
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Earlier this week, the Supreme Court announced it was putting off hearing a pair of highly anticipated cases that could fundamentally change social media as we know it The cases concern laws in Florida and Texas, pushed by conservatives in those states, which basically make it illegal for social media platforms to block or hide content – like say from a former president – even if the post violates the companies’ terms of service. Both laws have been blocked from taking effect while the rest of the country waits for the high court to weigh in. Marketplace’s Meghan McCarty Carino spoke with Daphne Keller, director of the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center, about why these cases could be consequential.
By Marketplace4.5
12471,247 ratings
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court announced it was putting off hearing a pair of highly anticipated cases that could fundamentally change social media as we know it The cases concern laws in Florida and Texas, pushed by conservatives in those states, which basically make it illegal for social media platforms to block or hide content – like say from a former president – even if the post violates the companies’ terms of service. Both laws have been blocked from taking effect while the rest of the country waits for the high court to weigh in. Marketplace’s Meghan McCarty Carino spoke with Daphne Keller, director of the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center, about why these cases could be consequential.

31,960 Listeners

30,668 Listeners

8,768 Listeners

925 Listeners

1,386 Listeners

1,704 Listeners

4,335 Listeners

2,177 Listeners

5,487 Listeners

56,481 Listeners

1,449 Listeners

9,523 Listeners

3,590 Listeners

6,445 Listeners

6,387 Listeners

163 Listeners

2,996 Listeners

5,506 Listeners

1,383 Listeners

90 Listeners