This week we ask: if the international community can’t make states abide by their human rights obligations, what’s the point of invoking human rights?

Human rights atrocities make headlines around the world and are usually followed by a national and international debate over how the perpetrators should be punished, and how these events might be prevented in the future. The government of the country where such human rights violations take place often comes under intense criticism and is pressured into creating processes of enquiry or passing legislation. And yet, often, little seems to change on the ground, and victims of human rights violations are rarely, if ever, are satisfied with the outcome. This begs the question: what is the point of these international calls for justice, if justice is rarely forthcoming?

A new book dealing with these questions and the contradictions in the international human rights order was released this year. Its author is Dr Kate Cronin-Furman, Associate Professor in the UCL Department of Political Science. Mentioned in this episode: Hypocrisy and Human Rights: Resisting Accountability for Mass Atrocities. Cornell University Press.

For more information and to access the transcript: https://ucl-uncovering-politics.simplecast.com/episodes/hypocrisy-and-human-rights-around-the-world/transcript

Date of episode recording: 2022-12-08T00:00:00Z

Duration: 00:32:04

Language of episode: English (UK)

Presenter: Dr Emily McTernan

Guests: Dr Kate Cronin-Furman

Producer: Eleanor Kingwell-Banham