How dangerous is it…REALLY?

How dangerous is it…REALLY?

Download on the App Store

How dangerous is it…REALLY? episodes

  • Arsenic: Who eats old lace anyway? (E22)

    Everyone knows arsenic is bad for you. Today we discuss where arsenic comes from, its history as a medicine, how much is bad for you, and how it got its awful reputation.



    Welcome back, everyone. 
    I hope you are all weathering the Coronavirus pandemic well.  I'm sure the world will survive this pandemic
    like it has the others, but individually I hope you all stay safe and healthy.



    Today’s topic is



    Arsenic: who eats old lace anyway?



    Arsenic as a medicine



    As the world searches for a cure to the Coronavirus, could I
    make a suggestion?  Let’s not try
    arsenic.  Through the centuries, it seems
    that arsenic has been advertised as a cure for many major illnesses.  Since Hippocrates first recommended arsenic
    as a cure for ulcers and abscesses, it seems that arsenic was recommended for
    about every conceivable illness.  It has
    been used to “cure” skin conditions, stomatitis, gingivitis in infants, asthma,
    rheumatism, hemorrhoids, cough, a fever reducer, and an all-around great health
    tonic. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07623.x




    From 1910 till the introduction of penicillin, an arsenic
    derivative known as Salvarsan was the primary cure for syphilis, and
    indications are that it actually did a pretty good job of killing the bacteria
    without killing the patient, something that not all syphilis cures could claim.
    https://www.sciencehistory.org/distillations/magazine/early-solution




    Today, arsenic trioxide is used to treat lymphoma and
    leukemia. https://pmj.bmj.com/content/79/933/391




    However, arsenic is most famous as a cure for rich relatives
    who were too stubborn to exit this world and leave behind a well-earned birthright.  A little sprinkle of some inheritance powder
    and suddenly the money started to flow again.



    Arsenic is a metalloid element with an atomic number of 33.  While it can be naturally found as a pure element, it is often found bonded with sulfur or oxygen. 



    Mankind has known about arsenic since before the Egyptians
    used it to embalm their dead to preserve the bodies until heat and moisture
    could prevent natural decay. 



    Arsenic in groundwater



    The most common natural way to encounter arsenic is through
    contaminated groundwater.  While
    occasionally human activity is responsible for the presence of arsenic in
    water, generally most contaminated wells are a result of the leaching of
    naturally occurring arsenic.  As a child,
    I remember having our well tested several times to determine arsenic
    levels.  The areas most affected by
    natural arsenic in the US are the southwest, northwest, northeast, and
    Alaska.  Arsenic in groundwater can be a
    hazard because dangerous levels of arsenic don’t affect the taste of drinking
    water.  Generally, the only way to detect
    these levels is through laboratory testing. 








    The EPA limit for arsenic in groundwater is 10ppb.  They also estimate that 2% of water supplies
    exceed 20ppb.  2ppb is a normal level,
    but levels of up to 1000 ppb have been found in drinking water.  https://www.atsdr.cdc.
    12 min
  • Radon: The monster in the basement (E21)

    In today's podcast we answer a listener's question about the dangers of radon. What do you need to do to protect your family from this monster in the basement?



    Hello everyone. 
    Thanks for tuning in to another podcast. 
    I appreciate all of you taking time out of your day to listen.  As always, I’d love to hear from you if you
    have a topic you would like me to discuss or suggestions for improvement.  The best way to reach me is through my
    website sci-vs-fear.com.



    Before I get started with today's topic, I got some feedback
    on the childbirth
    podcast from Gretchen.  She included
    some research from the CDC that showed a large disparity in maternal mortality
    between black and white women.  This
    study showed that black women had 2-5 times the maternal deaths of white women.



    https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2019/p0905-racial-ethnic-disparities-pregnancy-deaths.html



    Upon looking into it, there were several studies exploring
    the reason for the discrepancy.  All of
    the authors acknowledged that attributing cause in cases like this is very
    difficult.  I really appreciate Gretchen
    bringing this to my attention.  In the
    4-5 hours I have to research a topic, I am bound to miss something. 



    The interesting thing to me is that the study I cited in the
    podcast was also from the CDC, and it showed white women having slightly higher
    maternal mortality.  So, who is
    right?  I don't know.  Usually, when there is a discrepancy in data
    the truth lies somewhere in the middle. 
    These studies are a good demonstration of how the sample population can
    change the study outcome.  One study that
    I looked at found that some of the discrepancy is possibly due to the quality
    of the hospitals more likely to be used by black mothers.  They found that white mothers using the same
    hospitals, had similar outcomes.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5915910/#R20 
    That would make sense since much of the improvement in mortality we saw in the
    1930s was attributable to improvements in medical care.



    Gretchen also mentioned that in the US, maternal mortality
    is on the rise and higher than Europe.  I
    too had found this during my research. 
    Determining the factors responsible for this uptick would certainly be
    worth investigating.  I suspect the
    answer is quite complex but worth pursuing. 
    Thanks again for checking my facts and the input.



    For today's podcast, I got a question from Brett. "I
    recently had a salesman come to my house wanting to test it for radon.  He said that our area has high radon levels
    and that my house could be poisoning my family. 
    How dangerous is radon and am I putting my family at risk?"



    So, today’s topic is



    Radon: the monster living in the basement



    Well, Brett, deciding to get your house checked and
    potentially mitigated is a personal decision I can't make for you but there is
    a lot of interesting information available.



    The US attention to Radon began in 1984 when construction
    engineer Stanley Watras headed into work at the Limerick nuclear power plant in
    Pottstown Pennsylvania.
    19 min
  • Flesh eating bacteria: It’s not just a flesh wound (E20)

    We've all heard the stories, a simple cut rapidly turns into a life threatening infection that destroys muscle, skin, and tissue. Flesh eating bacteria, how worried should you be?



    Thanks for joining me again. 
    Thanks for all of you who provided feedback on the podcast.  Next week’s podcast will be a listener
    suggested topic.  For those of you who
    haven’t yet suggested a topic, I would still love to hear from you.  Sci-vs-fear.com



    Today's topic is:



    Flesh-eating bacteria: It's not just a flesh wound



    I first heard of flesh-eating bacteria as a young
    microbiology student.  It is pretty scary
    stuff.  It starts out as a minor scrape
    or cut and within a few days can result in a gruesome death.



    Take for instance the 2008 case of a 5-year-old Wisconsin
    boy.  He fell off his bike and skinned
    his chin and bit his lip.  Not an
    uncommon event in the life of a five-year-old. 
    One day later, he was in the ICU fighting for his life against
    flesh-eating bacteria.  Over the next
    three days, he underwent five different surgeries to remove dying and infected
    tissue.  As his body fought the
    infection, his blood pressure began to drop precipitously.  As the illness progressed, it became increasingly
    likely that he might not survive.  Thanks
    to aggressive antibiotic therapy and surgical interventions, after a week in
    the hospital, his condition began to improve and eventually he recovered
    completely. https://www.livescience.com/19722-flesh-eating-bacteria-early-treatments.html




    Flesh eating bacteria: also known as necrotizing fasciitis



    The medical term for the disease caused by flesh-eating
    bacteria is “necrotizing fasciitis”. 
    While many different organisms have caused necrotizing fasciitis, the
    most common bacterial cause is group A Streptococcus.  This is the same organism that causes strep
    throat, however, the infection takes a completely different course.



    Flesh eating bacteria is the same organism that causes strep throat



    Within 24 hours of infection, the symptoms are readily
    apparent.  The area of the cut or
    abrasion becomes red, warm, and swollen. 
    There is a significant amount of pain at the site of the infection, much
    more than you would normally associate with a minor cut or scrape. 



    The redness and swelling can begin to travel to other parts
    of the body.  Other symptoms include
    diarrhea, nausea, fever, dizziness, weakness and intense thirst.



    If not treated immediately, within 3-4 days the symptoms can
    become much more severe.  Swelling
    increases, often accompanied by a purplish rash.  This rash can spread, then it transforms into
    blisters filled with a dark, foul-smelling liquid.  The skin begins to discolor, flake and even
    peel away as it dies.  If not treated
    aggressively death can occur in four to five days due to a drop in blood
    pressure, toxic shock, and organ failure. https://www.webmd.com/skin-problems-and-treatments/necrotizing-fasciitis-flesh-eating-bacteria#2



    While the most shocking cases are those who are otherwise
    healthy, most individuals who acquire the illness have underlying medical
    conditions that weaken the immune system. 
    14 min
  • Childbirth: There’s got to be a better way (E19)

    Childbirth has been a constant in human history. Unfortunately, death among mothers was far from rare. We discuss how dangerous it was and how far we have left to go.



    Welcome, everyone. 
    With this episode, I have over 20 podcasts under my belt.  It has been a lot of fun and I appreciate all
    of you.  I have a completely self-serving
    request of you.  I'm trying to make my
    podcast better and I really need some good feedback to do so.  I would like to know your favorite episode
    and one topic that you would love for me to discuss.  Simply go to my website sci-vs-fear.com and
    click on the red contact button or if it is easier, email me directly at [email protected].  Again, I’d like to know your favorite podcast
    so far and one topic you would like for me to discuss.  Thanks again for all of your support!



    Today’s topic is:



    Childbirth: There’s got to be a better way



    As most of you could guess, the only direct experience I’ve
    had with childbirth is being born and those memories are a bit fuzzy.  I have four kids and so I’ve had plenty of
    experience on the Dad side, but doesn’t really count.  Not too long ago, we were in the hospital
    with our daughter, welcoming our first grandchild into the world.  As I watched her struggle to bring my
    grandson into the world, I thought “this has to be one of the most dangerous
    things ever.”  This episode goes out to
    my daughter and my wife.



    Today’s podcast is going to look at how dangerous childbirth
    is for the mother.  Making it to 5 years
    old is a big gamble for the baby and is a topic for another podcast. 



    US Childbirth deaths



    In the US, about 700 women a year die due to complications
    with pregnancy. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pregnancy-relatedmortality.htm
     For a country with the population of the
    US, this is a pretty low rate.  Other
    causes of death with similar rates are slipping and tripping falls, falls from
    ladders, drowning in swimming pools, and freezing to death. https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/all-injuries/preventable-death-overview/odds-of-dying/data-details/




    As we will discuss in a minute, it has taken a lot of hard
    work to get to this place.  The leading
    causes of maternal death are cardiovascular conditions, hemorrhage, infection,
    embolism, cardiomyopathy, mental health conditions, and
    preeclampsia/eclampsia.  Interestingly,
    the death rates were very similar for black and white women, except that deaths
    due to mental health conditions were noticeably absent among black women.



    Of these fatalities, a quarter occurred during pregnancy,
    15% on the day of delivery, 18% 1-6 days postpartum, another 18% 7-42 days
    postpartum, and the remaining quarter 43-365 days postpartum.



    The fatalities can be categorized as preventable, and
    non-preventable.  Hispanics had the
    lowest rate of preventable deaths at 62%, blacks at 63%, and white at 68%.  I found it interesting that of the maternal
    deaths in this CDC study, over 65% were still preventable. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternal-mortality/erase-mm/mmr-data-brief.html
    15 min
  • Surviving pandemic flu: You can’t fight the flu with kung fu (E 18.1)

    The next pandemic flu is an inevitability. The 1918 flu killed more people than WWI. Today we talk about steps you can take to protect yourself and family.



    Thanks for joining me for this bonus podcast.  As we talked in the flu
    podcast, a global flu pandemic is pretty much inevitable.  Proper preparation is the vaccination for
    fear, and today we will discuss what you can do.



    Today’s episode is:



    Pandemic influenza: 
    You can’t fight the flu with kung fu



    As we talked previously, if the next flu pandemic is like
    the 1918 Spanish Flu, the worldwide death toll could approach 1 million.  This is despite all the medical advances that
    have been made since 1918.



    Were we prepared for the 2009 flu?



    The problem with the flu is that it is a constantly morphing
    threat.  An evaluation of the 2007
    pandemic flu strategy is a good illustration. 
    When this plan was made, the assumption was that the next pandemic would
    be a highly pathogenic avian strain in the H5N1 family.  To this end, vaccine for this family was
    strategically stockpiled for rapid response.



    Another assumption was that the virus would emerge overseas,
    lengthening the available response time.



    When the next pandemic strain emerged in 2009, it was from
    the H1N1 family, a swine-origin virus rather than avian.  Instead of emerging overseas, the strain
    emerged in Mexico and rapidly spread to California.



    Fortunately, the strain proved to have a fairly low
    lethality and so the consequences of being wrong were not catastrophic.  Once the strain was recognized in April
    production of a vaccine was immediately started.  However, the vaccine wasn’t completed until
    October-6 months later.  It wasn’t until
    December that enough vaccine could be produced to protect the general
    public.  That’s 8 months to produce
    enough vaccine to protect the public once the strain is identified. 



    Can't we just make a vaccine for pandemic flu?



    These vaccines will be central in slowing a pandemic, but
    remember that the efficacy of most vaccines is only ~40% and the protection
    begins to wane rapidly.  Unless we get
    very lucky or better at predicting future strains, our most effective medical
    intervention will be unavailable for at least half a year. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/rr/rr6601a1.htm








    If the strain follows the 1918 model, where the first wave
    of the pandemic isn’t particularly lethal, this delay before the more deadly
    waves may be the advantage we need to get ahead of the virus.  There is no telling whether the next pandemic
    will follow this model.



    I wouldn't feel comfortable waiting 6 months before I took
    action to protect myself.  There are
    things we can do besides medical treatment. 
    The CDC calls these actions Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions.



    Communities fight the pandemic



    These include both community-based and personal protective
    measures.  Community-based interventions
    could include cancellation of schools, cessation of public gatherings and
    working from home or not at all.



    These measures would not be without difficulties.  As we are seeing in the coronavirus outbreak,
    9 min
  • The flu: I think there is a shot for that (E18)

    Tens of thousands of people die from the flu every year, yet most of us tend to ignore it. In today's podcast we discuss the dangers of influenza, the effect it has had on history, and what the future holds.



    Greetings all.  Hard
    to believe that my podcast has been going for almost 4 months.  I really do appreciate all of you tuning in
    every week.  Hope you’ve enjoyed
    listening as much as I have enjoyed making them.



    Today’s podcast is



    Influenza: I think there is a shot for that



    All the coverage the
    coronavirus has been getting has made me want to talk about the flu.  It is always easy to be scared of the new
    unknown thing, while we easily disregard the common everyday hazards.



    Year-in and year-out the flu kills almost as many people as
    traffic deaths.  Yet, we almost
    completely ignore this illness every fall.



    I pretty much ignored the illness, after all, what's the
    worst that could happen?  You just feel
    lousy for a couple of days and then get back to everyday life.



    Prevalence of the flu



    However, that illusion was shattered when one of my
    co-workers had a child catch the flu. 
    After a couple of days in the hospital, she passed away.  Everyone was shocked and heart-broken.  How does this happen in our day of advanced
    medical care?



    Turns out, these deaths aren’t really all that rare.  In the US, during the 2018-2019 flu season
    over 35 million people were infected.  Of
    those, 16 million sought medical care, half a million were hospitalized, and
    over 34,000 people died.  https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2018-2019.html




    This was actually a fairly mild year.  In the 2017-2018 season, these numbers were
    almost doubled with an estimated 60k deaths due to the flu.  https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2017-2018.htm




    Just to put that number in perspective, between 2016-2018 each
    year there were about 40k deaths due to traffic accidents in the US. 



    Who's at risk from influenza?



    Of those 60k flu fatalities, the 0-5 age range fared the
    best, representing only 0.1% of all fatalities. 
    Generally, most diseases target the young and the old, but with our
    current influenza strains, the risk increases with age.  Only six percent of flu deaths occur in
    people under 50 years old even though they account for nearly 60% of all flu
    illnesses.  For this age group, the flu
    is generally just an unpleasant, but not fatal, experience.  On the other hand, the 65+ age group
    represents only 13% of total flu illness, but 83% of all flu deaths. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/2017-2018.htm




    Clearly, the elderly are at much greater danger from the flu
    than the general population.  The reasons
    for this get pretty complex, but it is hard to argue with the numbers.



    Like the coronavirus, influenza is a virus.  While we have multiple antibiotics to treat
    bacterial infections, our viral treatment options are still amazingly
    limited.  Because viral reproduction
    occurs in a host cell, targeting of viruses is something we still have a long
    way to go on.  I believe we will
    14 min
  • Coronavirus update1: I’d like another round

    I thought it was time for an update on the Coronavirus or COVID19 now that things have progressed a little bit. Hope you enjoy listening to the update.



    I didn't have time to transcribe the podcast, but below are my references.



    https://www.cnn.com/asia/live-news/coronavirus-outbreak-02-12-20-intl-hnk/index.html







    https://www.cdc.gov/media/dpk/diseases-and-conditions/coronavirus/coronavirus-2020.html



    https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nCoV/summary.html



    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2761044



    https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2761043




    https://www.busiweek.com/the-economic-consequences-of-the-coronavirus/




    https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-global-economic-impact-of-wuhan-novel-coronavirus/



    https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-global-economic-impact-of-wuhan-novel-coronavirus/



    Listen to the original Coronavirus podcast
    11 min
  • Energy Drinks: I like to measure my caffeine intake in grams (E17)

    I've wondered for a long time how dangerous energy drinks are. In today's podcast we talk about caffeine and investigate the dangers posed by the booming energy drink industry.



    Glad you could join me today.  Hope you find today’s podcast as interesting
    as I did.  If you enjoy the podcasts, you
    could really help me out by sharing them with friends and family.



    Today’s podcast is:



    Energy Drinks:  I like
    to measure my caffeine intake in grams



    At work, we have recently been discussing energy
    drinks.  While we all partake from time
    to time, one individual ingests a remarkable amount of caffeine.  The last time we figured out his caffeine
    intake, it was almost 2 grams per day. 
    We all agreed that there is no way this could be healthy.  However, opinions based on gut instinct are
    rarely reliable and so I decided to dig into the facts and see what the science
    says.



    I realize I am treading dangerous ground by potentially
    interfering with people’s morning routines, but here goes.



    Caffeine has been a sacred part of the morning ritual for
    most of the history of mankind.  About
    85% of Americans consume caffeine daily. 
    It is probably one of the most widely consumed substances in
    America.  This is great from a scientific
    standpoint as it gives us a huge human test population.  With these types of numbers, even very rare
    adverse outcomes should be readily visible.



    How does caffeine work?



    We all know that caffeine makes us more alert, but how does
    that happen.  I found a couple of
    different explanations but they all have to do with the adenosine
    receptor.  Adenosine is created by the
    brain to let the body know when it needs sleep. 
    Adenosine binds to the nerves slowing down nerve cell activity and
    prepares the body for sleep.  Caffeine preferentially
    binds to these receptors preventing the attachment of adenosine without slowing
    the nerves.  This increases neuron firing
    causing us to feel more alert and improves athletic ability by decreasing the
    reaction time of our nerves.  Over time,
    the caffeine degrades and there is a large amount of accumulated adenosine
    waiting to bind to the receptors.  This
    sudden binding is what leads to the crash after caffeine consumption.  https://science.howstuffworks.com/caffeine4.htm
    https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/54536/how-does-caffeine-work




    Can you die from caffeine overdose?



    Lethal overdoses of caffeine have occurred, but they are
    rare.  Most of these overdoses occur
    through ingestion (often intentional) of purified caffeine rather than through
    the ingestion of beverages.  In
    fatalities, 10 grams or more are ingested in a single dose.



    In 2016 there were over 3700 cases of caffeine poisoning
    reported to Poison Control Centers in the US. 
    Of these poisonings, 846 required treatment at a hospital and 16 of
    those had negative outcomes. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK532910/?report=printable




    How much caffeine is in an energy drink



    How much caffeine is in your typical energy drink?  While there is no “typical” energy drink,
    National Institutes of Health says the caffeine ranges from ...
    11 min
  • Fentanyl: When straight heroin isn’t enough (E16)

    Fentanyl has caused a large increase in opioid related drug overdoses. In today's podcast we discuss fentanyl's history, uses, why drug dealers love it, and the dangers it poses.



    Welcome back, everyone. 
    Thanks to all you who have shared the podcast with friends and
    family.  As a reminder, all my show
    references and as well as bonus content can be found on my website at
    sci-vs-fear.com



    Today our topic is:



    Fentanyl: When straight heroin just isn’t enough



    In the past couple of years, there has been a significant
    rise in the number of opiate-related overdoses. 
    Opiates like heroin are nothing new, they have been used by mankind for
    thousands of years.  As a pain-reliever,
    it is difficult to match.  However, the
    addiction associated with opiates has always been an unfortunate
    side-effect.  This addiction often leads
    to death by overdose as addicts continually chase a better high.



    In the US, from 2016-2017, opiate overdoses increased by 47%
    primarily due to the synthetic opioids. 
    That’s an additional 24,000+ deaths a year due to man-made opiate-like
    drugs.  These drugs have names like fentanyl,
    acetylfentanyl, acrylfentanyl, carfentanil, furanylfentanyl, and U-47700.  In this podcast, we are going to refer to all
    of these substances as fentanyl.



    History of fentanyl



    Fentanyl was invented in 1959 by Belgian physician Paul
    Janssen.  He synthesized a
    chemical similar to morphine, but slightly different.  It had a couple of medical advantages over
    morphine.  It acted faster and was much
    stronger.    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/09/04/757089868/fentanyl-as-a-dark-web-profit-center-from-chinese-labs-to-u-s-streets




    In fact, fentanyl is 50-100 times more potent than morphine.
    This means you don’t have to use nearly as much to treat the same amount of
    pain.  https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/opioids/fentanyl.html  As we mentioned, there are different flavors
    of fentanyl, over 30 different unique compounds so far.  These different compounds have vastly
    different strengths.  For instance,
    carfentanyl is estimated to be 10,000 times more potent than morphine. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/fentanyl.html
    The normal IV fentanyl dose is ~ 120 ug which is roughly equal to 2 grains of
    salt.  The lethal dose of fentanyl for a
    normal adult is as low as 2mg (equal to about 32 grains of salt).  That’s not a lot.







    Now let’s look at carfentanil.  Its’ normal use is as a large animal
    tranquilizer.  Like elephant large.  It takes about 10 mg to sedate an elephant.
    The lethal dose for a human is ~20ug. 
    Keep in mind that a single grain of salt is ~ 60ug, so a single grain of
    carfentanyl contains 3 lethal doses. 
    Needless to say, this is pretty toxic stuff. 



    Fentanyl as an illicit drug



    As with any other legitimate medication, as soon as it
    enters common use, someone will find a way to abuse it.  One of the first people to profit from
    fentanyl was a self-taught chemist from Wichita, Kansas, named George
    Marquardt.  Not only did he figure out
    12 min
  • Coronavirus: I’d like mine with lime, chilled, and on beach (E15)

    Any time a novel disease emerges it gets a lot of attention. Today we discuss the history of the coronavirus, where this strain came from, and how dangerous it might be.



    Today’s topic is:



    Coronavirus:  I’d like
    mine with lime, chilled, and on a beach



    I first heard of the new coronavirus outbreak a couple of
    weeks ago.  First off, in full
    disclosure, I did terrible in virology while getting my first degree in
    microbiology.  Once something gets so
    small that I can’t see it with a normal microscope, I lose interest.



    Maybe you had better news coverage than I did, but the
    information I first heard wasn’t super specific or particularly
    informative.  The first report I heard
    made it seem like coronavirus was a newly discovered virus.



    What we know about coronavirus



    The first coronavirus was discovered in 1965 by Tyrell and
    Bynoe and named B814.  Pretty catchy name
    huh?  We’ve gotten better at making new
    diseases sound much scarier.  Since then,
    we have discovered dozens of corona viruses in a wide variety of mammals,
    birds, and reptiles.  https://journals.lww.com/pidj/fulltext/2005/11001/history_and_recent_advances_in_coronavirus.12.aspx








    Corona in Latin means crown. 
    The surface of the coronaviruses is covered with spikes that make it
    look like a solar corona under electron microscopy.







    The coronavirus is a  ~125 nm round particles.  For those of you like me, for whom the metric
    system is still a bit of a mystery, that’s 125 billionths of a meter.  Pretty dang small.  They are known as a positive-sense RNA
    virus.  I won’t go any further into what
    this means as it bored me to tears in virology, but I’ve referenced several
    papers in my show notes that explain it in depth. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3747522/




    There is still debate as to whether viruses are actually
    alive.  Viruses are essentially packets
    of DNA/RNA that hijack a cell's machinery to produce more viruses.  Without a host, viruses cannot reproduce.  



    Coronavirus is no different. 
    The outside of the virus contains receptors that bond with the surface
    proteins in the cell.  Once it binds, the
    viron starts a process that enables it to become part of the cell wall, barfing
    its RNA into the cell cytoplasm.  This
    causes the cell to produce viral proteins and RNA.  These are then packaged by the cell using the
    Golgi apparatus and other processes which then releases the newly formed viral
    particles from the cell. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1306801/




    You have likely been infected by a coronavirus as some point
    in your life.  Fifteen to 30% of all
    common colds are caused by a member of the coronavirus family.  We've all had colds, and while they are
    pretty miserable, they are generally pretty minor and stay in the upper
    respiratory tract where they don’t interfere with breathing in a
    life-threatening way.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3416289/ 



    Serious coronavirus outbreaks


    12 min

About How dangerous is it…REALLY?

From the publisher's feed

We discuss the science of the world’s most dangerous things in 15 minutes or less