. HillSleuth (1972) dir Joseph L. MankiewiczThe Prime of Miss Jean Brodie (1969) dir Ronald NeameMikey and Nicky (1976) dir Elaine MayBlonde (2022) dir Andrew DominikCity of God (2002) dir Fernando Meirelles, Kátia Lund12 Angry Men (1957) dir Sidney LumetM (1931) dir Fritz LangAnatomy of a Murder (1959) dir Otto PremingerTokyo Story dir (1953) dir Yasujirō OzuThe Wages of Fear dir (1953) dir Henri-Georges ClouzotAll About Eve (1950) dir Joseph L. MankiewiczThe Third Man dir (1949) dir Carol ReedSonic the Hedgehog 2 (2022) dir Jeff FowlerUnder the Skin (2013) dir Jonathan GlazerNocturnal Animals (2016) dir Tom FordEx Machina (2014) dir Alex GarlandThe Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift (2006) dir Justin LinDumb and Dumber (1994) dir Peter FarrellyDune ???? WHICH ONE? What Did Jack Do (2017) dir David LynchThe Social Network (2010) dir David Fincher


    Thank you all for the suggestions! Keep suggesting things and we might do this again!

    2 hr 7 min
  • Episode 27: Nosferatu (2024)

    Does Nosferatu 2024 have a unique perspective compared to the 1922 and the 1979 versions? Is Eggers' the best young auteur of the 21st century? Are his films too reliant on art direction vs theme? Are they just more "elevated horror" or is there something deeper going on here? And who the hell is Van Helsing!??! Some might see the stylized but stilted approach of Nosferatu (2024) and call it "mannered." I think that's fair, but in defence of the film it is something of a treatise on what it means to be "mannered," that is: to be a rationalized, uprooted, civilized westerner...


    Please send us hate mail:

    INSTA: haventseenpod

    LETTERBOXD: haventseenpod


    #podcast #film #criticism #genius

    1 hr 23 min
  • Episode 26: Barbenheimer (2023)

    Is Barbie (2023) a feminist film? Is Oppenheimer (2023) a masculinist one? Or is it possible that they both inadequately explore the feminine side of our psyches? Is it possible that Barbie is not feminist *enough*? What would Marie-Louise von Franz think of the corporate feminism of Barbie? Is it cool to be a stereotypical male feminist on a podcast in 2024? Probably not.

    FYI the book we called "Wild Woman" by "Mary Pinkola" is actually "Women Who Run With the Wolves" by Clarissa Pinkola Estés. Woops.

    Please send us hate mail:
    INSTA: haventseenpod
    LETTERBOXD: haventseenpod

    1 hr 59 min
  • Episode 25: Babylon (2022)

    Auteur cinema is in shambles. We have few filmmakers out here, creating personal visions and dream projects. We need more art and less content. We need auteur cinema! But we also need honest and brutal criticism. We need to hold ideas accountable; we need to demand better execution. Because... We will get what we tolerate! Damien Chazelle, we believe in you man!

    Please send us hate mail:
    INSTA: haventseenpod
    LETTERBOXD: haventseenpod
    https://linktr.ee/haventseenpod

    1 hr 34 min
  • Episode 23: Everything Everywhere All At Once (2022)

    “The death of a social machine has never been heralded by a disharmony or a dysfunction; on the contrary, social machines make a habit of feeding on the contradictions they give rise to, on the crises they provoke, on the anxieties they engender, and on the infernal operations they regenerate. Capitalism has learned this, and has ceased doubting itself, while even socialists have abandoned belief in the possibility of capitalism's natural death by attrition. No one has ever died from contradictions. And the more it breaks down, the more it schizophrenizes, the better it works, the American way.”

    ― Felix Guattari and Gilles Deleuze, Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia
    Hey, if you're a fan of this film--no problem, we are still friends, and we love you.
    Be warned: this episode IS a critique. We're not saying this film is deep state propaganda, but we are saying this is a religious film, whose focus is not storytelling but metaphysics. The "breakdown of the multiverse" seems to be less of a hazard, and more of an integral part to how capitalism sustains itself. As Deleuze (almost) says above, "No one has ever died of a plot hole," but by golly we nearly did! And yet the plot holes seem to be the very point to this movie, launching the characters from one nonsensical detour to the next (curtailing any attempt to bring the fragmented story into a grounded unity), only for everything to end where it began, with a nuclear family running a business and happily paying their taxes. I remember a similar film, where a man named Morpheus smirks while describing "paying your taxes" as the hallmark of a mind that has been colonized by the Matrix.

    As Zizek hath said, "It is easier to imagine the collapse of the multiverse than the end of capitalism." This is the Capitalist Realist film par excellance (RIP Mark Fisher).

    The multiverse concept is the great wet dream of cartesian statistical delusion. It's a vision of infinity without divinity; a sort of Stalinist capitalism of constant revolution but no real change. "The more it breaks down... the better it works." This is a film that reifies the status quo and celebrates a soulless cynicism. "Everything sucks, so you might as well be nice." When CERN takes over the world, the multiverse will be the state religion, and this film will be the bible.

    2 hr 43 min
  • Episode 22: Pokémon: The First Movie (1998)

    The boys are joined by fellow filmmaker/podcaster Ernesto Sandoval to talk about their repressed Pokémon memories. They answers questions like: Did you cry? How much did you cry? Is the worldbuilding in Pokémon woke or broke? Why did you cry? Why did everyone and their mom get obsessed with Pokémon back in the day? Stop crying. What does the writing get right and wrong in this film? Are you still crying? Why is Ernesto Sandoval so cute?

    Find Ernesto's podcast Twin Films here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/twin-films/id1725182018
    Please send us hate mail:
    INSTA: haventseenpod
    LETTERBOXD: haventseenpod
    https://linktr.ee/haventseenpod

    1 hr 19 min
  • Episode 21: Megalopolis (2024) REDUX

    Why? What is going on with Francis Ford Coppola? Why is this the film he's dreamed about for decades? What is the role of the artist in the future? Does the artist create the future? What the hell is going on in this screenplay? What is Megalon? Is "All You Need Is Love" still true? In this follow-up episode (no need to hear the previous Megalopolis episode) the boys delve into these questions.


    Please send us hate mail:

    INSTA: haventseenpod
    LETTERBOXD: haventseenpod
    https://linktr.ee/haventseenpod

    1 hr 15 min

About Haven't Seen It

From the publisher's feed

Haven't Seen It Pod is hosted by Michael Basha and Joshua Scammell. One has seen the film in question and one has not. The two will discuss a new film each episode, the filmmaker, and more all in the…