
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Earlier this week, the Supreme Court announced it was putting off hearing a pair of highly anticipated cases that could fundamentally change social media as we know it The cases concern laws in Florida and Texas, pushed by conservatives in those states, which basically make it illegal for social media platforms to block or hide content – like say from a former president – even if the post violates the companies’ terms of service. Both laws have been blocked from taking effect while the rest of the country waits for the high court to weigh in. Marketplace’s Meghan McCarty Carino spoke with Daphne Keller, director of the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center, about why these cases could be consequential.
By Marketplace4.5
12561,256 ratings
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court announced it was putting off hearing a pair of highly anticipated cases that could fundamentally change social media as we know it The cases concern laws in Florida and Texas, pushed by conservatives in those states, which basically make it illegal for social media platforms to block or hide content – like say from a former president – even if the post violates the companies’ terms of service. Both laws have been blocked from taking effect while the rest of the country waits for the high court to weigh in. Marketplace’s Meghan McCarty Carino spoke with Daphne Keller, director of the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center, about why these cases could be consequential.

32,238 Listeners

30,641 Listeners

8,799 Listeners

936 Listeners

1,387 Listeners

1,652 Listeners

2,177 Listeners

5,486 Listeners

113,434 Listeners

56,991 Listeners

9,563 Listeners

10,328 Listeners

3,617 Listeners

6,109 Listeners

6,590 Listeners

6,461 Listeners

163 Listeners

2,991 Listeners

154 Listeners

1,382 Listeners

91 Listeners