In the final episode of the Meggan Sundwall case, Maryn takes the lead as the verdict comes in — and the reaction is anything but quiet. She and Christie unpack the public response, the social media debate, and the evidence that never made it to trial. Then sentencing arrives, and Meggan speaks. Five episodes in, and this case still isn’t simple. Will this case be… Hung?

In Part 4 of the Meggan Sundwall case, Christie walks us through the defense’s last stand — a forensic psychologist dissecting Kacee’s psychology and Meggan’s motivations, and a former FBI agent taking direct aim at the investigation. Followed by closing arguments. Then Christie delivers her verdict. Four episodes in, and it all comes down to this: was it murder?

In Part 2 of the Meggan Sundwall case, Christie digs into the digital evidence — and it’s damning. A forensic analysis of Meggan’s phone reveals a trail of searches, deletions, and a years-long text thread with Kacee that prosecutors say tells the whole story. This one’s a mega episode — because trust us, you’ll want every detail. Christie and Maryn wade through the messages and ask the question the jury will have to answer: was this a mercy — or a murder?

In Part 1 of the Meggan Sundwall case, Christie walks us through the trial of a Utah nurse charged with aggravated murder in the death of her friend Kacee Lynn Terry. The state alleges Meggan helped administer a fatal insulin overdose — all while expecting to collect a $1.5 million life insurance policy. The defense says the state can’t prove it wasn’t suicide. Christie and Maryn dig into the testimony, the texts, and a web of lies that goes deeper than anyone expected.

In the final installment of the Issiah Ross case, Maryn takes the lead as the verdict finally arrives — after four days of deliberations stretched out by a winter storm. She and Christie break down the evidence the jury leaned on, Ross’s background, his controversial post-incident SoundCloud uploads, and his mother’s Facebook Live reactions. They also discuss “Lyric and Devin’s Law,” new legislation prompted by the case. Was justice served? Maryn and Christie weigh in.

In Part 2 of the Issiah Ross case, Christie digs into the trial evidence — and the deeper she goes, the murkier the picture gets. Two sides. Two stories. And enough conflicting evidence to make anyone second-guess themselves. Will Maryn and Christie come out with a verdict? Or will this case be… Hung?

In January 2026, Issiah Ross stood trial for the September 2022 killings of 18-year-old Devin Clark and 14-year-old Lyric Woods — two teenagers found dead on a secluded service road in Mebane, North Carolina. The state says Ross lured them there under the guise of a sexual encounter, then shot them both and fled to Delaware. The defense tells a different story: that Devin shot Lyric first, turned the gun on Ross, and Ross fired back in self-defense. This week, Christie takes the lead as she walks us through the trial, and she and Maryn dig into the evidence to figure out what really happened that night.

Maryn and Christie break down the Tracey Nix case, starting with the unusual six-person jury and how that can shape deliberations. They walk through the trial, the verdict, and the judge’s reasoning at sentencing. The hosts also explore information the jury never heard—details that raise new questions about how the case might have been viewed if they had been allowed in court. The episode ends with a surprising development after the trial, including allegations that led to Nix being moved within the prison system.

Maryn and Christie break down the Florida trial of Tracey Nix. Tracey was charged with aggravated manslaughter after her seven-month-old granddaughter, Uriel Shock, died after being left in a car for nearly three hours. The episode examines agreed-upon facts, witness testimony, bodycam footage, and medical evidence, alongside the defense’s claim of tragic negligence versus the prosecution’s argument of culpable disregard. At the center of the case: Florida’s legal definition of culpable negligence—and how it shapes the verdict.