
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
The relationship between the U.S. and China is typically framed as competitive and even adversarial. Each superpower brings strengths and weaknesses to how it approaches its society, business and growth. In his new book "Breakneck: China's Quest to Engineer the Future," author and China expert Dan Wang, frames the key differences between the two superpowers. He argues that China can be understood as an "engineering state" that builds at breakneck speed regardless of public opinion or dissent. He says the U.S., on the other hand, is a "lawyerly society" that offers civil and environmental protections, but blocks everything, good and bad. On the latest episode of the Bold Names podcast, Wang speaks to WSJ’s Christopher Mims about how this framework could help us understand which country ultimately has the upper hand in the current geopolitical and technological arms race.
To watch the video version of this episode, visit our WSJ Podcasts YouTube channel or the video page of WSJ.com.
Check Out Past Episodes:
This CEO Says Global Trade Is Broken. What Comes Next?
What This Former USAID Head Had to Say About Elon Musk and DOGE
‘Businesses Don’t Like Uncertainty’: How Cisco Is Navigating AI and Trump 2.0
Why This Tesla Pioneer Says the Cheap EV Market 'Sucks'
Let us know what you think of the show. Email us at [email protected].
Sign up for the WSJ's free Technology newsletter.
Read Christopher Mims’s Keywords column.
Read Tim Higgins’s column.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
4.3
14161,416 ratings
The relationship between the U.S. and China is typically framed as competitive and even adversarial. Each superpower brings strengths and weaknesses to how it approaches its society, business and growth. In his new book "Breakneck: China's Quest to Engineer the Future," author and China expert Dan Wang, frames the key differences between the two superpowers. He argues that China can be understood as an "engineering state" that builds at breakneck speed regardless of public opinion or dissent. He says the U.S., on the other hand, is a "lawyerly society" that offers civil and environmental protections, but blocks everything, good and bad. On the latest episode of the Bold Names podcast, Wang speaks to WSJ’s Christopher Mims about how this framework could help us understand which country ultimately has the upper hand in the current geopolitical and technological arms race.
To watch the video version of this episode, visit our WSJ Podcasts YouTube channel or the video page of WSJ.com.
Check Out Past Episodes:
This CEO Says Global Trade Is Broken. What Comes Next?
What This Former USAID Head Had to Say About Elon Musk and DOGE
‘Businesses Don’t Like Uncertainty’: How Cisco Is Navigating AI and Trump 2.0
Why This Tesla Pioneer Says the Cheap EV Market 'Sucks'
Let us know what you think of the show. Email us at [email protected].
Sign up for the WSJ's free Technology newsletter.
Read Christopher Mims’s Keywords column.
Read Tim Higgins’s column.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
32,103 Listeners
30,686 Listeners
2,823 Listeners
1,706 Listeners
4,365 Listeners
1,633 Listeners
675 Listeners
9,533 Listeners
1,031 Listeners
1,289 Listeners
6,054 Listeners
1,549 Listeners
195 Listeners
1,321 Listeners
609 Listeners
151 Listeners
147 Listeners